The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May. 24, 2006
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    685

    Default Why can't eq finals winners defend their titles??

    Why can't people that won eq finals that remain jr's the year after they won come back and defend their titles?? It just makes no sense to me!!!!! Lillie Keenen is a prime example!!!!
    Author of COTH article "The Other Side of Aaron Vale"



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug. 1, 2008
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Because it takes a lot of things coming together at the same time to win a National Championship--your horse has to physically feel good and be prepared properly, the course has to suit your horse and how it goes, you have to have a little luck as to when in the class you show (altho not always), your competition has to have some "off" rounds, your eye has to be working well, etc etc. And just because you may never win at Nationals, that is no reflection on how good of a rider you are. If you want to determine if a particular person is a talented rider, look at their WHOLE career, not just their results in the Eq at Nationals. There are many terrific riders that never won a National Championship.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct. 10, 2001
    Location
    West Coast of Canada
    Posts
    1,751

    Default

    Why should they be allowed back? They already won. It is someone else's turn to shine the following year. That is part of what makes the Big Eq finals prestigious.



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb. 19, 2011
    Posts
    1,194

    Default

    You can't compete in the class once you won it. Like Hayley Barnhill cannot compete in the Maclay or Medal for the rest of her junior career because she already won them. Lillie and Sam cannot ride in the WIHS because they already won that. It's someone else's turn to win it. If they could come back and would win it again it wouldn't be nearly as special as the first time they won it which is what makes the Big Eq finals really special.



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov. 15, 1999
    Location
    Middleburg VA and Southampton NY
    Posts
    6,228

    Default

    Because once is enough!

    What would be the point?



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec. 26, 2008
    Posts
    1,075

    Default

    I think what the OP is getting at is WHY? We know it's special but there are some titles out there that you can defend. Our association "Princess" title was one of those. You could win x number of years. BUT you had to go through the same process of doing the essay, preforming your ride ( which you choreographed) and interview with the judges. (think beauty pageant!)

    The POINT was that you were upping the competition. The other girls knew that you had won, knew that you had an idea what to expect, and were already experienced at it. It made the competition HARDER.

    I am not saying I think it should be that way just hoping for clarification since most people are simply stating "You can't defend your title because you already won it." Almost like don't question the way it is, it is that way because that is how it has ALWAYS been.....



  7. #7
    Join Date
    May. 24, 2006
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nlk View Post
    I think what the OP is getting at is WHY? We know it's special but there are some titles out there that you can defend. Our association "Princess" title was one of those. You could win x number of years. BUT you had to go through the same process of doing the essay, preforming your ride ( which you choreographed) and interview with the judges. (think beauty pageant!)

    The POINT was that you were upping the competition. The other girls knew that you had won, knew that you had an idea what to expect, and were already experienced at it. It made the competition HARDER.

    I am not saying I think it should be that way just hoping for clarification since most people are simply stating "You can't defend your title because you already won it." Almost like don't question the way it is, it is that way because that is how it has ALWAYS been.....
    EXACTLY what i was getting at
    Author of COTH article "The Other Side of Aaron Vale"



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul. 19, 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    11,214

    Default

    Most sports titles that you can defend don't have an age limit. If only juniors can compete for these titles, if you had one particularly dominant rider over several years, they'd basically shut out a lot of other people until they age out. Why lock up a spot (or spots, if you two or three prior winners who haven't aged out) when you could have a completely 'fresh' (ie no prior winners) field? The point is to develop MORE juniors, not fewer. They don't have their whole lives to try for Big Eq titles.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec. 10, 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    I agree with danceronice -- the equitation is meant to be a fielding ground for hunter and jumper riders, to develop as many as possible, so you don't want to limit that talent.

    Also, if you had already won it, why would you want to do it again? As stated above, the equitation is not meant to be an end in and of itself, it is meant to be a stepping stone. If you have won a big eq final, you have proved your capability and dominance in that respect and should move into the big hunters and jumpers. In addition, it would be a bummer to win a final in your penultimate junior year and then compete in it again in your last junior year and not win...



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr. 2, 2011
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danceronice View Post
    Most sports titles that you can defend don't have an age limit. If only juniors can compete for these titles, if you had one particularly dominant rider over several years, they'd basically shut out a lot of other people until they age out. Why lock up a spot (or spots, if you two or three prior winners who haven't aged out) when you could have a completely 'fresh' (ie no prior winners) field? The point is to develop MORE juniors, not fewer. They don't have their whole lives to try for Big Eq titles.
    I think this is a really good answer. OP knows that you can't, and I think there are a lot of riders out there who would want to try to defend their title. As someone said it takes a lot coming together to win it, which would be a reason TO allow someone (was it just the right magical moment? Or something that can be consistently reproduced?)

    Interesting question OP, and I think you have a great answer from danceronice.



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb. 19, 2011
    Posts
    1,194

    Default

    It's only special once, everything the time you win it falls in to place and everything goes your way. If you are permitted to compete again judges will know that you previously won it and the rider will automatically get a "jump" on the other riders because they proved their dominance. It isn't fair to the other junior riders who dream to win a Big Eq final to be competing against a rider who previously won it. danceronice pretty much hit the nail on the head with their post.



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2007
    Posts
    4,414

    Default

    Can't you compete in Talent Search classes even after winning the final, as long as you don't have a gold medal yet?



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct. 10, 2001
    Location
    West Coast of Canada
    Posts
    1,751

    Default

    The qualifying classes yes, but not the finals.



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr. 2, 2011
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dp1092 View Post
    It's only special once, everything the time you win it falls in to place and everything goes your way. If you are permitted to compete again judges will know that you previously won it and the rider will automatically get a "jump" on the other riders because they proved their dominance.
    Disagree. First of all, I'd like to think that judges are not automatically going to give a rider a "jump" just because they've won an eq final previously.

    However, judges are human and I'm sure this happens already. There are BNJ (big name juniors? is that a term?) whose names are already recognizable. Brianne Goutal won what, 4? eq finals...I guarantee the judges of the second, third, and fourth knew exactly who she was when she stepped into the ring.

    And no way are the judges this year not recogizing Lillie Keenan, Victoria Colvin, Sam Schaefer, etc. It already happens that a name can affect a placing. I say can because I have no idea how frequent (or infrequent) it happens. Not trying to start an argument about it. Just saying that its an issue that would not be worsened by allowing past winners to defend their title.

    I think the reason is that, as previously stated, its a division where you have limited years of eligibility and to have one rider who monopolizes those few years would be unfair.



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec. 21, 2008
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    880

    Default

    I don't believe that it makes it any less special for somebody to win it again. Personally, I think it would be even more special to do it twice. That would prove that you are the best of the best and can consistently repeat the same results. It isn't any less special to win two Olympic medals or win the grand prix at Spruce Meadows. As to allowing more people a chance to win, if you can't win against a defending champion then you probably don't deserve to win it. If you can't beat the best, then what does that win mean? I think that they should be able to compete again if they so desire. Are many of them going to move on to larger events and classes? Yes probably. But for those that want to try it again and want to put the work into being good enough to win again, then they should be allowed to do so.



  16. #16
    Join Date
    May. 24, 2006
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kmwines01 View Post
    I don't believe that it makes it any less special for somebody to win it again. Personally, I think it would be even more special to do it twice. That would prove that you are the best of the best and can consistently repeat the same results. It isn't any less special to win two Olympic medals or win the grand prix at Spruce Meadows. As to allowing more people a chance to win, if you can't win against a defending champion then you probably don't deserve to win it. If you can't beat the best, then what does that win mean? I think that they should be able to compete again if they so desire. Are many of them going to move on to larger events and classes? Yes probably. But for those that want to try it again and want to put the work into being good enough to win again, then they should be allowed to do so.
    AMEN!!!!!!!!!!! My thoughts exactly!!!!!!
    Author of COTH article "The Other Side of Aaron Vale"



  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug. 1, 2004
    Location
    Golden State
    Posts
    466

    Default

    To me it's like Miss America. You win ..then move on with your life and others get a chance for the special year.

    If you are more than pretty.. winning the final is a stepping stone and you move on to your career



  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    15,295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jumpytoo View Post
    To me it's like Miss America. You win ..then move on with your life and others get a chance for the special year.

    If you are more than pretty.. winning the final is a stepping stone and you move on to your career
    Oooo, good one!



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    33,422

    Default

    Because only some could come back while others have aged out. So would we change the rules to allow them back after they aged out? If we didn't but allowed somebody who had not aged out to defend would we be fair? Would a repeat win be worth anything if not every winner had the chance to repeat?

    And, you know, these winning kids want to MOVE UP and get out of the 3'6" kid and Green horse classes. Not stay at 3'6" on the off chance they can stay low and win yet again (maybe). Really great athletes don't think that way. Neither do great riders. They move on to the next challenge. Most great trainers teach that way as well.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.



  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul. 19, 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    11,214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kmwines01 View Post
    I don't believe that it makes it any less special for somebody to win it again. Personally, I think it would be even more special to do it twice. That would prove that you are the best of the best and can consistently repeat the same results. It isn't any less special to win two Olympic medals or win the grand prix at Spruce Meadows. As to allowing more people a chance to win, if you can't win against a defending champion then you probably don't deserve to win it. If you can't beat the best, then what does that win mean? I think that they should be able to compete again if they so desire. Are many of them going to move on to larger events and classes? Yes probably. But for those that want to try it again and want to put the work into being good enough to win again, then they should be allowed to do so.
    For the Olympics, in every sport with which I'm familiar, you can keep trying until you drop dead of old age. If you can make the cuts, you can defend your title. (Usually that does not work out so well, but people do it.)

    These are juniors. You have a very limited time to try for these titles. It's supposed to be developmental as well, not the be-all and end-all of their riding careers. You win, it's a sign you're supposed to think of moving on to the big dogs in the open divisions. It doesn't do the federation any good if their new talent just keeps hanging around in the little pond, relatively speaking. (Over in skating, another Olympic discipline, that would be why the ISU places an age limit on international Junior competition-that's a test level in skating, not just an age--even though you can test and skate at Junior on a national level 'til you're forty if you want. The ISU does not want the best and brightest hanging out in the junior grand prix picking off the kids as they come up, they want them to move on to Seniors, the Olympic division, which is harder because you hit the seasoned older competitors. Equestrian's no different--you want the best juniors to move UP and out into the adult world and work towards that, not racking up as many top junior titles as they can.)

    And as findeight points out, what about those who won the last year they were eligible?



Similar Threads

  1. Locations in Titles PLEASE!
    By witherbee in forum Giveaways
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: May. 11, 2013, 05:05 AM
  2. Could/Would You Defend This Shoeing/Trimming Job?
    By Frizzle in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 134
    Last Post: Jan. 25, 2012, 07:18 PM
  3. Will Mares defend stallions??
    By RockingN in forum Off Course
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Jun. 2, 2010, 05:09 AM
  4. Has anyone ever had to defend their amateur status?
    By alteringwego in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: Oct. 16, 2009, 03:50 PM
  5. How do I defend Eventing? Or do I?
    By eventamy in forum Eventing
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: Aug. 20, 2008, 09:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness