• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Cropping a pitbull's ears

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    if you choose to not buy or adopt a dog that gets docked, cropped or dews, that is your decision, however I have no problem with it being done by a vet and then getting proper after care (this is key, particularly with cropped ears that are long, lots of aftercare in posting)

    many dogs get either docked, cropped or both due to the breed standard, this is not illegal nor should it be, you don't like it them don't support the breed

    also, many dogs in the crop and dock breeds, when up for adoption the ones with good jobs done they usually get adopted faster, they are more recognizable to the general public

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Foxtrot's View Post
      Breeders who show their dogs have to conform to what the judges will pin.
      We watch Westminster Kennel Club when we see it is on and I noticed all the Boxers in their groups had stand up ears. Not one natural.
      Because dog showing folks in the US are just as much sheep as the hunter crowd.
      What we need is one very outstanding dog owned by a breeder with the intestinal fortitude to leave the damn ears alone.
      Then things might change.

      European dogs are shown without cropping or docking.
      "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

      ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

      Comment


      • #43
        Europe may show their dogs with out cropped ears or docked tails, but their German Shepard still looks and move like a freak of nature, their way is NOT the end all be all

        I feel that crops and docks done well are like warmblood brands, they help the animal if they get in a rough spot, easy to spot and identify the animal and I support both

        a fawn doberman looks a lot like a weim at a glance, many with natural ears get mistaken for a weim and owners have been told that they do not have a doberman by those that are not very familiar with either breed

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Burbank View Post
          Europe may show their dogs with out cropped ears or docked tails, but their German Shepard still looks and move like a freak of nature, their way is NOT the end all be all

          I feel that crops and docks done well are like warmblood brands, they help the animal if they get in a rough spot, easy to spot and identify the animal and I support both

          a fawn doberman looks a lot like a weim at a glance, many with natural ears get mistaken for a weim and owners have been told that they do not have a doberman by those that are not very familiar with either breed
          Let me get this striaght--you actually believe that ear cropping is necessary because otherwise, some uninformed person might possibly mistake one breed of dog for another?
          That's a fairly pathetic rationale.

          As for criticizing the GSD, I haven't seen any show winning 'merican GSD's that I'd call sound in quite a long time, either.
          But that is truly an apple/orange comparison.

          Or are you implying that ear cropping would improve the gait of the GSD?

          And you might want to read the latest on the poor legibility of WB hot brands a few years down the road. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22883927
          "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

          ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

          Comment


          • #45
            Completely agree with Ghazzu and Wendy. Cropping/docking is cosmetic surgery pure and simple.
            https://www.facebook.com/SugarMapleFarm
            Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/peonyvodka/
            www.PeonyVodka.com

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
              Let me get this striaght--you actually believe that ear cropping is necessary because otherwise, some uninformed person might possibly mistake one breed of dog for another?
              That's a fairly pathetic rationale.
              There are cases where it is easier to identify a dog's breed if the dog is cropped. For example, an uncropped Bouvier des Flandres looks an awful lot like a Black Russian Terrier.
              I would suspect, however, that what Burbank was arguing was that a dog with a well done crop is more easily identified as a dog produced by a better breeder. In some breeds, a dog with cropped ears is more adoptable than a dog without cropped ears.
              All in all, I don't think that a good crop done by a veterinarian with proper aftercare is at all comparable to what the original post was about, which was ear crops done by non-veterinarians without anesthesia and pain control. Almost all surgeries can be painful, but pain control can reduce the pain associated to a manageable level. Spaying and neutering are not pain-free procedures either, but they aren't considered cruel when done by a veterinarian with the best of modern technology.

              Comment


              • #47
                never said it wasn't purely cosmetic, I said that I am fine with it and see nothing wrong with it when done properly by a vet and then is properly taken care of afterwards, b/c if you don't do the aftercare it is a very pointless procedure

                in this day an age it is not needed, the original purpose is outlived, to keep an attacker from being able to grab the ears or tail and to look intimidating as a guard dog

                but I feel that if ppl want to do it they can (have a vet do it, not a DIY), and if you (general you , not YOU) don't like it well to bad

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
                  What we need is one very outstanding dog owned by a breeder with the intestinal fortitude to leave the damn ears alone.
                  Then things might change.

                  European dogs are shown without cropping or docking.
                  Your ignorance is showing. In breeds with cropped ears, "natural" ears are not untouched. Freeze and snap, hole punch (don't know the details and don't want to know), glue and fold, tape and fold, etc, etc, etc. A truly natural eared schnauzer often has rogue ears that do not meet the standard. Flying nuns, half pricks, and giant satellites are unattractive and take away from the gorgeous shape of the head in many breeds. If you don't want breeders interfering with ears and tails, then personally petition to change the breed standard. PS tail docking serves a very important purpose in many breeds and prevents happy tail. Some dogs left undocked out of "compassion" later have a painful late life docking after the tail is broken, crushed, or otherwise damaged.

                  Comparing an ear crop done on a quality dog is apples and oranges to a poor pit getting hacked up with scissors in someones basement.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by GraceLikeRain View Post
                    Your ignorance is showing. In breeds with cropped ears, "natural" ears are not untouched. Freeze and snap, hole punch (don't know the details and don't want to know), glue and fold, tape and fold, etc, etc, etc. A truly natural eared schnauzer often has rogue ears that do not meet the standard. Flying nuns, half pricks, and giant satellites are unattractive and take away from the gorgeous shape of the head in many breeds. If you don't want breeders interfering with ears and tails, then personally petition to change the breed standard. PS tail docking serves a very important purpose in many breeds and prevents happy tail. Some dogs left undocked out of "compassion" later have a painful late life docking after the tail is broken, crushed, or otherwise damaged.

                    Comparing an ear crop done on a quality dog is apples and oranges to a poor pit getting hacked up with scissors in someones basement.
                    Explain to me how a bench dog benefits from a docked tail or cropped ears? No show dog is out doing the job they were bred for that required either. I'm sorry but that's bunk. It may well be a breed standard, but I don't know many show dogs who are out doing a JOB anymore. They're on the bench.

                    And with proper management, there's no need for any dog to be docked or cropped these days.

                    My lab (not a breed that normally gets docked) has had swimmers tail. Should he have been docked? Or should I have paid better attention?

                    My poodle is not about to get his tail hung up in a darned thing other than the neighbor's dog--why is his tail docked? Makes no bloody sense. It's all for show and it's silly.
                    A good horseman doesn't have to tell anyone...the horse already knows.

                    Might be a reason, never an excuse...

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      It's a difficult topic, and it's not true that all Europeans/breeders from other countries embraced the no crop/no dock rules. Frankly, I think my breed is rather ugly with a tail, and a lot of other breeders feel the same way.

                      However, it is for cosmetic purposes only, and eventually I do think the U.S. will follow in some ways with breeders/exhibitors around the world.

                      I think there is a big, big difference between tail docking and ear cropping, and that surgically altering the ears is far more invasive and *cruel* (if one must use that word), than a shot of Novocaine, the docking, and one stitch on a 3 day old puppy.

                      I don't personally think that a well-done ear cropping is *cruel*, but it is a fairly "extensive" procedure to be done for purely cosmetic reasons.

                      My issue with *banning* ear cropping and tail docking, though, is that it is sort of like publishing the list of legal handgun onwers -- the good breeders will stop doing it, while the bad breeder/owners and backyard pit fighters won't. Not to mention that even the most horrific acts of abuse against dogs are very difficult to prosecute in many states. And yet, people will call the newspapers if someone spends $5K to produce a litter of fantastically-bred, healthy puppies and then docks the tails.

                      Seems like resources being used in the wrong direction to me.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        The BBC stopped showing Crufts on TV as a result of a programme that showed the welfare and health issues found in many pedigree breed. As a result, the Kennel Club started the Fit For Function campaign http://www.fitforfunction.org.uk/

                        Tail docking is largely illegal in the UK since 2007 http://www.cdb.org/awa/index.htm

                        The sky has not yet fallen
                        "Good young horses are bred, but good advanced horses are trained" Sam Griffiths

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          I lived in England for four years (many years ago) and that is one thing I love about that country -- animal welfare is taken seriously. Yay BBC.
                          https://www.facebook.com/SugarMapleFarm
                          Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/peonyvodka/
                          www.PeonyVodka.com

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Our small animal vet has not cropped ears for a good 15+ years now.

                            I don't think we need to go on banning all we don't like, but we should have the right to not participate on what we don't like.
                            If I remember right, breed standards have been changed to permit dogs with natural ears.
                            It will be hard to find some cropped breeds winning in conformation with natural ears, although the rare, excellent one may.
                            We breed animals of all kinds to suit us, not so much more of a stretch to then surgically alter them to suit us even more, if some so desire, strange that it may seem to the rest of us to go there.

                            We had to care for 3 cropped dobies and one minpin and it was just not worth it, that is why we didn't again would do that to a puppy.
                            Totally unnecessary.
                            Tail docking, that is ok, if unnecessary, but I would not fight that if the breeders so choose.
                            I have right now a docked dog, rat terrier, that would have been fine with a tail also.

                            Working with dogs for decades I have seen so much, including bad crops where the ears never did stand up again and all other kinds of strange stuff people do to dog's appearance and training.

                            I think each one of us has to decide what they want to do with their animals, short of straight abuse, that is already illegal.

                            The problem here is how to define abuse.
                            For that, I would say, some times, it is not what we do, but how we go about it that is abuse.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                              The problem here is how to define abuse.
                              For that, I would say, some times, it is not what we do, but how we go about it that is abuse.
                              Very very well put.


                              BuddyRoo: How active are you in the conformation world? Every year it is becoming more and more common for bench bred dogs to be dual purpose.
                              http://www.akc.org/enewsletter/akc_b.../fall/dual.cfm

                              I love making small talk in the picture line because it is so much fun hearing what others are up to. At a show this summer I talked to the BOB of a Papillon Specialty whose dog had his MACH. The majority of flat coated retrievers are dual performance. Many breeders are now putting rally, lure coursing, and therapy titles on their breeding stock. I know dogs who have won the breed, placed in group, and then walked across a parking lot to the lure coursing field and received a qualifying score towards a lure coursing title.

                              Of course there are still breeders who only breed for the ring. However, conformation is a dying sport. Savvy breeders are adapting and producing dogs that can hold their own in multiple rings.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X