• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Dogs and Protein

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dogs and Protein

    I wonder if anyone has any link(s) to reputable pages that support high(er) protein diet for dogs? I've done some internet searching and hit on a few but I don't have the information base that some of you have. I sell dog food for a living and what I hear from customers and coworkers is "too much protein is bad, that food has too much protein, oh no, 30% is too much protein for dogs" and I don't think that's accurate. I'd like to read up on it myself and have recommended reading for my customers if they're interested.

    TIA-I'm off to sell dog food for 8 hours.
    “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey

  • #2
    Sounds like high protein can be bad for large breed puppies when they are growing because it can lead to orthopaedic problems. No problem other than that according to these people-

    http://www.dogfoodproject.com/index.php?page=protein

    These folks seem to think that it is a myth that high protein is bad for dogs.

    http://www.dogfoodproject.com/index....e=protein_myth
    "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain" ~Friedrich Schiller

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Eclectic Horseman View Post
      Sounds like high protein can be bad for large breed puppies when they are growing because it can lead to orthopaedic problems. No problem other than that according to these people-

      http://www.dogfoodproject.com/index.php?page=protein
      This research (if you can even call it that with no backup) is dated and incorrect. It's the *calcium* level that is vitally important to growing puppies and having that wrong can cause orthopedic issues. They NEED a high protein to grow properly.

      Tons of backup linked in this thread: http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...ff-%28LONG!%29

      Real, actual, peer reviewed papers.

      Comment


      • #4
        MOST dogs are fine to get a higher protein. However, some dogs ARE sensitive to it and leak protein through their cells. This can cause signs such as diarrhea and in more extreme cases ascites in the abdomen, they are often thin with a bloated look. Its more prevalent in small breed dogs, but any dog can get it.

        This can also happen with the kidneys, although more rare. With protein losing nephropathy, the protein leaks out of the cells causing overall positive fluid loss, resulting in the kidneys damage. Pets with these conditions are best fed a restricted protein diet.

        In both cases, they still need protein, but not a large amount (as it will accelerate loss). A moderate hight quality protein + carbohydrate food (low fat) is important.

        Otherwise, the average dog can handle a high protein diet just fine.

        Comment


        • #5
          What do you consider "high protein"? a dog eating a completely carnivorous diet will be eating a diet that is, if expressed in the form used by bags of kibble, 50 to 60% protein. Dogs obviously evolved to eat this kind of diet and do wonderfully well on it.

          For a dog, a diet that contains less than 30% protein by weight (as expressed on a bag of kibble) is insufficient to support good health.
          Healthy adult dogs can SURVIVE on diets with protein as low as 17% by weight, but cannot achieve optimal health.
          Puppies and older dogs need more protein than adult dogs- they need at least 27% protein, and preferably more to thrive. Studies of older dogs fed diets with lower amounts of protein find they die years earlier than dogs fed adequate amounts of protein. And puppies don't grow properly if fed diets with less than 27% protein.

          The only dogs that might benefit from diets with less than 30% protein are very sick dogs- for example, dogs with serious liver or kidney diseases might need to eat a low-protein diet for a period of time.

          When they do studies on dogs, they find the amount of fat and carbohydrate in the diet is far more critical than the protein level- as long as the protein level is at least 30% by weight, the dogs do fine. Higher levels of protein don't seem to be beneficial nor are they detrimental in any way, but lower levels are definitely detrimental.
          For most dogs, the dietary fat should be around 20% (by weight) and the carbohydrate level should be 15% or lower (by weight), which means the protein level ends up being around 45% or so, well above the 30% cutoff.
          For very active dogs who engage in endurance-type activities, the fat level should be higher- 25 to 35%, and the carb level the same, so the protein level might, at the higher fat level, drop to 30%.
          For very active dogs who engage in sprinting-type activities, the fat should be 20 to 25%, and the carb level should be higher, up to 30%, which once again drops the protein level to the critical threshold of 30%.

          So I define protein levels, by weight as expressed on a bag of kibble (close to but not quite at dry weight level since most kibbles have 10% moisture):

          Below 27%: low protein
          27 to 35%: normal protein
          Above 35%: high protein


          I can look for the studies on Pubmed later- and yes, these are real scientific studies, published in the peer-reviewed literature. Not some dude's opinion on his website.

          large-breed puppies need high protein too- diets with 32% protein and proper calcium levels promote healthy growth of great dane puppies.

          If you want summaries to show to customers, B-naturals has a bunch of nciely written articles aimed at the layperson supported with citations that might go over well, here's one:

          http://www.b-naturals.com/newsletter/protein/

          Comment


          • #6
            But Squish is a high protein diet beneficial to dogs?

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't have any professional experience in this area, but, I took my corgi mix into the vet last night for a bloated belly that had been going on for a couple of weeks. After doing an xray and drawing off some clearish fluid out of her abdomen, he asked me about her diet and if she was getting enough protein. He said that dogs who do not get enough protein can have all kinds of problems. It wasn't her problem though, it turned out her liver was failing. I wish I could remember exactly what he said, but I'm still in a fog from putting her to sleep. When I take my other dog in next week, I will try to remember to ask him about the protein and how much he feels is a good amount and how much is too much. My remaining dog eats TOTW, sometimes the bison, sometimes the duck, sometimes the salmon.

              Sorry this isn't much help.
              My blog: Crackerdog Farm

              Comment


              • #8
                oh Crackerdog, I am sorry to hear about your loss. Jingles for your heart.










                ETA: It always surprises me that people think that protein is bad for dogs, or too much is bad. Sure, if you have a lap dog that sits all day they don't need the protein levels that sled dogs do.

                It amazes me that when I ask people at the markets (when we are discussing foods,) "what do you think your dog would eat without you?" And they can't answer the question. It's like they forgot that dogs are carnivores. I get the same response when people ask me if I make and sell cat treats and I tell them that there is no way I would make a cat treat, even using grain free flours; they are not made for it. Once I explain it to them, then they get it.
                www.facebook.com/doggonegoodgoodies
                http://doggonebakedgoods.com/

                Comment


                • #9
                  Crackerdog I'm so sorry. Godspeed your corgi mix.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Crackerdog, I am so sorry about your loss. If you were indeed feeding a low protein food, it was likely helping your dog extend her life slightly.

                    She was leaking protein from her liver into her abdomen, this clear fluid is called ascites and its a protein rich plasma containing albumin and globulins. In dogs with severe liver disease, the proteins are not being processed and toxic waste builds up - sometimes causing altered mentation in some. A high carb, low protein diet is always recommended for people and pets in liver failure. In people, diets of 3-4% protein are ideal for renal and liver diseases.

                    As far as a high protein diet goes - there are studies in people that have been on the high protein diets (like Atkins) which have serious health effects such as renal compromise. There are many believers here that high protein diets in dogs have nothing to do with renal disease, but I think diets that are unbalanced and TOO high in protein can absolutley contribute.

                    Dogs generally tolerate a higher protein diet. Most good quality commercial kibbles range in the 30-40%. Wellness checks on bloodwork can also give you a hint into what your dog needs, routine checks on kidney and liver values can be helpful.

                    I have one dog who is a healthy 2 year old, she gets a high level (35%+ protein) she is in good weight, active and looks great. The other older dog this is too high for her, and her kidney values were chronically increasing. She has been on a low protein (22% protein) for 2 years now and her kidney values have normalized.

                    So I think to answer your question `is high protein good for dogs`- I`d have to answer it would depend on the dog.

                    Munchingonhay - dogs are omnivores. Cats are carnivores.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As far as a high protein diet goes - there are studies in people that have been on the high protein diets (like Atkins) which have serious health effects such as renal compromise. There are many believers here that high protein diets in dogs have nothing to do with renal disease, but I think diets that are unbalanced and TOO high in protein can absolutley contribute.
                      you're totally wrong- in people, most cases of kidney disease are caused by diabetes and obesity, which are often caused by eating low-protein (high carb) diets. Many studies find that even in people, higher-protein diets might be protective against kidney disease- our current diets are much lower in protein than the hunter-gatherer diet our bodies evolved to exist on. The only animal in which high-protein diets have been found to promote kidney disease is the rat, and I'm not sure that finding was ever found to be robust or reproducible..

                      In carnivores like dogs and cats, it's been resoundingly proven that high protein diets don't damage the kidneys. Even in dogs with only one kidney. Even in dogs who are actually sick, have developed kidney failure, global protein restriction is unhealthy- they do better if given plenty of high-quality protein with restrictions on phosphorus.

                      this article summarizes what is known in an easy-to-read format: http://www.b-naturals.com/newsletter/kidney-diet/

                      Here, obesity causes kidney damage in dogs, and we know that feeding low-protein (high carb) diets promotes the development of obesity in dogs:

                      J Vet Intern Med. 2012 Dec 26. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12029. [Epub ahead of print]

                      Effect of Weight Loss in Obese Dogs on Indicators of Renal Function or Disease.

                      Tvarijonaviciute A, Ceron JJ, Holden SL, Biourge V, Morris PJ, German AJ.


                      Source

                      Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.


                      Abstract

                      BACKGROUND:

                      Obesity is a common medical disorder in dogs, and can predispose to a number of diseases. Human obesity is a risk factor for the development and progression of chronic kidney disease.

                      OBJECTIVES:

                      To investigate the possible association of weight loss on plasma and renal biomarkers of kidney health.

                      ANIMALS:

                      Thirty-seven obese dogs that lost weight were included in the study.

                      METHODS:

                      Prospective observational study. Three novel biomarkers of renal functional impairment, disease, or both (homocysteine, cystatin C, and clusterin), in addition to traditional markers of chronic renal failure (serum urea and creatinine, urine specific gravity [USG], urine protein-creatinine ratio [UPCR], and urine albumin corrected by creatinine [UAC]) before and after weight loss in dogs with naturally occurring obesity were investigated.

                      RESULTS:

                      Urea (P = .043) and USG (P = .012) were both greater after weight loss than before loss, whilst UPCR, UAC, and creatinine were less after weight loss (P = .032, P = .006, and P = .026, respectively). Homocysteine (P < .001), cystatin C (P < .001) and clusterin (P < .001) all decreased upon weight loss. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed associations between percentage weight loss (greater weight loss, more lean tissue loss; r = -0.67, r(2) = 0.45, P < .001) and before-loss plasma clusterin concentration (greater clusterin, more lean tissue loss; r = 0.48, r(2) = 0.23, P = .003).

                      CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE:

                      These results suggest possible subclinical alterations in renal function in canine obesity, which improve with weight loss. Further work is required to determine the nature of these alterations and, most notably, the reason for the association between before loss plasma clusterin and subsequent lean tissue loss during weight management.

                      Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.


                      PMID: 23278113 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


                      She was leaking protein from her liver into her abdomen, this clear fluid is called ascites and its a protein rich plasma containing albumin and globulins. In dogs with severe liver disease, the proteins are not being processed and toxic waste builds up - sometimes causing altered mentation in some. A high carb, low protein diet is always recommended for people and pets in liver failure. In people, diets of 3-4% protein are ideal for renal and liver diseases.
                      ascites fluid has nothing to do with "leaking protein from the liver". Ascites fluid from liver failure is often caused by high blood pressure in the portal vein that causes fluid to leak out. Acites fluid can also be caused by cancers and inflammation.
                      It is true that dogs with liver disease need an altered diet, but not global protein restriction. Good summary:
                      http://www.b-naturals.com/newsletter/liver/estriction.


                      this is the old, classic study showing it's not protein restriction, it's phosphorus restriction you want for dogs who have developed renal failure:

                      Am J Vet Res. 1992 Dec;53(12):2264-71.

                      Effects of dietary phosphorus and protein in dogs with chronic renal failure.

                      Finco DR, Brown SA, Crowell WA, Duncan RJ, Barsanti JA, Bennett SE.


                      Source

                      Department of Physiology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.


                      Abstract

                      Four diets were formulated to contain: 16% protein and 0.4% phosphorus--diet 1; 16% protein and 1.4% phosphorus--diet 2; 32% protein and 0.4% phosphorus--diet 3; and 32% protein and 1.4% phosphorus--diet 4. Forty-eight dogs were fed diet 1 for 3 months after surgical reduction of renal mass, then were allotted to 4 groups of 12 dogs each, with equal mean values for glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Dog of groups 1-4 were fed diets 1-4, respectively, for 24 months. Data collected from the dogs during and at termination of the study were analyzed statistically for effects of dietary protein, phosphorus (P), time, and interactions between these factors. During the 24 months of study, 24 dogs developed uremia and were euthanatized for necropsy. Necropsy also was performed on the remaining 24 dogs after they were euthanatized at the end of the study. Dog survival was significantly enhanced by 0.4% P diets (vs 1.4% P diets), but survival was not significantly influenced by amount of dietary protein. The 0.4% P diets (vs 1.4% P diets) significantly increased the period that GFR remained stable before it decreased, but dietary protein did not have significant effect. Significant blood biochemical changes attributed to P, protein, and time were identified during the study. Terminally, plasma parathyroid hormone concentration was significantly increased from prediet values in all groups of dogs. Urine protein excretion was not significantly affected by dietary amount of either protein or P, when measured by either timed urine collection or urine protein-to-creatinine ratio.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


                      PMID: 1476305 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
                      Last edited by wendy; Jan. 10, 2013, 03:58 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Champion (makes of Orijen and Acana) have some info on their website regarding protein.
                        http://files.championpetfoods.com/My...gh_Protein.pdf

                        http://files.championpetfoods.com/Hi...reed_Study.pdf

                        http://files.championpetfoods.com/Ef...l_Function.pdf

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Semi hijack, if you have a small dog that you suspect may be having trouble with too much protein in their food due to occasional diarrhea, how low would you suggest going? Current protein is 42%, would middle of the road be ok or go all the way towards the lower end to rule out that as a cause?
                          McDowell Racing Stables

                          Home Away From Home

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I personally would put the dog on a low fat diet (with moderate protein), but according to Wendy your dog may spontaneously combust

                            The study posted by wendy is flawed. Dogs can have normal values with only one functioning kidney. If you have one functional kidney, those dogs would absolutley not be affected by the protein levels. Renal "masses" are not comparable to chronic renal failure, often these masses are neoplastic in nature.

                            I think the only way to truly test is to get baseline BUN/Creatine and UPCR on your dogs. If they lower with no change other than lowering the protein - thats your answer. If they do NOT change, than your dog is tolerating the protein level.

                            Like I have mentioned before, a good quality protein is essential - however I think there needs to be a balance between protein/carb and fat to suit the individual dogs needs.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Thank you everyone for your condolences, it's still hard to process.

                              My vet was specifically concerned about her diet possibly being too low in protein, I guess it's something that he has been seeing around here lately. The other issues he found were low cholesterol and low blood pressure, interestingly, there had not been any change in her other than the bloated belly.

                              My remaining dog is on phenobarb, which I understand can cause liver problems, so I will be checking with him as to the correct protein level for her, if indeed it is an issue for her long term health.
                              My blog: Crackerdog Farm

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                I'm sorry for your loss, Cracker... it really underscores to me how confusing this all is.

                                Thanks for the information, all of you, I'm still plowing through it all!
                                “Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.” Stephen R. Covey

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I'd say protein is good unless you have a dog with kidney issues.

                                  My dog is on a highly restricted diet ~ 3% protein since he is in severe chronic renal failure. This means that his kidneys are functioning at less than 25%. When the body breaks down protein, toxic biproducts are formed and his body can't process these so that why he needs the very low protein diet.
                                  Unfortunately, he doesn't like his low protein diet (which is common) and will only eat more regular food. He's been fighting for two weeks since he was diagnosed but I am worried that the end is close.
                                  Any jingles would be appreciated (not to highjack the thread).

                                  Protein also comes as different "types" with some being easier to process than others - eggs, fish and spinach are high protein and easy to process whereas steak is not as easy for them to deal with.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I don't know if I agree with the ascertion that dogs are "omnivores" - they are morphologically carnivores, and just because humans have incorporated "omnivorous" values into their diet doesn't necessitate they are true omnivores. A feral dog (meaning one that had no interaction with humans, ever) is more likely to have an entirely carnivorous diet -- if it is lucky at all to catch anything.

                                    I've always had the same understanding of protein as Wendy - and I do believe that (at least for my dogs) the more protein, the better - so long as it is balanced appropriately by flanking values such as fat and carbohydrates.


                                    When they do studies on dogs, they find the amount of fat and carbohydrate in the diet is far more critical than the protein level- as long as the protein level is at least 30% by weight, the dogs do fine. Higher levels of protein don't seem to be beneficial nor are they detrimental in any way, but lower levels are definitely detrimental.
                                    For most dogs, the dietary fat should be around 20% (by weight) and the carbohydrate level should be 15% or lower (by weight), which means the protein level end
                                    ^ This

                                    I too worked at a high end feed store that supplied many products that were considered "high quality" - Blue Bufallo, TOTW, NB, I could go on forever. We frequently had customers that would inspect carefully the back of the bag and cry "Oh, the protein! It is much too high." Most of our proteins topped out at 40%. It was frustrating to witness them believe that a lower protein is better -- and we frequently tried to (to those who would listen which was few and far in between) that it was moreso the protein in comparison with fat/carbohydrates that made the difference.

                                    I am not a nutrition expert (I strive to read what articles I can, memorize what I can, and do what I can - Wendy's articles are a refreshing recap) but my dogs have done well on a moderate fat/carb with a "low" highs protein. It, to me, would seem much more natural to them - as I can't imagine in the wild they consume a copious amount of fat or phosphor.
                                    AETERNUM VALE, INVICTUS - 7/10/2012

                                    Comment

                                    Working...
                                    X