• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Aggressive puppy help!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I'll add that he needs to learn NOW that food aggression is not acceptable. Going for your hand when you take his food? No way. A guttural UH-UH (mama dog grunt) along with, if needed, scruffing his neck (mama dog discipline). Don't lose your temper, don't make a big deal or yell. Simple, firm, no-doubt-about-it, impersonal & effective discipline. If you reach for the food you get the food. He must never drive you away by aggression from anything you want to do.
    this is the WORST thing you can do with a food-guarder- you just taught the dog he has a real reason to guard his food, because you ARE going to take it away, and now he'll guard even more aggressively. Many people have turned mild cases of guarding into seriously dangerous dogs by punishing the guarding behavior.

    The way to teach a food-guarder to stop guarding is to teach the dog that you'll never forcibly take his food away- build trust- so he has no reason to guard it. You teach him that it's GOOD if you handle his food because you not only always give it back, but you usually give him extra goodies as a bonus.

    There's a little booklet called Mine! you can buy that goes carefully over the tried- and proven- protocol for fixing resource guarding.

    Comment


    • #22
      This is a young puppy. I stand by my statement.

      He has no reason to guard his food now yet he's doing it.

      I also agreed with several of the other methods. If this is generally a mild breed or a mild individual, I see your point, but dogs need to learn that they are not the boss when it comes to the feeding dish. Period. I stressed and specifically stated, as did others, teaching that you taking the food in no way means puppy is losing his meal, he's not. They learn very quickly that the sooner they acquiesce, the sooner they're eating.

      Comment


      • #23
        I had a Blue Heeler/Australiah Shepherd cross female puppy that was the same way as a puppy. She was the biggest in her litter and quite a bully with her litter mates from what we were told. We called her Devil Puppy and were worried if she would ever quit being human/food/dog aggressive. We just continued working on socialization with other dogs and people and she got over it. Today she is the sweetest and most submissive dog around.

        Her devil puppy days attacking our male Aussie: http://file1.npage.de/001804/17/bilder/bopum.jpg
        Now the sweetest, most-perfect overgrown lap dog: https://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.ph...type=3&theater
        Southern Cross Guest Ranch
        An All Inclusive Guest Ranch Vacation - Georgia

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
          This is a young puppy. I stand by my statement.

          He has no reason to guard his food now yet he's doing it.

          I also agreed with several of the other methods. If this is generally a mild breed or a mild individual, I see your point, but dogs need to learn that they are not the boss when it comes to the feeding dish. Period. I stressed and specifically stated, as did others, teaching that you taking the food in no way means puppy is losing his meal, he's not. They learn very quickly that the sooner they acquiesce, the sooner they're eating.
          My puppy was 8 WEEKS OLD and resource guarding. He is NOT a "mild breed" nor is he a "mild individual". He is an Austrailian Cattle Dog, a breed very well known for being tough, intelligent, sharp, independantly thinking individuals. In three weeks of training using positive methods, he is relenquishing extremely high value goodies to me without any fuss, and is happy to do it. A dog should NEVER be forced to give up a resource unless there is an immediate danger to them or someone else. Forcing to give something up by scruffing or any other method just teaches the dog that he absolutly has a reason to guard his food, and he's likely to get more aggressive next time. Telling someone to force a puppy, sharp or mild breed, is a good way to get someone bit.

          You teach them to give stuff up, not force them to do it. I don't care if the dog is 8 weeks old or 8 years old.

          Take your cutie to a good, positive trainer and learn the methods needed to teach him to give you things. In practically no time you will have a puppy who is happy to learn, happy to share, and pleasant to be around.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Arrows Endure View Post
            My puppy was 8 WEEKS OLD and resource guarding. He is NOT a "mild breed" nor is he a "mild individual". He is an Austrailian Cattle Dog, a breed very well known for being tough, intelligent, sharp, independantly thinking individuals. In three weeks of training using positive methods, he is relenquishing extremely high value goodies to me without any fuss, and is happy to do it. A dog should NEVER be forced to give up a resource unless there is an immediate danger to them or someone else. Forcing to give something up by scruffing or any other method just teaches the dog that he absolutly has a reason to guard his food, and he's likely to get more aggressive next time. Telling someone to force a puppy, sharp or mild breed, is a good way to get someone bit.

            You teach them to give stuff up, not force them to do it. I don't care if the dog is 8 weeks old or 8 years old.

            Take your cutie to a good, positive trainer and learn the methods needed to teach him to give you things. In practically no time you will have a puppy who is happy to learn, happy to share, and pleasant to be around.
            Speak it Arrows. Speak it loud, very loud.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Arrows Endure View Post
              My puppy was 8 WEEKS OLD and resource guarding. He is NOT a "mild breed" nor is he a "mild individual". He is an Austrailian Cattle Dog, a breed very well known for being tough, intelligent, sharp, independantly thinking individuals. In three weeks of training using positive methods, he is relenquishing extremely high value goodies to me without any fuss, and is happy to do it. A dog should NEVER be forced to give up a resource unless there is an immediate danger to them or someone else. Forcing to give something up by scruffing or any other method just teaches the dog that he absolutly has a reason to guard his food, and he's likely to get more aggressive next time. Telling someone to force a puppy, sharp or mild breed, is a good way to get someone bit.

              You teach them to give stuff up, not force them to do it. I don't care if the dog is 8 weeks old or 8 years old.

              Take your cutie to a good, positive trainer and learn the methods needed to teach him to give you things. In practically no time you will have a puppy who is happy to learn, happy to share, and pleasant to be around.
              This.^^^^
              OP- don't scruff your dog or take things away as you risk making him very aggressive and distrustful. Instead, handfeed, or trade up. Follow arrows advice.

              Comment


              • #27
                I agree that if you don't know how to do it right, don't do it. If it takes you THREE WEEKS to train an 8 week old puppy to let you pick up his food dish without a fuss, then by all means you'd better stick to that type of training. Most definitely.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Anne FS, there is no right way to scruff a puppy in regards to his food.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                    This.^^^^
                    OP- don't scruff your dog or take things away as you risk making him very aggressive and distrustful. Instead, handfeed, or trade up. Follow arrows advice.
                    I would take things away, but not when he's anxious. I'd do it when he offers to step away from his dish, and THAT you can train.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
                      I agree that if you don't know how to do it right, don't do it. If it takes you THREE WEEKS to train an 8 week old puppy to let you pick up his food dish without a fuss, then by all means you'd better stick to that type of training. Most definitely.
                      Translation: You're an idiot, my way works, but if you can't do it my way, it's your fault. And when my way doesn't work, you need to stick to positive reinforcement because that's a bad thing?????

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by threedogpack View Post
                        Anne FS, there is no right way to scruff a puppy in regards to his food.
                        You'd better tell all the mama dogs in the world. They obviously don't know this.

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
                          I agree that if you don't know how to do it right, don't do it. If it takes you THREE WEEKS to train an 8 week old puppy to let you pick up his food dish without a fuss, then by all means you'd better stick to that type of training. Most definitely.
                          It should take as long as it takes to do it correctly. All the sarcasm in this quoted post aside, three weeks of work is nothing in the over all scheme of things. I would rather do it right over a three week period, as oppossed to screwing it up forever over an afternoon.
                          Sheilah

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                            Translation: You're an idiot, my way works, but if you can't do it my way, it's your fault. And when my way doesn't work, you need to stick to positive reinforcement because that's a bad thing?????
                            It doesn't need translating. The translation is if you cannot grasp the concept and/or you cannot perform it in an emotionally neutral way in dog language that a young puppy totally understands, and couple it with praise & rewards, then don't do it.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              AnneFS, why do I have the feeling you really like Cesar Milan's "training" methods.

                              How about clicker training?

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by IdahoRider View Post
                                It should take as long as it takes to do it correctly. All the sarcasm in this quoted post aside, three weeks of work is nothing in the over all scheme of things. I would rather do it right over a three week period, as oppossed to screwing it up forever over an afternoon.
                                Sheilah
                                Right. If it takes you 3 weeks to do it your way and you are successful with a happy puppy, then by all means stick to what you're doing. You're doing the right thing for you & your puppy. I'm saying that some people would do it a different way and still totally not "screw it up forever." Just because you might doesn't mean someone else would.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                  AnneFS, why do I have the feeling you really like Cesar Milan's "training" methods.
                                  Because you're totally uninformed?

                                  I have no idea why you'd think that. I've seen his show twice and don't care for him at all.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
                                    You'd better tell all the mama dogs in the world. They obviously don't know this.
                                    But we aren't dogs and even puppies know it. We don't look like dogs. We don't smell like dogs. We don't act like dogs.

                                    Do we sniff a dog's butt when introduced? Do we lick their urine to check health or reproductive status? Hell no! So why do we so often hear crap about "treat them like another dog" for stuff like resource guarding? We are not dogs! No matter smart we are, we can't fake being dogs.
                                    Sheilah

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
                                      You'd better tell all the mama dogs in the world. They obviously don't know this.
                                      actually I've never had a mama dog scruff a puppy. I've had them, pick them up as tiny puppies and carry them, I've had them teach a puppy that if another dog has a toy (or food) and the owner of the toy growls you go away. I've never had a mama dog set a puppy up and then scruff it when it does it wrong.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by Anne FS View Post
                                        It doesn't need translating. The translation is if you cannot grasp the concept and/or you cannot perform it in an emotionally neutral way in dog language that a young puppy totally understands, and couple it with praise & rewards, then don't do it.
                                        so are you saying that it's the emotion that is the problem?

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          I don't know what the problem is with the people who are over-reacting here.

                                          I'm just stating that proper corrections are simple. Dogs need simple, they understand simple. Effective training is never anger. Praise is always to be "bigger" than any correction, and corrections are to be emotionally neutral. It seemed that from some of the responses people think the mama-dog-type-hand-on-back-of-neck is harsh, when it's not. You don't do it harshly. It's dog language to a young puppy. If someone is angrily shaking a puppy around, of course that's wrong and of course no one should ever do it, ever.

                                          The guttural "uh-uh" which little puppies catch on to immediately before they learn what the sound "no" means, you might say is negative as opposed to neutral, and maybe I can't explain it in writing, but it is *emotionally* neutral.

                                          Maybe like hating the sin but not the sinner? Puppy knows don't do that (whatever it was), but puppy also knows that's ALL it means. "Stop that." Puppy knows full well it's loved & cared for and we're not angry because it gets big praise when it does what we want and/or refrains from doing what we don't want.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X