• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Interesting Pet Food Article

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting Pet Food Article

    http://www.tuftsdaily.com/a-taste-of...1#.T1_-4fWp3yW

    Who will you trust when it comes to nutrition? Your breeder? The pet store owner? Your veterinarian? Your friends or a veterinarian with a phD in nutrition?

    "During the lecture, Freeman asked audience members which pieces of information on pet food labels were most important. According to Freeman, the most common answer given is the list of ingredients, but this is yet another myth.

    "The … most important thing is the manufacturer," she said. "You would absolutely be shocked at the variability in the quality of different companies."

    Freeman explained that at least one full−time, qualified nutritionist, a research and development department, self−operated plants and internal quality control standards are essential for any reliable manufacturer.

    ...
    According to Freeman, pet owners make the process more difficult than it needs to be. She advises customers to be skeptical of marketing, as most of the "stuff" on the label is just advertisement and has little to do with quality.
    ...
    Freeman drew her lecture to a close by testing the audience on other pet nutrition myths. She revealed that animal by−products are not actually poor quality meats, and that so−called "organic" pet foods do not have to meet specific requirements defined by the AAFCO to be labeled as such. The AAFCO also does not specifically define "human−grade," "premium" and "holistic"; these are purely marketing terms, Freeman said, adding that "natural" is one word that actually has a specific AAFCO definition.

  • #2
    Thanks for posting that article.
    Mystic Owl Sporthorses
    www.mysticowlsporthorses.com

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree with most of what she said, especially the part about the manufacturer; except this part:

      "If you're feeding this to your pet, you want it to meet all the nutrient needs for that animal," Freeman said. "The best way to decide that is with feeding trials. AAFCO has regulations, and they make sure that animals fed these foods actually stay healthy on these foods."

      I agree that all pet foods NEED to meet the AAFCO standards- however, the AAFCO standards are, in my educated opinion, very LAX. They aren't able to ensure the dog will "be healthy". They are a bare-minimum standard, not some kind of indication that the food will support optimal health for the life of the dog. Yes, if your dog is fed an AAFCO standard-meeting food he won't develop overt symptoms of malnutrition, but they don't ensure your dog will have all of its nutritional needs met such that optimal health can be achieved. Go look at the "real crap" brands of cheap food that somehow manage to meet the AAFCO standards (look at the one- and two- star brands on http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/ ).
      I wonder if this may be what she is referring to when she talks about "choosing manufacturers"? avoid the ones that make any lines of "real crap" food? I do that in my own food selection- first manufacturer/ then macronutrient profile (guaranteed analysis list on the label)/then ingredients/ then price per kcal. I figure that if the manufacturer is willing to make and market something that is obviously junk food, they don't care enough about dog health to work hard at making sure their other lines are as good as they can be. They are willing to take short cuts in the name of profit and meeting minimal standards for the low-end lines in their set of foods; so why would you think they wouldn't apply the same kind of thinking to their high-end lines of food?

      I also disagree that AAFCO's "feeding trials" are necessary or sufficient. Of course the best way to test a food is by a feeding trial- but a REAL feeding trial: feed a substantial number of dogs the food for their entire lifespan, the dogs living in a realistic setting, and measure health frequently over that lifespan. A randomized comparative trial would be most informative, Brand X vs. Brand Y, head-to-head real-life trial. No one has done this. The only long-term realistic setting large feeding trial I've ever heard of was Eaglepack's trial of their Giant breed puppy food, which went for over 2 years. You might think 2 years is enough for puppy food, but it would be better if after the dogs moved on to non-puppyfood they continued to monitor them through life to prove their puppy nutrition didn't increase rates of arthritis or cancer or what have you whatever later on in life.

      AAFCO's "feeding trials" are completely inadequate- they feed 10 dogs, kept in a kennel environment, for six months. Many nutritionally inadequate/inappropriate diets take years of feeding before overt symptoms of ill health appear. So the feeding trials are inadequate- nice if they do them, but they don't demonstrate much. Formulating the food to meet the lax AAFCO standards is ok, in my opinion, but be cautious. Over and over again we've realized whoops we don't know all there is to know about nutrition, and yet again we find out that this stuff in the bag really isn't "complete". The lack of taurine causing heart disease; the lack of omega-3 fatty acids causing poor puppy brain development; the excess calcium causing poor puppy bone development: all of these debacles occurred from people feeding foods that were listed as "complete and balanced" under the AAFCO standards, and are also conditions that would have been missed by an AAFCO feeding trial. So be cautious.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        It does make you wonder though about diets like Blue Buffalo, Taste of the Wild, Solid Gold, Dock van Patton's etc... that have not completed AAFCO feeding trials (how inadequate they are) and are just "formulated to meet" and do not have Board Certified Veterinary Nutritionists formulating their diets.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for posting the article, but I'm afraid I didn't find it very helpful on a practical level-- e.g.-- where on the label does it give any indication of the quality of the manufacture?? Is there a list of staff (e.g., qualified nutritionist/s)? Spread sheet showing expenditures for R & D (vs Marketing)? And yes, the AAFCO's standards are appallingly lax, and the average American dog's diet so less than optimally balanced (in protein vs carbohydrates, for example), that some vets believe the "normal" some liver enzymes is lower than it optimally should be.

          I was forced to do my own extended dog food trial 11 years ago when I adopted a (truly wonderful) dog with a bad case of whip worm that compromised his system so his nails would repeatedly split to the quick, necessitating painful veterinary procedures to clean up or prevent infection.... It took over 4 years to find combinations of food and a supplement (Synovia3G) which eliminated the problem. One thing I found for sure: Purina and the other big name brands totally didn't cut it-- although I know for sure they employ plenty of nutritionists. Online evaluations proved most helpful: Wellness was the first food that worked. I switched to EVO when Wellness changed their formula, and just switched to Orijens because I don't trust Proctor and Gamble, which recently acquired EVO. Recently, I've also been doing a lot of cooking for my dog, following guidelines from holistic vets. Makes sense to me that fresh, as opposed to processed food would be better for our animals just as it is for us.

          Call me cynical, but I tend to believe that the large dog food companies, especially those owned by conglomerates, are much more likely to use their banks of nutritionists to develop least cost formulations to maximize profits (while remaining within AAFCO standards) than to develop the best possible diets for our animals. I've also talked to quite a few company nutritionists and found that they sound an awful lot like salespeople as far as their employers' products are concerned.
          http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Excellent post Wendy!! I don't need to post now other than to say x2 to yours!

            Comment


            • #7
              thank u for posting this article,I think everyone should be more careful to take care of ur pets.I like games, such as War Inc. Battlezone,
              Forsaken World,
              raiderz,
              Backyard Monsters and
              Miscrits: World of Adventure
              Last edited by Lavinia; Mar. 21, 2012, 02:54 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X