• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

AQHA is promoting "extension of the gaits" aimed at judges!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AQHA is promoting "extension of the gaits" aimed at judges!

    http://americashorsedaily.com/extension-at-all-gaits/

    Hope it takes off!
    "If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple payments..."

  • #2
    I certainly hope so.

    Comment


    • #3
      This is a weird quote:
      “When a judge calls for a lengthened stride in a gait, there might be two or three horses in the pen already moving correctly,” David says. “Those horses don’t need to change."

      The comments at the bottom of the page are pretty spot on.

      Points for effort here I guess, but you can't "extend" a gait that isn't even properly tracking up and cadenced in the first place...at least by no definition that the rest of the horse world uses.

      Comment


      • #4
        In reading AQHA's statements about this in the past, it seems that the writers have confused "extension" with "lengthen". They seem to use them interchangably.
        Never argue with a fool. Noone can tell who is who.

        Comment


        • #5
          If the video on that news release of the world champion 2 year old is an example of the "new" guidelines, western pleasure is still a joke.

          Comment


          • #6
            yeah I expected a good mover. Still has that stilted crippled canter.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              I just watched the video (I was on my phone before so couldn't) and you're right, the video is not a good example!!! YUCK! In the beginning when the mare is loping and then circles around to the right, like facing the camera, it looks like she is sidepassing as she is cantering.

              If AQHA is going to try to make their point here, they could've done a better job picking a good example of what they are looking for. That video doesn't really convince readers that they are serious about what they want to see, when it is depicting what everyone thinks is crap.
              "If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple payments..."

              Comment


              • #8
                The two year old filly is better than the current norm, which would be this: http://youtu.be/5v-kyhDEX4I Western Pleasure trainers are seeing so many past exhibitors go to things like Ranch Pleasure, they will improve for income preservation reasons, if not for good horsemanship reasons.
                Comprehensive Equestrian Site Planning and Facility Design
                www.lynnlongplanninganddesign.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think the 2 year old looks way better than some, as Plumcreek has mentioned. In the quarter horse world they typically "get the hindquarter" before asking for the lope, and then she turns.

                  I really don't understand all the hate on the AQHA. Unlike many organizations they are actively trying to solve issues that have happened in the breed and in judging. Sure, not as fast as some other organizations and in some things they are quite behind, but can you imagine the USEF coming out and changing it so that hunters can have a little brilliance over fences (and afterwards)? Or the USDF saying they will heavily penalize waterskiing on the horse's mouth?

                  They've been trying to change the peanut roll, and largely it is gone from the big classes. Local shows, well, that's hard.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Why add a request for 'extension'? Just look for decent gaits & pin horses that don't look like they are in need of a bullet.

                    I'll believe it when I see it.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hippolyta, when you see the big classes at the local level you'll see why. The judge has to judge and pin what's in front of them. If no one is moving out, they can't pin them. So they are saying, if that happens, they reserve the right to call for it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm 42 years old and grew up in Apps and QHs. I recall the first round of "OMG help the WP horses!" in the early 80s. Then again in the 90s. Then again in the 2000s. And here we are again.

                        Nothing new under the sun. If they REALLY wanted to push for change- they would push harder. But they are skeered peeps will peel off and go show yellow horses, or paints, so they do a little 'ya'll outta do better' video and article and call it progress.

                        My vet's an AQHA judge of many, many years. He said the other day that in his opinion they've bred the halter horses into being such hare brained bad legged idiots that only a fool would try to ride one. There's your horse, judge.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I watched the videos. They look totally crippled. Is this the way they're supposed to move? How do they even get them to move like that in the first place? I grew up with quarter horses (used on the farm to move cattle and stuff). I never once saw one move like that.
                          In an age when scientists are creating artificial intelligence, too many of our educational institutions seem to be creating artificial stupidity.—Thomas Sowell, Is Thinking Obsolete?

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                            Hippolyta, when you see the big classes at the local level you'll see why. The judge has to judge and pin what's in front of them. If no one is moving out, they can't pin them. So they are saying, if that happens, they reserve the right to call for it.
                            Actually, a judge does not have to pin anyone. They could pin nobody if they really wanted & if all the riders/horses are all going incorrectly.

                            Will they do it? Probably not. But, the option is there.
                            "If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple payments..."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              That would be a judge that wouldn't be invited back, SuckerForHorses

                              I might take my guy and see how we do. Originally I was going to do the ranch pleasure, and I still might...but it would be interesting to see if they pin the more forward-going horse (he's still slow and lazy, but more forward than some). Of course, that would mean I'd have to have an absolutely perfect ride, and that I don't always have yet.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by potteryshop View Post
                                In reading AQHA's statements about this in the past, it seems that the writers have confused "extension" with "lengthen". They seem to use them interchangably.
                                The whole sport seems to have evolved in a way where they use the same terms as the rest of us, but in a twisted way.

                                I've heard pleasure riders talk about collection, lengthening, impulsion, engagement and even the gaits themselves while using them to represent performances that contain none of these things according to the rest of the world. I suspect that it's a case of telephone...one rider tells another rider while never looking outside their chosen sport.

                                Let's play a game of "one of these things is not like the other":
                                http://www.easphotography.com/Tindur...keTheOther.png

                                Top left: Reiner Klimke and Alerich in one of their medal-winning performances: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKbqokuTzh8
                                Top right: Richard Caldwell teaching a young hackamore horse to rate off a cow, clipped from a personal video a family member took (with permission) at a clinic I was riding in
                                Bottom left: Ranch pleasure champion, taken from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uexLqB80TFc
                                Bottom right: Western Pleasure Champion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?client=...71c&nomobile=1

                                Sorry, but WP is kidding itself in thinking that the current state of the union is anything other than bizarre.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  But wouldn't that be the case for other things, too, aktill?

                                  I mean, "on the aids" doesn't mean the same thing for you as it does in dressage, right?

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I have said this many times, but it boils down to trainer revenue. In Dressage, Cowhorse, and Hunters, you have to learn to ride to a minimum (about intermediate) standard to compete at all. In Western Pleasure, with the horses taught to crawl, that standard is more like advanced beginner, which opens up a much wider group of customers. Raising the standard to where WP horses would do 'real' gaits would eliminate some "write a big check, get on, and don't touch anything" clients. It would also make many more horses look better, and lessen the value of the few bloodlines with the temperament, body strength and conformation (like the DVD filly) to do a pretty good crawl naturally. Also, many so-called "trainers" have no idea how to train a horse without total submission - they have their system and they're sticking to it. (Look what happened to Totilas when the new rider trained by a formula vs Gal's incredible level of feel). This is the reality from my 40 years observing all this.
                                    Comprehensive Equestrian Site Planning and Facility Design
                                    www.lynnlongplanninganddesign.com

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                                      But wouldn't that be the case for other things, too, aktill?
                                      I mean, "on the aids" doesn't mean the same thing for you as it does in dressage, right?
                                      Nope, same same. On the aids merely means responsive to the rider's requests, neither above or behind the bridle nor behind the leg. The exact aids we use might be different due to either requirements (going to one hand) or tack (signal vs contact) but I take dressage lessons weekly AND interspersed vaquero horsemanship clinics without issue because horsemanship concepts are universal when taught correctly.

                                      The outward appearance of a horse should be dictated partially by conformation and partially by their degree of development. A reiner doesn't need to be gathered up/collected to the same degree as a dressage horse, and generally has a much more downhill build, so their appearance will be different. If a dressage horse is asked to do reining work and vice versa, however, the only different in appearance should be the result of different conformation.

                                      Universal concepts like collection as expressed biomechanically:
                                      http://www.equinestudies.org/true_co..._2008_pdf1.pdf
                                      ...DON'T change however. Likewise impulsion, extension, etc, nor the fundamental definition of what the gaits mean.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Nope, same same. On the aids merely means responsive to the rider's requests, neither above or behind the bridle nor behind the leg. The exact aids we use might be different due to either requirements (going to one hand) or tack (signal vs contact)
                                        Exactly - which means they are not really the same to the outward appearance (and I know for a fact that many dressage trainers would NOT consider your vaquero horse to be on the aids - they would be WRONG, and I do understand that, but that would be the case).

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X