• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Wondering about Western Dressage?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wondering about Western Dressage?

    There sure is a lot of buzz out there about western dressage lately. . I'm excited to hear first hand from Frances Carbonnel when she comes to East Coast in May. She is one of the founders of Western Dressage Association of America.

    Has anyone attended a clinic with her? I think its fantastic that the traditional dressage principles are crossing over.

  • #2
    The more, the merrier.

    There have been some thread in this forum about western dressage, but you may want to check the Dressage forum for opinions of all kinds on it.
    There has been a more in depth discussion there.

    Comment


    • #3
      It sounds like a fun but evolving sport...

      Comment


      • #4
        I attended a WD demo on Friday evening. Jackie Ross presented and was very thorough. Although her name is practically synonymous with Morgans these days, she has a strong background in dressage and eventing.

        Based on discussions here on COTH, I was very interested to hear that WD is NOT supposed to be identical to regular/classical dressage - it's supposed to show the softness, flexibility, suppleness, obedience of a horse that would have been doing WESTERN work. This requires moving out, stretching, striding up, being relaxed in an active sort of way, having the engine in the back and using the hindquarters. Just (in some ways) DIFFERENTLY than an English dressage horse.

        She also talked about bits. While the expectation is that snaffles will be required in the near future (next year, perhaps), the western horse is trained to be light in a curb. Again, the use of a curb on a western horse is DIFFERENT than using a curb bit on an English horse. The contact is VERY different.

        She also mentioned that WDAA, which is under the auspices of USEF (or whatever the correct phraseology is) is only two years old. It's maturing. It's learning. It hasn't yet reached its goals.

        Jackie, I hope I interpreted what you said correctly. Or that my 'take' on what you said is in line. If I didn't, I will delete this immediately!

        Thanks for a SUPERB lesson in western dressage.
        www.ayliprod.com
        Equine Photography in the Northeast

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ccoronios View Post
          Based on discussions here on COTH, I was very interested to hear that WD is NOT supposed to be identical to regular/classical dressage - it's supposed to show the softness, flexibility, suppleness, obedience of a horse that would have been doing WESTERN work. This requires moving out, stretching, striding up, being relaxed in an active sort of way, having the engine in the back and using the hindquarters. Just (in some ways) DIFFERENTLY than an English dressage horse.
          I am thrilled to hear this. As I think I have said here at least once or twice, I feel strongly that western dressage should not simply be English dressage with western tack. It's nice to know that some of the folks involved in developing this new discipline share that belief.
          "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
          that's even remotely true."

          Homer Simpson

          Comment


          • #6
            Curious as to why a snaffle would be required.
            Ride like you mean it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Based on discussions here on COTH, I was very interested to hear that WD is NOT supposed to be identical to regular/classical dressage - it's supposed to show the softness, flexibility, suppleness, obedience of a horse that would have been doing WESTERN work. This requires moving out, stretching, striding up, being relaxed in an active sort of way, having the engine in the back and using the hindquarters. Just (in some ways) DIFFERENTLY than an English dressage horse.
              I'm not thrilled to hear this.

              Now, I think there are a lot of 'English Dressage' riders and trainers who are not doing dressage very well. Pull on the reins, and push him into a 'frame', is not dressage, in my opinion, much less classical dressage. Seeing someone ride an 'upper level' horse in a double bridle, who never lets loose of the curb rein, does not make it some sort of different 'english dressage', to be distinguished from 'western dressage' where the curb rein is not ever held tight...where's the head banging against the brick wall icon?


              But my understanding of dressage is that it is basic training, strengthening and suppling to create an athletic horse for ANY kind of riding at all. There should be no 'what kind of dressage' distinction for what kind of career the horse goes into...eventing, bullfighting, jumpers, ranch horse. If a horse is mediocre at its sport, you can bet there are some dressage basics missing.
              And the said missing basics probably aren't "We need to train this horse to have a big huge reaching trot where the horse is running along on his forehand with the rider pulling hard on both reins and using spurs, whip and lots of leg to keep him going."

              In my opinion, dressage done right is not english or western. It is the essence of developing the athleticism in the horse and rider, and the communication between them.

              And, rant over.
              Any time you can find help from a good horseman, who can really help you and your horse, I don't care what the discipline is called. Go enjoy it!

              Comment


              • #8
                And another thing!

                Western horses are taught to be flexible and light. If you watch them trained, even "the bad ones"--- horses you DQs would never write home about--- are remarkably broke to the leg. They do lateral work like nobody's business. Babies, POS 4-H things, WP horses.... all of them can be moved where the rider wants. They are like riding helicopters.

                I think DressageWorld does better at emphasizing longer and shorter strides within gaits than does WesternWorld. Add that to WesternWorld's emphasis on lateral movement..... and ride in whatever bridle/bit you want (so long as it's not the Germanic many, many pounds of pressure in your hand), and you'd have a hell of a horse.
                The armchair saddler
                Politically Pro-Cat

                Comment


                • #9
                  "......it's supposed to show the softness, flexibility, suppleness, obedience of a horse that would have been doing WESTERN work. This requires moving out, stretching, striding up, being relaxed in an active sort of way, having the engine in the back and using the hindquarters. Just (in some ways) DIFFERENTLY than an English dressage horse."

                  We use to call that reining.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    No. A reining horse has to have those qualities, but the moves required are very limited and very stylized. Circles, straight lines, spins and roll backs. No trot work, no lateral work with all the tests of balance that they demonstrate, even though good lateral work is essential in a good cow horse. And reining emphasizes speed work, whereas working cattle also requires slow, soft and quiet. Western Dressage addresses all gaits, all movements, and the full range of motion - the gymnastic work behind the speed work.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ezduzit View Post
                      Curious as to why a snaffle would be required.
                      Because in western, as in 'regular' dressage, the snaffle is the precursor to the curb/double bridle. Western horses may 'move up' more quickly than English horses, but in the best of western training, the progression is there. Actually begins with a bosal (hackamore). So in requiring a snaffle at the lower levels, WD is encouraging its followers to recognize the progression.
                      www.ayliprod.com
                      Equine Photography in the Northeast

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by horsehand View Post
                        "......it's supposed to show the softness, flexibility, suppleness, obedience of a horse that would have been doing WESTERN work. This requires moving out, stretching, striding up, being relaxed in an active sort of way, having the engine in the back and using the hindquarters. Just (in some ways) DIFFERENTLY than an English dressage horse."

                        We use to call that reining.
                        Reining was the most obvious "similarity", and many of us tried to describe reining to our English riding friends as "western dressage," because is involves an intricate pattern and is one horse at a time. But Western Dressage seeks to extend that to, as longride indicates, ALL western work. Dressage is, indeed, simply TRAINING - the same training that should given to any horse/breed/ discipline - WITH VARIATIONS. No training method is 'one size fits all'.
                        www.ayliprod.com
                        Equine Photography in the Northeast

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The reason I ask is because my horse moved up to the curb as a 4 year old. He is now 10. I tried him in a snaffle last year and he was beside himself with angst...where's my bit???? Should I assume this is because he balances himself off the bit? I can drop the reins and aside from falling apart, he doesn't go slower or faster so his curb bit is not used to control his speed. It's how he came to me. Having to go back to a snaffle could be a bad thing for us or it could be a much-needed education. I just wondered at the REQUIRED part of the statement.


                          Originally posted by ccoronios View Post
                          Because in western, as in 'regular' dressage, the snaffle is the precursor to the curb/double bridle. Western horses may 'move up' more quickly than English horses, but in the best of western training, the progression is there. Actually begins with a bosal (hackamore). So in requiring a snaffle at the lower levels, WD is encouraging its followers to recognize the progression.
                          Ride like you mean it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by longride1 View Post
                            No. A reining horse has to have those qualities, but the moves required are very limited and very stylized. Circles, straight lines, spins and roll backs. No trot work, no lateral work with all the tests of balance that they demonstrate, even though good lateral work is essential in a good cow horse. And reining emphasizes speed work, whereas working cattle also requires slow, soft and quiet. Western Dressage addresses all gaits, all movements, and the full range of motion - the gymnastic work behind the speed work.
                            That's my impression of "what happened to reining," too.

                            Which leads to another theoretical question (or rant):

                            I think we-- reiners or dressers-- place too much emphasis on getting particular movements or "tricks" to look the way they should.

                            Really, and truly, I don't care if a horse I'm making to cut cattle or ride into battle can half-pass (or spin, or trot in place). All of those exercises were A Means To An End. I want the horse to be a car--- waiting on his hind end, with power brakes, steering and fuel injection. Whatever I have to practice with his body and mind to get there is fine with me.

                            Yes, yes: For contests, we have to pick a pattern and compare competitors' attempts to do that. But I'd be quite happy if the WD BigWigs went back to the drawing board and rewrote tests that took the best from dressage, reining and even the lateral-movement stuff that trail classes do.
                            The armchair saddler
                            Politically Pro-Cat

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ezduzit View Post
                              The reason I ask is because my horse moved up to the curb as a 4 year old. He is now 10. I tried him in a snaffle last year and he was beside himself with angst...where's my bit???? Should I assume this is because he balances himself off the bit? I can drop the reins and aside from falling apart, he doesn't go slower or faster so his curb bit is not used to control his speed. It's how he came to me. Having to go back to a snaffle could be a bad thing for us or it could be a much-needed education. I just wondered at the REQUIRED part of the statement.
                              Well, you can wait a year for the WD folks to figure out what rules they want to make about the curb, or teach your horse to go in a snaffle.

                              If I may get inside his little head, the problem is that your nice horse was taught that bits give *signals*. He knows the vocabulary of a curb bit, maybe even just a single bit that he has been ridden in. The angst comes from not being fluent in the other language, the one that the snaffle speaks. You can slowly teach him how to translate between the curb- and snaffle languages. It would be most kind if you let him go in the snaffle with the reins loose most of the time. The "push up into the contact" thing that most dressage people want is probably something he was explicitly taught *not* to do when he was a baby snaffle horse. That doesn't mean he's behind your leg, however.
                              The armchair saddler
                              Politically Pro-Cat

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by mvp View Post
                                Yes, yes: For contests, we have to pick a pattern and compare competitors' attempts to do that. But I'd be quite happy if the WD BigWigs went back to the drawing board and rewrote tests that took the best from dressage, reining and even the lateral-movement stuff that trail classes do.
                                Yes. That's exactly what I mean when I say I don't want WD to just be English dressage with western tack.
                                "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                                that's even remotely true."

                                Homer Simpson

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post
                                  Yes. That's exactly what I mean when I say I don't want WD to just be English dressage with western tack.

                                  Ooh! The basis for a fun discussion.

                                  If you were writing tests for a horse in his first year of training, second, third and so on, what would you want to see?
                                  The armchair saddler
                                  Politically Pro-Cat

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by mvp View Post
                                    Ooh! The basis for a fun discussion.

                                    If you were writing tests for a horse in his first year of training, second, third and so on, what would you want to see?
                                    LOL. Sneaking in a few quick posts at work is one thing, but for this, I think I'll have to wait until I'm at home. Good question.
                                    "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                                    that's even remotely true."

                                    Homer Simpson

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      WDAA website - under Education Center, has rules, tests, & guidelines. http://www.westerndressageassociation.org/ There seems to be a fair amount of lateral work in these tests, as you move through the levels.

                                      ezduzit, I can't answer your concern about 'requiring' snaffle. And Jackie mentioned that it was under discussion, not set in concrete.
                                      www.ayliprod.com
                                      Equine Photography in the Northeast

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Keep this in mind when you're thinking of what should be in a 'dressage' test. Each movement chosen should be an exercise that strengthens the horse and prepares it for further work. A dressage test doesn't test accuracy - the picture. It test the muscles development and strength required. We know the training has been correct because the horse doesn't lose balance in a movement or going from one movement to the next. We know this because the feet land where we expect them to land while the horse maintains a balanced carriage and consistent contact. So if a horse is balanced, and a half pass is performed in a way that correctly builds muscle and balance, it will be done "correctly" or if you like accurately. To do it any other way shows a lose of balance. So should a spin be in the tests? Does doing a spin prepare the horse to do other work or is it a skill, like jumping, that is unique to itself. Should we ask the horse to maintain the canter in a pirouette, which is done to increase the flexibility and carrying power of the hind legs, or should we ask for a spin or a roll back which is very fast and very practical but does little to gymnasticize the horse? If a roll back is a gymnastic exercise, how is it improving the horse's overall carriage and balance?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X