• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Reiner Andrea Fappani trying to put a MotoCross track in my Neighborhood!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Reiner Andrea Fappani trying to put a MotoCross track in my Neighborhood!

    My neighborhood in far northeast Scottsdale, Arizona is a quiet, secluded magnet for equestrians and we have several world-class Western breed and performance centers here. Imagine my horror when I learned that Andrea Fappani has requested a special use permit to put in a motocross track for dirt bikes on 20 acres here!

    When I saw the signage for his project, I was pleased to have him coming here. Even though I'm not involved in the Quarter Horse world, he is a big name. His current facility is nearby, and we locals thought he was just moving operations.

    Apparently, he's going to stay put where he is but wants to build a motocross track, and possibly a house and an RV garage. This is a gorgeous 20 care parcel on which he enjoys AGRICULTURAL ZONING--meaning he pays less in taxes than those of us who actually keep horses on our land.

    We put up with dirt roads here because we have peace, quiet, and easy access to fabulous trail riding in the Tonto National Forest. We live through draconian zoning regs that make it hard to even erect a shade for our horses. Now we have a so-called horseman who wants to cheat on his taxes and ruin the peace and air quality with screaming dirt bikes that are most likely going to leave the 20 acres and tear through our roads and private land, doing untold damage.

    If any of you COTHers know this man, his family, his assistant trainers, or his clients, please speak up. This is so outrageous! He is claiming there was an existing track on the property, and is grandfathered. According to property owners adjacent to the subject parcel, this is not true. Aerial views do not show any track, at least before his graders went in and scraped everything out, and local horseback riders have used the parcel for years without ever seeing any signs of a motocross track.

    I don't like to see a person who can do this to his own neighborhood go uncensured. It's not something a true horseman would do. I was told he said the neighbor's horses would just have to get used to the dirtbikes. Nice, huh?

  • #2
    Sorry, I do not see a MotoCross Track as inconsistent with equestrian activities.

    What makes you think the bikes are any more likely to "to leave the 20 acres and tear through our roads and private land, doing untold damage" than horses?

    My neighbors have an informal motocross track right next to my pasture and it doesn't bother me. The horses got used to it pretty quickly.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

    Comment


    • #3
      There is a motocross track a few miles from my house. It hasn't "ruined" the area at all. As far as I can tell, the riders confine themselves mostly to riding on the actual track and I don't think I've ever seen any of them riding off the property.

      And I'd be all for my horses getting used to the dirtbikes. In fact, before I take my young horse out to the local state park to trail ride for the first time, I plan to borrow a friend's ATV and ride it around my pasture until the horses learn to ignore it.
      "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
      that's even remotely true."

      Homer Simpson

      Comment


      • #4
        My old boarding barn had a motocross track for their teen son that rode competitively.

        My hubby rides dirt bikes, and mountain bikes – just like horses, they are feeling the pressures of land loss and development – and have to fight hard to keep, and make places to ride.

        Sounds like this is on private land – personally, I wouldn’t have a problem with a track going in – would you rather a housing development and all of the traffic and resource use that would entail?
        APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

        Comment


        • #5
          NIMBYs are some of the most despicable people on earth. Such a sense of entitlement that they think they have the right to control what others do on their property based on some nebulous concept of "harm".

          Comment


          • #6
            OBTW, it is not just YOUR neighborhood. He lives there so I guess that makes it HIS too.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Flagstaff Foxhunter
              My neighborhood in far northeast Scottsdale, Arizona is a quiet, secluded magnet for equestrians and we have several world-class Western breed and performance centers here. Imagine my horror when I learned that Andrea Fappani has requested a special use permit to put in a motocross track for dirt bikes on 20 acres here!

              When I saw the signage for his project, I was pleased to have him coming here. Even though I'm not involved in the Quarter Horse world, he is a big name. His current facility is nearby, and we locals thought he was just moving operations.

              Apparently, he's going to stay put where he is but wants to build a motocross track, and possibly a house and an RV garage. This is a gorgeous 20 care parcel on which he enjoys AGRICULTURAL ZONING--meaning he pays less in taxes than those of us who actually keep horses on our land.

              We put up with dirt roads here because we have peace, quiet, and easy access to fabulous trail riding in the Tonto National Forest. We live through draconian zoning regs that make it hard to even erect a shade for our horses. Now we have a so-called horseman who wants to cheat on his taxes and ruin the peace and air quality with screaming dirt bikes that are most likely going to leave the 20 acres and tear through our roads and private land, doing untold damage.

              If any of you COTHers know this man, his family, his assistant trainers, or his clients, please speak up. This is so outrageous! He is claiming there was an existing track on the property, and is grandfathered. According to property owners adjacent to the subject parcel, this is not true. Aerial views do not show any track, at least before his graders went in and scraped everything out, and local horseback riders have used the parcel for years without ever seeing any signs of a motocross track.

              I don't like to see a person who can do this to his own neighborhood go uncensured. It's not something a true horseman would do. I was told he said the neighbor's horses would just have to get used to the dirtbikes. Nice, huh?
              .

              Comment


              • #8
                Well I for one feel for you. I live in Cairo, GA which was getting very famous for having practice tracks for motorcross including Ricky Carmichael who was #1 rider in the world. These tracks are SO LOUD you can't hear yourself think. They have ruined the serene, quiet, country life that so many people moved out here for. This county has had many lawsuits filed over these tracks. Now while the older ones are grandfathered in, the newer ones have to have at least 1 mile of land OF THEIRS on each side of the outer edge of their tracks or they cannot build them. While this might seem extreme, trust me, there's nothing so annoying as listening to what sounds like duelling chainsaws every day & one mile only dampens the sound somewhat.
                One of the worst things about this is that anyone who would build a track near a quiet neighborhood is normally not the type of person you can reason with. They didn't give a damn about encroaching on your personal air space in the first place & so probably don't really care about your loss of peace & quiet.
                In the counties surrounding the area where I live we have acres & acres of open land with NO HOMES & NO PEOPLE but the motorcross folks didn't choose these areas. They choose the populated areas. One track actually put up lights & raced past midnight all weekend. Their neighbors are people who had put all their savings into a small boarding barn & tack shop. They lost it practically overnight. Their land is not worth anything because they cannot give it away next door to this track. They were there before the track. That is just plain wrong anyway you look at it.
                Producing horses with gentle minds & brilliant movement!
                www.whitfieldfarm.shutterfly.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have a private motocross track in my PASTURE. My husband and son race motocross, and my husband teaches lessons. I'm in Illinois, and during riding season, spring through fall, I move the horses to an adjacent pasture and they graze about 25 ft. from bikes jumping 80 ft. through the air. I also ride in my nearby arena while the guys ride on the track, and have had friends come over with their horses to ride. They all marvel at just how quickly the horses acclimate to the sound of dirt bikes. I like that dirt bikes are gradually transitioning to all four-strokes, which have a lot deeper, throatier sound than the old chainsaw-like two strokes, which the horses do not seem to like. I do understand that the sound of revving bikes is not for everyone (like Whitfield Farm Hanoverians -- sorry, some of our friends are at Georgia Training Facility right now -- a neighbor of yours?), but I grew up with dirt bikes and find the culture as fun and engrossing as our equine one.
                  TypaGraphics
                  Graphic Design & Websites
                  typagraphics.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The only way to control the land is to buy it. There are a LOT of people out there who get annoyed when people put horses in their neighborhood (oh, the filth, then stench of manure, the flies, etc.).

                    It's PRIVATE property that HE owns. What right to you have to tell him what to do with it?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Motocross track for your own use on private property- OK.
                      Motocross track for Exclusive Farm Use? No, sorry, doesn't qualify. In my opinion, that is not an agricultural use.
                      This whole thing would depend on the state/county land use laws, I think.
                      Some would say, you must only have agricultural use for the property. Some would say, go ahead and put it in but you have to pay taxes on non-agricultural land. Some would say, OK for private use and for friends you invite over, but not for competition, lessons, or other business use.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Can you go to your county planning and zoning office and ask to see the list of "permitted uses" for your particular area? Some areas are multiple use, some may be agricultural only, some estate residential, some high-density residential, etc. Typically each category will have a list of activities that are either permitted, conditional or not permitted. Find out what kind of zoning you and this guy have. Depending on your specific zoning, the track may be (1) permissible and too bad for you; (2) "conditional," which means the zoning board has to schedule a meeting and hear from him re his request for this use, and from anyone who may object, before they decide whether to permit; (3) it may be not allowed under the zoning in place. So do your homework first; if it is conditional, you can see if others in the area object and band together to make your objections known at the zoning board meeting. No guarantee they'll find in your favor but at least you will have had the chance to explain your objections. And if they lean toward approval you may be able to ask for some conditions like times permitted (e.g., not after 9 pm or before 7 am).
                        It's just grass and water till it hits the ground.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Whitfield Farm Hanoverians View Post
                          They were there before the track. That is just plain wrong anyway you look at it.
                          I would support that position if it weren't for the legions of people who move into an area and then try (and often succeed) to shut down the "offending" race track, shooting club, airport, stinky farm, etc. that has been there for ages before them.

                          It's gotten so bad that state rifle associations have had to lobby for laws that ban NIMBYs from going after gun clubs due to noise or any other issue except real safety issues (like bullets leaving downrange).

                          To paraphrase the soup nazi: NO SYMPATHY FOR YOU!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Flagstaff Foxhunter View Post
                            If any of you COTHers know this man, his family, his assistant trainers, or his clients, please speak up.
                            You can speak up. Maricopa County has a Citizen review process for special permit applications - Call the county and get the info that you and your neighbors - the one specifically affected - can put their 2 cents in on his request.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by painted02 View Post
                              The only way to control the land is to buy it. There are a LOT of people out there who get annoyed when people put horses in their neighborhood (oh, the filth, then stench of manure, the flies, etc.).
                              Yes! Totally.
                              We had this problem when we bought our piece of land. The neighbor was miserable about how we were ruining the neighborhood by putting our house and small private barn there.

                              If the land owner is following the local zoning laws then they are doing nothing wrong. Just because it is not your sport of choice does not make it evil.

                              I assume the comments about taxes and such are all assumed and just an attempt at dramatics. What they will pay in taxes after they are done developing is not something you can guess now. Assuming it will be the same as is being paid on the open lot is probably not accurate.

                              and local horseback riders have used the parcel for years without ever seeing any signs of a motocross track.
                              I find this line amusing. People who do not own the land have been romping around on it for years and that is OK, but the owner wants to do something with it and it is not OK.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                                I find this line amusing. People who do not own the land have been romping around on it for years and that is OK, but the owner wants to do something with it and it is not OK.
                                Where I'm from they are called trespassers.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  What the OP said was that there were "draconian zoning regulations" that applied to people who live there but that he/she thought this person was not being held to the same standard. That is an enormous problem in areas that are highly regulated. The regulations are not applied to everyone. That is a problem that OP raised. I did notice that the person opening the motorcycle track does not live in the area at all.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Coyoteco View Post
                                    I did notice that the person opening the motorcycle track does not live in the area at all.
                                    Irrelevant, so long as they own the property

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by caballero View Post
                                      Irrelevant, so long as they own the property
                                      It is not irrelevant as it is said in a response to comments in the thread that the owner of the motorcycle property lived on that property which is inconsistent with the recitation of facts in the op. That's the only reason I mentioned it - to clarify a misstatement made in a subsequent post.

                                      As I said, the op's problem is unequal application of the law. One person can't put up a shade for horses, and another can put in a motorcross track that is inconsistent with the area. I actually think both should be allowed, but that is not the facts stated in the op. The simple shelter is not allowed so

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        It is not inconsistent. A shelter is a building. A track is not a building is just pushing dirt around.

                                        And really, like has been said, this person owns this land and they want to use it a certain way. If the local zoning allows for that use then the NIMBY stuff is just people wanting control over land that is not theirs.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X