• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

AQHA Hypp status

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    While I'm hopeful that eventually the AQHA will phase out registration for N/H horses, I can't believe that APHA and ApHC haven't done ANYTHING yet. They need to step up to the plate and at the very least require testing, and stamp papers with results like AQHA does now.
    The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done".

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by 1sock View Post
      While I'm hopeful that eventually the AQHA will phase out registration for N/H horses, I can't believe that APHA and ApHC haven't done ANYTHING yet. They need to step up to the plate and at the very least require testing, and stamp papers with results like AQHA does now.
      I agree that they should, since both regisitries allow outcrosses to quarter horses. I think APHA is stamping papers now, but I don't think the test is mandatory. I'm not sure what ApHC does, I haven't been involved with appys since I was a kid.

      If AQHA doesn't allow N/H or H/H horses to be registered it will help reduce the number of cases in other registries, since all outcrosses have to be registered to their own breed association. One or both parents with no papers = foal not registerable with APHA or ApHC. The downside is that they would still be eligible for the color registries: pinto, palomino, buckskin, etc., since they allow registration as long as the horse is the right color.
      It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.
      Theodore Roosevelt

      Comment


      • #23
        AQHA years and years ago developed a plan to phase out HYPP. Great plan too, by such and such a year you cannot register H/H horses. By 2012 (I think) you would not be able to register N/H horses. And then they changed that to 2020, I think. Not sure about that (I have Morgans. LOL). My take was that the outcry was so huge, they changed the year to implement it to when they (whoever 'they' are) would no longer be in office and therefore wouldn't have to deal with it.

        But I'm not bitter that they'd let something like this continue when it could be wiped out in one generation. Not bitter at all.

        Comment


        • #24
          Somewhat related, why, in the QH journal - do they not list with the stallion if his HYPP status? I guess because if your horse is H/H or H/N that is not good to advertise. But even stallions that are N/N often do not have that in their ads.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by sonomacounty View Post
            Somewhat related, why, in the QH journal - do they not list with the stallion if his HYPP status? I guess because if your horse is H/H or H/N that is not good to advertise. But even stallions that are N/N often do not have that in their ads.
            I think they do that because in the halter horse industry there is so much hanging on Impressive lines in breeder's eyes.
            If someone wants to play in their sandbox they don't want to be seen as making a big issue of that problem.
            Advertising N/N stallions would be doing so?

            The reason the AQHA can only do so much to stop those that want to keep using other than N/N individuals for breeding is, as stated many times already, because of the lawsuits doing so would bring.
            That is why there is a process to achieve that and it means years of bringing the issues to votes and jumping thru many hoops to implement what those votes demand.
            As long as there are so many against stopping any HYPP other than N/N from being registered, the AQHA hands are tied to that process.

            Remember, registration associations can't do anything they just want to do out of the blue.
            There is due process and breeders have rights, as shown in the Malvin Hatley white rule lawsuit, that almost bankrupted the AQHA to fight and they lost.
            That is a path no registry wants to try to go down again.

            Comment


            • #26
              Thanks Bluey.

              I get it - The AQHA would get seen as infringing on people's business if they restricted breeding to H/H or H/N's and if you advertise your stallion as N/N, that is, sort of, rubbing it in people's faces and it could piss some off. Did I get that right?

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by sonomacounty View Post
                Thanks Bluey.

                I get it - The AQHA would get seen as infringing on people's business if they restricted breeding to H/H or H/N's and if you advertise your stallion as N/N, that is, sort of, rubbing it in people's faces and it could piss some off. Did I get that right?
                I didn't explain that right.
                The breeders are the ones making the decisions about breeding and if they advertise making a point of supposedly standing for only breeding N/N, they may become controversial in the eyes of other breeders.
                The AQHA doesn't has anything to do with that.

                The AQHA has the best interest of the breed in mind and is trying to get HYPP, once they knew what it was, out of the picture.

                BUT, as that one breeder against the AQHA lawsuit did teach all registries, by owning duly registered parents, a registry can't arbitrarily change the rules, even with good reason according to the registry, as with denying registration to HYPP carriers, without following certain other rules.

                Breeders have rights too and as long as some still want to breed N/H, if the AQHA would not now permit them to do so and, as threatened, they would sue, they probably, as in the old lawsuit, would prevail, as "it is their legal right do be stupid", as someone commented after the old lawsuit was lost.

                That is why that rule is coming, but has to jump thru legal hoops first and that is taking time.
                Also the AQHA I am sure is trying to implement new rules so in situations like these they may have a bit more legal ground to stand by what is needed and restrict registrations if necessary.

                Now, that is just looking at this from what has happened, pure guess, I don't know.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Ok, got it. I'm glad I rephrased to see if I got it right.

                  "it is their legal right to be stupid" - some words, eh?

                  Unfortunately, it's the horses who suffer the most on this, though.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by sonomacounty View Post
                    Ok, got it. I'm glad I rephrased to see if I got it right.

                    "it is their legal right to be stupid" - some words, eh?

                    Unfortunately, it's the horses who suffer the most on this, though.
                    Yes, incomprehensible that someone would breed any other than N/N.
                    It may be legal, but I think it is definitely unethical to breed for a known, serious disability.
                    Some day any other than N/N will not be registrable, which may still not stop those that want to use those horses.
                    They just will cull the positives and sell as good looking grade horses, for a chance to get the N/N ones.

                    HERDA is it's own case, not the same genetic type problem.
                    You can breed positive to negative, so the gene is not expressed.
                    Many breeders are already doing that or avoiding those with the gene at all.

                    Of course is best just not breed any individual with that gene.
                    Then, we have to recognize that all individuals carry so many similar "bad" recessive genes, you would not have much to breed to if you tried to eliminate all recessives altogether, nice that the thought would be.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      OLWS is not a big deal in my opinion because as long as you only breed a OLWS horse to a non OLWS horse the resulting foal will be fine because it is not harmful in its heterzygous form. It is not a recessive gene like HERDA or harmful in its heterzygous form like HYPP. That would be almost like saying you would want to phase out merle colored dogs because it his horrible to the animal in its homozygous form... I know OLWS is lethal when homozygous and merle is not, but we can all agree that breeding two merles typically leads to a terrible blind/deaf life for the puppy. Anyway, my point is that with responsible breeding practices OLWS is not a big deal.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        The problem with OLWS is that not everybody tests their horses or they knowingly breed positives to positives and hope they win the genetic lottery. I had a friend who bred her breeding stock mare to an OLWS positive stallion and had a lethal white foal who had to be put down right after birth. Her mare was a carrier and she didn't know because she never had the mare tested since she was solid. It was awful.
                        Last edited by Thoroughbred in Color; Dec. 11, 2012, 02:42 PM.
                        It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.
                        Theodore Roosevelt

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          My understanding is that the HYPP breeding continues because folks threatened lawsuits, and the various associations chose not to engage. I do not have any empirical evidence, such as meeting minutes, but find it very believable given the litigous nature of society.
                          Appy Trails,
                          Kathy, Cadet & CCS Silinde
                          member VADANoVA www.vadanova.org

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by sonomacounty View Post
                            Thanks Bluey.

                            I get it - The AQHA would get seen as infringing on people's business if they restricted breeding to H/H or H/N's and if you advertise your stallion as N/N, that is, sort of, rubbing it in people's faces and it could piss some off. Did I get that right?
                            As far as I know, H/H is non-registerable. N/H, as has been said, is being phased out. I have no idea why they've pushed it back. *one* breeding season out is far enough IMHO.
                            The ninja monkeys are plotting my demise as we speak....

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X