• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

AQHA lawsuit

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AQHA lawsuit

    I guess he's gone from annoying the dressage community to AQHA now...

    http://www.ratemyhorsepro.com/equine...efendants.aspx
    Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

  • #2
    Good lord, my head hurts!
    "If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple payments..."

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh somehow I just KNEW who it'd be before I even opened the link lol. Jeez.
      Michael: Seems the people who burned me want me for a job.
      Sam: A job? Does it pay?
      Michael: Nah, it's more of a "we'll kill you if you don't do it" type of thing.
      Sam: Oh. I've never liked those.

      Comment


      • #4
        Ok... so let me get this straight.

        He's suing because he isn't allowed to show at an AQHA show and he thinks they're big bad *meanies* to the horses?

        Is it even legal to sue for this? Good lord...
        The ninja monkeys are plotting my demise as we speak....

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by propspony View Post
          Ok... so let me get this straight.

          He's suing because he isn't allowed to show at an AQHA show and he thinks they're big bad *meanies* to the horses?

          Is it even legal to sue for this? Good lord...
          Nonono, not that he isn't "allowed" to show, it's that he isn't allowed to abuse horses (DUH) and (his contention) is that the AQHA REQUIRES people to abuse horses while schooling at home to get the desired show ring response.

          lol.

          chuckle.

          bwahahaaaa.
          I'm sorry I can't help myself.
          Michael: Seems the people who burned me want me for a job.
          Sam: A job? Does it pay?
          Michael: Nah, it's more of a "we'll kill you if you don't do it" type of thing.
          Sam: Oh. I've never liked those.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            It's beyond ridiculous, really. I thought he "trained" dressage, not AQHA???
            Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

            Comment


            • #7
              Missed something. What was the dressage lawsuit?
              Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

              Comment


              • #8
                Dafuq did I just read?!?!

                Comment


                • #9
                  He is suing the AQHA because they won't allow him to be on the AQHA comission for horse welfare because he's not a member of the AQHA? Good luck with that Mr. Buck.

                  Last I looked, belonging to the organization is rather de riguer for serving on one of it's comissions or boards.

                  What a whack-a-mole!.
                  Last edited by skydy; Oct. 10, 2012, 06:38 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rabicon View Post
                    Missed something. What was the dressage lawsuit?
                    He involved himself in the lawsuit against Cesar Parra when a horse was injured in Parra's care. There was a lengthly thread on the dressage forum about it.

                    Mr. Buck likes to sue. Unfortunately for him he has zero credibility. None. Nada. Zilch..

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by skydy View Post
                      He involved himself in the lawsuit against Cesar Parra when a horse was injured in Parra's care.
                      Not just involved, but declared himself an "expert."
                      Proud member of the Snort and Blow Clique

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Begs the question, is the HSUS directly or thru some of it's satellite groups helping him with resources like money and legal advice from their herd of lawyers?

                        Some of the wording is so similar to what they present to courts, I would not be surprised if the same writers are involved.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If you read the complaint, you'll find that it's an interesting lawsuit.

                          Originally posted by propspony View Post
                          Ok... so let me get this straight.

                          He's suing because he isn't allowed to show at an AQHA show and he thinks they're big bad *meanies* to the horses?

                          Is it even legal to sue for this? Good lord...
                          No, that's not why he's suing. Yes, he thinks the AQHA and it's various winning trainers *are* "big meanies to horses. That wouldn't matter except that it violates the AQHA's mission statement.

                          Originally posted by Grataan View Post
                          Nonono, not that he isn't "allowed" to show, it's that he isn't allowed to abuse horses (DUH) and (his contention) is that the AQHA REQUIRES people to abuse horses while schooling at home to get the desired show ring response.

                          lol.

                          chuckle.

                          bwahahaaaa.
                          I'm sorry I can't help myself.

                          No, that's not right, either.

                          The guy claims, in the first paragraph, that he is de facto prohibited from doing business with clients via winning at AQHA shows because it takes abuse to win there.

                          Not a lawyer, but as I read it, he's citing Texas law about "fair trade practices." The point is that you cannot knowingly prohibit trade. If you do, then you have been "deceptive."

                          So his reasoning goes like this: Because the only way to win at AQHA shows (thereby building your trade) is by abusing horses, and the breed association itself allows this shizza to happen.... contrary to its rules about horse abuse, it is purposely not enforcing those and thereby depriving him of the chance to do business, and doing that by deception since the AQHA's judging standards (and examplar videos, I take it) don't match up with real world judging.


                          It's an interesting lawsuit because the AQHA as well as the USEF (regarding D&M rules) don't create rules that can, in practice, be enforced. I don't quite know how someone establishes that they have the right to "do trade" in the horse show world. The hard part about his argument is proving that the AQHA (or the USEF for that matter) could have 1) done otherwise and 2) purposely wrote sham mission statements so as to deceive honest competitors who wouldn't abuse or drug horses in order to contribute to the industry, had these governing bodies announced that, "yeah, we don't really care to enforce anything." I suspect that these will be the key points with interpreting the "fair trade" law.
                          Last edited by mvp; Oct. 10, 2012, 11:26 PM. Reason: accuracy
                          The armchair saddler
                          Politically Pro-Cat

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            And the fact that they won't let him be on an AQHA committee because he is not a member?

                            Honestly, not enough sense to join before he sues?

                            ETA I posted this on the off course forum, for those who are familiar with old spirithorse/dragonheart8's past on this BB..

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Oh, goody! He's gone off to bother some OTHER horse discipline.

                              What a relief...

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                So where exactly is this person a trainer? Does he actually have a show barn or is it just virtual training in his head since tacking up might be abusive.

                                Any Texans been to his place?
                                "The Desire to Win is worthless without the Desire to Prepare"

                                It's a "KILT". If I wore something underneath, it would be a "SKIRT".

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by mvp View Post

                                  So his reasoning goes like this: Because the only way to win at AQHA shows (thereby building your trade) is by abusing horses, and the breed association itself allows this shizza to happen.... contrary to its rules about horse abuse, it is purposely not enforcing those and thereby depriving him of the chance to do business, and doing that by deception since the AQHA's judging standards (and examplar videos, I take it) don't match up with real world judging.


                                  It's an interesting lawsuit because the AQHA as well as the USEF (regarding D&M rules) don't create rules that can, in practice, be enforced. .
                                  Buck has a fair point here.

                                  AQHA could rapidly improve things and enforce the rules *right now* if they would make an example of a couple of judges (where there is video tape ) and pull their cards for 6 months or so. The judges have been warned to follow the rulebook in numerous AQHA communications. But for some reason, AQHA prefers to try and 'educate', which has not done the job.

                                  mvp - "I don't quite know how someone establishes that they have the right to "do trade" in the horse show world."

                                  I do not remember the particulars, but I believe a 'restriction of trade' lawsuit was the catalyst for AQHA eliminating the excessive white rule for registration of foals .
                                  Comprehensive Equestrian Site Planning and Facility Design
                                  www.lynnlongplanninganddesign.com

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Where is this guy's barn and is he successful in any area of the horse show world or breeding programs?

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I agree his lawsuit is without merit. However, there are issues with the AQHA monitoring the training practices on the show grounds. I'm under the impression that there is no requirement for a steward to be present on the grounds during a show (correct me if I am wrong). There are people who will literally ride a horse into a state of exhaustion overnight to get the demeanor in the show ring that wins. A la Shirley Roth http://www.equinechronicle.com/break...th-police.html. The accusations against her stem from something that happened on the show grounds. It makes me wonder what happens at home. Ultimately it is up to the owners to boycott trainers who resort to abusive methods to get the win in the show pen.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Here is a video of the horse that was involved in the Shirley Roth incident:

                                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEMxIR6Pusg

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X