• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Western Dressage confusion! UPDATED!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by aktill View Post
    No disrespect intended, but the whole discipline rationalizes building rules around the most common denominator, rather than correctness or tradition. Makes for big classes, but that's a pretty sad goal.
    I think you've just made a pretty profound point. Seriously. Maybe riders think that because that's what democracy does, dressage should be the same. Well, it isn't necessarily working well in government, or running a country, so why should it work well in dressage? You've got to have some standards.
    Founder of the People Who Prefer COTH Over FB Clique
    People Who Hate to Rush to Kill Wildlife Clique!
    "I Sing Silly Songs to My Animals!" Clique

    Comment


    • #42
      It's the USA . That's the way dressage got started in the late 50's early 60's and it's still true that many many Intro and Training level riders don't have much real knowledge of dressage when they start showing. They take lessons to get better at showing, and only later discover that the show is not the thing. Being a beginner isn't abusing the rules.

      The western dressage organizations are just dealing with a reality that dressage didn't have to cope with. How to win over people who have been taught that a horse must go straight into the bridle on a looped rein or go in a totally downhill frame and most of all have to have their horses in a curb by the time the animal is 5 years old. We don't want any of those things for western dressage horses, but if we insist that riders have to retrain before they can enter the ring, they'll never make the effort.

      The standards are there. It's up to the judges. When I started out it was unusual for a beginner to make over 55% on a test. Now that same ride gets a 65% - 70%. If the judges are even more lenient for WD, which some seem to be, it's going to be hard for newbies to see what those standards are. But I think this is true across the board. Inflated scores aren't just for WD folks.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by NoSuchPerson View Post
        I love the idea of western dressage and I think lots of good western trainers are already doing western dressage, but they just call it good horsemanship. For example, the guy who trained my current riding mule is a reining guy, but he did everything a good dressage trainer would have done with the same ultimate goal in mind - an equine that is light, flexible, capable of extending and collecting himself as required, and responsive.

        Also, I am old. :-) I showed western pleasure back in the '60's. My mare was light, balanced, and worked off her hindquarters - "back-to-front" you might say if you were a dressage type. I switched to H/J and dabbled in dressage after that, so I never experienced the "peanut roller" phenomenon that so many people now associate with the WP horse. Thus, I don't see the concepts of western dressage as being new and radical so much as they represent a tentative return to an earlier era.

        But, I don't love the idea of simply holding western dressage classes alongside regular dressage classes at regular dressage competitions. I don't believe western dressage ought to be just regular dressage with a western saddle. I think in order for it to be a viable discipline over the long term, it has to retain a sense of being unique and distinct from regular dressage.

        I confess, though, that I don't have an good alternative suggestion to holding western dressage classes at regular dressage competitions, especially since western dressage is still in it's infancy and cannot yet sustain itself as a stand-alone entity.
        You sound like you may be around my age. I grew up in the SE too and learned to ride what was then called "forward seat" but loved being a spectator at shows of any discipline because I just loved the horses, and my mother loved watching the shows. There were no peanut rollers in WP in the shows I saw in the 60s either, and when I saw my first peanut-rolling WP class 40-odd years later, I had NO IDEA what those horses were doing, or why!

        I like what you say here about western dressage.
        Founder of the People Who Prefer COTH Over FB Clique
        People Who Hate to Rush to Kill Wildlife Clique!
        "I Sing Silly Songs to My Animals!" Clique

        Comment


        • #44
          Thanks, Wellspotted.

          I had the same reaction you did the first time I ever saw a western pleasure class with horses' noses down around their knees as they troped along. In fact, I think I said, "What the ^%$# is wrong with those horses? :-)
          "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
          that's even remotely true."

          Homer Simpson

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by longride1 View Post
            The western dressage organizations are just dealing with a reality that dressage didn't have to cope with. How to win over people who have been taught that a horse must go straight into the bridle on a looped rein or go in a totally downhill frame and most of all have to have their horses in a curb by the time the animal is 5 years old. We don't want any of those things for western dressage horses, but if we insist that riders have to retrain before they can enter the ring, they'll never make the effort.
            Blimey, I don't mean to pick, but you feel people shouldn't need to retrain themselves properly to the standards being evaluated before they go into the ring?

            How fair is it then to the people who actually follow a training progression and have properly schooled horses?

            I know we live in the age of "don't mess with anyone's self esteem", but showing isn't really just something to do in some people's minds. There are those who actually want to have their good work rewarded.

            I have just as little sympathy as you on the age vs headgear issue, though. I think it's ridiculous that most western events limit what bitting you can use based on how old the horse is. Rather then earning the right to move from say a snaffle to a curb through training, the horse and rider simply have to successfully avoid dying to do so instead.

            Go team.

            In the vaquero traditions particularly, there's no shame in "stepping down" the equipment based on holes that are discovered, or even merely based on the job being done. Lots of guys I know talk about moving a bridle horses back into the two rein when they know the work will get quicker, or even back into one of the hackamores if the country they're working over is more likely to snag reins etc.

            Likewise, if you move from one stage to the next (say bosal to bosalita) and the horse or rider struggle, there's no "shame" in revisiting earlier stages.

            Comment


            • #46
              I do feel they must retrain to be successful. And please note I called for tighter judging. That means you can go in the ring, but your scores will reflect the weak spots in your training. I'm not saying give 70's to bad rides. I'm saying the opposite. Give 2s and 3s when deserved and 8s when deserved and let people figure out that there's something missing when they get 50's and correctly trained horses get 70s. I am disturbed by seeing rides with no positioning, much less bend, get over 70% at Primary 3. If someone wants to go in the ring and try a test by all means let them do it. But they should see serious deductions if using a curb two handed causes their horse to raise it's head and go hollow even for a stride. They should be able to figure out from the comments that two handed for bend with a shank bit isn't really working for them.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by HappyTalk View Post
                No one is talking about teaching lateral flexion on a curb. Most western trainers start with a snaffle and work to the horse wearing a curb. There are plenty of curb type bits with rotating mouthpieces (the Myler type bits) that allow one side of the mouth to be affected.
                All my shanked bits are flexible in the middle and easily can be used two handed. Of course, they are no longer 'curb' bits at that, even though my favorite does have a medium port. It's just hinged IN that port. Still, I don't consider it a true curb.

                I haven't looked yet, but aren't there bitting rules for this as in any other sport?
                "As a rule we disbelieve all the facts and theories for which we have no use."- William James
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                Proud member of the Wheat Loss Clique.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by ezduzit View Post
                  My issue with using two hands on the curb is that western horses neck rein (or seat rein as I like to say ). The curb bit is not meant to be used as a direct rein bit the way a snaffle is used.
                  EZDUZIT, thank you. My thoughts exactly.
                  I've re-entered the horse universe after a 6-year hiatus.
                  Former dressage and Western rider, and was a little *horrified* to see pictures of two-handed curb bit riding.
                  If I had grabbed the bridle with two hands, my old school bridle horse mentor would have physically removed me from the horse and screamed at me! haha
                  I'm still interested in WD but need to do more investigation.
                  I also live in Arizona.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    My husband is interested in western dressage - I am a classical dressage rider - where is the best place to get info regarding ? And is AQHA recognizing western dressage the same as regular dressage as far as allowing members to obtain points for recognized competitions ?

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Why use a curb bit at all? If I have to put so much pressure on my horse's mouth to get her to stop, how is that dressagy? If you want to, and don't have any cows that you need to rope, why not use a direct rein?

                      Circle Y now makes a Western Dressage saddle. (They moved the bucking rolls down to the side to keep the leg in place.) I think that along with the Mounted Shooting Saddle and 15 types of barrel racing saddles, the Western Dressage movement may be yet another marketing opportunity for the Tack industry.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        The best place for information is the Western Dressage Association of America web site and a tour of WDAA state affiliate web sites on Facebook. WDAA is recognized and shows run under their rules by AMHA, AHA, Pinto Horse Assc., ASA, Appaloosa Horse Club, IFSHA, AA Andalusian and Lusitano HSA and USEF. Many USDF GMOs are also offering WD tests at their schooling shows along with HOY awards. Currently the AQHA has not developed a program for western dressage but there has been talk between the two organizations.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Hermein View Post
                          Why use a curb bit at all? If I have to put so much pressure on my horse's mouth to get her to stop, how is that dressagy?
                          Proper use of a curb bit has nothing whatsoever to do with putting more pressure on a horse's mouth. Properly used on a properly trained horse, a curb is about less pressure and more subtle cues.

                          What about upper level dressage horses being shown in a double bridle? Do you think that is about putting more pressure on a horse's mouth and that it is not dressagy?

                          However, I agree that there is no reason not to use a snaffle if you want to.
                          "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                          that's even remotely true."

                          Homer Simpson

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by Hermein View Post
                            Why use a curb bit at all? If I have to put so much pressure on my horse's mouth to get her to stop, how is that dressagy? If you want to, and don't have any cows that you need to rope, why not use a direct rein?
                            Wha?

                            You need to learn what leverage bits (and the horses who wear them) were made for.

                            Look, there's no need for a horse to trot in place or skip, either. But dressagists care about those movements and I admire a horse strong and broke enough to do them.

                            In other news: Thanks for the history of dressage in America before my time. It might be very educational to learn what that discipline looked like in it's infancy here as an instructive comparison for WD.
                            The armchair saddler
                            Politically Pro-Cat

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Proper use of a curb bit has nothing whatsoever to do with putting more pressure on a horse's mouth. Properly used on a properly trained horse, a curb is about less pressure and more subtle cues.
                              "Properly" seems to be the key word here, right? Imo, leverage hasn't much to do with dressage. Or shouldn't. "Leverage" is a means to increase pressure--given that once you have a tool that increases pressure, you don't need to exert as much force.

                              You need to learn what leverage bits (and the horses who wear them) were made for.
                              You don't see many 3 yr old dressage horses working in a double bridle. Thank heavens. It seems to me that western riding is always in a hurry--rushing to get the babies ready for the futurities; and giving spurs to a novice rider, expecting her (who isn't sure what her feet are doing) to use them properly.

                              If I've missed something, please enlighten me.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Hermein, you've missed everything about how Western horses are supposed to be developed in the bridle. All of it.

                                people who use them as a crutch should receive scores that reflect that problem, because it most assuredly IS a problem.

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by Hermein View Post
                                  "Properly" seems to be the key word here, right? Imo, leverage hasn't much to do with dressage. Or shouldn't.


                                  You don't see many 3 yr old dressage horses working in a double bridle. Thank heavens. To me, early use of a curb, is akin to giving a begining rider spurs.

                                  If I've missed something, please enlighten me.
                                  What follows is JMO (and I come originally from HunterWorld through Old Skool DressageWorld to WesternWorld):

                                  I don't understand the AQHA's "all horses 5 and up should be out of the snaffle" thing for the show ring. I think that's where your stereotype of young horses being ridden in leverage/signal bits comes from.

                                  It's not so in non-showing WesternWorld. It makes sense to me to spend a long time riding a horse in a snaffle. You should be able to get *everything* you'll eventually want from the horse in that bit.

                                  A little detour here:

                                  There is a question in my mind about how the horse should relate to the snaffle. Dressagers don't think of a snaffle as a signal bit. Any signal given to the horse comes from the rider's body. So the horse should push right up into that contact. IME, Western folks want the horse to be "behind the bit." What I think that really means is that the Western horse-- often bitted up in a thin and unstable bit as a young horse-- should keep a loop in the reins and look for slight changes in the reins before a hand ever actually pulls on his mouth.

                                  So (and still on the detour), I don't give a rat's a$$ which way you use the snaffle, but I want the same end results. Those are:

                                  1. The horse engages his hind end and lifts his shoulders.
                                  2. He flexes laterally and longitudinally. Usually the horse learns those two in that order. To my mind, that's the reason for the snaffle (as opposed to a bosal or leverage bit).
                                  3. I eventually do less and less with my hand and give more and more of any signal for turn, squat, extend, collect, change gait and all from my body.

                                  Back to the main topic:

                                  So from VaqueroWorld, which I take to be the more-or-less starting point for WesternShowWorld, the leverage bit means the horse as successfully come through all these earlier stages of training.

                                  Now, does the average 5-year-old in a shanked bit in the show ring have all that? I dunno. But I'll bet that folks are settling for apparent ridability in those young horses and don't have the Vaquero's thoroughness.

                                  Can trainers produce a horse that does? Maybe if everything were absolutely right-- you began at 2 with a great-minded, well-balanced horse and your were a very skilled trainer, you might be able to take a horse from snaffle to leverage bit in 3 years.

                                  My point is that there is a whole lot of pretty decent horsemanship connected to a training system that ends in a leverage bit. Lots of it *does* pursue the same biomechanics goals that classical dressage does. And, IMO, the idea of riding a horse with aids that involve signals is psychologically kind.
                                  The armchair saddler
                                  Politically Pro-Cat

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    You don't see many dressage horses making it to Grand Prix; and usually they're not the youngsters--which signifies (maybe correctly or maybe not) that they've been in training, level by level.

                                    You do see a lot of reiners, cutters, ropers and wp-ers competing hard as two and three year olds. If someone wants to show in Western Dressage, what are the odds that the particular horse will have been trained level by level?

                                    IF Western Dressage should lead to more concern for the horse among traditional western riders, I'm all for it. And if that works out that way, the next thing I want is to put off starting race horses until they're 3 or 4. Heresy.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by Hermein View Post
                                      You don't see many dressage horses making it to Grand Prix; and usually they're not the youngsters--which signifies (maybe correctly or maybe not) that they've been in training, level by level.

                                      You do see a lot of reiners, cutters, ropers and wp-ers competing hard as two and three year olds. If someone wants to show in Western Dressage, what are the odds that the particular horse will have been trained level by level?

                                      IF Western Dressage should lead to more concern for the horse among traditional western riders, I'm all for it. And if that works out that way, the next thing I want is to put off starting race horses until they're 3 or 4. Heresy.
                                      That is comparing apples and potatoes.
                                      All you can say is that both are kind of round.

                                      Racers, reiners and cutters are working on being bred with talent for something they can do better than none as a given talent.
                                      Nothing like a client bringing you a horse to train that has that talent and you already see that the first few times you get on them, don't have to spend years getting there.

                                      Just like a gymnast, that starts at five and six and if talented, is at the top of it's game in mid teens, after years of training that brings that talent out, those horses are at their best early in their lives, later they confirm and learn to be steady, but that brilliance is either there right off, or you just won't have it

                                      If you wait until later to train them, you lose those years where they are the most trainable, just as you would a gymnast trying to start training at 15 and trying to compete with those that have grown into the sport and have all those formative years of motor memory practice perfecting their talent.

                                      There are some studies showing that colts started early do have higher parameters of physical and mental fitness than those started a year later and stay more sound all along, because they are training for that from that early start.
                                      It is a few years before that early start advantage evens out.

                                      I grew up with the idea that you never started any horse under saddle until four, it just was not done.
                                      If you had a three year old you wanted to work with, you drove it to a lighter wagon with an old horse as wheeler.

                                      When I came to the USA and saw so many twos being started and competing, I didn't know what to think.
                                      After years of starting and training them, I can say, it is wonderful for the horses.
                                      Why lose those early formative years with them?

                                      Critics of starting colts early bring up injuries that may happen when you train for performance.
                                      Injuries happen at any age you train for any performance and is a different topic, that is HOW to train, not WHEN.
                                      A bad trainer will have more injuries at any age it trains it's horses, a good one won't have hardly any.

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        FWIW, an old school bridle horse guy told me (many years ago) that he often wouldn't have a horse "straight up" in the bridle (ie cathedral port) until the horse was 8 or 9. His horses lived long and useful lives, working well into their late-20s.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                          Racers, reiners and cutters are working on being bred with talent for something they can do better than none as a given talent.
                                          I'd add that folks have sped up the dressage progression since I was a kid as well. The old "a level a year" doesn't seem to apply anymore.

                                          I do think the structure of showing in Western World-- that run by the AQHA meaning that shows exist to support breeders has caused futurities…. which has caused a huge emphasis on what young horses can do…. which has caused folks to discover that athletic young, kind-minded horses *can* be made to do a lot.

                                          Were the USEF similarly so focused on supporting breeders with shows as opposed to shows in general, I think we'd see the same kind of thing.
                                          The armchair saddler
                                          Politically Pro-Cat

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X