• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

The best pedigree for eventing ever, or a jumble of meaningless fancy names?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The best pedigree for eventing ever, or a jumble of meaningless fancy names?

    Okay, this one is for real. I'm working on it right now... but obviously I need to know how this pedigree pans out for eventing. Am I blinded by the famous names or could this one really be a star? Please, be super critical-- I really, really can't afford another horse! I'm especially interested in temperament, movement, and jumping ability.

    http://www.pedigreequery.com/split+city
    The wind of heaven is that which blows between a horse's ears. ~ Arabian Proverb

  • #2
    Originally posted by piccolittle View Post
    Okay, this one is for real. I'm working on it right now... but obviously I need to know how this pedigree pans out for eventing. Am I blinded by the famous names or could this one really be a star? Please, be super critical-- I really, really can't afford another horse! I'm especially interested in temperament, movement, and jumping ability.

    http://www.pedigreequery.com/split+city
    With the exception of Fappiano most of the names in the pedigree are not sport horse lines or the sport horse types are too far back in the pedigree to make a difference.
    Well known race horses do not always = sporthorses.
    Fan of Sea Accounts

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      I thought Pleasant Tap was good for sporthorses?

      Is there anything in particular I should be aware of; lines that are risky for soundness, perhaps?

      He should be pretty quiet, right, given that Fappiano and Pleasant Colony are known for good minds?
      The wind of heaven is that which blows between a horse's ears. ~ Arabian Proverb

      Comment


      • #4
        I like Fappiano, Pleasant Tap, and Nijinsky right up close. I've had varied Unbridled and Theatrical horses, the mare really seemed to make a difference with them.

        Further back, I like Le Fabuleux, Flaming Page (she's done quite well producing-wise), Blushing Groom, and Stage Door Johnny. One of the old broodmares went back to Never Knock, though closer up, and she was quite nice.

        Even further back, there are good horses like Wild Risk, In Reality, Bull Page, Ribot, Prince John, and Herbager.

        The breeding's there, but looking at the horse in front of you, especially with TB's, is more important than papers.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by piccolittle View Post
          I thought Pleasant Tap was good for sporthorses?
          Anything by Pleasant Tap was not bred to be a sport horse. At a stud fee of 10K-12K that isn't happening.
          He was a very good race horse and has produced over 800 offspring not all of whom have had racing careers. The ones that do compete as sporthorses are horses looking for a new job, not horses bred for sport.

          I've never seen anything by him listed with USEF on the leading sire lists although there are a number of posts on this forum claiming that he produces hunters, jumpers, and eventers. When challenged the poster usually backs off and says the offspring 'look' like they should be sporthorses.
          He does come from a line of horses that have produced horses that have done well in sport. But again, they were not being bred for sport, they are race track rejects.

          If anyone has info on Pleasant Tap horse that have done well as sport horses ( and not 2'6" horses) I'd be glad to hear about it.
          Fan of Sea Accounts

          Comment


          • #6
            I am not much of a TB person anymore, but I love Pleasant Colony and his offspring. The ones I have ridden are definite sport horse type.
            Kim
            'Like' my facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Calla...946873?sk=wall

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Thanks such much for the input! Guess I got a little overexcited
              The wind of heaven is that which blows between a horse's ears. ~ Arabian Proverb

              Comment


              • #8
                You don't ride the papers. What is the horse like?
                Horse Show Names Free name website with over 6200 names. Want to add? PM me!

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by kookicat View Post
                  You don't ride the papers. What is the horse like?
                  I'm still in the ogling stages, but...

                  http://www.canterusa.org/index.php?o...&directory=305

                  Critique?
                  The wind of heaven is that which blows between a horse's ears. ~ Arabian Proverb

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'd pass for an event horse. He's quite short backed, I'm not a huge fan of his legs or his neck. His shoulder and hip angles are quite nice though.

                    I think there are better prospects in the listings.

                    I wish that there were better pictures of Song Sparrow. I also like Flynnstone.
                    Horse Show Names Free name website with over 6200 names. Want to add? PM me!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I just took some new pictures of our Pleasant Tap daughter--she is being prepared for her AHS MPT and was very well received at her visual inspection.
                      http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pi...&id=1021903725
                      Her owner has turned down offers from several BNT as an upper level eventing prospect. She is just getting started eventing but has successfully completed one combined test and one lower level horse trial. Considering she is starting from scratch with only six months of dressage/jumping she is doing very well. She has excellent gaits and could easily be groomed up the levels in dressage.
                      It looks like Bruce Davidson Sr. was riding a Pleasant Tap son in 2008

                      Hidden Brook, B. g., 16.1, 2001, Pleasant Tap (TB)—Copperama (TB)
                      Owner: Bruce Davidson Sr.
                      Rider: Owner
                      Top 3 finishes: 1st place Intermediate: Poplar Place Farm March Horse Trials (Ga.).
                      Last edited by goodpony; Apr. 5, 2010, 10:48 AM.
                      Redbud Ranch
                      Check us out on FB

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by PineTreeFarm View Post
                        Anything by Pleasant Tap was not bred to be a sport horse. At a stud fee of 10K-12K that isn't happening.
                        He was a very good race horse and has produced over 800 offspring not all of whom have had racing careers. The ones that do compete as sporthorses are horses looking for a new job, not horses bred for sport.

                        I've never seen anything by him listed with USEF on the leading sire lists although there are a number of posts on this forum claiming that he produces hunters, jumpers, and eventers. When challenged the poster usually backs off and says the offspring 'look' like they should be sporthorses.
                        He does come from a line of horses that have produced horses that have done well in sport. But again, they were not being bred for sport, they are race track rejects.

                        If anyone has info on Pleasant Tap horse that have done well as sport horses ( and not 2'6" horses) I'd be glad to hear about it.
                        Sorry, but this made me giggle.

                        First of all, I'd be willing to bet that the majority of sires one would look for in a TB's pedigree were never bred for anything but racing, and had a huge stud fee that kept sport horse breeders away. But, they became influential anyway because they were quality animals and they passed that on to their offspring.

                        Second, and I know this might sound crazy, but the TB is bred mainly for racing. I know, it's crazy! But because of this, the vast majority of great TB's that we know are just racetrack rejects looking for a new job. Are their accomplishments somehow less, or are they somehow not sport horses because they did something different before coming onto that scene? Should their lineage not be noted?

                        And last, and I can't believe I have to say this since it's been gone over so many times on this forum, the USEF database sucks. A lot of people don't record their horses parents, change their names, etc etc. I wouldn't discount a stallion just because he's not listed on there.

                        I don't really understand this rant against PT. Sounds more like you've got some sort of vendetta than anything.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Originally posted by kookicat View Post
                          I'd pass for an event horse. He's quite short backed, I'm not a huge fan of his legs or his neck. His shoulder and hip angles are quite nice though.

                          I think there are better prospects in the listings.

                          I wish that there were better pictures of Song Sparrow. I also like Flynnstone.
                          I was thinking about Song Sparrow too, and I'd also like to see better pictures. As it is, he looks a bit long to me, as though he'd have trouble collecting... he looks somehow disconnected in the second picture. I love that he's already been hunting though!

                          I'm interested; what do you dislike about the other horses legs, and why would you be looking for a longer back? For education's sake
                          The wind of heaven is that which blows between a horse's ears. ~ Arabian Proverb

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by piccolittle View Post
                            I was thinking about Song Sparrow too, and I'd also like to see better pictures. As it is, he looks a bit long to me, as though he'd have trouble collecting... he looks somehow disconnected in the second picture. I love that he's already been hunting though!

                            I'm interested; what do you dislike about the other horses legs, and why would you be looking for a longer back? For education's sake
                            There's nothing wrong with a short back, really. I just like them a smidge longer because it makes the paces smoother to ride. I've also found a slightly longer back to give more scope- nothing scientific to it, just what I've seen with my own and other people's horses.

                            Split City's legs are a little light on bone for my taste, especially taking into account how he would look fully muscled and event fit. He's also fairly long in the cannon and pastern which is something I try to stay away from in eventers because there's a lot of strain on those legs running XC and jumping.

                            Hope this helps.
                            Horse Show Names Free name website with over 6200 names. Want to add? PM me!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ditto to copper mom observations-he goes at least twice to wild risk, theatrical takes you to percipitation, stage door johnny to prince john, you see never bend war relic etc, plus he is from mare family 1x.

                              As for a short back--that is great for those of us that have trouble "packaging" our horses-hence why I love short backed horses -the long strung out ones tend to stay that way with me on their backs :-)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X