• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Cunningham

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by concertogrosso View Post
    Whether you like him or not, you must admit he is bred out of the wazoo, with Cassini I (who btw had a very successful career as an international show jumper, see http://www.holsteinerverband.biz/cms...t=189&pageno=2) to Contender, who never did have a show career but proved his prepotency by his extra-ordinary offspring.

    It is disputable whether Contender or Cassini I is the "most seeked after" sire in Germany (especially Holstein), but both score pretty high in being coveted beyond the quota they are allowed to cover.

    I do not know Cunningham's owners or their politics and goals, but just looking at the horse on paper and his performance record he stands out to me. He may not sire the prettiest head or the snappies knees, but if you look at rideability, scope, conformation and the "big picture"... it's all there? ...again, I have not seen him in person, and once again, it depends on the MARE that you breed to him as to what you get!!!

    Cassini I's full brother Cassini II is offered by frozen semen in US, I have seen him throw a pretty head and "modern type" and the semen, allegedly, is dynamite. Fox Fire Farm has the goods.

    There is also an approved Cassini I son Cascani standing at stud in US, go to http://www.octoberhill.com/cascani.htm and I believe Contigo M is by Cassini I... where is he now???

    Anna
    I "met" Cunningham at Devon. He was done showing, about ready to load up in the van and had a lot of "pinto" markings. LOL. He was, IMO, an absolute gentleman, puppy dog temperament and stood up a most impressive horse. Even with the yellow stains.

    I agree with you about the bloodlines. Cassini I on a Contender mare? Fantastic!

    MHO, I think the hunters are a bit too easy for him, but I'll not begrudge his owner her choice of disciplines for her stallion.

    His type is extraordinary IMO - very modern, upstanding. Not pretty, pretty as many of the modern dressage lines are, but handsome nonetheless.

    He's a nice horse.

    Sue
    "Horsemanship is not merely a matter of bodily skills, but is based on scholarship and, therefore, is a matter of the mind and intellect." Charles de Kunffy

    http://www.equiimages.com

    Comment


    • #22
      If I remember correctly, spacely is "not a fan" of Cunniingham because his owner did not rush off to get him approved by any of the US based Euro-registries when she imported him, preferring to prove her horse at the shows doing the job for which she purchased him rather than risking such a valuable horse at a 100 DT.
      That's a rather strange excuse for not presenting him. His website says he is fully approved with the Holsteiner Verband, so he would not have to do the 100 Day Test. He only has to be presented to any registry since he's already approved in Germany.
      Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
      Now apparently completely invisible!

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Tiki View Post
        That's a rather strange excuse for not presenting him. His website says he is fully approved with the Holsteiner Verband, so he would not have to do the 100 Day Test. He only has to be presented to any registry since he's already approved in Germany.
        Exactly. It makes me think there is a reason other than "hunter people don't care about papers" or whatever the latest excuse is that he's never been presented in this country. He was rather unimpressive at Devon according to those that saw him there.

        FWIW, I breed for the hunter ring & care about papers.
        Last edited by spacely; Aug. 10, 2007, 05:31 PM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Actually, some hunter people do care about papers as they breed retired mares. I know several. And their horses show. And win. And sell with good price tags, etc. (Thus they would seem to be the kind of market an SO might wish to target ).
          Last edited by coriander; Aug. 10, 2007, 05:12 PM. Reason: typos...

          Comment


          • #25
            Cunningham

            Concertogrosso "being coveted beyond the quota they are allowed to cover" - a quota? Who decides?
            Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

            Comment


            • #26
              The Holsteiner Verband.

              For some of the top stallions, you have to purchase a breeding to a newer Verband stallion and only then will you be allowed to breed a mare to the top guy.

              By the way, I think Cunningham is a lovely stallion and would breed a mare to him in a heartbeat. As stated above, a Cassini I over a Contender??? No problems there! Handsome is just icing on the cake.
              "We don't ride the clock. We ride the horse." Reiner Klimke.
              http://community.webshots.com/user/arnikaelf

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by EquineLVR View Post
                Good question about Contigo M - he did the 100DT here in the USA in 2000 at Rancho Murieta.

                FISH - might this be the Stallion you were thinking of as he did win the 100 DT that year.
                Yes. That's the one.

                And Cunningham, BTW, has a gorgeous head and neck-- which he very reliably throws. His knees (and hind end, too) are nothin' to sneeze at either. Unfortunately, I no longer have a premium membership, but I have plenty of spectacular photos of Cunningham o/f if anyone wants to email me.
                http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Tiki View Post
                  That's a rather strange excuse for not presenting him. His website says he is fully approved with the Holsteiner Verband, so he would not have to do the 100 Day Test. He only has to be presented to any registry since he's already approved in Germany.
                  I don't bother much with registries, but my understanding is that at least in the US-based registries there's a difference between the 3 y.o. approvals and full licensing given after performance requirements have been satisfied. Over the last few years, Cunningham's owner has frequently been approached by various registries about presenting him and has continually worked to do what she believes to be in the best interests of her wonderful horse. Whether the discussions involved 100 DTing or inspection sites, her primary concern has always been the safety and well being of her stallion. If and when her concerns have been satisfied and her schedule permits, Cunningham will be presented in order to satisfy the desires of mare owners wanting to register their foals. The fact is, however that, especially in the H/J arena, registry approvals, etc., not at the top of most people's priorties lists. If they were anywhere near as meaningful as some of you seem to think they are, Zarr and Popeye K prior to this year would certainly not have enjoyed the popularity that has in fact been theirs.

                  If you want more details than that, I suggest you call Cunningham's owner. My patience with these kinds of insinuations is wearing pretty thin.

                  Speaking of little details that have aroused my curiousity, however: does anyone happen to know why Westporte would show in the Green Conformation hunters but not show up for the model?

                  P.S. I was at Devon, and met many people there who were very positively impressed by Cunningham, comng over to admire him and inquire about him much as Reg apparently did at Pebble Beach. Devon is a tough venue, especially for hunter stallions, and he turned in very respectable rounds. Popeye K didn't exactly show his best at Devon either. Guess that must mean the rest of his record is meaningless, right? How many stallions even qualified??-- I counted, and could only find 2 who (if you'll excuse the expression) had the balls to show up and compete against the multitude of unflappable geldings. Competing in the hunters is hard with stallions. Those few with the temperament and style (not to mention training and financial commitment) to reach the top of this game deserve better, IMO, than to be subjected to nitpicking and nasty inuendo.
                  Last edited by fish; Aug. 10, 2007, 07:56 PM.
                  http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Cute horse, Fish!

                    Sounds like Cunningham has a lot of nice traits that he passes on! I personally don't like that first jumping picture of Cunningham at all http://www.countrylanewarmbloods.com/cunningham2.html but in some of the other photos he did look better http://www.countrylanewarmbloods.com/cunningham3.html.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by SueL View Post
                      I "met" Cunningham at Devon. He was done showing, about ready to load up in the van and had a lot of "pinto" markings. LOL. He was, IMO, an absolute gentleman, puppy dog temperament and stood up a most impressive horse. Even with the yellow stains.

                      I agree with you about the bloodlines. Cassini I on a Contender mare? Fantastic!

                      MHO, I think the hunters are a bit too easy for him, but I'll not begrudge his owner her choice of disciplines for her stallion.

                      His type is extraordinary IMO - very modern, upstanding. Not pretty, pretty as many of the modern dressage lines are, but handsome nonetheless.

                      He's a nice horse.

                      Sue

                      Sue, you have such a way with words. He seems to me like he wants to jump the moon... either way he's a very talented boy.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #31
                        I can certainly tell you all that to judge any horse from one single photo and his position of knees says very little of the things that matter most and I speak from having made a living of photographing horses. I have seen more than one very successful Grand Prix Jumper jump like a "flying moose", and I don't think winnings were less because of it. There are quite probably a few very good examples of top hunters who fit that bill as well. Brains override beauty any day in my books. I can think of one in particular who had the special quality and was little more than an average jumper, but he still sold for 1 million dollars. Not bad for a horse that some might consider average.

                        Bottom line is, let's not assassinate a nice horse over one iffy pic. Temperament and heart wrapped up in an impressive package works for me. Perhaps far too much emphasis is placed on the "trophy" look anyway.

                        I was at a horse show... I was seeing lots of very nice horses...every now and then something jumps out at you...I saw a stunning horse at a distance, being ridden bareback by a young girl meandering about while horses were coming and going in all directions, and something told me, that has to be a stallion just by the way he carried himself, but nothing about behavior indicated what one might expect from a stallion, he was a bit vain perhaps, or some might call that presence. He had a teddy bear attitude, something that is hard to see in a picture, which appealed to me personally.

                        As I approached him, I was taken by a tall impressive extremely well mannered horse in a moment of relaxation after the show. I liked him. That is not to say he is "the best there ever was, or the best there will ever be" and certainly I see no need for anyone to feel their opinion of him should be changed by my views. However, I do think he is very worthy of note and am thankful for the information put forward by others who too felt him noteworthy.

                        Thank you.

                        Let's not let this thread get "marish". Please.
                        Last edited by Hocus Focus; Aug. 10, 2007, 09:30 PM.
                        http://regcorkumlive.blogspot.com/

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          [QUOTE=Hocus Focus;2618366]I will add just a couple of small things. First of all, I can certainly tell you all that to judge any horse from one single photo and his position of knees says very little and I speak from having made a living of photographing horses. I have seen more than one very successful Grand Prix Jumper jump like a "flying moose", and I don't think his winnings were less because of it. There are quite probably a few very good examples of top hunters who fit that bill as well. Brains override beauty any day in my books. Both is best of course.

                          QUOTE]

                          I agree with you that you simply cannot judge a horse by one picture however, I would also tend to think that for Cunningham's stallion page nothing but his best would be featured. I personally do not have much of an opinion of him at all b/c I don't know enough about him but I will say that there is a ton of talent out there in Hunter Land and plenty of note worthy stallions that possess 'the jump' and that amateur friendly attitude that so many are looking for. Solely based on the 3 pictures I saw of him on his webpage, I do not have any 'wow' feelings like I do about their other stallion.

                          Anna

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #33
                            Anna, I agree of course... but that is more a problem of having booked the wrong photographer in many cases.....
                            http://regcorkumlive.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by Hocus Focus View Post
                              Anna, I agree of course... but that is more a problem of having booked the wrong photographer in many cases.....

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by Hocus Focus View Post
                                Anna, I agree of course... but that is more a problem of having booked the wrong photographer in many cases.....
                                Or a web designer making poor choices from a stack of photos....

                                If you're really interested in evaluating the horse's jump, I recommend his DVD. If you still don't like him, I guess we've got a problem with all that judging that's put him at or near the top of 3 divisions this year.

                                Oh, well.
                                Last edited by fish; Aug. 10, 2007, 10:24 PM.
                                http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  [QUOTE=RheinlandPfalzSaar;2618435]
                                  Originally posted by Hocus Focus View Post
                                  QUOTE]

                                  I do not have any 'wow' feelings like I do about their other stallion.

                                  Anna
                                  What "other stallion"? I believe Mary Slouka, Cunningham's owner, only owns the one stallion, Cunningham, at present, having sold Czechmate, her Carthago stallion, to a couple in Tenn. last year.
                                  http://www.tunnelsendfarm.com

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    [QUOTE=fish;2618539]
                                    Originally posted by RheinlandPfalzSaar View Post

                                    What "other stallion"? I believe Mary Slouka, Cunningham's owner, only owns the one stallion, Cunningham, at present, having sold Czechmate, her Carthago stallion, to a couple in Tenn. last year.
                                    Westporte, http://www.countrylanewarmbloods.com/stallion.htm have no idea if Mary Slouka owns this one or not but they are both on the same website - I should have been clearer.

                                    I am sorry if I offended you. I truly think that your horse is darling. All I am trying to say is that I was not 'wowed' by the pictures on Cunningham's webpage, I even said in my post that I know nothing about him other than just what I've seen in the pics. I do still stand by what I said about normally the best pictures go up on the website and I would certainly hope that their is an owner or trainer involved in picking out which pictures are going to represent your horse to the breeding public. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying their horrible pictures by ANY means, I am sure that he is a lovely stallion choice to breed to with the right mare.

                                    Anna

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Westporte & Cunningham are NOT owned by the same people. Country Lane (Westporte) hosts that page for Mary as they bred a mare to him.

                                      I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE Westporte, have bred to him for next year & will likely continue to do so. He's a fabulous producer (& approved too).

                                      I do believe there is a reason that Cunningham has not been presented for approval in this country other than the owner having no interest in doing so, but who knows what it is. You can say what you want Fish, but going to an inspection likely wouldn't have any negative effect on him. Heck, for some registries, he may not even have to be presented. He may just be approved based on his testing scores, performance record & approval in Germany.
                                      Last edited by spacely; Aug. 11, 2007, 03:09 AM.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Spacely I would love to hear the speculation.

                                        I can't imagine that the owners of Westporte would breed to a stallion that had something so wrong with him that no registry would take him.

                                        Mary is not one for marketing. The only website she has for Cunningham is a link on Westporte's site with old pictures. The link is to show who their mare was bred too and they nicely added contact information. If Mary isn't interested in creating her own website or investing in a well made DVD/Video why would you not believe she didn't care about what registries her stalion was accepted by? She has chosen to invest her time and money into having a top hunter. Obviously that is her priority and her choice. It does not mean there is something wrong with her stallion.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          I never said there was anything wrong with him. Yes, I have heard a few things, which I won't repeat, but I've heard stuff about a lot of other stallions too. Is it true? Who knows, but I won't repeat it.
                                          Last edited by spacely; Aug. 11, 2007, 03:12 AM.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X