• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Registry Ethics Poll

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Registry Ethics Poll

    Please give me your feedback

    Should a Registry consider a stallions owners decission to resend a stallion report and Breeders Certificates after it has have been submitted and breeders cert. sent ... over a year...because they have decided the foals are not worthy of registry for one reason or another. What would you do if you couldnt register your foal for this reason??
    What about the stallions owner..should future breeders be forwarned??
    This registry will be Hidden untill all issues have been decided good or bad.
    Heather Bolding
    Noble Farms
    Breeding Quality Sport Ponies & Warmbloods

  • #2
    I am sorry, could you clarify?
    www.EquusMagnificus.ca
    Breeding & Sales
    Facebook | YouTube

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by EquusMagnificus View Post
      I am sorry, could you clarify?
      do you mean that the stallion owner is rescinding? that they don't want the foal registered?

      Comment


      • #4
        I certainly heard of that happening before - the SO doesn't want papers issued for a foal. There was money owed the stallion owner by the mareowner.
        "No matter how cynical I get its just not enough to keep up." Lily Tomlin

        Comment


        • #5
          If the stallion owner did not feel that the mare was up to par at the time she was bred then the SO should not have allowed the mare to be bred. A year later the mare owner has a foal on the ground and has spent considerable money on this foal. I feel it would be highly unethical of the stallion owner to take this stance. Were I am mare owner in that situation I would keep it to myself, resolve it legally and then I might consider making it public knowledge.

          As far as the registry I would be equally displeased with them if all of the paperwork was properly done and appropriate fees had all been paid. If evertything was properly done for the breeding I think it would be very unfair to the MO for the SO and registry to after the fact decide to refuse registry. That does not make sense to me.
          www.rockhillfarm.net

          Comment


          • #6
            In other words: "I, stallion owner, will allow you, mare owner, to register your foal AFTER I deem that the foal is of sufficient quality."

            No way. If the stallion owner wants to control quality, he/she should do so before the mare is bred not after the foal is on the ground.
            "I always remember you as quite the desk chair contrarian." - APirateLooksAtForty

            Comment


            • #7
              I guess if there were fees due to the stallion owner, I would be fine with holding the papers, but if it is a matter of the SO not liking the quality of the foal, then that should be between the SO and their surgical veterinarian, IMO.

              If the foal owner has met all the criteria, the foal should be registrable.

              Comment


              • #8
                If the registry is going to honor the stallion owner's decision to rescind the paperwork on a foal (regardless of why) and thus not register the foal, then the registry needs to make sure it's in writing in their handbook that they reserve the right to do so.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I really have no idea what the OP said and I think everyone is guessing at what s/he could mean.
                  Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
                  Now apparently completely invisible!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Tiki, I'm betting there is a whole lot more to the story than meets the eye.

                    I've already stated I can think of one way this would happen. I can think of a couple more too. There is NO WAY I'd pass judgement on a registry or the stallion owner without knowing the entire story.

                    I will note that registry papers are the last line of defense (and pretty much the only) for a SO.

                    And..... it could be the SO is a total control freak jackass. But I'm not hopping on the registry/SO crucifixion bandwagon without knowing everything.
                    "No matter how cynical I get its just not enough to keep up." Lily Tomlin

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Agree that it was confusingly worded and rather unclear.

                      But what it sounds like the OP meant, was that the SO filed their breeding report with their registry, listing all the mares that were bred, as most registries require. And then the registry issued "Breeders Certificates" which is what the SO gives the MO as proof that they paid their stud fee and they send in to register their foal. And then long after these events took place, the SO decides to tell the registry that the initial report was in error and some of the mares should be left off. And SO files a new breeding report with not all the names on there. So that the MOs whose mares were left off now cannot register their foals.

                      If that is what the OP meant, my opinion would be: 1. Any SO that would do such a thing is a lying, cheating, skunk and should be outed immediately so that no one will ever do business with them again. 2. Any registry that would allow a revised breeding report to be filed which *leaves off* mares that were previously reported (as opposed to, say, a corrected report *adding* a mare that was inadvertently forgotten) should be boycotted forevermore by every breeder everywhere, and should also be outed immediately.

                      I really hope that is not what happened. That's what it sounded like, but it's hard to imagine any registry going along with such a thing, honestly.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I agree the OP is confusing. If the mare owner owes the SO money - I would defend blocking the Registry providing papers for the foal. As far as trying to stop papers because the foal wasn't up to par - no.
                        Summit Sporthorses Ltd. Inc.
                        "Breeding Competition Partners & Lifelong Friends"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by ise@ssl View Post
                          I agree the OP is confusing. If the mare owner owes the SO money - I would defend blocking the Registry providing papers for the foal. As far as trying to stop papers because the foal wasn't up to par - no.
                          Don't registries send the stallion owner the breeding certificates for the foals ?
                          If a mare owner has not paid stud fees, etc. the stallion owner can simply not provide the certificate, I don't see why there would be any need to file a different report.
                          http://sporthorsesnw.com/
                          https://www.facebook.com/pages/Sport...01526589966216

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Off the top of my head I can think of three reasonable reasons:
                            1. Mare owner owe's money (or in someway does not honor a written contract regarding the breeding)

                            2. Stallion's sperm (A.I.) illegal split and unauthorized breeding done (mare was legit, but second mare on farm breed from split).

                            3. Foal shows genetic problem, SO will no longer breed and doesnt want any more breedings. Or SO feels foal should have been pts because of genetic problem with mare, but Mare Owner didn't do so or plans to use foal (with inheritable genetic problem) in future breeding program .

                            So, for me, it would depend on the reason for the rescinding.

                            Does this registry require DNA samples?
                            Last edited by Chall; Sep. 5, 2009, 12:36 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              BLUE MOON HAS IT CORRECT
                              The stallion was stood at a stallion station and thats where the mares were BRED
                              Stallion owner is owed no money for any of these breeding contracts ...they were all payed in full (with cleared checks). All contracts were legal and followed and the registry isnt giving mare owners any reasoning for why SO is doing this. This was done to ALL mare owners of that year. All fees are paid etc. to the registry also.
                              I understand if stud fees were owed but there not and how can SO do it a year later?? If there was an issue then the SO should never of issued breeders cert. and sent in the report. its not fair to us mare owners

                              SO refuses to answer calls

                              There were only 3 mares bred(all different MO) to this stallion that year all in the general area of the stallion and None of us are able to get our papers

                              AND as far as the registry goes they have been so kind to of let us spend our money at their shows and aquire points on these babies with NO mention that it means nothing in the long run
                              Heather Bolding
                              Noble Farms
                              Breeding Quality Sport Ponies & Warmbloods

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Oh and NO the registry does not send the breeders cert. They are Downloaded off the registries web site by the SO then signed and sent out to The MO and from I can see on the registries web site it specifically tells SO NOT to send the BC untill ALL stud fees are paid so I would assume that when SO sign And sends they are stating all fees are paid
                                And NO DNA on foals is not done unless they are purebreds in which in this case 1 is and was DNA typed

                                I would also like to add that we all show together(MO) and all of these foals have been Either champion or reserve in their divisions at EVERY show so quality is something SO should be THRILLED with
                                Heather Bolding
                                Noble Farms
                                Breeding Quality Sport Ponies & Warmbloods

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Wow! I just can't imagine this happening.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Is it possible that the SO has found out something about the stallion, a genetic problem say, that means that the offspring should never be allowed to enter the gene pool? If it was a rare-ish breed, it would be possible that the registry agrees with the SO, but no one wants to make anything public?
                                    www.juniperridgeranch.us
                                    Visit us on Facebook!

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Molly Malone View Post
                                      Is it possible that the SO has found out something about the stallion, a genetic problem say, that means that the offspring should never be allowed to enter the gene pool? If it was a rare-ish breed, it would be possible that the registry agrees with the SO, but no one wants to make anything public?
                                      IMO, if that would be the case, the MO's have a large investment, and have the right to know.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Is the stallion not available for breeding any more at all or was it just a single year that they rescinded all of the breeding contracts?

                                        I would send a certified letter to the SO or whomever you paid the stud fee to requesting explanation in a predetermined time frame (14 days is good). If you don't get any answer, get an attorney. Do you still have your breeding contract? It sounds like they have not upheld their end of the contract and are in breech.

                                        If you contract was with the breeding station and not the SO, then your correspondence should be with the breeding station. They will have legal recourse to go after the SO but you may not if the SO never entered a contract with you.

                                        Get your paperwork together and get an attorney.
                                        The rebel in the grey shirt

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X