• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Any thoughts on the phrase "She breeds better than herself"??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Any thoughts on the phrase "She breeds better than herself"??

    I will have to admit, my philosophical mind (or at least that's what I call it, ) makes me really ponder this phrase. On the one hand I've heard breeders say time and time again "breed the best to the best" and then, almost as a slight contradiction, I've heard "She breeds better than herself" with reference to broodmare capabilities. When I first heard the latter, I thought "oh yeah, sure she does". Now, after having steadily watched my own ponies AS WELL AS others' ponies and offspring and paying close attention to foals born etc. (and yet I am still a novice, preferring to believe that there IS always more to learn!!!) I am thinking: you know. . I might have to agree with the latter, that some mares do breed better than themselves! (not that the former doesn't also stand) but. . .. what do you more "seasoned" breeders think?
    Willow Run Connemaras
    Home of: "Willow Boy" (*Chiltern Colm ex *Sillbridge Miranda by Thunderbolt)
    ~Irish Connemara Ponies for Sport and Pleasure~
    www.willowrunconnemaras.com

  • #2
    I call it "outproducing herself."

    I had one. I bred her because she had more heart than any horse I'd ever had, even tho she was not a traditional sporthorse type. I also knew I would keep her offspring for myself.

    My suspicions were confirmed when the inspector, looking at her and her foal at side, said to the audience, "See vat a really good stallion can do."

    Well, yea, it was a nice stallion, but the mare had SOMETHING to do with it.

    I bred her twice and kept both foals - one is nine and schooling third level and has won USDF All Breed Awards at each level; the other just turned 4. They are both better horses than their mom, but also have her huge heart. Never discount "heart" when you are breeding horses. It can sometimes take you much further than 'talent' ever can.
    Donerail Farm
    www.donerailfarm.com
    http://donerailfarm.wordpress.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      If I hadn't seen it with my own eyes (in the case of several different mares AND stallions) I wouldn't believe it myself.

      I purchased a mare that does such a thing. She is the dam of my riding mare (whom I purchased first).

      I bought her solely because of her foals.

      Here's the kicker. The mare in question has had an EXTREMELY rough life. Obviously environmental factors had a lot to do with the reasons why this "ok" mare consistently outproduces herself. I do believe she was stunted as a young horse due to the fact that every single foal out of her has exceeded her height by a minimum of 1 hand. At some point she has also had some serious injuries to her neck. These injuries affected the way she carries herself and doesn't do her any favors in the area of conformation. Ironically, most of her foals (and even grand-foals) are known for their beautiful necks!
      www.SilverSpringFarm.net
      Breeder of rare, high quality Silver Dapple Paints and Quarter Horses.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think that the "best" mares don't necessarily always produce the "best" foals.

        For instance..... I have two mares by the same stallion. Bred to my stallion, they've had three foals and four foals. Mare 1 is a very accomplished show mare, she's stunning, she's a brilliant mover -- people always are asking about her and smitten with her. Then there's Mare 2 -- by the same stallion, minimal show record, not as fancy, not as big of a mover -- but I think she is the better producer. Mare 1's foals are really fantstic, but I really like Mare 2's foals better. The foals share 3/4 of the same pedigree, but I think Mare 2's foals are more correct, and definitely bigger movers. You'd never guess something like this just standing them up next to each other!

        My theory is that those "best" mares are not always your "best" producers.....
        Family Partners Welsh Ponies - Home of Section B Welsh stallion *Wedderlie Mardi Gras LOM/AOE http://www.welshponies.com
        Click here to buy: A Guide To In Hand Showing of Your Welsh Pony

        Comment


        • #5
          I say "outproduced herself" as well.

          And yes, I had one of those (I use Saddlebred mares). I also used to say that she "throws more to the stallion". Both her babies look/move more like their sires, and I would also venture that their temperaments are more like their sires as well. Her filly, by a grandson of Uniform, is a pistol, but bold and athletic. Her colt, by Balta'Czar, is a laidback, submissive puppy dog who is more timid and quiet.

          Interestingly, I went out and bought another ASB mare who I think is a vast improvement over my last one - better gaits, more height, more substance+bone, bigger feet, better topline... but who knows, maybe her foals won't turn out as nice as my other mare's..?! This is partly why I bought a breeding to Balta'Czar again, I will use it on this new mare in 2010 and see how that cross compares to my 2008 colt, who turned out REALLY nice.

          When the pro handler came to see my 2008 colt in person, he took one look at my mare (who was in VERY poor shape, underweight and with no muscling whatsoever) and said "wow, she really is just an oven, isn't she??".. Hrmm.. a not-so-subtle way of saying she outproduced herself?? Yes, she did. That said, my colt's incredibly elegant long-ish neck, which drew rave reviews from the handler, can definitely be credited to his mama.
          www.jlsporthorsesales.net

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by erinwillow View Post
            I will have to admit, my philosophical mind (or at least that's what I call it, ) makes me really ponder this phrase. On the one hand I've heard breeders say time and time again "breed the best to the best" and then, almost as a slight contradiction, I've heard "She breeds better than herself" with reference to broodmare capabilities. When I first heard the latter, I thought "oh yeah, sure she does". Now, after having steadily watched my own ponies AS WELL AS others' ponies and offspring and paying close attention to foals born etc. (and yet I am still a novice, preferring to believe that there IS always more to learn!!!) I am thinking: you know. . I might have to agree with the latter, that some mares do breed better than themselves! (not that the former doesn't also stand) but. . .. what do you more "seasoned" breeders think?
            I have one of those. She has a mediocre pedigree and some minor confo flaws. She is an OK mover but not stellar though all her foals have been talented jumpers. 3 of 4 look like mini me of the stallion (so that is better than herself). The 4th one you can see a lot more of momma in the filly but still with a better set on neck and shorter/stronger topline. So yes....all her foals are better than herself. The 4 foals are by 3 different stallions. Her 4 foals: one is a yearling, 2 are eventing and one is doing dressage (placed top 10 at DAD). The yearling is the bugger of the lot....she has been jumping pasture fences since pre weaning.

            On the other end of the spectrum I have had 2 mares that were premium/reserve champion at their inspections and their foals have on the whole not been as good as the dam. Those mares have "underproduced" themselves and were sold.
            Providence Farm
            http://providencefarmpintos.blogspot.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by rideagoldenpony View Post
              I think that the "best" mares don't necessarily always produce the "best" foals.
              Just like some of the best stallions never seem to produce quite as good as themselves.

              I had a mare who died this year during foaling who often outproduced herself. Although she was a very nice mare her babies are just awesome!
              Chris Misita
              www.hiddenvalleyfarms.net Home of Bravo and Warrick!
              To dare; progress comes at this price. All sublime conquests are, more or less, the rewards of daring.
              Victor Hugo

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cyndi
                I call it "outproducing herself."

                Most breeders do. Never heard the other description before.
                Randee Beckman ~Otteridge Farm, LLC (http://on.fb.me/1iJEqvR)~ Marketing Manager - The Clothes Horse & Jennifer Oliver Equine Insurance Specialist

                Comment


                • #9
                  It is about the mechanics of genetics. I think of a large puzzle with many different pieces that makes up a whole picture. Then imagine a whole other complete set of pieces that go with that puzzle that just sit in the box. It becomes a random picking of pieces from box/picture that goes into each egg, that provides 50% of the pieces that will be avalible for the next picture(foal).
                  I think that sometimes there are fairly minor flaws (that seem to be big) that when re-combined with a stallion, are usually fixed. So that is how I see an animal producing better than itself. There are also environmental factors as people have mentioned. I am also sure that some very nice mares also throw beautiful babies. I guess it all makes it nearly impossible to predict the outcome, so that is why the breeding worth of a stallion or mare is determined by their offspring, rather then entirely on their own appearance/performance.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Ive got one too... I think there was a lot of neglect as a foal that effected some things..and she really is not all that bad.. but her foals are pretty much copies of their sires.. I wouldnt let her go for anything. I think one thing to remember is we should always breed to improve and 'hopefully' think in a generational sense so even people who say "only breed a mare you want a carbon copy of" may not be being appropriately critical.. you can always find a fault. PLus, I think some breeders are better than others at making really good matches even with mares that may not be deemed worthy by others.
                    www.windhorsefrm.org and on Facebook too!
                    Where mares rule and Basset Hounds drool!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      There is a corollary to the "outproduced herself" statement to which I have the same reaction: I'm not sure I buy it but I think I've seen it! That is, a mare (or stallion) who stamps offspring with a particular trait.

                      How can that be? How can a mare "put her head on her foals"? Or her neck, or her length of back (be it good or bad)? It sure seems to happen though. I have a mare who not only outproduces herself, she endows her foals with her lovely head and her behemoth hindquarters (baby got back!).
                      Shall I tell you what I find beautiful about you? You are at your very best when things are worst.
                      Starman

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I say "outproduces herself' also. I have such a mare also...my white mare Sierra. She is only average herself but her foals are all way nicer than herself...spectacular even. Her bloodlines are a nice outcross on both my stallions and to 4 different stallions now in her lifetime, she has produced all top notch foals. I'm not sure why or how she does it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Aka "Wow, take a look at that, who would've thought?!"
                          McDowell Racing Stables

                          Home Away From Home

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            what about the term "genetically neutral"? Is there such thing? if so is that a factor for such mares?
                            www.windhorsefrm.org and on Facebook too!
                            Where mares rule and Basset Hounds drool!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by wehrlegirl View Post
                              what about the term "genetically neutral"? Is there such thing? if so is that a factor for such mares?
                              If the mare caries a lot of ressesive traits, then the stallion's look will be more prominent. This is a huge generalization, as most traits are shared, and not alway dom, ressesive. We also tend to jugde things on outside apperance, as opposed to what is goin on inside the package.

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                This is such a cool topic Thanks all for chiming in. The phrase "breeds better than herself" was one that a fellow Connie breeder used and by all means does not have to represent the "norm", I rather like the phrase "outproduces herself" in honesty :-) At any rate, I too have to admit that I have seen this happen. . Mare A is FABulous, nice mover and sweet and Mare B may be this that or the other (name your fault) and then lo and behold the two of them have foals and. . .guess what?? I am in love with Mare B's babies!!! I think, as someone mentioned, that is DOES have to do with the genetic "puzzle" that each pony/horse brings. . .hmmmm so I guess I bring myself to the next question: Is there a difference between performance and breeding equine. . or???? Apologies if this opens up an entire can of "chicken or egg" worms. . but I just find it truly fascinating. . .
                                Willow Run Connemaras
                                Home of: "Willow Boy" (*Chiltern Colm ex *Sillbridge Miranda by Thunderbolt)
                                ~Irish Connemara Ponies for Sport and Pleasure~
                                www.willowrunconnemaras.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I think though that it is important to know the depth of pedigree in a mediocre mare before breeding or you may end up producing a "throwback" in a 2nd or 3rd generation. If the mare is somewhat inferior in phenotype but her pedigree says that she should be superior in genotype then it is safe to test breed the mare and be pleased if she outproduces herself.

                                  On the other hand, if her ancestors themselves are mediocre at best, then breeding a mare to superior stallion and producing an F1 foal that is superior might not be that surprising. The problem is that F1 foal could then, in turn, produce inferior offspring when F1 is crossed up on genetics that would allow some of the faulty traits come through (even if that mate is considered adequate to superior).

                                  I think it is important to consider the pedigree to see that the strength is there.

                                  Now surely there have been individuals that have surprisingly given us GENERATIONS of nice descendents despite a mediocre phenotype and a lacking pedigree, but I would think that might be rare indeed. I would love to hear examples though.

                                  Thoughts?
                                  Last edited by Ladybug Hill; Jun. 29, 2009, 10:13 PM. Reason: trying to add clarity
                                  Chris
                                  Ladybug Hill--Hunters and Ponies
                                  WWSD? (what would Suerte do?)

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I think you nailed it Ladybug.

                                    I own an outproducer. She consistently takes the best of her, and the best of the sire, and through some sort of alchemy, throws really wonderful offspring - all nicer than she herself. She is not genetically neutral - not a blank slate. I always see a lot of her in her youngsters. She does however, produce what I would expect of her pedigree///with one exception - she always gives more jump than hoped, and a very particular, very careful hindend technique over a fence. Regardless of sire. Ummm....I'm not complaining.

                                    But as much as an outproducer as she is - she is not who I immediately think of when I contemplate the term. I have another mare in mind.

                                    THis mare is out of an exceedingly rich motherline. She is also an F1 cross. When I first saw her as a young mare, I was incredibly disappointed. She got all the wrong parts. She was....SO much less than the sum of her parents. Yet, over the years, I've had the fortunate experience of watching her foals. And watch her foals become riding horses, and watch her daughters go to the breeding shed. This mare became an actual warmblood blue hen. She is now spending her later years doing embryo transfers for a very savvy and far-sighted warmblood breeder. Watching this mare reproduce was a big part of my education. She MORE than lived up to her pedigree. - and she's taught me to be very careful when dismissing a less-than-stellar main studbook mare out of hand. I now place far more emphasis on knowing the damline
                                    "No matter how cynical I get its just not enough to keep up." Lily Tomlin

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by erinwillow View Post
                                      On the one hand I've heard breeders say time and time again "breed the best to the best" and then, almost as a slight contradiction, I've heard "She breeds better than herself" with reference to broodmare capabilities.
                                      I do not think these statements are necessarily inconsistent at all. The whole point, in my view, of breeding the best to the best is to improve with each successive generation - the goal *is* to produce a foal that shows the best qualities of each parent and thus is better than either one alone. In selecting mares, I will not use one unless I would be happy with a carbon copy of her - that is the minimum I want out of the breeding. If the pairing produces a quality below that of the mare, I won't touch that stallion again. If the mare were underproduce again, I would not reuse her either (unless I am pretty sure the problem does not lie with the mare). Fortunately, I have not encountered that problem. It helps that I know the dams of my mares very well, and in one case, also the granddam, and have seen that they are all consistently strong producers.
                                      Roseknoll Sporthorses
                                      www.roseknoll.net

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Ladybug Hill View Post
                                        I think though that it is important to know the depth of pedigree in a mediocre mare before breeding or you may end up producing a "throwback" in a 2nd or 3rd generation. If the mare is somewhat inferior in phenotype but her pedigree says that she should be superior in genotype then it is safe to test breed the mare and be pleased if she outproduces herself.

                                        On the other hand, if her ancestors themselves are mediocre at best, then breeding a mare to superior stallion and producing an F1 foal that is superior might not be that surprising. The problem is that F1 foal could then, in turn, produce inferior offspring when F1 is crossed up on genetics that would allow some of the faulty traits come through (even if that mate is considered adequate to superior).

                                        I think it is important to consider the pedigree to see that the strength is there.

                                        Now surely there have been individuals that have surprisingly given us GENERATIONS of nice descendents despite a mediocre phenotype and a lacking pedigree, but I would think that might be rare indeed. I would love to hear examples though.

                                        Thoughts?
                                        To clarify, by F1 are you referring to TB in the pedigree? This is where I get lost because of my mare of superior racing lines can produce outstanding sporthorses when crossed on superior warmblood stallion..does this mean the next generation would not be as predictable? Because this is what I aim for in breeding her..
                                        www.windhorsefrm.org and on Facebook too!
                                        Where mares rule and Basset Hounds drool!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X