• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What a breeder SHOULDN'T be.....

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Well, I am horrified by it all, just horrified that people like this exist. But then hey, what the hell, isn't this the opinion of all the farmers out there? Your animal is only allowed to live until production stops peaking, usually WAY before their natural time.

    Such is the hypocracy though. We collectively like the taste of one, so such treatment is totally acceptable and totally not cruel. If you go on about the way cows or pigs ect are treated you get the " shutup, PETA, farm animals do not suffer!" shit. But then, if you don't like to eat them, the exact same thing is cruel.

    Its all cruel and it's all wrong, so you had better take a good hard look in the mirror before not sit back and point a finger at this heartless woman if you routinely go to the grocery store and give your money to people who treat an almost physiologically and mentally identical animal the exact same way (actually, much worse) as this lady treats the horses she buys and sells. There is absolutely no difference whatsoever.
    www.svhanoverians.com

    "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Donella View Post
      Its all cruel and it's all wrong, so you had better take a good hard look in the mirror before not sit back and point a finger at this heartless woman if you routinely go to the grocery store and give your money to people who treat an almost physiologically and mentally identical animal the exact same way (actually, much worse) as this lady treats the horses she buys and sells. There is absolutely no difference whatsoever.
      Exactly right!

      I'm no vegan -- I eat meat and I see no problem raising animals for food. Otherwise most of these species would have no reason to exist at all. But it would be nice if they had a good life prior to that. In "the old days" the typical family farm animals would have a relatively good life prior to the day it was slaughtered, unlike many of the commercial farms of today. It had space, food, companionship.

      In my area it is still quite common for people to get a weaner pig or calf each year to raise, then the portable slaughter guy comes and collects it and a week later you go get your "product". Meanwhile, the animal runs in a large pasture, has buddies, is fed well and (in the case of my neighbor's pigs) gets to wander over to MY house and freak out the horses!

      I try to support local farmers (like most of my meat is buffalo, from the local bison ranch) and I will not eat veal, because I've seen how those little guys are raised and it sucks, but I don't have some blanket adversity to killing animals for food.

      And I've been to slaughter plants and watched horses slaughtered right in front of my eyes...it was no worse than the vet putting them down. Instead, so much of the cruelty seems to be in overcrowded transport and "stabling" while awaiting slaughter.

      Death is such a stranger to most of us -- we try so hard to remove ourselves from it -- and often it isn't pretty -- not for pigs or horses or people. But it IS a fact of life and that will never change. But LIFE can be pretty damn cruel as well...take a stroll through some long term care facilities one of these days....

      As for legislating people to be more responsible -- well, again I have to point to the small animal "problem" -- people who give their dogs/cats up to shelters, where most will face certain death are not prosecuted. Why not? And what's up with people not spaying or neutering pets...STILL!

      In my area some incredibly generous person donated the land to build a new shelter (privately funded), with the stipulation it be a "no-kill" shelter. It's a BEAUTIFUL facility -- 3x larger than the old one...yet when I went there last week to check out the cat collection (they are the source of all my barn cats), the gal said they were already filled....3 weeks after opening.

      I keep hearing stories of 100's of dogs/cats that were simply left behind in empty houses when the family's home was foreclosed on -- some starved to death.

      I mean COME ON!!!! How much $$$$ does it take to feed a dog or cat?!?

      So you really can't count on people to do the right thing....at least that is my incredibly cynical viewpoint....

      And banning slaughter before some workable, practical solution was in place was just plain stupid. It's a shame more people didn't speak up THEN...but they were afraid they'd be labeled cruel or something.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Kyzteke View Post
        I keep hearing stories of 100's of dogs/cats that were simply left behind in empty houses when the family's home was foreclosed on -- some starved to death.

        I mean COME ON!!!! How much $$$$ does it take to feed a dog or cat?!?
        It may not be the cost of feed, but rather a place to actually KEEP said dog or cat. You lose your house and where are you going? A relatives hopefully, but what if they wont let you bring your dog or cat? A hotel? They arent going to let you bring a dog or cat.

        But I agree its not that much to feed them at all.
        Check out my Equine Genetics Blog! Updated April 25th with Splashed White!!!
        http://equinegenetics.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Pronzini View Post
          I'm not sure that that is right. There was an anti slaughter feel good proposition put on the ballet a few years ago but it didn't actually change the classification. Here's the text (now known as Penal Code section 598c)

          Unless you are thinking of something else and as a California horse owner, I would very much like to know what it is.
          Yup. Thinking of something else. In 1998, the The Prohibition of Horse Slaughter and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption Act of 1998 made selling, buying or killing a horse for meat a felony, and the offering of horsemeat for human consumption a misdemeanor. Section 2(b) states: "Horses are not raised for food or fiber and are taxed differently than food animals."

          And, Cal Business and Professional Code
          · Section 4825.1(d) in reference to veterinary practice: Animals…raised, kept, or used for profit, and not including those species that are usually kept as pets such as …companion animals, including equines...

          There's more, but I truly don't have time to look it all up. Suffice it to say that when I moved to California in 2002, I was well aware of the fact that the equine in California was considered a companion animal. It had a direct impact on what I do because with livestock, the layperson is given more latitude when performing reproductive procedures.

          Hope that helps!

          Kathy St.Martin
          Equine Reproduction Short Courses
          http://www.equine-reprodution.com
          Equine-Reproduction.com Now offering one on one customized training!
          Leg-Up Equestrian Assistance Program, Inc. A 501(c)(3) non-profit charity

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by RiddleMeThis View Post
            It may not be the cost of feed, but rather a place to actually KEEP said dog or cat. You lose your house and where are you going? A relatives hopefully, but what if they wont let you bring your dog or cat? A hotel? They arent going to let you bring a dog or cat.

            But I agree its not that much to feed them at all.
            Well, many hotels DO allow dogs/cats. I stay in them all the time. Motel 6 for example.

            Back when I was seriously poor (as opposed to now, when I am just averagely poor), I arrived in Colorado with about $50 to my name. Me and my German Shepherd dog (all 110 lbs) lived for a month in my car.

            Or these people who say..."I'm moving and the landlord doesn't allow dogs/cats/ferrets/whatever." Then don't live there!! Pick another place! I've live all over this country and ALWAYS had at least one dog. Maybe I didn't live in the best places, but giving up the dog(s) was never an option.

            Again, it depends how loyal and determined you are.

            Comment


            • #26
              I read this post on Fugly as well. And overall to me personally, she doesn't seem like a very nice person or someone who should have horses, but that's just me. Just like some of you probably wouldn't like me because I don't think slaughter, when done humanely, is a problem.

              Last week a letter was written to the Irish Field, our weekly racing/showing paper. It was from a very well know sporthorse breeder in this country and no they don't post here. Actually, they might not be breeding anymore. She stated we needed a different system to slaughter whereby the horse meat was prepared here instead of being shipped out. The real danger here is in live export. She cited welfare and jobs as the 2 major issues.

              Another problem is the current waiting time for slaughter which is roughly 6 weeks at the moment. This is to ensure horse if put down on the day, not waiting around or shipped live. We can also avail of the hunting kennels in this country. When you put a horse down, you call the kennels and they dispose of the animal as dog food. And mind you all the kennels have to conform to EU regulations for preparing the food for the dogs. My 2 foals which were lost were taken to the kennels. However harsh that may seem, it's what had to be done. We are not allowed to bury on the land.

              Don't get me wrong, I don't think slaughter is a solution for people who breed willy nilly. Personally if I have a horse with issues which means finding a suitable home is not an option, I will always have them put down here with us. It's better than thinking you found a "forever" home which meant your horse had a lifetime of suffering ahead of him/her.

              I know many of you didn't want this to be a pro or anti thread, but it is the gist of the OP really.

              Terri
              COTH, keeping popcorn growers in business for years.

              "I need your grace to remind me to find my own." Snow Patrol-Chasing Cars. This line reminds me why I have horses.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Equilibrium View Post
                IWhen you put a horse down, you call the kennels and they dispose of the animal as dog food. And mind you all the kennels have to conform to EU regulations for preparing the food for the dogs. My 2 foals which were lost were taken to the kennels. However harsh that may seem, it's what had to be done.
                In my area there is a "Cat" zoo with various lions, tigers etc (a bear, too, I think). I had heard they would take horses and other livestock, put them down in your presence, then process them for cat food.

                So last winter I called them...I had a mare that I considered taking there. They had a TEN WEEK waiting list....

                Comment


                • #28
                  Unfortunately, attempting to limit breeders in their decisions about breeding stock, breeding programs and breeding decisions as to what is "good" and which is "poor" quality requires a value judgement which limits the rights and freedoms of those people concerned. I may pick different stock than somebody else, if my interests in what I do with my horses are different from someone else's. Who is to say who is right and who is wrong in their decisions, other than the free and open market? Show breeders make different decisions than race breeders, who make different decisions about what is important than someone breeding for their ideal cutting horse, or mountain riding or pack horse, driving horse, barrel racer, rodeo horse, or meat horse (for those who breed expressly FOR the meat market). If there is a market for it, and people are interested in it, there will be horses bred for each and every purpose, whether or not you personally are interested in this discipline or market, or approve of it. No value judgements from me on any of them, as long as the people involved feed and care adequately for the horses they have, while they own them. If there is no other market for the horses a breeder is producing, then they all have a basic value, a price per pound from the meat industry. This is the "safety net" for horses. Horses with no value to their own owners or anyone else will be neglected, abandoned, starved. This fate is to be avoided for all horses. The slaugher industry gives value to horses, it is the ultimate "rescue" for unfortunate horses who have no value for other parts of the industry, due to injury, conformational flaws, unsoundness, lack of training, or training from unskilled people. Not all horses are created equal, there is a normal curve of distribution of quality, no matter what breeding decisions are made. There are a limited number of quality owners. This creates competition for quality owners among horses.

                  Just because some individuals are repulsed by the thought of equine slaughter or eating their equine friend, trying to impose THEIR opinions on others, limit and control others to force them to comply with their opinions is repugnant. You can not FORCE somebody to feel like you do about YOUR animals. You can impose regulations about minimum care levels that are required for owned animals, but you can't force change of thoughts on people you don't personally agree with. Countries have gone to war over dictators who have sought to impose thought control.

                  The slaughter industry is PART of the equine industry, and needs to be accepted as such, regulated adequately with care and transport, and not swept under the rug, ignored, or abolished, just because some people don't like it. There are other parts of the equine industry that I don't personally like, am interested in, or participate in, but do not attempt to enforce my opinions on others who ARE.

                  Attempts to limit breeders production, reduce numbers of horses bred, produce fewer horses only reduces the size of the entire industry, drives prices up of horses, feed, services etc, makes it harder for regular people to buy and own horses, more expensive and harder to bring new owners and riders into the equine industry. I don't think that anyone who likes horses wants to see this sort of thing happen. I like to see horses readily available and affordable to encourage more people to be able to pursue their interest in horses. That is how the entire industry gets and stays healthy, strong, which is good for both people and horses. Since the meat industry is driven by the desire of people to eat meat, limiting the number of horses available has nothing to do with the industry itself, other than driving up prices for both meat and riding horses, and the services that are related.
                  www.cordovafarm.weebly.com

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by silver2 View Post
                    I'm sorry but that's complete bullshit.

                    As for the "Queen Asshat" I think what she does is fine, she buys essentially joblots of horses from the track and sorts through them for the ones that are sound/sane enough to be riding horses and then sends the rest to the place they were headed anyway. This is called being a horse dealer and it's been a legal way to make a living for about 10,000 years. The trainers known damn well what is happening, don't kid yourself, but this way at least their nice horses get a chance. Horses are livestock and I have no problem with them being slaughtered and at least put to some use if they have no use as work animals. Not every horse "deserves" life long financial support merely by virtue of being equine.

                    I also laugh every time someone says "oh, I rescued my 17hh, big bodied, well bred, pretty, and sound TB from the track!". No honey, you got a good deal- you didn't "rescue" shit. That's a desirable animal who would've been sold to someone.
                    absolutely

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      In order for horses to be used in zoos, kennels and sanctuaries they can not be euthanized chemically. The need to be put down by gunshot or captive bolt. Also in many areas you can not bury a horse that has been chemically euthanized. In fact in many areas you can't bury a horse at all. Many areas of the country don't have rendering plants anymore.
                      Patty
                      www.rivervalefarm.com
                      Follow us on facebook - https://www.facebook.com/pages/River...ref=ts&fref=ts

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by Kyzteke View Post
                        Death is such a stranger to most of us -- we try so hard to remove ourselves from it -- and often it isn't pretty -- not for pigs or horses or people. But it IS a fact of life and that will never change. But LIFE can be pretty damn cruel as well...take a stroll through some long term care facilities one of these days....

                        And banning slaughter before some workable, practical solution was in place was just plain stupid. It's a shame more people didn't speak up THEN...but they were afraid they'd be labeled cruel or something.
                        Originally posted by Equilibrium View Post
                        Just like some of you probably wouldn't like me because I don't think slaughter, when done humanely, is a problem.
                        A whole lot to agree with here. Daydream Believer and Nancy M to mention a few. Life has it's realities, as well put by the comment about take a look at our nursing homes for humans.

                        I am not against slaughter, particularly if there was a smaller local place to drive your animal to - to avoid the stress, and if the kill was humane. After that it is just a carcass. I would prefer to do the TB thing and take the heart and head home to bury.

                        Our local state horse campgrounds now 'count' the horses 'in' and the horses 'out.' You may take more out than you bring in, NOT visa versa. Some farms are finding extra animals in their pastures and now put locks on the gates.

                        If you think that you are upset about what goes on in our backyard -- don't watch those tapes about Asia or other places in the world. I can never get those images out of my mind. They haunt me. But I have never been haunted about holding one of my own for the mercy that I did for a friend. I accepted that role when I took the job of the relationship and enjoyed the years of companionship.

                        It does deeply sadden me that not everyone practices responsibility as a value. No easy solutions, never has been.
                        Don't let anyone tell you that your ideas or dreams are foolish. There is a millionaire walking around who invented the pool noodle.

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Donella View Post
                          Well, I am horrified by it all, just horrified that people like this exist. But then hey, what the hell, isn't this the opinion of all the farmers out there? Your animal is only allowed to live until production stops peaking, usually WAY before their natural time.
                          This is what drives me nuts -- when people like you make generalizations just to fit their emotions. My grandparents farmed and cared about their animals and treated them humanely. They had a purpose (make money, feed the family, etc.) but that doesn't mean my grandparents as farmers were heartless or like the example in this thread.

                          I also live in a farming community. The farmer (who recently gave up his cows, couldn't compete against the big dairy farms) is the kindest man and took good care of his cows. He felt bad when lightning would take one out or bloat got them...and it wasn't just for financial reasons.

                          I too am for the option of slaughter and am sorry that horses now are subjected to longer trips and conditions out of this country and are no longer monitored by rules and regulations in the U.S. I do agree 100% that the woman in the example in this post went way over the top and came across extremely heartless, definitely her words made me sad (calling horses "trash," etc.). But...as extremely gruesome as she worded things, she has made some realistic points. Sad ones, but true.
                          "Dreams are the touchstone of our characters." Henry David Thoreau
                          Touchstone Farm
                          www.bytouchstonefarm.com

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by Kyzteke View Post
                            Well, many hotels DO allow dogs/cats. I stay in them all the time. Motel 6 for example.
                            I havent stayed in a Motel 6 for a few years, but when I was out of the ones that allowed dogs they couldnt be over 30 lbs. Sure with 40lbs dogs you could be ok, but my 90lbs lab? He aint getting in there.

                            Back when I was seriously poor (as opposed to now, when I am just averagely poor), I arrived in Colorado with about $50 to my name. Me and my German Shepherd dog (all 110 lbs) lived for a month in my car.
                            And I would do that in a heartbeat for my dogs. Wouldnt go where they couldnt, but I dont, and from the sound of your post you dont have kids. I couldnt, nor would I except parents to force their children to live in a car to keep a dog.

                            Or these people who say..."I'm moving and the landlord doesn't allow dogs/cats/ferrets/whatever." Then don't live there!! Pick another place! I've live all over this country and ALWAYS had at least one dog. Maybe I didn't live in the best places, but giving up the dog(s) was never an option.
                            Not an option for me either BUT back when I was looking for an apartment for me to live in only a handful would let me take my dog. And the ones that did wanted to charge me DOUBLE rent a month to keep him there.

                            Again, it depends how loyal and determined you are.
                            I agree that I would never leave my dog, but its not always as simple as you or I would like it to be.
                            Check out my Equine Genetics Blog! Updated April 25th with Splashed White!!!
                            http://equinegenetics.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              And, it's also not unusual for someone to walk out and find a horse tied to their trailer that wasn't there when they went in.
                              The young man who starts my horses told me that he went to one of the auctions to check out the tack and horse equipment. He said he saw people pulling in with horse trailers, taking the horses off, looking around to see who was watching, and then tying the horses to other people's trailers and leaving - f a s t ! ! !
                              Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
                              Now apparently completely invisible!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X