• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Top 25 mare families in the world

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by alexandra View Post
    As Kareen already said. Theere is no offical family numbering in Hanoverian breeding. Someone thought has collected mare line information a for making things easier numbered the damlines he listed. I find a 763 there and it icludses the privately owned stallion Tresor of Belgium (it does not give info on his show record tough) but also listed for this family are Olympic star under Todd Minikus, Borsalino Heike Kemmer, Walloony Tomy Hassmann.
    And this should be the hanoverian mare family with the most success in international GP jumping ? I wonder who is lacking information there.
    Not to interrupt the thread but Tresor was on the HK Olympic showjumping team. His show record is impressive. He's owned by the Lams.
    "Sometimes you just have to shut up and color."

    Comment


    • #42
      Keeping everything is perspective... meaningfull or not... it is nice to see one of my mare (yrantha mare line) being in the 8th position of this list.

      Now should I be sad if what I consider my best mare line (1792) not being on that list? Nope.

      Every piece of information is always great to help you make your opinion . More info you have, better decision you take and learning never stopped. I try to take statistics, opinion, index and research as a piece of a puzzle hoping to get the big picture alltogether one of these days.

      Thanks to all for making this all so interesting and informative.
      Suzanne
      bloomingtonfarm.com
      Breeder of Royal Dutch Sport Horse

      Comment


      • #43
        Tom - great post! And a whole new and logical way of looking at rankings, that's for sure.
        Siegi Belz
        www.stalleuropa.com
        2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
        Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by siegi b. View Post
          Tom - great post! And a whole new and logical way of looking at rankings, that's for sure.
          Totally agree.. very insightful.. helps when you are looking at all these motherlines and trying to figure out how to apply them.
          Hickstead 1996-2011 Godspeed
          " Hickstead is simply the best and He lives forever in our hearts"
          Akasha 1992-2012 - I will always love you sweet girl.

          Comment


          • #45
            Thanks to everyone who expressed appreciation.
            Morningside Stud
            http://www.morningside-stud.com
            http://twitter.com/MorningsideStud
            http://www.facebook.com/MorningsideStud

            Comment


            • #46
              I still think the Monday Night Football analogy is pretty good!!!
              The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
              H. Cate

              Comment


              • #47
                Only problem here is that if stallion B has too few offspring, the percentages will change in greater magnitude because there are so few numbers versus the stallion that has more offspring on the ground. Thus you also need to know the reliability of the statistic/percentage.

                Yeah, that's why I like the FN's statistics. I see Sir Donnerhall has the highest breeding value for dressage BUT his reliability is 88 percent whereas Donnerhalls is a bit lower but his reliability is 99 percent.

                I HATED statistics in Uni but the one thing I do remember is that they can be used to "prove" anything. You have to know how to read them to get any value from them at all.
                www.svhanoverians.com

                "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

                Comment


                • #48
                  There is little substantive difference between a statistical reliability of 98 and a reliabilty of 99. What is driving Donnerhall's very high reliability is the fact that he was a good sire PLUS the very very large number of offspring.

                  TH FN index is very suspect, in my opinion, because it overweights to an incredible degree performance test results, Bundeschampionate results, and young horse clases. So it is very common for a young stallion with not a single progeny in sport to be very highly ranked (an example is Stakkato early in his career) if he did great at the Bucha and the HLP.

                  Someone wrote about that each peice of data/information can be useful and in some respects this is true. But one must recognize the limitations of the data and analyses or silly conclusions are drawn such a 4-y-o stallion X is the "best" sire in Germany or mareline Y is the "best" motherline in the world.
                  Morningside Stud
                  http://www.morningside-stud.com
                  http://twitter.com/MorningsideStud
                  http://www.facebook.com/MorningsideStud

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by tom View Post
                    Or consider whose record is more impressive in producing Nobel Laureates in Literature? Ireland has one-third (4) the number of Nobel prizes in literature as does the USA (12). Who impresses you the most by their production of Nobels in Literature? Ireland or the USA? For me the answer is easy: Ireland.
                    I find this example the most interesting in terms of manipulation of data. Now I got my Master's in Irish Lit and lived there for a year, so please don't think I'm anti-Irish, but you could also look at the distribution of the prizes:

                    Seamus Heaney 1995
                    Samuel Beckett 1969
                    George Bernard Shaw 1925
                    Samuel Butler Yeats 1923

                    ...and argue that Irish writers, having won only a single Prize in the last 39 years, are declining in talent. (I know! The blasphemy!) And what of the fact that Ireland's most studied author -- James Joyce -- doesn't even make the list? Surely this omission was due to politics.

                    My point is that rankings are only a single factor. If you don't pick the right stallion for the right mare, the rest is, well... blarney.
                    Kendra -- Runningwater Warmbloods
                    Home of EM Raleska (Rascalino/ Warkant) and Donatella M (Furstenball/ Jazz Time)
                    'Like' us on Facebook

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Sure, politics plays a role. But my example was to show how the denominators must be considered.

                      In any case, isn't Toni Morrison the only US-born Nobel Laureate in Literature to have won the prize in the last 46 years, since John Steinbeck won in 1962, or am I forgtting someone? (Not naturalizd citizen but US-born.) That puts Ireland's 1-in-39 years in a different light, not even taking into account the size of the relative populations!

                      Of course rankings are only one factor when making breeding decisions. But some rankings may be so useless that they should not factor into the decision at all!
                      Morningside Stud
                      http://www.morningside-stud.com
                      http://twitter.com/MorningsideStud
                      http://www.facebook.com/MorningsideStud

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by tom View Post
                        TH FN index is very suspect, in my opinion, because it overweights to an incredible degree performance test results, Bundeschampionate results, and young horse clases. So it is very common for a young stallion with not a single progeny in sport to be very highly ranked (an example is Stakkato early in his career) if he did great at the Bucha and the HLP.
                        Tom I have been shaking my head over this (over all of these statistical analyses), and yet I am not surprised.

                        It'd be interesting to see the data submitted to different criteria in analyses, and see how much the standings change.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Precisely. But some people would rather just accept rankings, no matter how suspect they might be, because they like the results and/or are too intellectually lazy to do any further investigations.
                          Morningside Stud
                          http://www.morningside-stud.com
                          http://twitter.com/MorningsideStud
                          http://www.facebook.com/MorningsideStud

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by tom View Post
                            Precisely. But some people would rather just accept rankings, no matter how suspect they might be, because they like the results and/or are too intellectually lazy to do any further investigations.
                            Your theory is very interesting Tom. Noteworthy, actually. I've had some of these thoughts myself, since my stallion with one FEI offspring was ranked 25th, I've often wondered where everyone else would be with only 19 offspring on the ground.

                            However, I suspect you might be taking shots at Reece and me... that's fine if that's what you want to do, but the collateral damage cuts a pretty wide swath throughout the world.

                            I think it's possible for you to effect a positive change in the system, which would be good for everyone. I also think you could do so without much resistance if you can keep yourself from insulting too many people along the way. JMHO
                            http://ShowjumpersUSA.com
                            CAMPESINO (1990 - 2008)
                            Capitol I - Sacramento Song xx
                            http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/annalisasmith

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Agreed.

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #55
                                Originally posted by tom View Post
                                Precisely. But some people would rather just accept rankings, no matter how suspect they might be, because they like the results and/or are too intellectually lazy to do any further investigations.
                                I am one of those people who accept the rankings (I certainly don't use them to make my breeding decisions though) as they are published, because I have no other means, nor do I have an agenda to poke holes in them. Could they be compiled in a more deterministic fashion ? Maybe , but then one would have to have all the data that they used for the compilation.

                                Tom, You have twisted my words over and over again . I have NEVER said that the Holsteiner model was the only road to breeding top showjumpers , nor have I ever said that another model was inferior. What I have consistently said was that if you are not breeding within the rules , regs and model of the Holsteiner Verband , then you are not breeding Holsteiners. I am breeding HOLTEINERS. I breed with ONLY stallions approved by the Holsteiner Verband , or my AHHA registry and out of ONLY Holsteiner mothers.

                                This drives you nuts ! What also drives you nuts is my reporting of the top 25 mare lines in the world which Holsteiners currently hold 12 of the top 25 spots in the world, including the #1 position. What also drives you nuts is my posting of the list of sires from the last Olympics that had sired two or more offspring. Out of 12 sires that had accomplished this magnificent breeding feat....9 out of the 12 were Holsteiner sires, with them holding the first 7 positions on that list !

                                Then we have a Holsteiner winning the Olympic Gold in eventing. Then we have a Holsteiner (Carlson vom Dach) who helped Will Simpson and the U.S. secure team gold with his last round.

                                After all this amazing Holsteiner production........we now have doubting "Tom" trying to poke holes in that production simply because it doesn't adhere to the model he represents.

                                You should be careful when you perform "Tom's" compilation. The Holsteiner studbook only breeds with 7,000 mares. When you get through , they could very possibly be ranked even higher than they are now !
                                Last edited by Bayhawk; Dec. 3, 2008, 12:54 PM.

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Excellent post Reece! Couldn't have said it better myself!

                                  *** by the way, I love the Hosteiner Chatroom bb. Thanks for getting it up and running. :-)
                                  http://ShowjumpersUSA.com
                                  CAMPESINO (1990 - 2008)
                                  Capitol I - Sacramento Song xx
                                  http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/annalisasmith

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Thank you Tom for pointing out a very serious problem in the scientific community (and coming up with rankings is science in a way). Even in my line of work, where peer-reviews articles are daily business, I sometimes scratch my head and go "ouch" when I have to read statistical analysis on such delicate issues as stem cell biology or gene therapy - knowing where wrong conclusions based on "statistics" (that for some odd reason, everybody seems to believe w/o question) can lead from here.

                                    FN/WBFSH etc rankings are flawed on many levels. I read them, and I acknowledge them (and all the hard work that goes into them), but I sure wish sometimes these organizations would employ the help of statisticians and experts in the field to get it done better. Or maybe these guys are already at work? That would be a scary thought indeed ...
                                    www.trakehners-international.com
                                    www.fontana-syndikat.de

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #58
                                      Originally posted by ShowjumpersUSA View Post
                                      Excellent post Reece! Couldn't have said it better myself!

                                      *** by the way, I love the Hosteiner Chatroom bb. Thanks for getting it up and running. :-)
                                      Thanks ! It is the way I feel .

                                      Here is the link to the BB http://www.bulletinboards.com/messag...hol101&SBS=yes

                                      There is an interesting discussion about the AHHA's approval of Hickstead over there.

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by Bayhawk View Post
                                        Thanks ! It is the way I feel .

                                        Here is the link to the BB http://www.bulletinboards.com/messag...hol101&SBS=yes

                                        There is an interesting discussion about the AHHA's approval of Hickstead over there.
                                        Reece,

                                        I try exceptionally hard to stay out of the fray but I could not let this go.

                                        I value your opinion on breeding but noting that there is an "interesting" discussion on Hickstead's AHHA approval that you started was not very classy IMO. Escpecially since the dam is by Ekstein which was Tom's stallion - seems like a deliberate pot shot to me.

                                        This is a bulletin board and I love the info I get here - not only from you but Tom and Bonnie and Viney etc... lots of good stuff here.. but shots below the belt are really uncalled for.

                                        Very dissapointed as you seem above those types of tactics.
                                        Hickstead 1996-2011 Godspeed
                                        " Hickstead is simply the best and He lives forever in our hearts"
                                        Akasha 1992-2012 - I will always love you sweet girl.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by EquineLVR View Post
                                          Reece,

                                          I try exceptionally hard to stay out of the fray but I could not let this go.

                                          I value your opinion on breeding but noting that there is an "interesting" discussion on Hickstead's AHHA approval that you started was not very classy IMO. Escpecially since the dam is by Ekstein which was Tom's stallion - seems like a deliberate pot shot to me.

                                          This is a bulletin board and I love the info I get here - not only from you but Tom and Bonnie and Viney etc... lots of good stuff here.. but shots below the belt are really uncalled for.

                                          Very dissapointed as you seem above those types of tactics.
                                          I guess you've only been reading bayhawk's Dr. Jeykll posts?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X