• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Top 25 mare families in the world

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I sorta wonder whether it really is the "dam/mother line of the competitors they are looking at or the dam line of the sire or any other mix or match.

    At one point I think xx mare family 9(c?) was actually listed years ago and at the time the only reference I could see to that mare line in the competitors was through Erdball xx who showed up frequently as a dam sire only but it was not as the actual dam line of any competitors. So take it with a grain of salt.

    Comment


    • The study I refer to in my earlier post was done in Holstein. The super high scorers (47 and up) at the mare inspections were not the top performers nor the top performer producers. They were very pretty and correct as their primary attributes and rarely went on to top in sport nor produced top in sport. Not advocating producing incorrect horses - obviously - but to cause one to consider why that should be? Shouldn't the most highly scored inspection horses be performing and/or producing at the highest level average and not as an exception? Are they really aiming to produce just Barbie dolls? Doubt that. Rarely is it the case the highest inspection scorers are in the top 100 FEI jumpers in the world so obviously some re-evaluation of inspection standards and/or judging needed to happen. This study was a few years ago before they opened their book to outside stallions many of whom would not meet Holsteiner type. The most successful jumpers in the world right now are more often than not HYBRIDS of French, German, Dutch, and Belgium bloodlines. Some have Holsteiner mothers but not Holsteiner fathers or visa versa, but far fewer have both Holsteiner mothers and fathers. If you are breeding for sport rather than just for inspection success, it is hard to ignore this reality.

      Comment


      • The study I refer to in my earlier post was done in Holstein. The super high scorers (47 and up) at the mare inspections were not the top performers nor the top performer producers. They were very pretty and correct as their primary attributes and rarely went on to top in sport nor produced top in sport. Not advocating producing incorrect horses - obviously - but to cause one to consider why that should be? Shouldn't the most highly scored inspection horses be performing and/or producing at the highest level average and not as an exception? Are they really aiming to produce just Barbie dolls? Doubt that. Rarely is it the case the highest inspection scorers are in the top 100 FEI jumpers in the world so obviously some re-evaluation of inspection standards and/or judging needed to happen. This study was a few years ago before they opened their book to outside stallions many of whom would not meet Holsteiner type. The most successful jumpers in the world right now are more often than not HYBRIDS of French, German, Dutch, and Belgium bloodlines. Some have Holsteiner mothers but not Holsteiner fathers or visa versa, but far fewer have both Holsteiner mothers and fathers. If you are breeding for sport rather than just for inspection success, it is hard to ignore this reality.

        Comment


        • One other point. There are a lot of breeding "rules" heavily promoted on this board, but one has to wonder about the success of Edward Doyle and Rusty Stewart who break many of these rules and are producing amazing horses -many horses- winning WC Qualifiers, WC Finals and competing at Nations Cup level. And the rule promoters have not done nearly as much in the same decades. Never can substitute a good horseman's feel and experience with those clinging to their statistics and loud vocalizations.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            Originally posted by omare View Post
            I sorta wonder whether it really is the "dam/mother line of the competitors they are looking at or the dam line of the sire or any other mix or match.

            At one point I think xx mare family 9(c?) was actually listed years ago and at the time the only reference I could see to that mare line in the competitors was through Erdball xx who showed up frequently as a dam sire only but it was not as the actual dam line of any competitors. So take it with a grain of salt.
            Omare , your take is incorrect. The mare family rankings are comprised of horses from individual families competing at the top of the sport. They are scored by the stamm. The new rankings have just come out and Holsteiner stamm 776 is #1 in the world again. This ranking has nothing to do with the fathers. It is entirely about the female family.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by knowthatifly View Post
              One other point. There are a lot of breeding "rules" heavily promoted on this board, but one has to wonder about the success of Edward Doyle and Rusty Stewart who break many of these rules and are producing amazing horses -many horses- winning WC Qualifiers, WC Finals and competing at Nations Cup level. And the rule promoters have not done nearly as much in the same decades. Never can substitute a good horseman's feel and experience with those clinging to their statistics and loud vocalizations.
              Right and add Tatra, Newsprint and the Chapot's to that list.
              Fan of Sea Accounts

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                Originally posted by knowthatifly View Post
                One other point. There are a lot of breeding "rules" heavily promoted on this board, but one has to wonder about the success of Edward Doyle and Rusty Stewart who break many of these rules and are producing amazing horses -many horses- winning WC Qualifiers, WC Finals and competing at Nations Cup level. And the rule promoters have not done nearly as much in the same decades. Never can substitute a good horseman's feel and experience with those clinging to their statistics and loud vocalizations.
                When you breed Holsteiner horses you must follow rules. Those rules are responsible for the Holsteiner Verband Studbook being ranked #1 in the world. Those rules are responsible for Holsteiner stamm 776 being the #1 mare family in the world. Those rules are responsible for the Holsteiners Cristallo and Casall being ranked #1 and #2 in the world recently. Those rules are responsible for producing 60 of the top 100 sires in the world according to the WBFSH..... 60 % ! Those rules are largely responsible for the success of KWPN and BWP.

                Those same rules keep the Dutch and Belgians flocking back in to Germany every year to buy more good Holsteiner fillies , mares and Stallions. Holsteiner breeders don't go to Holland and Belgium to buy horses. Their rules have afforded them this luxury of not needing to.

                You don't have to follow these rules. There are more roads than one that lead to the Grand Prix ring. I just happen to choose to follow the rules and it works for me.

                Until you can beat this model laid out before you......don't knock it because you make yourself look very silly.

                Comment


                • Do they list the competing horses that comprise the stamms list?

                  What is the list of names below the stamm? The names listed below the 771 for example include dead sires-i dont do math and I dont get this.

                  (Ramiro Z
                  Locarno
                  Promised Land
                  Acorado I
                  Landos
                  Calvados I
                  Calvados II

                  (vader u. moeder)
                  (Raimond u. Valine)
                  (Lord Calidos u. Wurzel)
                  (Niet geregistreerd u. Vorregister)
                  (Acord II u. Doreen XIII)
                  (Lord u. Uta V)
                  (Cor de la Bryère u. Biserta)
                  (Cor de la Bryère u. Biserta

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    Originally posted by omare View Post
                    Do they list the competing horses that comprise the stamms list?

                    What is the list of names below the stamm? The names listed below the 771 for example include dead sires-i dont do math and I dont get this.

                    (Ramiro Z
                    Locarno
                    Promised Land
                    Acorado I
                    Landos
                    Calvados I
                    Calvados II

                    (vader u. moeder)
                    (Raimond u. Valine)
                    (Lord Calidos u. Wurzel)
                    (Niet geregistreerd u. Vorregister)
                    (Acord II u. Doreen XIII)
                    (Lord u. Uta V)
                    (Cor de la Bryère u. Biserta)
                    (Cor de la Bryère u. Biserta
                    All the horses listed below the stamm ARE FROM the stamm. From Ramiro on down they are all stamm 776.

                    It's also important to note that these are just SOME of the horses from stamm 776 contributing tot he mare family ranking.

                    This stamm 776 also provides the Holsteiner Verband Studbook with the most mares entered for breeding. It's truely a remarkable mare family.
                    Last edited by Bayhawk; Mar. 28, 2013, 07:45 PM.

                    Comment


                    • I think I understand that they are all from stamm 776 but how does that relate to the 2012 ranking of stamms as they are not presently performing (i apologize as you can tell I can be a bit child like literal at times- I dont get what those stallions stamms have to do with this years ranking or is it a cumulative ranking from the beginning of record keeping?)

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        Originally posted by omare View Post
                        I think I understand that they are all from stamm 776 but how does that relate to the 2012 ranking of stamms as they are not presently performing (i apologize as you can tell I can be a bit child like literal at times- I dont get what those stallions stamms have to do with this years ranking or is it a cumulative ranking from the beginning of record keeping?)
                        Yes a cumulative ranking from the beginning of record keeping. I know of at least 50 more international jumpers from this stamm. They would never have room to list them all in the tiny block. Those listed were also major contributors in their respective times. All horses from stamm 776 that are or have jumped internationally contribute to the ranking ,Just like they do from any of the other stamms.

                        This is why this ranking is very important. You get to see what the top female families are producing stacked up against every other female family of any book. It's quite useful for me. This is why I buy and breed horses from stamm 776. The genetics are obviously there.....#1 in the world for the production of international showjumpers.

                        Comment


                        • it looks the points are based only on the handful of horses listed (and why does ramiro Z get 120 points--and Acordado I thought died very young-gets 20--did he get to GP level?)

                          Clearly, I dont get the methodology.

                          Comment


                          • yes..helpful and interesting. Is there a current version?

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X