• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Not a cool thing to do....negative 'opinions' public...

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Not a cool thing to do....negative 'opinions' public...

    Sometime back, a comment was made here at COTH....
    regarding warmblood /arabian crosses...
    It was a bit disturbing to see it was from a long time member of this forum. And I assume (since I've never met this person) a horseperson of some experience. A newbie might be excused from the faux paux...

    The quote I am referring to from this poster comes after a statement they made that GOV inspectors have seen some nice arabian/warmblood cross examples, Rosenthal/arabian specifically...this poster goes on to say (as regards to a recent Oldenburg Verband inspection)
    " I recently saw two Rosenthal/arabian foals, one was gorgeous, the other, so-so, (pretty but lacking in movement, elasticity, etc. ) There was a vast difference in the quality of the mares and it showed in the offspring."*
    This poster was describing quite a unique and RECOGNIZABLE scenario. Especially by the owners of the above foals and mares. The poster also conveniently left out some important details.

    1. the 'so-so' foal was APPROVED that day. the difference being the other 'gorgeous' foal went premium. I guess ‘so-so’ is now acceptable to GOV...
    2. The dam of the ‘so-so’ foal, obviously at the other end of the 'quality' spectrum in the 'vast difference' comment made by the poster, was already a Main Book GOV approved mare with 4 foals to her credit. ALL four approved, two of which went premium. Her production speaks for itself. She is also 18 yrs old, drawn down by the foal, far smaller than the plump 5 yr old 15.2h dam of the ‘gorgeous’ foal. The poster’s 'vastly different in quality showed in the offspring' statement left an entirely different impression.
    3. This poster, (along with the inspectors), observed the 'so-so' foal for two minutes. Hardly enough time for someone to make a valid public criticism of the overall quality of the foal. At least the inspectors always caution that they have to judge based on what they are seeing 'AT THAT MOMENT IN TIME'. and that it in no way reflects on the past or future quality or development of that animal. Hardly enough time for an onlooker to make such a rash negative statement publicly about 'quality'.
    The foal was 'quality ' enough to be approved, but did not 'show off' well enough to go premium. Foals who do not express themselves strongly in inspection may not impress as well, even if they have good conformation or movement. It’s a subjective process.
    In any event, what was the point in making this negative opinion public?
    To make this kind of negative comment on a public forum like COTH regarding someone else’s horses is just unfathomable.

    oh yea.. I guess it’s pretty obvious.....that 'so-so' foal and her dam are mine.......

    I thought a long time before speaking out about this. I even contacted the poster privately to no avail.
    I just had to defend my old gal, df China Doll..She deserves it... here is a link to all of this mare's approved GOV foals.


    The bay filly with four whites (Rachel Arabela) is the ‘so-so’ foal. And the grey mare is the dam (China Doll).
    One of the foals is IronStone, by Ironman, now,6 yrs old & 17.1h. he’s the only one old enough to be competing. He's eventing. With a 14 yr old up.

  • #2
    This forum discusses, and yes evaluates, foals, mares, and stallions all the time. How was this any different?


    • #3
      I'm sure it stung, but..... everyone is entitled to an opinion. Surprisingly few people actually read every thread on CoTH (or even read CoTH at all) and remember every detail - my point is that the horse will speak for itself. Don't sweat the small stuff, honestly.
      Visit us on Facebook!


      • Original Poster

        Well, that wasn't my point. I was not concerned about the opinion, because as you said, everyone has an opinion. It was the publishing of the opinion and the inaccuracy of the statements that were the most annoying. Valid, constructive criticism can sometimes be helpful. This was anything but.
        I would have felt the same if I had read these comments about the horses of friends or aquaintances. Wrong is wrong..
        Too many people today 'hide' behind technology. It seems to encourage bad manners and bring out the worst in some.
        And I was not concerned about how many people may have read this. I read it..
        I don't really think this forum, or any other civilized venue is the place to criticize someone's horses, performances, etc . 'Evaluating' is not the same as what was said here.
        I was not concerned about a potential client 'recognizing' the horses.
        There was no value or purpose in the comments..
        I do think that many owners would have been similarly irritated and 'sensitive' with the manner in which the 'opinion' was presented.
        I don't find it that odd that one would want to step up and defend one of their horses they felt was inaccurately portrayed..I just wanted to point it out, set a record straight on a nice mare who has done very well.


        • #5
          There is no "accurate' or"inaccurate" where opinions are concerned. If you don't want to hear them keep your stock at home.
          Last edited by Equibrit; Oct. 23, 2013, 07:58 PM.
          ... _. ._ .._. .._


          • #6
            The breeder of our mare Prime Time started with a Russian Arabian mare. He also got a lot of negative feedback from the other breeders in Germany. Time proved that he was correct. Feel free to check out my website for more about this mareline.

            Sometimes you have to put up with the comments. Time will tell if you are making good breeding choices.



            • #7
              With respect you are coming across as a jilted owner.

              Opinions are free. Voicing them on an open forum like COTH is also free. In defending your mare/offspring you have voiced your opinion too. All's fair.


              • #8
                Originally posted by Kerole View Post
                With respect you are coming across as a jilted owner.
                I can understand why the OP would be irritated and would want to defend her horses and her successful breeding program.

                Wouldn't most of us have done the same ?


                • #9

                  The poster from what I recalled didn't say your foal was hideous and that she had to go wash out her eyes with bleach after watching him trot... Not did she even name him specifically.

                  She simply said he was in her opinion, so-so, meaning average.
                  Average gets approved, above average get premium, so it's inline with the inspection results.

                  Based on only the pictures I can see, I would probably agree with that assessment. He's cute and decently built and will probably be a very nice riding horse, but based on that snapshot in time he appears to be a nice enough but not spectacular baby.

                  But that is based on one moment in time, he may not be showing to his best that day. Foals are tough to judge. Maybe he is spectacular but is not at the best growth phase to judge.

                  Also since it's this particular foal under discussion - he is the end result, what the mare has produced previously isn't really relevant.

                  I get it that you love your mare and foal, that's important but understand that not everyone has the same preferences.
                  Last edited by Moderator 1; Oct. 27, 2013, 07:37 AM.


                  • #10
                    I would have never seen your "so-so" foal had you not started this thread.
                    Charlie Brown (1994 bay TB X gelding)
                    White Star (2004 grey TB gelding)

                    Mystical Moment, 1977-2010.


                    • #11
                      OP, chill out.


                      • #12
                        I never saw the original post/comment, but I'd like to point out that foals aren't "approved", they are simply registered. I have never seen a registry turn down a foal; if both parents are approved, the foals are registered, simple as that.
                        Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!


                        • #13
                          The great sire Ulft was a 'second tier' rating as a foal


                          Time will tell, after all. Until your jumper starts pulling rails or your dressage horse cross canters I would not get too upset by opinions of foals.

                          Different opinions are why we have so many breeds and types of horses in the first place.

                          Personally I find some WB foals to be coarse or 'meaty' and lately have seen some hyper-reactive sorts.
                          That doesn't make them any less competitive when they grow up. Judging babies is, well, judging babies.


                          • #14
                            Mardi, no I would not.

                            I may follow the 'offending' post with a defence of my mare/foal and their looks/performance that day.

                            I would not start a new thread on the topic. I would not make two lengthy posts saying it is cruel and unkind to voice an opinion on COTH that did not match mine.


                            • #15
                              I dont know about the USA, but in Germany the premium means nothing..... It means that at that moment the commission thinks, that the foal might be an improvement compared to the mother.... If the foal is not having its best day at inspection it doesnt get a premium..
                              Most of my foals got premium... So what... doesnt make them any better...


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by AliCat518 View Post
                                I would have never seen your "so-so" foal had you not started this thread.
                                I don't know why anyone would "out" their foal as being one that was negatively commented upon anonymously. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Whoever was commenting on your foal is as entitled to hers as you are. Frankly, her comments seem relatively innocous to me. You disagree, which is fine, but she was hardly dragging the foal and your breeding program through the mud. Luckily, the people whose opinion counted on that day (the GOV) was that your foal was nice enough Congrats!
                                "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"


                                • #17
                                  After reading the OP here and then searching for the other post it references, I take it that the OP most likely is not taking issue with the assessment of the foal, but rather the comment that the difference between the premium foal and her own was understandable due to quality differences between the mares of said foals.

                                  FWIW, I did not read that post as particularly inflammatory (I have had much worse said about even my best mare), but I can understand loving a mare and wanting to defend her. I agree with the others that mentioned that it would have been more prudent to bring this up in the other thread in order to perhaps get an explanation from the "offending" poster about why they said it. It could be that there are differences between the mares that made that stallion more preferable for one over the other (I believe the previous thread was about stallions crossing to a certain type of mare) and then the poster could have had the opportunity to clarify and perhaps even educate about this.

                                  Furthermore, I do not think that the poster was commenting on the mare's production quality, but rather the mare herself. OP, I am glad that your mare is producing high quality offspring for you! Be happy because ultimately what we as breeders are trying to do is to breed mares that out-produce themselves anyway!


                                  • #18
                                    When you show, do inspections- whichever- you are presenting your animal for an evaluation in the moment..... Relatively in public. If you are that upset over a pretty generic statement- the horse world is not for you. You really need to have a thicker skin.

                                    I used to get some comments about one of my babies, gasp chestnut filly with bling out of an unregistered mare (but with a performance record) and a not super popular stallion (double gasp). eh. 4 years later she was 6 out of 30 some at Devon, at 5 she hauled her Ammy mother around Devon (me) and people were seeking me out to make offers on her.

                                    The comments may sting at the time, but time will tell. And please- those comments were mild. Put on big girl breeding panties and let it go. You are letting a vague comment eat at you.
                                    Come to the dark side, we have cookies


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by ancientoaks View Post
                                      I don't really think this forum, or any other civilized venue is the place to criticize someone's horses, performances, etc . 'Evaluating' is not the same as what was said here.
                                      Criticizing (often recognizable or identified) horses, riders, trainers, judges,
                                      breeders, course designers, show facilities, organizers, etc., is very much part of the culture of this forum. As long as it does not degenerate into "name calling" or the like, it is perfectly acceptable.

                                      Other people are then free to defend the horse, rider..., and often do.

                                      There is also plenty of "constructive criticism" .

                                      But the "unconstructive criticism" is perfectly acceptable as long as it is polite.

                                      chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).


                                      • #20
                                        If this is the worst thing that has happened to you lately, consider yourself very lucky.
                                        "I don't know what your generation's fascination is with documenting your every thought... but I can assure you, they're not all diamonds." Mr. G