• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

WB registries that will accept PHR papers - update: some discrepencies?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WB registries that will accept PHR papers - update: some discrepencies?

    I am looking at this awesome 2yo filly... Checks every box thus far. However they never registered her although everything is a go to do so.

    She has fantastic lines for sport and it shows. One of my big regrets with my broodmare is that I didn't get her inspections out of the way when she was younger (she has developed non hereditary vision issues, she goes in September but I am sure her scores would have been better and she would have moved out more before the vision loss) and told myself I wanted to get any mares inspected as early as possible just in case I decide to go that route.

    It will cost me $800 some dollars to do the JC registration. Honestly that is what I am leaning towards doing, I would rather not worry about it. However I remember there were a few registries that accepted PHR papers and wanted to know what those were.

    Also if you were in my shoes (and as I mentioned this filly, so far, seems to be all that. She would still need to prove herself however signs point towards a future as an eventing broodmare, her sire also sired a Rolex horse and I love her dam line too) what would you do? Is the JC paperwork as important as I think it is or is PHR perfectly fine?
    Last edited by magicteetango; Apr. 16, 2013, 09:05 PM.
  • Original Poster

    #2
    Well Old/ISR doesn't and I can't seem to find that on the RPSI website... Thinking JC is my best choice for sure! I probably should have just hit up Google to begin with!

    Comment


    • #3
      Id just do the JC paperwork and be done with it. Offers you more options as far as breeding goes.
      Different Times Equestrian Ventures at Hidden Spring Ranch
      www.DifferentTimesEquestrianVentures.com

      Comment


      • #4
        Ditto on getting her JC registered. That's what I did when I bought one of my mares as an unregistered 2-yr-old. I considered it an investment for me and "insurance" for her--in that she would produce registrable foals when (if) bred to stallions of various breeds. IMO, it was money well-spent.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Oh I would get her registered no matter what, I am annoyed that it will be $600 more than November. Don't know why they wouldn't have gotten her registered.

          I know TBs conceived via AI who aren't approved by a QB registry register via the PHR. I was hoping it was a valid second option but doesn't appear it is for me at least.

          Oh well... Drop in the bucket in the long run!

          Comment


          • #6
            Will her price reflect this additional cost to you and are you sure all the paperwork is in place to register? (For JC do you need stallion owner certificate?)

            One of the top jumper breeders located in California registers via the PHR.
            I am thinking it might be the way to go as getting dinged here and there for fees (registration, approvals inspections etc.) gets a bit much (I am getting old I think) and it is hard to stay in any one book if you have a xx mare. Foals out of xx mares/xx damlines have less value and will she even be approved to go into a main mare book is still unknown even if you have JC papers. I think the PHR is only $125 for all (even including dna kit I think?)

            If she is an eventer and will have eventer produce I am not sure the eventers will care. Mainly I would think you need to be able to have dna "registered" in the case it might ever be an issue and be able to verify age (for Young Horse competitions) --which the PHR will do for you.

            (Maybe it is a drop in the bucket but at this point I think every penny counts with horses since any profit margin is slim if you are lucky and if you are not they run through a fence ,et and never amount to anything...)
            (I think I have an 'evolving' view point on the PHR-the older I get the more acceptable an avenue it lloks to me.)
            Last edited by omare; Apr. 10, 2013, 04:41 PM. Reason: edited to add more

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Looking at how well balanced and well built she looked as a yearling, I would have a hard time not seeing her get approved. To be honest if they did not approve her I am not sure how I would feel about breeding her. Now granted in 5-7 years my confidence level as a breeder may be much further along and I may not worry as much?

              They say paperwork is all in order for it. I sure hope so otherwise I am likely not interested sadly. She is priced well for her age and being unraced but I do plan on making an offer (not an insulting one) due to the extra $$ I now need to put out.

              And yes... $800 isn't exactly a drop in the bucket really, with all the other fees I will incur if she does wind up being broodmare quality (I have rejected two thus far that I owned or leased, I am so looking for something quite particular with the potential to produce for the ULs). However if I do not do it by the end of the year and later go "Hey, I want that JC registration" it is something like $2,200. Which is nuts. I googled Jockey Club amnesty, no dice, so I don't think I will have another chance.

              If PHR were accepted by the various stud books I would much prefer. Just so annoying to pay $600 more because she is... Oh... 5 months past the dead line? I hate stuff like that, drives me nuts. But not the JC's fault. And in the great scheme of things I would prefer to be able to take her to whatever stud book I would want and not have a hang up. With my mare I am now limited to who does just the triangle and who will make exceptions if they require liberty work. I do not have the cajones or stupidity to ask, for instance, the AHHA to waive liberty and jump... Especially as they're known for being particular. Which sucks, the mare is exceptional IMO (and other breeders have agreed). I don't want any hang ups with the next one.

              Comment


              • #8
                In my opinion, a TB mare needs her JC papers, if you can get them. You are not likely to be her last owner & it will make her more marketable - and it will also make her foals more marketable.

                But call the jockey club & see if THEY see any blocks to getting her registered. They are nice about talking to people & you want to know what they think, too. It could change your decision.

                Good luck.
                Hidden Echo Farm, Carlisle, PA -- home of JC palomino sire Canadian Kid (1990 - 2013) & AQHA sire Lark's Favorite, son of Rugged Lark.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  They called the JC and she is registered, and a year older than the listing had stated. My only qualm is this mare looks quite chestnut to me but equineline states she is a gray/roan. Obviously she could have white hairs I cannot see in the distance, she just better be who they say she is! Anyone think these are red flags or would you not be concerned?

                  Got new pictures yesterday, hoping to go see her ASAP. Very nice looking filly and I have been after one by her sire for quite some time.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The Jockey Club does DNA verification.

                    You could make the sale contingent on that.

                    You may have to replace lost papers and find out if you need a transfer from last owner on the papers.

                    https://www.registry.jockeyclub.com/...ryhelpdeskfaq&

                    Get your questions answered before you buy the horse.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by magicteetango View Post
                      They called the JC and she is registered, and a year older than the listing had stated. My only qualm is this mare looks quite chestnut to me but equineline states she is a gray/roan. Obviously she could have white hairs I cannot see in the distance, she just better be who they say she is! Anyone think these are red flags or would you not be concerned?

                      Got new pictures yesterday, hoping to go see her ASAP. Very nice looking filly and I have been after one by her sire for quite some time.
                      Concerning, but does not have to mean she's not who they say she is. How old is she? My grey filly was VERY dark all winter--to the point I regularly mistook her for the black horse in the field. She was three in March.

                      Can you perhaps ask the Jockey Club to give you the markings on the papers for comparison?

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        She will be three in April. That is what I thought as well, my fingers are crossed everything is right. And great idea about the markings Simkie.

                        I will make sure everything is straight before I buy... I am just so hopeful about this filly I would hate to walk away, I can't wait to show her in the FEH classes this summer! See... I am already making plans, cart before horse!

                        I will call the JC tomorrow about the markings and ask about DNA typing as well.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Did they advertise her as a two year old? Or as a yearling? Another possibility would be that the filly you're looking at is a younger sister to the registered grey filly. If they had her listed as a two year old, perhaps not understanding that her official birthday is January 1, I would be less worried about that possibility than if they listed her as a yearling.

                          At these ages, at least it's usually pretty easy to accurately age the horse from the mouth, so it should be a no brainer to determine if her age matches the registered horse...

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            She was listed on CANTER as a yearling coming two in December. I asked them if she was two or three after looking up her name and they said she would be three April 25th. So it could be a mix up... Or a full sister. Whoever listed her could have gotten it confused or perhaps a barn worker held her and gave the info?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I didn't know CANTER listed yearlings. That is awfully young to be a failed or retired race horse already. If she is registered doesn't that solve your problems however?
                              McDowell Racing Stables

                              Home Away From Home

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                It does. I don't think she was ever trained, the impression I got. As long as this is the correct horse, yes it solves my problems... I just hope I am not being overly trusting since I like this filly so much, and the bloodlines behind her.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Does she not come with her registration papers? If not the jockey club can give you the description off her papers and you can check the cowlicks.
                                  McDowell Racing Stables

                                  Home Away From Home

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #18
                                    Well they had said she wasn't registered but everything was in order to do so. Now they called the JC and she is, I need to verify that they have a copy or if I will need to file for duplicates. I am about to call the JC and verify the markings and whorls so I can match them to her if they don't have a copy.
                                    Last edited by magicteetango; Apr. 17, 2013, 11:20 AM.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by magicteetango View Post
                                      Well they had said she wasn't registered but everything was in order to do som Now they called the JC and she is, I need to verify that they have a copy or if I will need to file for duplicates. I am about to call the JC and verify the markings and whorls so I can match them to her if they don't have a copy.
                                      I don't know how much I would trust JC markings recordings. I only say this because while my horse's tattoo matches the papers I received with him from the JC, the markings do not match him one bit whatsoever. He is a brown bay with low white markings on 3 feet (one is only 1/2 of the foot). His papers say he has white over one knee on the leg that has no white and the other markings are off as well. The face markings are accurate though..lol.
                                      Rhode Islands are red;
                                      North Hollands are blue.
                                      Sorry my thoroughbreds
                                      Stomped on your roo. Originally Posted by pAin't_Misbehavin' :

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        Ohh don't tell me that! I sent them her photos and they are checking for me to see if she is the same filly. Her baby photos, he said, have a star and a disconnected stripe... Her current photos have no stripe although the star is as described. I am hoping against hope he says hey this is your filly!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X