• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Welcome to Canada Redwine and Aloha!!!

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    to the OP: surely you can't be irritated with those who read your first post as if it was written by a USC cheerleader ? The rah-rah effect was a bit unusal considering the circumstances.

    Congratulations on getting your contract fulfilled. I sincerely hope it all works out for you and you have a gorgeous and healthy foal.


    • #42
      Originally posted by Mardi View Post
      to the OP: surely you can't be irritated with those who read your first post as if it was written by a USC cheerleader ? The rah-rah effect was a bit unusal considering the circumstances.

      Congratulations on getting your contract fulfilled. I sincerely hope it all works out for you and you have a gorgeous and healthy foal.
      ^THIS. I do think that anyone who searches for info on those stallions needs to know who owns them, so that they can make an educated decision as to whether they want their money to support Jill Burnell.

      On the plus side, all monies received will be documented by Ashland vs. Jill Burnell's accounting; it's a shame the authorities can't just have the net income frozen or put in escrow versus sending Jill Burnell a check.

      I am glad the stallions are safe, and the defrauded mare owners will now be getting a product from a professional lab versus ... the Burnell "lab"
      Disclaimer: Just a beginner who knows nothing about nothing


      • #43
        Spectrum - I don't think anyone is suggesting that those with an outstanding breeding to Redwine or Aloha should be say no to Ashlands offer. But the OPs post seemed to be promoting the stallions and future breedings. This is what annoys others, that NEW breeders will still be funding Jill Burnell.


        • #44
          I don't read anywhere that anyone has suggested she not take up Ashland's offer to make good on Jill Burnells contracts.

          I do read it as blaring horns and blinking red stop lights about singing the praises of the stallions/situation considering they are still legally owned by Jill.

          Perhaps a better title would have simply been " Ahsland honoring Jill Burnnels's failed contracts"
          "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"


          • #45
            Originally posted by Spectrum View Post
            Let me preface this by saying I am in full agreement that Jill Burnell was a criminal and mistreated/abused horses, defrauded people, etc. I'm not supporter, have never bred to one of her stallions, and have ZERO skin in the game other than as a bystander.

            But.....Wow. Some of the comments on this thread about people who have had unfulfilled breedings blow my mind from multiple standpoints. One, the idea that instead of people getting what they paid for, people should say, "NO, I don't want it now because the wrong person is giving it to me!" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If there is an arrangement where they can get the breeding THEY PAID FOR, they should take it! If JB herself was providing it at the time they paid for it, they would have been paying collection fees, booking fees, whatever. So now you're saying that INSTEAD of taking what they ALREADY PAID FOR they should sue JB?!

            Well, unfortunately business law doesn't work that way. If you are offered what you paid for under the terms you paid for it, and don't accept it, you can't recover damages BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T BEEN DAMAGED. So if Ashland is serving as JB's agent to fulfill those contracts you can't sue JB for noncompliance because her agent is actually attempting to fulfill the contract on her behalf.

            So basically you're saying that if someone ALREADY PAID JB for the breeding, they should be a martyr for the cause and not accept what they are owed? I'm sorry, but that's one of the most asinine things I've ever read on this board. And believe me, I've read some pretty asinine things on this board!!!

            The OP should probably have posted, "Glad to have the stallions in the hands of people who will do right by mare owners and glad they are fulfilling past obligations, and THANK YOU."

            The idea that JB should never benefit from those stallions, while heartfelt, is totally not realistic. Those stallions had two potential ends- starving or otherwise dying under Jill's eventual lack of care due to lack of funds or else going to better hands. They were valuable stallions, so the only way they were going to end up somewhere better is if someone paid for them, unless of course they were starving or damaged/injured so badly they no longer had any value. Do you really wish that was what happened to those stallions instead of JB getting money in her pocket? Seriously, you think the end would have justified the means?

            Currently they are in a situation with good care and strong potential for never going back to JB. Do we wish Ashland already owned them? Yes. But we take what we can get.

            If mare owners want to breed to them, that's another ball of wax, but at some point you need to just accept the realities of the situation and give thanks for the small blessings.

            Clearly JB is an addict and will just keep hoarding horses. She has demonstrated she will connive in any way she wishes to get her hands on mares, including lying to the sellers or having others get mares on her behalf. Nothing we can do about that but keep educating people!

            In the meantime, we also need to accept that people who have losses are going to accept being compensated for those losses. People who have the opportunity to buy those stallions are going to try to market them so they can afford to buy them. And in order to get them permanently out of JB's hands, JB is going to want money for them. If you favor the stallions returning to JB, by all means, keep spewing pointless vitriol. But at least don't be stupid about the laws involved, and try to get a grip on reality for cripes sake!
            Well said SPECTRUM!!!


            • #46
              This may sound mean but I really hope this is what happens. I hate for any farm to lose out but the message should be LOUD and CLEAR to all. These stallions already have enough foals on the ground.

              Originally posted by Blume Farm View Post
              I know no one has the answer to this, but...

              What if Ashland only gets the responsibility of fulfilling past stud fees that were never fulfilled? They have to do all the work and get no compensation? Other than a collection fee? Wonder if JB is going to give them at least part of the stud fees of already paid mare owners?

              It would be a bummer for Ashland if most of their breedings this year are just fulfilling past breedings....from their perspective.
              Ladybug Hill--Hunters and Ponies
              WWSD? (what would Suerte do?)


              • #47
                Also curious if Jill will have any responsibility for paperwork or if Ashland can do all of it as agent.
                Ladybug Hill--Hunters and Ponies
                WWSD? (what would Suerte do?)


                • #48
                  I am wondering how long it will be before we hear that Ashland is having difficulties with her. Seems darned near everyone that ever worked or partnered with her in the past has ended up either in a financial dispute with her, or has otherwise been profoundly let down by her. Even some of her former "friends" got used and abused in one way or another.


                  • #49
                    This is my tiff with Ashland honoring these old contracts that Jill never fufilled:

                    It is a known fact that JB took breeding fees from customers who signed breeding contracts and never sent them the product they paid for in order to breed their mares. Many of these customers have gone several years and they are still out of their money. Fast forward to now: Jill is heavily involved in an ever-developing legal battle with MHS and California over her abuse to the horses in her care.

                    While the MHS is putting together a case; Jill "leases" both Redwine and Aloha (who,last I knew had a lien on him) to Ashland Farms in Canada for the unforeseeable future. In all technicality; both stallions are still owned by Jill but their breeding, care, etc is fully managed and cared for by Ashland Farm. Jill is still the legal "owner" and is collecting some of the breeding fees collected by Ashland from the breedings of these stallions. Ashland Farm has agreed to honor any outstanding contract to either stallion that was never filled.

                    What I am trying to understand is HOW other's believe Jill will be exempt from charges for FRAUD for taking customer funds and not sending them what they paid for. Yes, Ashland is honoring contracts that were never filled BUT Ashland is completing the action, not Jill herself who was responsible for the funds collected however many years ago when the contract was signed. Ashland has paid Mrs. Burnell lease fees to take over management of the stallions for their own personal business motive for the year.
                    Honoring the contract that Jill fraudulently avoided does not excuse JB from the crime. She still committed the crime; despite the lessor of her stallions honoring old contracts. Jill herself has not honored the contract nor has she refunded the money to the customers she stole money from. JB has still committed the crime and now she's collecting stud fees from the stallions in Canada because she still owns them.


                    • #50
                      Here are my thoughts:

                      A good many stallion owners across North America donated breedings to the auction to help Jill's animals and people taking legal action, but they also generously offered to cover the unfulfilled contracts to the GFF stallions. WHY didn't mare owners take them up on that? The stallions that were offered are phenomenal! Much nicer than either Redwine or/and especially Aloha.

                      No offense to the owners who have foals by the two here, there's really only a handful of their get (combined) that I'm impressed with. The rest are just meh. MY OPINION. Which is a shame because Redwine is actually nice horse (I'm just not overly wowed by the majority of his get).

                      Not even touching the aforementioned lien on Aloha from the stallion test (where, IIRC, he scored pitifully low) that makes hia piece of the whole deal....questionable.

                      But here is my biggest thought on all of this: So many keep saying "oh, it's great! These horses are away from Jill and she won't profit!" Really? She is still listed as the owner, therefore she will still be able to take some credit for the foals produced. She can't necessarily take credit as the breeder, but she can still list these foals under her stallions and gain publicity for them. Anything put on the ground by these stallions will benefit her "program" and "business" because she can then advertise along the lines of "see what my stallions produce?? Breed YOUR mare to them, too!"

                      And she has more mares??
                      "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique


                      • #51
                        Just my inconsequential $.02 here, but if MOs would stop supporting Jill, either directly or through some middleman (ie Ashland), then at some point those boys will stop being money makers for her (which is allegedly the reason she's not selling) and she WILL sell them to someone who will 1) take good care of them and 2) cut ties between Jill and the stallions.

                        At some point ethics and morals have to come in to play - there are as nice, and nicer stallions out there, these are NOT the only 2 stallions any mare could only possibly be bred to.
                        The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Iluvmyhorse View Post
                          Wow. This is rediculous. And now we see how the s**t pile gets deeper when people throw out their little "ideas" on how business is being done. Maybe Ashland has no plea from JB and has taken these stallions from a HORRBLE HOME due to their popularity with potential clients? Maybe Ashland is making a wise and honorable business decision by covering peoples lost breedings, WHEN THEY HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO? I am glad to see those boys here, I will be glad when my mare is confirmed in foal, i will be glad when a healthy foal is born, and I WILL BE EXSTATIC TO WATCH THAT FOAL SUCCEED. Dont worry about collection fees or no collection fees. Thats between Ashland and their clients. I would love to see JB lose Redwine, just like everyone else. Point of fact is, we can praise the stallions all we like. What we are NOT praising is JILL BURNELL. Stop judging and accusing potential clients of "animal Abuse" or lining JBs pockets. GUESS WHAT EVERYONE..SADLY JB OWNS REDWINE SO SHE WILL BE GETTING A CHUNK OF CASH IF SOMEONE BUYS HIM. ITS GOING TO HER ONE WAY OR ANOTHER..I can only PRAY that she uses the money wisely to right her wrongs and get the hell outta Dodge (without horses).
                          well if you think that purchasing new mares in this situation is a good idea I think your prayer about her using the money wisely is already wasted. (that was posted by ironspring and very disheartening to hear)

                          I like both stallions and if they were owned by someone else would definitely use them. But I am not prepared to look at another picture of a starving mare and think that my funds had a part in that.

                          You are right, she will get a chunk of $$ if she sells the stallions, but if you look at past behavior I really don't think you have to worry about her keeping it long.

                          ps. yes I know, you are simply using unfulfilled breeding contracts, and I personally don't see an issue with that. I am referring to the appearance of soliciting new clients for the boys while ownership is still JB


                          • #53
                            OK A) I have notified ashland owners of the lovely bash fest here B) aloha is now owned by pikkturesque

                            Really people, ashland are good people here! I will back out now and let ashland and the mods decide how far this goes

                            Im done here, i dont think paul and darlene deserve this
                            Beyond the Ring-para dressage, training, coaching

                            Proud Team Four Star Minion! Renegade for Life!


                            • #54
                              To be fair, no one is bashing Ashland Farm here. On the contrary, we are all immensely thankful that Aloha has a new, permanent home and that Redwine is standing at a facility where he will be cared for as he should have been all along. We are also thankful that Ashland has stepped up and agreed to honor past breeding contracts.

                              I will not be asking them to honor mine, due to a multitude of reasons, the main one being that I'm completely over the whole situation and consider it a lesson learned. That's my choice.

                              Ashland has chosen to step into the middle of a PR nightmare, and solely for the horses' sake I commend them for doing so. I certainly hope that they do wind up purchasing Redwine outright sometime in the near future. That's the only way that they will be free of the Jill Burnell debacle (and I hope that all her horses go to better homes sooner rather than later). No one is against the welfare of Redwine, or against the efforts of Ashland Farm, but until they shake off the Jill Burnell factor, IMO the waters will continue to be muddy. I wish them well


                              • #55
                                I wonder how they will handle getting a breeding cert from 2012, if you were successful in getting the semen, getting a foal, but unfortunately have no paper work (other than the vet and a trainer who would say "Yes, this foal if by RW").
                                Come to the dark side, we have cookies


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by *Teddy* View Post
                                  OK A) I have notified ashland owners of the lovely bash fest here B) aloha is now owned by pikkturesque

                                  Really people, ashland are good people here! I will back out now and let ashland and the mods decide how far this goes

                                  Im done here, i dont think paul and darlene deserve this
                                  No one is bashing them. They are just stating the reasons why they will not pay for a breeding to a stallion owned by Jill Burnell, regardless of where it is standing or who is managing it.

                                  I sincerely hope this ends well for the owners of Ashland, but based upon JB's past behavior pattern, I suspect this will be short lived too.

                                  Silvercreek never mentioned whether Aloha's lien had been paid off. Last post I read, it was still unpaid, so until it's cleared, I don't consider him sold either. Jill Burnell has a history of using and abusing people's generosity and walking away leaving a mess in her wake - I just hope Ashland is aware of what they're getting into.
                                  The rebel in the grey shirt


                                  • #57
                                    That's correct. Aloha's outstanding balance for the stallion test remains unpaid and we still have possession of his registration papers/passport.


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by showjumpers66 View Post
                                      That's correct. Aloha's outstanding balance for the stallion test remains unpaid and we still have possession of his registration papers/passport.
                                      So pitiful. I hope you're able to get this resolved sooner rather than later, but I have a feeling the outstanding balance owed is likely more than the horse is even worth at this point.

                                      My question is.... if you have a 3 year breeding contract (or whatever GFF used), the contract is not fulfilled within the time frame, but is now "able" to be fulfilled out outside of the contract period... is she still considered to be in default? I see quite a few people saying that MOs won't have a "claim" now as Ashland is offering to honor any unfulfilled contracts. But what if the contract was signed in 2008 and it was for 3 years?
                                      Stübben North America
                                      Los Angeles - Ventura County - San Luis Obispo


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by showjumpers66 View Post
                                        That's correct. Aloha's outstanding balance for the stallion test remains unpaid and we still have possession of his registration papers/passport.
                                        Can you sue the new owners? At least they have cash to go after unlike the old owner.
                                        McDowell Racing Stables

                                        Home Away From Home


                                        • #60
                                          Funny how this subject always brings newbie COTH members out of the woodwork!