• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Biggest challenge for breeders in NA?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Biggest challenge for breeders in NA?

    Would love to hear from breeders what they feel is the biggest challenge that lays before them?

    Why do you breed?

    What kind of support do you feel you need the most?

    Look forward to hearing from you.

    Cheers
    Hyperion Stud, LLC.
    Europe's Finest, Made in America
    WWW.HYPERIONSTUD.com
    Standing Elite and Approved Stallions

  • #2
    The biggest challenge that lies before breeders is the education that goes with breeding , i.e. Knowledge of the horses being used for breeding.

    This is the one thing that has to be improved in our culture before anything else will work consistently moving forward.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'll get this started Vicki,

      1. I breed because I am passionate about the Holsteiner horse and the community from which it comes. I love how unwaveringly athletic they are and how consistently they can be turned out for the sport of show jumping. Most importantly I feel that there aren't enough breeders in America following the pratices perfected in Holstein which have made the breed the breed that it is.

      2. I need four things:

      a) more competent riders who are trained properly and capable of realizing the potential of my horses.

      b) more schooling shows to bring up my young horses properly

      c) more domestic stallions that are approved that have enough progeny information on the ground for us to breed our mares intelligently

      d) Lastly I need a competent database which utilizes One # One Horse as its foundation to catalog pedigree's properly and records performance effectively.


      Tim
      Sparling Rock Holsteiners
      www.sparlingrock.com

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by RyTimMick View Post
        I'll get this started Vicki,

        ........

        a) more competent riders who are trained properly and capable of realizing the potential of my horses.

        b) more schooling shows to bring up my young horses properly

        c) more domestic stallions that are approved that have enough progeny information on the ground for us to breed our mares intelligently

        d) Lastly I need a competent database which utilizes One # One Horse as its foundation to catalog pedigree's properly and records performance effectively.


        Tim
        Tim has posted this so cogently that it deserves repeating....I have merely deleted the part referring to the Holsteiners as, while Tim and others have my full respect for the choices that they make within that breeding philosophy, we ourselves at Sakura Hill Farm take a more liberal approach in our breeding decisions. We do avail ourselves of the data bases the Holsteiner Verband, KWPN and Selle francais et al. have compiled and unabashedly ask our co-breeders who are well-versed in progeny for their advice and opinions.

        Our small contribution to Tim's b) is our support of and participation in the YHSs. We were also wise to have chosen the Ocala area for our breeding operation---schooling shows of all sorts abound and HITS, RMI and even WEF, not to speak of Jacksonville, Atlanta, Gulfport and Tampa are within a reasonable distance. Being able to trailer into HITS and RMI as well as the many schooling shows alleviates one of the big obstacles to deveoping youngsters, ie, the prohibitive cost of showing the young ones. However, course builders must be better educated as regards the special needs of developing young horses. These venues bring with them pros and trainers both local and imported. Finding those who are capable of and willing to take on the youngsters can be a challenge but is one that personally we fortunately have been able to solve in a variety of ways. Ingenuity is a useful commodity as is having a rider in the family who can take on the youngsters at certain stages of their careers!

        In the instance of Tim's a), it can be difficult to place the rising young stars well. So few of our amateur riders--and many pros as well--- have any concept of what it takes to take a prospect from age 4 to GP. And so few pros are willing to have their students take the time to do so. While we initially cringed at having the VDL annual sporthorse auction here in Florida, we are beginning to think that it may promote a willingness on the part of pros to buy a few prospects domestically and bring them along.

        In reference to Tim's c), we would add the willingness, indeed, the ability of domestic stallion owners to get their stallions out in competition at a level that permits comparison with European-based stallion is something that needs to be encouraged and supported.

        Tim's d) is a sine qua non.

        Even in the short six years that we have been breeding we have noted a marked improvement in the marebase as well as in the general knowledge of domestic breeders. Similarly, there has been increased awareness on the part of pros of bloodlines and availability domestically. Frankly, USEF has not been a dynamic force in this evolution and can surely play a more pro-active role in support of domestic breeders and in fostering a connection between the worlds of breeding and competition.
        Sakura Hill Farm
        Now on Facebook

        Young and developing horses for A-circuit jumper and hunter rings.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by RyTimMick View Post
          I'll get this started Vicki,



          2. I need four things:

          a) more competent riders who are trained properly and capable of realizing the potential of my horses.

          b) more schooling shows to bring up my young horses properly

          c) more domestic stallions that are approved that have enough progeny information on the ground for us to breed our mares intelligently

          d) Lastly I need a competent database which utilizes One # One Horse as its foundation to catalog pedigree's properly and records performance effectively.


          Tim
          This.

          I think the internet it is helping breach some of the geographical hurdles that we face in the US. It at least allows us glimpses of performance etc without having to trek 3k just to evaluate breedingstock, sales horses. It at least allows for a less travel intensive initial overview.
          "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sakura Hill Farm View Post
            Tim has posted this so cogently that it deserves repeating....I have merely deleted the part referring to the Holsteiners as, while Tim and others have my full respect for the choices that they make within that breeding philosophy, we ourselves at Sakura Hill Farm take a more liberal approach in our breeding decisions. We do avail ourselves of the data bases the Holsteiner Verband, KWPN and Selle francais et al. have compiled and unabashedly ask our co-breeders who are well-versed in progeny for their advice and opinions.

            Our small contribution to Tim's b) is our support of and participation in the YHSs. We were also wise to have chosen the Ocala area for our breeding operation---schooling shows of all sorts abound and HITS, RMI and even WEF, not to speak of Jacksonville, Gulfport and Tampa are within a reasonable distance. However, course builders must be better educated as regards the special needs of developing young horses. These venues bring with them pros and trainers both local and imported. Finding those who are capable of and willing to take on the youngsters can be a challenge but is one that personally we fortunately have been able to solve in a variety of ways. Ingenuity is a useful commodity as is having a rider in the family who can take on the youngsters at certain stages of their careers!

            In the instance of Tim's a), it can be difficult to place the rising young stars well. So few of our amateur riders--and many pros as well--- have any concept of what it takes to take a prospect from age 4 to GP. And so few pros are willing to have their students take the time to do so. While we initially cringed at having the VDL annual sporthorse auction here in Florida, we are beginning to think that it may promote a willingness on the part of pros to take on a few prospects domestically and bring them along.

            In reference to Tim's c), we would add the willingness, indeed, the ability of domestic stallion owners to get their stallions out in competition at a level that permits comparison with European-based stallion is something that needs to be encouraged and supported.

            Tim's d) is a sine qua non.

            Even in the short six years that we have been breeding we have noted a marked improvement in the marebase as well as in the general knowledge of domestic breeders. Similarly, there has been increased awareness on the part of pros of bloodlines and availability domestically. Frankly, USEF has not been a dynamic force in this evolution and can surely play a more pro-active role in support of domestic breeders and in fostering a connection between the worlds of breeding and competition.
            Michele , with all due respect......after breeding for only 6 years , you know next to nothing. Your " liberal approach" to breeding.......meaning you are using horses from all major breeds and registries even further diminishes your knowledge.

            My friend in Holstein just got a "Young Breeder" award for his successes after ONLY 25 years of breeding. Only 25 years of breeding...... "YOUNG breeder award".

            So please , before you start extracting other peoples words and trying to add your own.....you should have a little more experience yet.

            Comment


            • #7
              Reece, please do not turn this perfectly well-intentioned thread and my post into a personal attack. At no time in my post did I set myself up as an "experienced" breeder. I related our "experience" acquired over six years of breeding, ie, the daily problems and the solutions we have found. I have chosen to address the difficulties encountered in training and sales essentially and only tangentially those of breeding. We have not been functioning in a vacuum, instead drawing on the "experience" of many.

              I might add that I myself competed in hunter/jumpers as a junior in the '50s and 60's and hunted, as an eventer up to and including Prelininary as a young adult and in the '90s and on I took a child from the ponies to the East Coast USET Talent Search Finals while competing at the "A" shows in New York, Connecticut and Florida through the collegiate competitions while she was at Mount Holyoke College during which time she also competed her jumper that we had imported in 2005 up to and including Level 6 as well as started an imported youngster who now is competing GP in Wellington under a new owner, sent her to train with an Olympian in Europe who chooses and brings along young horses and now as a young adult, she is training and competing jumpers essentially with a few hunters in the mix.

              Frankly, this is "experience" that is invaluable to me in breeding and one that seems to have been something of a rare commodity in the domestic breeding world- at least until recently and in the discussions on this BB.

              I will attribute your admonition to a misunderstanding of the several meanings and usages of the word "experience". In point of fact, I did not even use the word in my post, not in reference to ourselves or to others.
              Last edited by Sakura Hill Farm; Feb. 13, 2013, 06:38 PM. Reason: completion
              Sakura Hill Farm
              Now on Facebook

              Young and developing horses for A-circuit jumper and hunter rings.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Sakura Hill Farm View Post
                Reece, please do not turn this perfectly well-intentioned thread and my post into a personal attack. At no time in my post did I set myself up as an "experienced" breeder. I related our "experience" acquired over six years of breeding, ie, the daily problems, solutions. We have not been functioning in a vacuum, drawing on the "experience" of many.

                I will attribute your admonishment to a misunderstanding of the several meanings and usages of the word "experience". In point of fact, I did not even use the word in my post, not in reference to ourselves nor others.
                "Personal attack" ? Really Michele ? How is it that anytime someone dis-agrees with someone else it is labeled a personal attack ?

                Just stating facts as compared to my post above that relayed we should know more about the horses we are breeding with.

                Tim followed that up with relaying his experiences involving the HOLSTEINER horses which you abruptly saw fit to remove from your response. Your response is a prime example of what I was referring to. You know next to nothing about the horses you are breeding with. How can you ? You've only been breeding for 6 years and with many different breeds. You can't possibly have a real knowledge of all blood and motherlines !

                A little less pretentious and a little more humility will only serve growth.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bayhawk View Post
                  Michele , with all due respect......after breeding for only 6 years , you know next to nothing. Your " liberal approach" to breeding.......meaning you are using horses from all major breeds and registries even further diminishes your knowledge.

                  My friend in Holstein just got a "Young Breeder" award for his successes after ONLY 25 years of breeding. Only 25 years of breeding...... "YOUNG breeder award".

                  So please , before you start extracting other peoples words and trying to add your own.....you should have a little more experience yet.
                  Does this ^^ have anything to do with the OP's topic ? If not it was just personal sentiment better kept personal. Sorry Reece you are a priceless wealth of Holst knowledge but your interpersonal diplomacy could use more work.

                  So to get back on topic ?

                  Would love to hear from breeders what they feel is the biggest challenge that lays before them?

                  Why do you breed?

                  What kind of support do you feel you need the most?

                  Look forward to hearing from you.

                  Cheers
                  "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                    Does this ^^ have anything to do with the OP's topic ? If not it was just personal sentiment better kept personal. Sorry Reece you are a priceless wealth of Holst knowledge but your diplomacy could use more work.

                    So to get back on topic Reece ?
                    "The biggest challenge that lies before them" . It was completely relevant to my response about knowing horses that you breed with. How many times must one point this out ?

                    My diplomacy skills could maybe use some work in the event I were choosing to be diplomatic.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bayhawk View Post
                      "The biggest challenge that lies before them" . It was completely relevant to my response about knowing horses that you breed with. How many times must one point this out ?

                      My diplomacy skills could maybe use some work in the event I were choosing to be diplomatic.
                      It is relevant Reece. So a question for you/anyone else really.
                      Should/do you breed for a discipline or for a registry or homogenize and breed a registry for a discipline ?

                      For those that breed for a discipline rather then registry or vice versa how does that affect their path of progression.

                      Is that perhaps a problem plaguing the US's breeding endeavors.

                      To many breeding for a registry or conversely to many breeding for a discipline and not using the confines of one particular registry.
                      "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                        It is relevant Reece. So a question for you/anyone else really.
                        Should/do you breed for a discipline or for a registry or homogenize and breed a registry for a discipline ?

                        For those that breed for a discipline rather then registry or vice versa how does that affect their path of progression.

                        Is that perhaps a problem plaguing the US's breeding endeavors.

                        To many breeding for a registry or conversely to many breeding for a discipline and not using the confines of one particular registry.
                        It goes directly back to my first response to Hyperion. You must know the horses you are breeding with and become better producers (breeders) before any of the rest of this matters IMHO.

                        The Catoki thread is a prime example. It came out that he needed a big mare. The questions were....what kind ? why ? etc. etc. THEN.........a knowledgeable poster published a photo and height of his mother. THIS ! This is how you change the culture here. Info about the family. Now it is absolutely known why Catoki needs a big mare.

                        This is NOT registry or breed dependent. This application can and should be applied to all breeding for which ever discipline is chosen. It doesn't matter if you have a Holsteiner mare ,Hann. mare , Dutch mare , SF mare or any combination thereof. The application is the same.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Sorry I opened this post...thought it was going to be educational...I should have known better.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bayhawk View Post
                            The Catoki thread is a prime example. ... Now it is absolutely known why Catoki needs a big mare.

                            ....
                            Rubbish.
                            Absolute nonsense. Genetics selects randomly during its next production, no matter how carefully we try to control it.

                            Mare #1: 15.3hh -16hh. Her sire is tall (17hh) but her dam isn't, although her dam's sire is also tall. Mare 1 produced a huge (first) foal and a moderately tall (16.1-2hh?) second one by 2 x different stallions, both moderately different heights/pedigree (16.2-17.1hh).

                            Mare # 2: o/o a 17.2hh stallion and a 16.1h mare lineage. She's scarecely over 16.1 herself and produced a HUGE colt (17.2hh+ as a 3yo) from a 17hh stallion. I don't know what size her other 3 x foals turned out to be.
                            GreenGate Stables
                            http://ggstables.webs.com/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yiddish proverb:
                              Man plans and God laughs.


                              Morningside Stud
                              http://www.morningside-stud.com
                              http://twitter.com/MorningsideStud
                              http://www.facebook.com/MorningsideStud

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by GGStables View Post
                                Rubbish.
                                Absolute nonsense. Genetics selects randomly during its next production, no matter how carefully we try to control it.

                                Mare #1: 15.3hh -16hh. Her sire is tall (17hh) but her dam isn't, although her dam's sire is also tall. Mare 1 produced a huge (first) foal and a moderately tall (16.1-2hh?) second one by 2 x different stallions, both moderately different heights/pedigree (16.2-17.1hh).

                                Mare # 2: o/o a 17.2hh stallion and a 16.1h mare lineage. She's scarecely over 16.1 herself and produced a HUGE colt (17.2hh+ as a 3yo) from a 17hh stallion. I don't know what size her other 3 x foals turned out to be.
                                I dont think they would keep a mare in their program that was giving such huge variations each foal which I think is the point of culling.

                                I agree that intimate knowledge of the lines you use does require less jumping about registry wise.

                                I think its rare here in the US that someone not only takes pride in their registry but also stays with the generations to be able to predict more about the produced foals. I know they can be a little thorny and tunnel vision but I enjoy someone who brings breeding to such an art.
                                ~~Member of the TB's Rule Clique ~~
                                http://www.off-breed-dressage.blogspot.com/

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by GGStables View Post
                                  Rubbish.
                                  Absolute nonsense. Genetics selects randomly during its next production, no matter how carefully we try to control it.

                                  Mare #1: 15.3hh -16hh. Her sire is tall (17hh) but her dam isn't, although her dam's sire is also tall. Mare 1 produced a huge (first) foal and a moderately tall (16.1-2hh?) second one by 2 x different stallions, both moderately different heights/pedigree (16.2-17.1hh).

                                  Mare # 2: o/o a 17.2hh stallion and a 16.1h mare lineage. She's scarecely over 16.1 herself and produced a HUGE colt (17.2hh+ as a 3yo) from a 17hh stallion. I don't know what size her other 3 x foals turned out to be.
                                  Rubbish is right and you make my point. Typical North American breeder making assumptions from a very small sampling. Your sample is what is rubbish. You haven't enough numbers to even make a productive determination whereas the Europeans all tell you that Catoki needs a big mare due to his mothers small stature. They have seen enough small foals. I have seen many small foals from Catoki and their small to medium sized mothers.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Catoki does not need tall mares because his mother is small. Catoki needs tall mares (if your goal is to produce tall horses) because his damline is small.

                                    Catoki needs tall mares because the long-run "normal" size of sport horses for the last 50-60 years is consolidated in Catoki's damline. What I mean by this is that 16 hands = 1.625 m is probably the "normal" or average or mean size of sport horses for the last 50 - 60 years, +/- 3 cm. And this is the expected size of mares in Catoki's damline. We see smaller horses all the time and we see larger horses all the time, but the mean in the population of sport horses is probably about 16 hands; this also appears to be the mean size of Catoki's direct damline. With studbook stallion inspection committees and breeders almost always preferring "bigger" stallions -- 169 cm and bigger -- over smaller stallions we may see the average size of sport horses increase in size in the next 50 years. But this will be a slow process of change.

                                    Why? Because by definition the mean size of about 16 hands is consolidated in the damline of the majority of breeding mares.

                                    If the data in horsetelex are correct, here are the sizes of the mares in Catoki's damline, starting with his dam Bilda:


                                    Bilda 1.63 m

                                    Vordula 1.69 m

                                    Limburg 1.63 m

                                    Gilda 1.60 m

                                    Oldmarie 1.63 m


                                    (horsetelex does not report the size of Bilda's other progeny, and especially the daughters and grand-daughters. That's a shame because it would be interesting to look at that data to "test" my theory.)

                                    Bilda is the product of Silvester (1.73 m) bred to Vordula (1.69 m). If you look at the mares in Catoki's damline Vordula was a "freak" -- a tall mare. But we see that the direct damline immediately reverted to the expected size of 1.63

                                    If a photo of Vordula had been shown and you were told Vordula had been bred to Silvester, and that was all the information you had, you probably would predict a 1.70 m daughter named Bilda (+/- 2 or 3 cm). But if you were also given the list of mares in the Bilda's damline and their sizes I do not think many of you would predict that Bilda would grow to 1.70 m +/- 2 or 3 cm. So a photo of the mother is only one piece of the puzzle. The sizes of the mares in the damline is what is most important.

                                    In my experience the size of a horse seems to be predicted more by the size of the horse's damline than by any other variable. In other words, along with athleticism and jumping ability I believe that size is strongly influenced by the damline. A breeder can use very tall stallions but if "small" (or actually, average size) is consolidated in the damline it may be a long process to reliably and predictably breed taller horses from that damline. (We will leave the effects of "regression to the mean" to another time.)
                                    Morningside Stud
                                    http://www.morningside-stud.com
                                    http://twitter.com/MorningsideStud
                                    http://www.facebook.com/MorningsideStud

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I think each breeder has his or her own specific challenges. If there was an overarching challenge then it has to be one of size (of the US. Which seems pretty permanent) which impacts my breeding decisions from the word go.

                                      Why do I breed? Fame, glory, riches etc etc. Joke. I breed because the addictive experience of breeding, raising, breaking, and riding the result of my choices, hunches and research can't be beat. It's transcendent.

                                      What kind of support do you feel you need the most? I'd like my chosen Registry to be more open? comunicative? in touch with the troops on the ground?
                                      www.juniperridgeranch.us
                                      Visit us on Facebook!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by HyperionStudLLC View Post
                                        Would love to hear from breeders what they feel is the biggest challenge that lays before them?

                                        Why do you breed?

                                        What kind of support do you feel you need the most?

                                        Look forward to hearing from you.

                                        Cheers
                                        I think a big challenge for like the Baroque breeders, for example, is the trends they face. I noticed a large movement away from the traditional Andalusian movement (which is dare I say, almost gaited) to trying to achieve warmblood like movements, breeding for height and almost losing the Baroque identity. Luckily some people, much like the Foundation QH people haven't swayed from the original ideals of the Andys. And therein lies the problem with breeding for trendy, the mob is fickle.
                                        I LOVE my Chickens!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X