• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Confused! Grande and soundness

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Confused! Grande and soundness

    I wonder if the endless COTH wisdom can clarify something for me.

    As far as I know, Grande is considered to be the sire of very sound horses. It has been hammered into my head that if I want to increase the odds of a foal getting to top sport, Grande is probably desirable.

    However, after taking a look at every stallion registered in sporthorse.com sired by Grande, I noticed most of them (if not all) have a variable degree of sickle hocks.... and sickle hocks decrease the chance of a horse staying sound.

    Can anyone clarify this?
    Last edited by SCMSL; Jan. 8, 2013, 06:27 PM.
    www.facebook.com/lusitanos4sale
  • Original Poster

    #2
    Nobody?
    www.facebook.com/lusitanos4sale

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm no expert on Grande, but while my horses who descend from him have stayed sound, he is several generations back. None of them have sickle hocks.

      I do have a horse with tons of St. Simon who looks very much like him, including the sickle hocks, and is probably the soundest horse I've ever owned.

      IME with upper level jumpers, slight sickle hocks are not a problem. YMMV of course and I know very little about soundness issues in Dressage horses.

      Comment


      • #4
        Jumpers can have a little bit of sickle hocked appearence, but very rarely are they actually clinical. Horses with very strong stifles and toplines put very little strain on their hocks. Perhaps you are looking at the wrong parts of the body?

        Tim
        Sparling Rock Holsteiners https://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/c...milies/yes.gif
        www.sparlingrock.com

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Perhaps you are looking at the wrong parts of the body?
          Of course you always have to evaluate a horse as a hole, but I just found this disparity senseless.

          What do you mean by clinical sickle hocks?
          www.facebook.com/lusitanos4sale

          Comment


          • #6
            There are unsoundnesses and there are conformation flaws...they are not at all the same. Even a flaw, while obvious to our eye, may likely never cause an unsoundness. They are "thought" to indicate a weakness that could become an unsoundness. Some of these flaws are likely to result in insoundness especially in the horse is not managed well to prevent unsoundness. Some of these flaws are merely biases and believed to be weaknesses but really rarely result in unsoundness particularly if the flaw is not severe or is not accompanied by other flaws. For example if a horse is slightly sickle hocked and then also has a small hock and weak pasterns and a too straight stifle...for many people they will SEE the sickle hock as it is easy to see and compare to a straight hind leg but the other issues require a better eye to detect...what is an insufficient hock or how straight is too straight in the stifle and how much flexion in the pastern is too much and how much is too straight. The sickle hock gets the blame but the breakdown was likely due to more complicated mechanics. So a mild sickle can also be part of a very strong structure as can a mild turning out of the toes behind...but many people see it and claim COW HOCKS! Cow hocks is a bad structure if it is a general weakness in the whole of the hind leg accompanied by other weak structures but if it is just closer but still correct hind legs it is not "cow hocks". A flaw is a variation from perfect but it is not necessarily an unsoundness or even a potential risk...it is just not perfect. People get really overwhelmed by less then perfect and it is not that important a judge of future soundness or even suitability...you need to know your sport...look at a lot of horses and balance conformation with other assets. When they inspect they give a numerical value usually and there is a range perfect is within the range but there is room for less than perfect. I would be more concerned with whether the Grandes stay sound. There is conformation and there is toughness...my Irish Draughts are tough. They can be standing on an abcessed foot that could cripple another horse and they will be sound...that is toughness. A long lived productive offspring gets farther in training. It is more a REAL test of soundness than a score on paper.

            Comment


            • #7
              Confused too! I tried the site..I didn't find it relevant to your question. Nonetheless, just how many generations are you going back to find ONE sire and then make such an observation?? Grande has no sons or grandsons standing since he was born in 1958.

              http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/grande4

              There is a picture of Grande on this site - his year of birth 1958.

              Pictured: The mare and foal - both are champions as young horses in hand and both are champion performance horses representing 4th & 5th generation Grande breeding and a number of other bloodlines.
              Attached Files
              Last edited by TWF; Jan. 8, 2013, 08:16 PM. Reason: checking my spelling!
              Tradition of "Grande" Sporthorse Champions
              GRANDE SOVEREIGN 2014 USEF 8th Leading HB Sire
              & Sire of OWN IT - USEF National HB 3yo Champion

              Grand Affiar, Grande Desire, GR Impression, Couture du Jour

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SCMSL View Post
                Of course you always have to evaluate a horse as a hole..
                I know this was a typo, but it really made me giggle
                Barn rat for life

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by wcporter View Post
                  I know this was a typo, but it really made me giggle

                  Yes, a big money sucking hole LOL
                  The rebel in the grey shirt

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Although it did make me laugh about the "Hole" comment I also find it funny that besides the fact that the picture of Grande does not show sickle hocked confirmation, his name is "Grande" and he only stood at 162cm. Kind of funny.

                    Tim
                    Sparling Rock Holsteiners https://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/c...milies/yes.gif
                    www.sparlingrock.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by SCMSL View Post
                      Of course you always have to evaluate a horse as a hole, but I just found this disparity senseless.

                      What do you mean by clinical sickle hocks?
                      Let me clarify. Clinical means that the deviation from vertical must be significant enough to deam the horse Sickle hocked. When looking at a horse, the deviation reviewed is the angle created between the hock and the fetlock. If this angle is zero, then they are perfect. Vets look to see a degree of imperfection before designating a horse "Sickle Hocked". A slight deviation does not warrant this designation, and would not be clinical.

                      Tim
                      Sparling Rock Holsteiners https://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/c...milies/yes.gif
                      www.sparlingrock.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RyTimMick View Post
                        Let me clarify. Clinical means that the deviation from vertical must be significant enough to deam the horse Sickle hocked. When looking at a horse, the deviation reviewed is the angle created between the hock and the fetlock. If this angle is zero, then they are perfect. Vets look to see a degree of imperfection before designating a horse "Sickle Hocked". A slight deviation does not warrant this designation, and would not be clinical.

                        Tim
                        Thanks Tim. I might be overly critical of my horse's faults. Not sure the exact degree of deviation used to determine a clinical sickle hock, but the successful jumpers I've seen, including my own, have been slight and not a problem.

                        From the photo posted, I would not consider Grande sickle hocked, but I was also surprised by his height.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Little man?? I know I got a chuckle out of that too! He was likely named at birth ..perhaps to overcome his "challenges". I do think he was in fact not demonstrating any hint of a sickle hock ...so PLEASE....don''t question the GRANDE!
                          Tradition of "Grande" Sporthorse Champions
                          GRANDE SOVEREIGN 2014 USEF 8th Leading HB Sire
                          & Sire of OWN IT - USEF National HB 3yo Champion

                          Grand Affiar, Grande Desire, GR Impression, Couture du Jour

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Having worked at the Atlanta Olympics and studying bloodlines of succesful FEI horses, both dressage and jumping, there is a lot of Grande in those pedigrees from Atlanta and Athens.
                            It is a shame that there is so little of that blood left for us to use. In fact, the HAnoverian Verband a few years ago was encouraging breeders to use stallions with Grande in the pedigree. But because he threw heavy, his bloodline is not popular.
                            However,in 1999 and 2000, I went looking for a mare with Grande up close in her pedigree and found a Grande direct daughter in foal to DeNiro. Bought the foal in uetero. Diora is now 13 years old and very sound. She has given us beautiful, and for the most part, modern offspring. Everyone is sold to upperlevel riders before they are a full year old.
                            Maryanna Haymon- Marydell Farm - Home to Don Principe & Doctor Wendell MF
                            www.marydellfarm.com
                            2012 USDF Champion Breeder! 2007, 2011 USEF Champ Breeder
                            2009,2010,2011 USDF Res Breeder of the Year!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Well Grande isn't sickle hocked so I doubt it is coming from him.
                              www.svhanoverians.com

                              "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X