• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Proper way of listing a horse's bloodlines?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proper way of listing a horse's bloodlines?

    So I regularly see horses bloodlines listed in such as manner as this

    (Horse #1 x Horse #2)

    Or

    (Horse #2 x Horse #3 x Horse #4)

    Can someone explain if 1) the positioning means anything and 2) when there are three like the second example, where does the 3rd come from?

    I plan to dive deeper into the bloodlines, what produces what, etc over spring and more deeply as soon as a graduate as it intruigues me and I feel it important information for me to know with my personal goals. If anyone knows of good literature or people to speak to I would appreciate that as well!!
    First and foremost about the horse.
    Rose Bud Ranch Sporthorses
    Like Us On Facebook!

  • #2
    AxB is either sire x dam or sire x damsire

    AxBxC is either sire x dam x damsire or sire x damsire x dam's damsire.

    Comment


    • #3
      And to be more confusing...

      This one XXX-YYY/AAA/BBB means sire-dam/damsire/granddam's sire.
      Mary Lou
      http://www.homeagainfarm.com

      https://www.facebook.com/HomeAgainFarmHanoverians

      Member OMGiH I loff my mares clique

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by rosebudranch View Post
        So I regularly see horses bloodlines listed in such as manner as this

        (Horse #1 x Horse #2)

        Or

        (Horse #2 x Horse #3 x Horse #4)

        Can someone explain if 1) the positioning means anything and 2) when there are three like the second example, where does the 3rd come from?
        I won't speak in codes Yes, the position means something. In the example you gave; (Horse #1 x Horse #2) Horse #1 should ALWAYS be the sire. Horse #2 is always the dam. That being said, if you search the internet, you will find a few newbies who don't realize this is the proper way to list bloodlines It annoys me when I venture to someone's website and they have the dam listed first x the sire.

        In your second example; (Horse #2 x Horse #3 x Horse #4) Again, Horse #2 and #3 are the sire and dam and Horse #4 is the damsire (sire of the dam).

        As others have mentioned, some warmblood breeders like to just list the sire and the damsire. It would be written like this for example (Totilas x Rubinstein). The sire is Totilas and the dam is by the stallion Rubinstein.

        Hope that helps!
        www.DaventryEquestrian.com
        Home of Welsh Cob stallion Goldhills Brandysnap
        Also home to Daventry Equine Appraisals & Equine Expert Witness
        www.EquineAppraisers.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I use Horse 1 x Horse 2
          to indicate sire x dam

          I use Horse 1/Horse 2 to reflect sire and dam-sire (and on down the line, as needed).

          As far as I know that is the correct usage.
          Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
          https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

          Comment


          • #6
            There are basically two different conventions in expressing a horse's pedigree.

            The German convention, which has been adopted by only a few other countries, completely ignores the mares in the pedigree. Some warmblood breeders who are not German use the German convention and would denote a pedigree in this way:
            Horse=sire x sire of dam x sire of dam's dam.

            It is most common in the United States and most of the rest of the world (Thoroughbred convention) to denote the pedigree in this way:

            Horse=sire x dam x dam's sire.

            To my way of thinking, the TB convention is far more enlightening.
            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
            Thread killer Extraordinaire

            Comment


            • #7
              In my youth, I hung around with some very old-timey SB and TWH breeders (some of those guys had been born way back in the very early 1900's). They taught me that when writing bloodlines, the "x" always refers to a mare. IOW, the stallion was crossed (x) with a mare. I learned the following methods:

              These examples all refer to Sandro Hit.

              Sire x dam
              Sandro Song x Loretta

              Sire x dam (damsire)
              Sandro Song x Loretta (Ramino)

              Sire x dam by damsire
              Sandro Song x Loretta by Ramino
              I think the Germans would write this as Sandro Song x Loretta v. Ramino

              And if not mentioning the dam's name -
              Sire / damsire / 2nd damsire
              Sandro Song / Ramino / Welt As

              Sire - damsire - 2nd damsire
              Sandro Song - Ramino - Welt As

              Comment


              • #8
                It is proper to denote a pedigree by listing sire of the horse, and then the sires of the mares. It is confusing to input the mares name, then go back to listing sires again. I will use a famous horse as an example.

                Cassini I/II Capitol I/Caletto II/Mambo/Consul stamm 3389

                as see there is no mention of Wisma, the dam.

                If one wishes to do so then you state it this way.

                Cassini I/II by Capitol I out of Wisma by Caletto II
                or v. Capitol I aus Wisma v. Caletto II

                This list is supposed to tell you what the breeder bred to when making their decisions. That is the whole point. It helps to figure out patterns that work, such as the Capitol/Caletto II cross that we see in the Cassinis', Indoctro, etc.

                If you are not going designate who you are referring too, then you should follow this model.

                Tim
                Sparling Rock Holsteiners
                www.sparlingrock.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Love this thread! I think these days the importance of the mare (even more so than the stallion) is becoming more realized so the mare should definitely be listed!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BaysofourLives View Post
                    Love this thread! I think these days the importance of the mare (even more so than the stallion) is becoming more realized so the mare should definitely be listed!
                    It is about the mare, that is what is being missed. You know more about the mare because the breeding "CHOICES" the breeder made. Stallion can breed hundreds of mares in a year. We have tons of information on them. By listing those sire choices, we understand what the breeder was trying to do. These are the broodmare sires, it is about the broodmares. We talk about the mares by who they are by. For instance.

                    Corrado I. His pedigree is Corde/Capitol I/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879

                    The Capitol dam is Soleil. Now look at Cayado and Connor's pedigree

                    Cayado Clearway/Calando I/Corde/Capitol I/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879
                    Connor Casall/Corde/Capitol I/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879

                    We can see that the Corde mares Errada and Korrada are full sisters and from the same branch of the stamm. The information is right there. We are talking about the mares, the reason Edward Struve chose to breed Errada to Calando I and Korrada to Casall tells us more about those mares then their name.

                    Tim
                    Sparling Rock Holsteiners
                    www.sparlingrock.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The OP is like many of my customers; they are not steeped in the breeding conventions of the various countries and societies. So to make it easier for them to understand the breeding of our youngsters, we list the pedigree this way:

                      sire o/o (out of) dam/dam sire
                      Ramzes SF o/o EM Fair Lily/First Gotthard

                      As a breeder I understand the importance of stamms and mare lines, but most of the customers are looking at the young horse and the dam who is on the farm. They don't know stamm123 or motherline Jagdhuette.

                      Also, because we have developed a couple of mare lines that originate in the US (yes, based on European bloodlines with some US TB added), we want these mares to be recognized for their offspring. We always talk about 'our' marelines with customers. :-)
                      Judy
                      Sylvan Farm~Breeding for Performance
                      Ramzes SF, approved GOV and Belgian http://sylvanfarm.com
                      USEF National ID and Horse Recording Task Force; USHJA Jumper Breeding Ad Hoc Committee

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        WOW everyone!! Thank you so much this is a great thread! I'm glad I asked!!
                        First and foremost about the horse.
                        Rose Bud Ranch Sporthorses
                        Like Us On Facebook!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The correct way (though lots of people do it differently) is:

                          Sire/Damsire/2nd Damsire (Camiros/Marlon/Aldato). You can throw the 3rd damsire in there if you want to.

                          My HUGE petpeeve is when people say a foal is "out of" a stallion. NOOOOOOO! A foal is BY a stallion and OUT OF a mare.
                          Maryanne Nicpon
                          Minglewood Sport Horses
                          Ballston Spa, NY

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by RyTimMick View Post
                            It is about the mare, that is what is being missed. You know more about the mare because the breeding "CHOICES" the breeder made. Stallion can breed hundreds of mares in a year. We have tons of information on them. By listing those sire choices, we understand what the breeder was trying to do. These are the broodmare sires, it is about the broodmares. We talk about the mares by who they are by. For instance.

                            Corrado I. His pedigree is Corde/Capitol I/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879

                            The Capitol dam is Soleil. Now look at Cayado and Connor's pedigree

                            Cayado Clearway/Calando I/Corde/Capitol I/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879
                            Connor Casall/Corde/Capitol I/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879

                            We can see that the Corde mares Errada and Korrada are full sisters and from the same branch of the stamm. The information is right there. We are talking about the mares, the reason Edward Struve chose to breed Errada to Calando I and Korrada to Casall tells us more about those mares then their name.

                            Tim
                            How can you tell that the two mares are full sisters? That seems a fairly big jump from the information presented. First you'd have to know how many Frivol mares in stamm 6879 had foals by Maestoso. Then you'd have to know how many of THAT universe of mares had foals by Capitol I, and how many of THAT universe had foals by Corde. If the stamm started with those mares' dam or granddam, you'd need to know that as well. You can't distinguish between the sisters from the way the pedigree is denoted no matter what. The two sisters are different mares and not fungible. Unless the two foals are from the same year, how do you tell that two different mares are involved? It all seems unnecessarily obscure, when if the dam is listed, you can draw the same conclusions about the breeders choices from the pedigree itself.
                            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                            Thread killer Extraordinaire

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              In a Thoroughbred’s pedigree it is pretty simple as Vinery pointed out;

                              XYZ horse is by, Sire‘s name, out of Dam‘s name, by Dam’s Sire’s name, going farther back, out of ( Grand dam’s name), by (Sire’s name of the Grand dam) out of (Great grand dam’s name) by (Sire of the great grand dam) etc.

                              The male line, top line is only mentioned once as is the top male line of the dam sire. Everything after that is the tail female line only, the very bottom line of a multiple generation pedigree.

                              So for this mare, http://www.pedigreequery.com/loved4 which we own, a 5 generation pedigree would read like this; Loved, by Pulpit out of Dearest by Riverman, out of Glowing Tribute by Graustark, out of Admiring by Hail to Reason, out of Searching, by War Admiral, out of Big Hurry by Black Toney out of La Troienne.
                              I threw in the 6th generation for an example of a mare’s tail female line that traces back to the often mentioned blue hen mare La Troienne.

                              This is a great example of line breeding that worked out very well, http://www.pedigreequery.com/sea+hero Sea Hero won the Kentucky Derby and was bred by one of the great private breeders Paul Mellon . Sea Hero was a top race horse but unfortunately he was not much at stud and was latter sold to Turkey. As you can see the bottom line, tail female, of his sire Polish Navy traces to La Troienne as does his dam, Glowing Tribute.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                How can you tell that the two mares are full sisters? That seems a fairly big jump from the information presented. First you'd have to know how many Frivol mares in stamm 6879 had foals by Maestoso. Then you'd have to know how many of THAT universe of mares had foals by Capitol I, and how many of THAT universe had foals by Corde. If the stamm started with those mares' dam or granddam, you'd need to know that as well. You can't distinguish between the sisters from the way the pedigree is denoted no matter what. The two sisters are different mares and not fungible. Unless the two foals are from the same year, how do you tell that two different mares are involved? It all seems unnecessarily obscure, when if the dam is listed, you can draw the same conclusions about the breeders choices from the pedigree itself.
                                I understand what you are saying. However I am referring to the diagnostics of the horses after knowing their pedigree. If I had only heard Casall/Corde/Capitol/Maestoso/Frivol stamm 6879 I would know that it was Connor. If you told me it was a Casall out of Korrada, I would also know that it was Connor, but when looking at dozens of foals on a field, and listening to pedigree's rattled off it is too hard to list pedigree's with dam's names thrown in. When you here the list of sires, you go back to the blue hen mare and stop. It allows you to analyze a pedigree quickly on the fly. This way you only need to memorize the stallions pedigree's, and in doing so you learn the mares.

                                My other reason would be that the #1 sport horse breeders in the world do it this way, and that is good enough for me.

                                Tim

                                Tim
                                Sparling Rock Holsteiners
                                www.sparlingrock.com

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Maryanne Nicpon View Post
                                  The correct way (though lots of people do it differently) is:

                                  Sire/Damsire/2nd Damsire (Camiros/Marlon/Aldato). You can throw the 3rd damsire in there if you want to.

                                  My HUGE petpeeve is when people say a foal is "out of" a stallion. NOOOOOOO! A foal is BY a stallion and OUT OF a mare.

                                  Ill admit I've done this out if sheer no paying attention, after I write it I'm like .. Woah.. That doesn't do!
                                  First and foremost about the horse.
                                  Rose Bud Ranch Sporthorses
                                  Like Us On Facebook!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Tim, there is yet another full sister to Errada and Korrado named Fayence. She was bred multiple times to Contender and is the dam of Chellano Z. So now there are three mares all of whom look exactly the same when you only list the sires in the pedigree.

                                    It really does look like male chauvinism at work. In the bad old days, it was believed that the mare was only the uterus, the sac through which the male passed on his potency. She was not thought to be anything but a conduit for the male. Those days are long gone, but the German convention certainly is embedded in that mindset, whether it is still the philosophy or not.

                                    Inadvertently or not, it's also magical language that only initiates can decipher.
                                    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                    Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #19
                                      So, as I agree that the mare is very important, how is a concise way to incorporate the mare lines without it becoming an entire novel - obviously I would include all known Information in the long version, but what is the best way to summarize the important areas of the lineage...
                                      First and foremost about the horse.
                                      Rose Bud Ranch Sporthorses
                                      Like Us On Facebook!

                                      Comment

                                      Working...
                                      X