• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New Changes to Hanoverian Breeding Policies; A sign of the times?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Changes to Hanoverian Breeding Policies; A sign of the times?

    This link was posted on a Facebook group that I'm a member of: http://www.eurodressage.com/equestri...ng-policy-2013

    While I don't breed Hanoverians, I do find it interesting b/c it is a topic that is often debated here on this board, i.e. "open registries" vs. an actual "breed" registry, and how much "outside" blood is allowed into the various registries.
    Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

  • #2
    I highly doubt it's a matter of the Verband throwing open its doors and throwing standards to the wind. IMHO, this change is overdue and a smart move. I have been in the position myself of wanting to use a particular stallion but being unable to because he is not yet AHS/Verband-approved. Mare owners in that situation have to choose between a good match and satisfying the registry. Often, they choose to have their Hanoverian mare approved in another registry in order to breed to that stallion and then the foal goes to the other registry as well. I see this most frequently with Hanoverian mares being put to GOV stallions. I see the rule change as ultimately a positive one for the AHS, though I'm sure there are those who will say this just opens a gate for "flavor of the month" stallions.
    Kendra -- Runningwater Warmbloods
    Home of EM Raleska (Rascalino/ Warkant) and Donatella M (Furstenball/ Jazz Time)
    'Like' us on Facebook

    Comment


    • #3
      So by, "- Wider Breeding Spectrum
      According to the plans of the Board the so-called 50% rule will disappear in future. This means that all registered mares can then be paired to all registered stallions and the consequent foal can get a Hanoverian brand."
      .... does it mean registered mares of ANY breed are qualified?

      Comment


      • #4
        "does it mean registered mares of ANY breed are qualified?"

        No, it means that all registered Hanoverian mares can then be bred to the chosen Approved stallions from other studbooks and the resulting foal can get full Hanoverian registration/brand.

        I agree with Hansiska. I think it is a smart move. It opens the door for more bloodline options. I choose stallions based on whether they are a good match for my mares, even if it means me taking them to be inspected/approved with other registries in order to get a foal eligible for registration. This will open up many more breeding options and make it easier for the breeder to find the best match for their mare.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think it's a timely move; it answers the "problem" I mentioned in recent thread here about breeding within the "confines" of one's registry. I do think it is important that they stay more closed and selective in terms of outside mare approval. They are different from most other registries in terms of mare selection because they require a specific type of mare from specific population and that mare must score on par or better than a States Premium Hanoverian mare to be accepted. If this rule were to go through the only thing that would change is that approved mares of non Hanoverian blood could be bred to approved Hanoverian stallions without Hanoverian blood. Ie, I could breed my Han approved Trakehner mare to Totilas and register the foal Hanoverian.

          Quality is not really the issue when it comes to top stallions from other registries. There are lots of really good stallions out there with lots to offer the Hanoverian mare base (I would think?). I am not saying they will all necessarily work well, but they are certainly of good enough quality and of the right breeding to offer potential.
          www.svhanoverians.com

          "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Donella View Post
            If this rule were to go through the only thing that would change is that approved mares of non Hanoverian blood could be bred to approved Hanoverian stallions without Hanoverian blood. Ie, I could breed my Han approved Trakehner mare to Totilas and register the foal Hanoverian.
            It might also mean that you could breed your Hanoverian-approved TB mare to a Hanoverian-licensed TB stallion and get a "Hanoverian." I'm not convinced yet that this would be an altogether desirable outcome though my views may well be in the minority.
            Last edited by Bent Hickory; Dec. 14, 2012, 11:26 AM.
            "I always remember you as quite the desk chair contrarian." - APirateLooksAtForty

            Comment


            • #7
              I must say I am of one mind with Hansiska and Donella on the points made .... except that I also agree with Bent Hickory, that in some very few cases it could have weird consequences. I hope they temper that part of the amendment to ensure there are no 100% non-Hanoverian-bloodlines offspring eligible for branding.
              Sunny Days Hanoverians
              http://www.sunnydayshanoverians.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Sunnydays View Post
                I must say I am of one mind with Hansiska and Donella on the points made .... except that I also agree with Bent Hickory, that in some very few cases it could have weird consequences. I hope they temper that part of the amendment to ensure there are no 100% non-Hanoverian-bloodlines offspring eligible for branding.
                Agree 100%. It opens new possibilities that I welcome, but I too hope that there will be no possibility of the scenario BH mentions.
                Mary Lou
                http://www.homeagainfarm.com

                https://www.facebook.com/HomeAgainFarmHanoverians

                Member OMGiH I loff my mares clique

                Comment


                • #9
                  International Top Stallions
                  In order to allow an easier approval of stallions which are part of the international world top, these stallions can be approved for Hanover without being presented at the Hanoverian licensing.
                  So, is this based PURELY on performance? their conformation not going to be assessed? What about radiograph review and the health screen?

                  I realize that whenever the HV has tried to protect their breeders from stallions based in other registries that have conformation concerns or concerns about suitability to the Hanoverian marebase, they have been forced to backpedal and accept the stallion anyway a year or two down the road because of the hue and cry. Without further information, I read this rule change as either "bowing to the marketplace forces" or abdicating the responsibility to protect the membership ....depending on how you want to spin it.

                  - Wider Breeding Spectrum
                  According to the plans of the Board the so-called 50% rule will disappear in future. This means that all registered mares can then be paired to all registered stallions and the consequent foal can get a Hanoverian brand.
                  'm not reading this to be any different from AHS rules. It says registered. In my mind that means a mare with a Hanoverian foal brand (which means there are actual Hanoverian bloodlines in her pedigree somewhere). The way I'm reading the statement, it does NOT mean an HV approved Holsteiner mare bred to an approved Hanoverian TB sire gets to registered Hanoverian.

                  If this IS what this means that is not, in my opinion, a good thing. The Hanoverian product is fairly consistent. That consistency can be traced to moderately consolidated bloodlines. I'm certainly not disputing that outcrossing is a good thing. It is. But ideally you outcross and then re-visit the bloodlines you wish to preserve. Otherwise, you could get a whole lot of "where did THAT come from".
                  "No matter how cynical I get its just not enough to keep up." Lily Tomlin

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    To be clear, the so-called "50% rule" by definition deals with breeding animals from outside breeding populations and the registerability of the offspring from these animals. The high-level purpose of the rule was to ensure that an outside (i.e., non-Hanoverian) mare could only be bred to a Hanoverian stallion and an outside stallion could only be bred to Hanoverian mares, all animals being otherwise approved for Hanoverian breeding. (How else are you bringing in "outside" blood if its not actually being mixed with your existing blood?) Overall, the rule prevents the "anomalies" of a TB mare being bred to a Holsteiner stallion and the offspring being deemed a "Hanoverian" or a Holsteiner mare being bred to a Holsteiner stallion and the offspring being deemed a "Hanoverian." The "50%" rule also recognizes the marginal cases where an Oldenburg mare descending from Hanoverian blood lines really should be able to breed to the same stallions as a "Hanoverian" mare and similarly with stallions.

                    To my mind, removing the "50% rule" in the context of opening the registry means no restrictions on the registerability of the offspring from any Hanoverian-approved parents regardless of whether there is ANY Hanoverian blood whatsoever in parents or the resulting offspring. This means that full-blooded TBs and full-blooded Holsteiners (and countless other permutations of these and other non-Hanoverian breeds/registries) could be registered as Hanoverians so long as both parents were approved for breeding. This means that the Hanoverian breeding societies become far less a "breed" and far more a pure "registry."
                    Last edited by Bent Hickory; Dec. 14, 2012, 03:39 PM.
                    "I always remember you as quite the desk chair contrarian." - APirateLooksAtForty

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bent Hickory View Post
                      It might also mean that you could breed your Hanoverian-approved TB mare to a Hanoverian-licensed TB stallion and get a "Hanoverian." I'm not convinced yet that this would be an altogether desirable outcome though my views may well be in the minority.
                      I don't think so. It says any registered Hanoverian mare not any mare approved Hanoverian.
                      Visit Sonesta Farms website at www.sonestafarms.com or our FaceBook page at www.facebook.com/sonestafarms. Also showing & breeding Cavalier King Charles Spaniels.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Sonesta View Post
                        I don't think so. It says any registered Hanoverian mare not any mare approved Hanoverian.
                        This is an issue of either improper translation or poor word choice. If it's truly meant to be "registered Hanoverians" such a change would mean the breeding philosophy is becoming MORE restrictive than the existing philosophy and that clearly is contrary to the overall message of the article.
                        Last edited by Bent Hickory; Dec. 14, 2012, 03:12 PM.
                        "I always remember you as quite the desk chair contrarian." - APirateLooksAtForty

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          So, from the perspective of my fellow Hanoverian breeders, how "open" is too "open" or are the proposals referenced in Euro-Dressage article not "open" enough?
                          "I always remember you as quite the desk chair contrarian." - APirateLooksAtForty

                          Comment


                          • #14

                            I don't think so. It says any registered Hanoverian mare not any mare approved Hanoverian


                            It's a typo.

                            So, from the perspective of my fellow Hanoverian breeders, how "open" is too "open" or are the proposals referenced in Euro-Dressage article not "open" enough?

                            I think quality control comes in through the mare base. Most stallions with any of the major registries that have passed stringent performance tests ect are not going to diminish the overall quality of the Hanoverian breed. As a Hanoverian breeder I would be totally fine, happy in fact, if they were more open in their approval of stallions.

                            Conversely, I believe they need to stay the way they are with their mare base, very selective in terms of what they approve. I believe that the overall quality of a sport horse breed is directly related to the overall quality of it's mare base and you only retain quality through strict selection.
                            www.svhanoverians.com

                            "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I breed a few Hanoverians each year and have a devil of a time finding suitable matches for my mares because many are unavailable in NZ due to import regulations. On a purely selfish level, opening the stallion base up will make my life a lot easier!

                              But I also agree that the mare base should be preserved and that a horse with no Hano blood should not be considered a full Hanoverian.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Bent Hickory View Post
                                It might also mean that you could breed your Hanoverian-approved TB mare to a Hanoverian-licensed TB stallion and get a "Hanoverian." I'm not convinced yet that this would be an altogether desirable outcome though my views may well be in the minority.
                                My friend, who breeds TBs for eventing took a tour a few years ago of Hanoverian breeding farms in Germany, and one of the farms on the tour WAS breeding TBs to TBs and branding them Hanoverian. The guide told them it was a special farm to breed eventers. She was quite shocked as she knew of the 50% rule.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Sounds like your friend was at Fritz Butt's (breeder of Butts Abbraxxas and other top and Olympic eventers). I thought someone already mentioned him.

                                  http://www.georgenhof.net/fritz-butt-engl.html
                                  Kendra -- Runningwater Warmbloods
                                  Home of EM Raleska (Rascalino/ Warkant) and Donatella M (Furstenball/ Jazz Time)
                                  'Like' us on Facebook

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Bent Hickory View Post
                                    To be clear, the so-called "50% rule" by definition deals with breeding animals from outside breeding populations and the registerability of the offspring from these animals. The high-level purpose of the rule was to ensure that an outside (i.e., non-Hanoverian) mare could only be bred to a Hanoverian stallion and an outside stallion could only be bred to Hanoverian mares, all animals being otherwise approved for Hanoverian breeding. (How else are you bringing in "outside" blood if its not actually being mixed with your existing blood?) Overall, the rule prevents the "anomalies" of a TB mare being bred to a Holsteiner stallion and the offspring being deemed a "Hanoverian" or a Holsteiner mare being bred to a Holsteiner stallion and the offspring being deemed a "Hanoverian." The "50%" rule also recognizes the marginal cases where an Oldenburg mare descending from Hanoverian blood lines really should be able to breed to the same stallions as a "Hanoverian" mare and similarly with stallions.

                                    To my mind, removing the "50% rule" in the context of opening the registry means no restrictions on the registerability of the offspring from any Hanoverian-approved parents regardless of whether there is ANY Hanoverian blood whatsoever in parents or the resulting offspring. This means that full-blooded TBs and full-blooded Holsteiners (and countless other permutations of these and other non-Hanoverian breeds/registries) could be registered as Hanoverians so long as both parents were approved for breeding. This means that the Hanoverian breeding societies become far less a "breed" and far more a pure "registry."

                                    this is pretty much a reverse of what the Hanoverian Verband forced upon the AHS over 20 years ago when they needed to create an export market and had noticed we had begun producing great horses here in the USA - they restricted mares bred specifically for the AHS books from becoming dams of fully approved stallions( sons) or elite eligible ( mares) offspring and tried to revoke licenses of American bred stallions that had successfully completed their 100 day test .. All to improve the export market in Germany. We had 5 mares downgraded or not allowed to be presented for breeding approvall, one of these the second highest scoring in the USA, an "Elite mare", dam of Elite daughters and an approved son. Their reasoning was the lack of " proper gene pool" among US mares... Ironically, several years later , I had several Germans contacting me looking for quality TB mares to modernize their own breeding programs in Europe. Had we stumbled upon something with our readily available
                                    (and more modern) TB genepool of mares?


                                    The current trend to allow horses born in the USA to obtain Hannoveranner Verband registration is their next marketing effort to keep the funding flowing. This is exactly as was done with the GOV / Old NA, maybe not for the same reasons. Why register your Hanoverian with the AHS when u can get Verband papers so your American bred has the same exact paperwork as an import? Have they started sending separate ( vs those on the AHS Inspection tour) inspection judging teams to the USA to facilitate this yet?

                                    Europeans are suffering the changes in the economy as well, and looking for innovative new ways to generate income to assist their breeders and to market their own associations and members horses. Its always been about the money.

                                    I saw the writing on the wall when our family got caught with our knickers down so long ago. ALL of my mares are now registered with the American Warmblood Registry and are eligible to be approved with others- including the AHS.

                                    When an American Warmblood is exported to Europe, it is immediately inspected with a registry there and suddenly ..."discovered"

                                    Wakey wakey
                                    Last edited by MagicRoseFarm; Dec. 20, 2012, 01:48 PM. Reason: clarify terms
                                    "It's not how good you ride, It's how good your horse covers for you." -Kristan
                                    Magic Rose Farm- home of Beste Gold & Hot Shot
                                    Beste Gold & Offspring on Facebook
                                    Magic Rose Farm Warmbloods on FB

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Fairview Horse Center View Post
                                      My friend, who breeds TBs for eventing took a tour a few years ago of Hanoverian breeding farms in Germany, and one of the farms on the tour WAS breeding TBs to TBs and branding them Hanoverian. The guide told them it was a special farm to breed eventers. She was quite shocked as she knew of the 50% rule.
                                      IS that possibly because the 50% rule only applied OUTSIDE the breeding region of Hannover Germany
                                      "It's not how good you ride, It's how good your horse covers for you." -Kristan
                                      Magic Rose Farm- home of Beste Gold & Hot Shot
                                      Beste Gold & Offspring on Facebook
                                      Magic Rose Farm Warmbloods on FB

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by MagicRoseFarm View Post
                                        ...our readily available
                                        (and more modern) TB genepool of mares?
                                        Hmmm, the typical modern TB is bred for precocious speed, which means short distances, which means they are built more like sprinters (I saw some TB stallions in Lexington a few years ago that were built more like Quarter Horses - very high behind - and this was at a well known racing stallion station). That is not a conformation I would want in a sport horse breeding program.

                                        Originally posted by MagicRoseFarm View Post
                                        When an American Warmblood is exported to Europe, it is immediately approved with a registry there and suddenly ..."discovered"
                                        Immediately approved? Not sure which European registry you are referring to, but for the German Verbands, it would have to meet the pedigree requirements of the approving registry, pass inspection, and - if a stallion, meet the approving registry's performance requirements. So maybe not so "immediate".

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X