• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Staying Within The Confines of a Registry??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Staying Within The Confines of a Registry??

    How hard do you try to stay within the confines of your chosen registry...or do you? We started out with Hanoverian branded mares and I like the registry so this is what we did the last few years (we are SpruceView Hanoverians after all lol ). However, I now have three mares that are not branded H and if I want to register the foals H I have to breed to an H branded stallion. I feel a bit like this is limiting me from making the best stallion choice for my mares....but I am worried it is going to get a bit complicated going with multiple registries.

    I know this isn't a big deal I am just curious as to whether others out there let registry "limit" their stallion choices or do you pick a stallion for your mare and then register the foal accordingly? (assuming mare is eligible for approval with multiple registries).

    www.svhanoverians.com

    "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

  • #2
    This is just me personally. . I breed Trakehners, which is a closed book. I do not breed my approved Trakehner mares outside the breed, and I also don't own any non-Trakehner (or approved TB for the TK) mares.

    I made the decision to breed TKs due to my love of the breed, once I knew this is what I was doing it narrows down my choices and makes my life easier! Lol. Besides, my breed of choice is pretty small all things considered and as a dressage judge once told me (regarding my breed) "it's a good refining breed that brings good attributes to the other breeds so someone has to keep breeding quality purebreds!"
    Emerald Acres standing the ATA, Trakehner Verband, sBs, RPSI, and ISR/OLD NA Approved Stallion, Tatendrang. Visit us at our Facebook Farm Page as well!

    Comment


    • #3
      I won't say the C word because we have had that conversation before. But I will throw in that it is in these cases that a WB registry that covers all major European registries can be a big benefit to breeders in NA. You lose some of the cache but it makes life simpler and the horse is the same quality.
      But you do lose the prestige and organization and branding of the larger registry. I know many other breeders in Alberta that use one of the Canadian registries for their off breeding ideas and most belong to and produce registered horses with one of the major European registries.
      Or you could try and get the mare approved with the KWPN?? (did I guess right) at the next inspection. Phone Jackie, she should be able to help you out.

      Comment


      • #4
        I have a non Hano mare that is approved AHS and I can breed to stallions without a H brand and register them AHS. So can you explain further? Maybe I'm just not understanding?
        http://www.tamarawiththecamera.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I am not registry loyal AT ALL. I have used a total of 4 registries in the past, and while I'd like to narrow that down to about 2, it doesn't look like that is going to work in the forseeable future. I want to breed jumpers, and registry isn't that important to me. I generally choose stallions that I believe compliment my mares and then go from there. I do take registry into consideration late in the decision making process, because I'm not looking to expand into having to use more registries than I already am
          Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
          https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

          Comment


          • #6
            This is one of the main reasons I use a registry I do. They have a lot of flexibility allowing me to use most stallions approved by the mayor studbooks plus any the registry themselves have inspected and approved.

            I can't imagine having to go to different inspections with different mares and foals. Driving to one hours away is challenging enough. A less restrictive registry works for me. One studbook, one membership, one inspection, just makes life easier.
            www.vandenbrink.ca

            https://www.facebook.com/VandenbrinkWarmbloods?fref=ts

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Donella View Post
              I feel a bit like this is limiting me from making the best stallion choice for my mares....but I am worried it is going to get a bit complicated going with multiple registries.

              I know this isn't a big deal I am just curious as to whether others out there let registry "limit" their stallion choices or do you pick a stallion for your mare and then register the foal accordingly? (assuming mare is eligible for approval with multiple registries).

              We would not ever let the registry limit your ability to make the best choice for your mare. The market is not looking for more registered horses in this economy, it is looking for outstanding horses that can win. As history has shown over and over during the down times, the money is still there for those that can produce them. Good luck OP with your choices!

              Comment


              • #8
                Do you guys get your mares approved with many different registries? Is that a hard thing to do assuming you have a WB mare registered in one of the main registries?

                eta: I have a GOV registered mare - could I get her approved HAN if needed? (she is by a HAN stallion)

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have a bit of a split view on this. I have a premium graded trakehner mare that I'll use for breeding at the end of her competition career. I intend breeding at least one purebred trakehner. All the others will be registered AES as they accept mares graded into other WBFSH studbooks without inspecting them. They also allow you to use any stallion graded with any WBFSH recognised studbook.

                  So I'm going to support a closed studbook as well as going with the most open studbook I can find.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yes and No. Like acottongim I breed Trakehners and have purebred Trakehner mares and try to the best of my ability to stay within the Registry because they are a breed. However, I will go out of Registry (as I have done this year) if I feel a stallion really has something extra to bring to the table that I can't find in a Trakehner stallion for one reason or another (as I am limited to fresh). I'd rather breed the best horse I can breed rather than breed the best Trakehner I can breed - because there's always appendix papers and those foals are eligible for approval in other registries anyway.
                    www.juniperridgeranch.us
                    Visit us on Facebook!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I pick stallions based on everything but registry I do find that GOV has flexible registry options - with a MMB mare, I can register foals with an outside stallion (and just pay a $100 outside stallion fee).
                      www.threewishesfarm.com
                      https://www.facebook.com/ThreeWishesFarm
                      Expecting 2017 foals by Vagabond de la Pomme, Cornet Obolensky, Zirocco Blue, Catoki and Christian.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm with Vandenbrink on this.... She didn't mention the registry but it's the one that appears in my signature block. They make it very easy to breed to "outside" stallions and I have yet to feel limited in my choice.
                        Siegi Belz
                        www.stalleuropa.com
                        2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                        Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          We made the decision early on in our breeding program to breed more toward a specific discipline (hunters) than for a particular breed. I had hoped to stay within a couple different registries but I'm finding that harder and harder to do. I choose my registry on a variety of factors but above all I choose the stallion that best suits my mare and my intended discipline. Don't get me wrong, registry is a factor (I do prefer to use a European based registry and try to stick to a registry my mare is already approved with) but it usually comes lower on the list.
                          In 2013 I will be going to 3 different inspections (only expecting 4 foals!)...and if all goes as planned I will be going to 4 in 2014. Some of that is due to new mares that are registered/approved with some new registries for me (the mares all met my criteria for a top hunter broodmare so I did not care that they were not approved with the registries I'm a current member of) and I've found it has increased my options for stallions. Paying all the membership dues is kind of expensive but it's also REALLY nice to only have to have a few bathed and braided at a time All of the inspections are day trips for me too which helps. I've also found a few people looking for a breed specific hunter prospect so it widens my net a bit.
                          Last edited by NorthHillFarm; Dec. 4, 2012, 09:25 PM. Reason: clarification
                          www.NorthHillFarmNY.com
                          Like us on Facebook!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I definitely know where you are coming from. I am involved with multiple registries right now. I have a SWANA mare and registered her foal SWANA. I am still stuck on my Hanoverian mare and am thinking of going GOV with her just because the inspection site is so much closer though she is eligible for full approval. I now have a KWPN mare who I would like to register her foals with that registry. Anything not eligible for main studbook I usually go CWHBA since it is more economical.

                            At some point here I am going to have to narrow down the registries as the membership fees really add up! I like SWANA since I don't HAVE to inspect the foals to register them if I chose not to once the dam and one foal has been presented in the past. I have debated going GOV with a lot of my mares as well to narrow things down, we will see how it goes...
                            Cindy's Warmbloods
                            www.cindyswarmbloods.com Cindy's Warmbloods
                            www.facebook.com/CindysWarmbloods Join Us on Facebook for latest updates!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm like you, Donella; for years I have had two Hanoverian broodmares and I stuck with them. However, I have an ISR/Oldenburg mare, and given the choice of AHS or GOV for breeding, I chose GOV. I like very much the ability to breed to any stallion approved by a major recognized registry. I have found them easy to work with, with convenient inspections. I still have one AHS mare, and seriously considered presenting her GOV. I may yet do it if the right stallion comes along.
                              Mystic Owl Sporthorses
                              www.mysticowlsporthorses.com

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I'm lucky that the registry for my breed-of-choice is just open enough and at the same time just restrictive enough -- breeders have flexibility, but there are still enough guidelines that the registry can maintain its reputation and credibility. I can't imagine ever wanting to breed something which wouldn't be eligible for full registration.

                                If things were different, I don't know. I wouldn't want a registry to stop me from making the best stallion/mare pairing, but I also wouldn't want to breed something which couldn't be registered with any reputable registry. A little flexibility can be a good thing -- but breeding so far outside the box that nobody reputable would register the foal probably isn't a good plan..... That doesn't sound like the case here though! If it's an either/or between AHS and KWPN, they're both such reputable registries I wouldn't be worried and I'd go with the breeding choice I felt was best.

                                Although I do completely understand and respect registry loyalty.

                                -Gigha
                                River Oaks Farm - home of the Elite Book Friesian Sporthorse Grand Prix dressage stallion Lexington - sire of four consecutive FSA National Inspection Champions. Endorsing the FSA.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by stripes View Post
                                  I have a non Hano mare that is approved AHS and I can breed to stallions without a H brand and register them AHS. So can you explain further? Maybe I'm just not understanding?
                                  If you have a non-Hanoverian mare that is approved AHS and you don't need a Hanoverian stallion, then your mare must carry at least 50% Hanoverian blood. Otherwise, your non-Hanoverian mare would have to be bred to a stallion having a minimum of 50% Hanoverian blood (typically one that is branded "H" but Pablo is an example of a non-Hanoverian stallion that can be used since he has 62.5% Hanoverian blood).

                                  All of our mares are multi-registry approved. We breed primarily Hanoverian but want to maintain flexibility based on our stallion choices.
                                  Jan Marquardt
                                  Walkabout Station - www.walkaboutstation.com
                                  www.facebook.com/walkaboutstation
                                  www.youtube.com/walkaboutstation

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by kokoda View Post
                                    If you have a non-Hanoverian mare that is approved AHS and you don't need a Hanoverian stallion, then your mare must carry at least 50% Hanoverian blood. Otherwise, your non-Hanoverian mare would have to be bred to a stallion having a minimum of 50% Hanoverian blood (typically one that is branded "H" but Pablo is an example of a non-Hanoverian stallion that can be used since he has 62.5% Hanoverian blood).

                                    All of our mares are multi-registry approved. We breed primarily Hanoverian but want to maintain flexibility based on our stallion choices.
                                    I have an Arabian mare that is approved AHS. I can breed to any branded/registered/approved Hanoverian stallion or as you stated a non Hano stallion that is approved AHS and carries 50% Hanoverian blood. At least this is how it was explained to me by AHS. So I did understand correctly. Thanks for further clarifying.
                                    http://www.tamarawiththecamera.com

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I kept my post general and didn't mention the specific registry since that tends to make these threads go all different kinds of directions...but since everyone else is being so specific, I'll add that my registry of choice is CWHBA. I have a number of Dutch papered mares, I like the dutch bloodlines but I register all the foals CWHBA. I don't pick and choose. Too much hassle, too many different inspections to go to...too expensive plus many other reasons that have been discussed a number of times on this board. They are restrictive enough in my books, but leave me with plenty of options.

                                      Most buyers will buy the best horse regardless of the logo on the paper ....as a breeder I need a registry that works for me.

                                      P.S..yes that's a dutch name...VandenBrink. I am dual registered myself LOL
                                      www.vandenbrink.ca

                                      https://www.facebook.com/VandenbrinkWarmbloods?fref=ts

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Sorry I made the wrong assumption, Vandenbrink. I seemed to remember you discussing Dutch bloodlines in the past and that, coupled with your Dutch name obviously made me jump to a conclusion...
                                        Siegi Belz
                                        www.stalleuropa.com
                                        2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                                        Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X