• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Linebreeding experts please read

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Linebreeding experts please read

    I am asking this to learn more about linebreeding. I noticed that one of the stallions in the test was somewhat similarly bred to my mare, and then I started wondering how close is too close and what is ideal? I believe I read that 4th generation is the ideal repeat? Is this correct? For hypothetical fun I would love some opinions (but know this is just a paper exercise and you don't breed pedigrees, etc.). Also, does anyone have a link to the Holsteiner article on this (I found reference online to a recommended article in the magazine, but couldn't find the article)?

    Happy to open the thread up--please feel free to add examples of good (or bad) linebreeding, close breeding etc. and how it worked out (or didn't).


    Bon Balou (Balou Du Roet/Argentinius)
    http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/bon+balou

    Levante SLS (Landfriese II/Galoubet A)
    http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/levante+sls

    The Galoubet and Landadel is 4th generation on the sire line in a hypothetical foal, but is in the third generation in the damline in a hypothetical foal...
    DIY Journey of Remodeling the Farmette: http://weownblackacre.blogspot.com/

  • #2
    Here is what your hypothetical foal would look like on paper
    http://www.sporthorse-data.com/dbtes...damid=10872133


    My own experiment with linebreeding http://www.sporthorse-data.com/dbtes...damid=10513738 resulted in Haven who has not disappointed me at all.

    In fact, now that I look back - the mare's first foal also had some linebreeding http://www.sporthorse-data.com/dbtes...damid=10513738 and he's a little jumping machine!

    What is the saying - "When it works it's linebreeding and when it doesn't it's inbreeding"? I think that it can help to consolidate traits - just make sure they are the ones that you want
    Last edited by mikali; Nov. 19, 2012, 03:54 PM.
    Alison/Mikali Farms
    www.mikalifarms.com

    Comment


    • #3
      yup, I always heard the saying credited to Hank Weiskamp (Skipper W) although who knows, maybe he stole it from Tesio,
      Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by mikali View Post
        Here is what your hypothetical foal would look like on paper
        http://www.sporthorse-data.com/dbtes...damid=10872133


        My own experiment with linebreeding http://www.sporthorse-data.com/dbtes...damid=10513738 resulted in Haven who has not disappointed me at all.

        In fact, now that I look back - the mare's first foal also had some linebreeding http://www.sporthorse-data.com/dbtes...damid=10513738 and he's a little jumping machine!

        What is the saying - "When it works it's linebreeding and when it doesn't it's inbreeding"? I think that it can help to consolidate traits - just make sure they are the ones that you want
        Haven is lovely! Will you keep her as a broodmare (or is Haven a boy and I just can't see the important parts on my screen)?

        Augh. Editing because I can't read. So the first foal had the most, which was Nimmerdor at 15% concentration (btw the "potential litter" is a such a cool tool!) correct? The second foal had 14% Capitol blood and then they each had various crosses under 10%. That got me thinking that maybe there are ideal percentages vs. generation (such as 4th generation as ideal) that might be a better goal or thing to watch out for?

        I know there are certain bloodlines you do not want too much of as well, but for now I'm interested in the theory on percentages and/or generational repeats.

        I read one article on the Tesio method awhile back, but need to go back and try to find it again. If anyone has any resources to share it is greatly appreciated. TIA!
        DIY Journey of Remodeling the Farmette: http://weownblackacre.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          http://www.sport-horse-breeder.com/tesio-methods.html

          http://www.sport-horse-breeder.com/p...-position.html
          Caitlin
          *OMGiH I Loff my Mare* and *My Saddlebred Can Do Anything Your Horse Can Do*
          http://community.webshots.com/user/redmare01

          Comment


          • #6
            You have to make sure you know any negatives in a line, before doubling up those genes.

            My best and most consistent cross has been a grandson of the Dutch stallion, Obelisk (Talisman - Amor), bred to an Obelisk daughter. I knew the gene pool I was doubling very well, met Obelisk in "person" and had friends that regularly worked with him, so I felt very comfortable. Repeated it 8 times, and have been thrilled with each one.

            Comment


            • #7
              this:

              Originally posted by Fairview Horse Center View Post
              You have to make sure you know any negatives in a line, before doubling up those genes.
              there is genetic variability but there are also trends. there is no 'blanket' answer, but there can be detailed answers to individual proposed crosses.

              it can be right to avoid linebreeding Capitol too close. but does that then make the breeding of Cabrio wrong, who won the Spruce Masters Million? http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/101938

              the purpose of the breeding may also be a consideration... some may risk a little more with linebreeding like that above, but this horse - while now approved for breeding with two studbooks - will require that much more care when used in breeding. one has to imagine that the last thing the owner of the Calato mare was thinking of getting when he put the Cassini semen in would have been an approved stallion... a good sport horse would have been a more likely best-case result.

              but the exceptions don't make rules, and Cabrio is exceptional. and this is what often becomes problematic domestically here. whims and uneducated hunches take the place of calculated, educated risk too often. a taker of educated, calculated risk should not be deterred. they will fall foul of that risk in some (many?) cases, and possibly reap occasional greater rewards in others, like Cabrio.

              regarding linebreeding, conservative models will err away from it, or at least to lower concentrations of a common ancestor. there is good reason for this and there is genetic safety in it. it gives stronger likelihood of offspring free of genetically inherited difficulties, and it can also set up more 'breedable' pedigrees for future generations.

              after a pretty thorough search, the only geneticist reference i could find was that up to a concentration of 15% blood from a common ancestor may be referred to as linebreeding, 15% or more may be described as inbreeding. again, this is very subjective and where it is good to be aware of how the specific individual breeds. Cabrio by this measure has 37% Capitol blood, and even Indoctro has 18% Corde blood. to say they are both 'inbred', with the negative connotations that description brings, would just not pass the test and proof of current performance breeding.

              linebreeding can be good; outcrossing can be good. risk-taking can be good; 'safe' breeding can be good. nothing beats understanding how the blood breeds, deciding upon the degree of risk the individual breeder is comfortable with, and then being educated and ready for the range of outcomes which could occur. whether it goes well, or whether it goes poorly, only the uneducated breeder should be suprised frequently.
              Hidden Pearl Farm

              Comment


              • #8
                My understanding of line breeding is that 2 "free" generations between using the same horse or close relative was a safe method of re-introducing a common ancestor to strengthen the gene pool you wish to confirm in the resulting foal. Of course, that is done judiciously with ancestors worthy of repeating. There is no guarantee in breeding whether you outcross or linebreed. However, when you do line breed or use matching phenotypes you better insure the possibility of getting what you expect.
                Best
                PennyG

                Comment


                • #9
                  There is certainly enough genetic variability between Landadel and Galobet. However, the issue then becomes why. Why line breed these two greats. Well, I can assure you that you would not line breed to both for the same reason. They are both old blood, and that brings its own set of problems. What is it exactly you are trying to accomplish by linebreeding these horses. Do you know what these horses brought to the table, good and bad? How does your mare stand? What would you improve on her, and do these horses provide this? These are the questions I would ask.

                  Do not line breed, just to line breed. You must do it for a reason, because the risks of doubling up on the bad are too great.

                  Tim
                  Sparling Rock Holsteiners
                  www.sparlingrock.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I remember a mare from a farm I worked at in the past, she was the product of a pretty intense breeding program - her pedigree is rather an extreme example of in-breeding, it's always stuck in my memory. Have a look:

                    http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/ben-...fadjurs+legacy

                    It would appear that her breeder put 20+ years of dedicated breeding to achieve the cross. Definitely a high in-breeding coefficient, but FWIW; she was quite a nice mare, correct with a lovely temperament.
                    Shallow Brook Farms

                    http://www.facebook.com/ShallowBrookFarms

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by RyTimMick View Post
                      There is certainly enough genetic variability between Landadel and Galobet. However, the issue then becomes why. Why line breed these two greats. Well, I can assure you that you would not line breed to both for the same reason. They are both old blood, and that brings its own set of problems. What is it exactly you are trying to accomplish by linebreeding these horses. Do you know what these horses brought to the table, good and bad? How does your mare stand? What would you improve on her, and do these horses provide this? These are the questions I would ask.

                      Do not line breed, just to line breed. You must do it for a reason, because the risks of doubling up on the bad are too great.

                      Tim
                      Lot's of good responses. This one gets away from the paper exercise (percentages and such) and more to the horses at hand. Frankly, I've never seen the stallion and my point wasn't to get to his strengths or weaknesses but to look at linebreeding as a general tool. Obviously the tongue in cheek answer is "jumping ability" as the goal, but I recognize that isn't a good answer at all. I was looking at this cross as an example to open discussion and hoping people would bring other examples (I have no current plans to even breed the mare) but your response got me thinking that perhaps a mare shouldn't be linebred until one has bred her to outside blood to see what she in particular transmits? How else do you know what the individual at hand transmits?

                      The Capitol examples are "old" blood correct? I don't see him as a particularly modern horse. Did the successful breeders use modern type horses that carried this old blood? What made the heavy % crosses ok? Do you breed this way (Cabrio for example) to produce competition horses or to produce brood stock or is it interchangeable? I'm curious as to philosophies on this (looking forward to reading the more in-depth articles provided over the holiday break).

                      That said, I know mares that stamp their offspring, and then those who let the sire through. To go back to my example, which isn't a great one because she is only 2, I don't know about this filly's particular abilities at this point (a good reason not to breed her in my book), but her dam (the Galoubet mare) appeared to allow quite a bit of the stallion she was bred to influence the foal's type. Levante, for example, in type is much more like Landfriese--refined and longer lined and more feminine in appearance, where the mare was shorter coupled. Despite looking like a thoroughbred, the filly is quieter and more unflappable than any horse I've own (including stock horses). I'm actually a tad worried she's going to be lazy. We shall see when she is started next year I guess. Interstingly, she was a bit standoffish and reactive as a foal, so I don't know how much of her current personality is inherent and how much is nutured from handling, going places, etc. But we don't just breed for type or conformation either, and athletic ability is not 100% correlated to type and that is the factor I assume most competition breeders are striving for (not ignoring type of course). So how do you stack personality, type and ability when looking at linebreeding? Galoubet was not known for his super easy offspring, for example. I won't get into the mares he was crossed to, etc., but regardless of the reasons, I think that is a fair geralization? Someone correct me if I'm wrong. As the Galoubet mare was bred late in life, her oldest offspring is just starting under saddle. The stallion in the example is also young, no idea what he is producing (again before someone eats me alive, I'm not actually suggesting the cross). However, I am guessing you (Tim) are working from a model with more understanding of your damlines strengths and weaknesses in multiple generations of production. But how do you decide what stallions you breed your young mares to then? How much reliance is put on the mare family vs. the individual? Also, what do you suggest for breeders with young outcrossed horses? Breed only to proven stallions?

                      I hope my ramblings make some sense. I'm sure I will edit this for comprehension again.

                      Also, for those that use linebreeding when do you know it is time for some outside blood?

                      Somekindawonderful--Fadjurs Legacy seems like an apt name for that one!
                      DIY Journey of Remodeling the Farmette: http://weownblackacre.blogspot.com/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Not really in regards to linebreeding, but your question on how to decide whom to breed young mares to....

                        I'm a relative newcomer to breeding, but my general rule of thumb is to breed my young, un-proven mares to very proven stallions. I will use young/unproven stallions on my older/more proven mares because I have a better idea of what they bring to the table. As far as linebreeding goes I don't really focus on that; I feel like I'm not experienced enough yet to make very good use of linebreeding without taking on more risk than I would desire.
                        Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
                        https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Nick's points are to be taken seriously. It is sage advice. Tim's comment of don't line breed just to line breed is also very sage advice. These are 2 very experienced breeders here.

                          Here are a couple pedigrees to study. It is a good example of not only linebreeding, but perhaps some inbreeding too.

                          http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10527892

                          http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10469745

                          Both of these results ended up in stallion production, or producing mares who in turn produced stallions of very high caliber. These were both done by someone who really knew what they were doing and by someone who KNEW those mares and her family traits inside, out, backwards, and upside down.


                          Line breeding could also be said to also take place in the form of nicks. We see this where Lineage A is a sweetheart when paired with Lineage B.

                          One example is Donnerhall and Pik Bube. We could all name offspring who resulted from this nick - producing either top stallions directly, or elite daughters who went on to produce stallions.

                          Another example is Now or Never with Belisar mares or Saros mares. It becomes a sweetheart lineage because it produces direct stallions, or elite daughters who go on to produce stallions.

                          http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?p=378605

                          http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?p=372950
                          Practice! Patience! Persistence!
                          http://www.mariposasporthorses.com/
                          https://www.facebook.com/MariposaSportHorses/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TrotTrotPumpkn View Post
                            Lot's of good responses. This one gets away from the paper exercise (percentages and such) and more to the horses at hand. Frankly, I've never seen the stallion and my point wasn't to get to his strengths or weaknesses but to look at linebreeding as a general tool. Obviously the tongue in cheek answer is "jumping ability" as the goal, but I recognize that isn't a good answer at all. I was looking at this cross as an example to open discussion and hoping people would bring other examples (I have no current plans to even breed the mare) but your response got me thinking that perhaps a mare shouldn't be linebred until one has bred her to outside blood to see what she in particular transmits? How else do you know what the individual at hand transmits?

                            The Capitol examples are "old" blood correct? I don't see him as a particularly modern horse. Did the successful breeders use modern type horses that carried this old blood? What made the heavy % crosses ok? Do you breed this way (Cabrio for example) to produce competition horses or to produce brood stock or is it interchangeable? I'm curious as to philosophies on this (looking forward to reading the more in-depth articles provided over the holiday break).

                            That said, I know mares that stamp their offspring, and then those who let the sire through. To go back to my example, which isn't a great one because she is only 2, I don't know about this filly's particular abilities at this point (a good reason not to breed her in my book), but her dam (the Galoubet mare) appeared to allow quite a bit of the stallion she was bred to influence the foal's type. Levante, for example, in type is much more like Landfriese--refined and longer lined and more feminine in appearance, where the mare was shorter coupled. Despite looking like a thoroughbred, the filly is quieter and more unflappable than any horse I've own (including stock horses). I'm actually a tad worried she's going to be lazy. We shall see when she is started next year I guess. Interstingly, she was a bit standoffish and reactive as a foal, so I don't know how much of her current personality is inherent and how much is nutured from handling, going places, etc. But we don't just breed for type or conformation either, and athletic ability is not 100% correlated to type and that is the factor I assume most competition breeders are striving for (not ignoring type of course). So how do you stack personality, type and ability when looking at linebreeding? Galoubet was not known for his super easy offspring, for example. I won't get into the mares he was crossed to, etc., but regardless of the reasons, I think that is a fair geralization? Someone correct me if I'm wrong. As the Galoubet mare was bred late in life, her oldest offspring is just starting under saddle. The stallion in the example is also young, no idea what he is producing (again before someone eats me alive, I'm not actually suggesting the cross). However, I am guessing you (Tim) are working from a model with more understanding of your damlines strengths and weaknesses in multiple generations of production. But how do you decide what stallions you breed your young mares to then? How much reliance is put on the mare family vs. the individual? Also, what do you suggest for breeders with young outcrossed horses? Breed only to proven stallions?

                            I hope my ramblings make some sense. I'm sure I will edit this for comprehension again.

                            Also, for those that use linebreeding when do you know it is time for some outside blood?

                            Somekindawonderful--Fadjurs Legacy seems like an apt name for that one!
                            TrotTrotPumkin,

                            I do think breeding with knowledge of your mare and her family is best. Very often our mares breed from their Dams, and not how they stand. You could have a mare the stands 162cm, so the mare owner breeds her to Clearway, and gets this 170cm filly. You own the filly and think she is tall, I can breed her to Casall who needs a big mare. This would be a mistake as her mother was small, and she might breed from her dam. You could get a midget. Now if you breed to the blood in her pedigree, you can increase the chance that the TB blood comes through in the offspring, increasing the chance of the offspinrg being leggier. I have Calando I mare who I felt needed better action up front to match her quick hind legs. I linebred to the Halfbred stallion Corde, because he was known for improving front end speed and technique. It worked, and the colt has much better shoulder and front leg action then the mother. I also made sure I line bred using outcross blood, not Holsteiners. If you line breed to the WB's, you get all of their mothers too, and 100's of years of type. This is not what you want to do. Usually we make sure the linebreeding doesn't cause a problem, sometimes we use it to for a specific trait that we are looking for in our offspring. To do this, you MUST known the faults of these stallions, because your mare must be strong in these areas.

                            Before taking such risks, I would breed your mare to a stallion who is proven, and we know how he breeds. He can then tell you about your mare.

                            Best of luck

                            Tim
                            Sparling Rock Holsteiners
                            www.sparlingrock.com

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X