• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Official Results from 2012 NA Stallion Test are posted!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    For those that prefer doing away with the bell curve and using a “set standard” – who determines the standard? The registries that have agreed to accept the results? The testing staff? The stallion owners? The COTH community?

    And how is it determined? Is it based on scores from the previous year’s testing? Or from a range of years? How many years – 2, 5, 10? How far back do you go? And what happens if it gets based on a date range where there were particularly above-par or below-par stallions?

    Methinks folks would be grumbling just as much – or more.

    Comment


    • #42
      It would be up to the registries who accept the results and every registry may have a unique standard.

      Personally, I disagree with using past test results. Each test is individual in that it has a different group of stallions, different test riders, different judges, different weather conditions, etc. If you go back far enough (i.e. the 100-day test) than you are looking at different training directors, test formats, management, and locations.

      Originally posted by DownYonder View Post
      For those that prefer doing away with the bell curve and using a “set standard” – who determines the standard? The registries that have agreed to accept the results? The testing staff? The stallion owners? The COTH community?

      And how is it determined? Is it based on scores from the previous year’s testing? Or from a range of years? How many years – 2, 5, 10? How far back do you go? And what happens if it gets based on a date range where there were particularly above-par or below-par stallions?

      Methinks folks would be grumbling just as much – or more.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by DownYonder View Post
        For those that prefer doing away with the bell curve and using a “set standard” – who determines the standard? The registries that have agreed to accept the results? The testing staff? The stallion owners? The COTH community?

        And how is it determined? Is it based on scores from the previous year’s testing? Or from a range of years? How many years – 2, 5, 10? How far back do you go? And what happens if it gets based on a date range where there were particularly above-par or below-par stallions?

        Methinks folks would be grumbling just as much – or more.
        They are already using a set standard as part of the calculations. I do not believe COTH had anything to do with it.

        I believe you are missing the issue.

        Comment


        • #44
          Just to clarify ...

          An "8" in gaits is a great score where as a "5" would be "okay". You can look at the raw scores to see the areas where a stallion is a stand out. The raw scores show the median and the deviation from the mediation. Here is a definition of the scores:

          10 = Excellent
          9 = Very Good
          8 = Good
          7 = Satisfactory
          6 = Above Average
          5 = Average
          4 = Below Average
          3 = Insufficient
          2 = Bad
          1 = Very Bad

          Originally posted by TrueColours View Post
          Does it mean that if I have a stallion presented that is an okay mover - he's a 8 out of 10 in all of his gaits, and the year I present him all of the other stallions are also "okay" movers, he would get approved (all other things being equal) because he is part of an "okay" group and he doesnt "stick out" anywhere???

          Comment


          • #45
            Is there a link for photo's of the testing?

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by stoicfish View Post
              They are already using a set standard as part of the calculations. I do not believe COTH had anything to do with it.

              I believe you are missing the issue.
              Apparently some folks can’t take a joke.

              So what IS the issue? That ONE stallion received scores much lower than the other stallions? Is this like kindergarten, where every kid has to get a gold star so his little physche isn’t damaged?

              Bell curve aside, this stallion’s scores WERE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER than the other stallions. I don’t know about you, but for producing PERFORMANCE horses, it seems it would behoove us to NOT use stallions who fall way short of “the standard”.

              Comment


              • #47
                Little to nothing has been said about the ponies this year. It was very exciting to see 2 ponies at the testing for the first time!!! The quality of the ponies was definitely on par with that of the big boys, and it was especially fun to watch the ponies bravely jump the exact same cross country jumps as the horses.

                Congratulations to Delores Seketa, owner of Adonis and Jeff White, owner of Highlife's Bulgari Boy!!!!
                www.foxcreekfarm.com

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #48
                  I'm glad you mentioned that Dianna! We loooooooved having the ponies! We had wonderful ponies this year. Even though the Pony Test does not normally contain a large number of ponies, it is just as exciting and important to us as the 70/30 Day Tests. And just like you cannot possibly compare the different years of 70-Day Tests, it is the same with the Pony Tests. We have different test riders, judges, and circumstances, so while the raw scores can provide some information on the stallions, it will put the stallions at an unfair advantage if you compare the years together. Congrats again to the owners of the two ponies, and hopefully we will have more of them next year!!!
                  Summer Stoffel
                  Silver Creek International/Equicore
                  www.silvercreeksporthorses.com
                  www.equicore.com

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    DY,
                    Your humour is fine, it was the suggestion that the test didn't already have a standard. And once again, it isn't about any one horse or test, it is about the means of calculating the results. I think Silver Creek works hard to bring a service to NA, I just think the math should be fair also. I know from a couple of years ago, they were talking about changing the minimum number in Germany to ....what is it, 25? For the reasons that we have discussed.I have a hard time believing that they think 12 horses would be representative of a population in NA.
                    And I am not worried about a horse that got 5's and 6's. More worried that if it is a slow year for stallions, that Silver Creek's test will be subject to math that is not appropriate. The governing bodies should be fair to us in NA and allow us the same standards that they set for themselves. I get that NA may not always have 25 animals but we should be able to have a test, regardless, that is fair in the scoring. They just need to rework the math.

                    PS If Silver Creek and all the owners can put in the effort time and money, I believe the regulators can work harder to make it as least as fair as it is in Germany.
                    Last edited by stoicfish; Nov. 14, 2012, 06:02 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #50
                      For the record, they now require 25 stallions for a test in Germany to start, but not 25 to run the calculations. Which means they start with 25, but can finish with only 12. This has happened under the new calculating system. Which, in reality can mean that when this happens, it could be possible for 6 (more or less) out of the remaining 12 to have insufficient scores to meet the requirements for licensing (since the new system does not include the bell curve), whereas when there is a bell curve only 1 out of the 12 (of the original 25) will not have sufficient indexes for licensing.

                      And also, the word we are receiving is that many of the breeders and many of the powers that be in Germany are more unhappy with the new system and feel that it is more unfair since there is a breeding index (an index score according to the pedigree of the horse) that is used to weight the scores. Some are happy with it, and some are not. So you can see no matter what the system is, there will always be things to critique. It's impossible to find a "fair" system, because everyone's definition of "fair" will be different. I can guarantee you that more Americans will challenge the "fairness" of the new system since it adds a weighted pedigree index and the pedigrees here in America contain many different bloodlines than in Germany.

                      We will never run a test here with less than 18 to start since we take into consideration that we do not know what condition the stallions are arriving in, and the odds of some showing up here with lack of training/insufficient condition to finish the test is high. So this leaves us a cushion in case we encounter a situation like that. We spend a lot of time working with individuals here in NA and in Germany to find the best system every year and we have constantly monitored the progress in development of different systems and this current system is definitely the option we want to provide for North American breeders that want the ability to have multiple breeding licenses. If a better system is developed, we have the ability and are willing to adapt, but will not sacrifice the reciprocity with all of the registries/associations. It is of highest importance to us to provide stallion owners with an avenue for licensing in multiple registries.
                      Last edited by SilverCreek; Nov. 14, 2012, 06:49 PM.
                      Summer Stoffel
                      Silver Creek International/Equicore
                      www.silvercreeksporthorses.com
                      www.equicore.com

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by SilverCreek View Post
                        For the record, they now require 25 stallions for a test in Germany to start, but not 25 to run the calculations. Which means they start with 25, but can finish with only 12. This has happened under the new calculating system. Which, in reality can mean that when this happens, it could be possible for 6 (more or less) out of the remaining 12 to have insufficient scores to meet the requirements for licensing (since the new system does not include the bell curve), whereas when there is a bell curve only 1 out of the 12 (of the original 25) will not have sufficient indexes for licensing.

                        And also, the word we are receiving is that many of the breeders and many of the powers that be in Germany are more unhappy with the new system and feel that it is more unfair since there is a breeding index (an index score according to the pedigree of the horse) that is used to weight the scores. Some are happy with it, and some are not. So you can see no matter what the system is, there will always be things to critique. It's impossible to find a "fair" system, because everyone's definition of "fair" will be different. I can guarantee you that more Americans will challenge the "fairness" of the new system since it adds a weighted pedigree index and the pedigrees here in America contain many different bloodlines than in Germany.
                        So to be clear, they kicked out the curve altogether or just for a test under 25 horses?
                        And the breeders are unhappy with the pedigree evaluation? Do you know what kind of weight it has? Depending on how it is weighted, I think it is a great addition to the evaluation. Possibly too subjective though maybe. But I could see using the KWPN BLUP's of the ancestors to factor in. But really, if I bred a freak from my no-name mare, it may have high scores but little chance of genetically being consistent for being a sire.
                        What do you think of that pedigree evaluation Summer? Besides how you think people may accept it.
                        Thanks for sharing the info!

                        BTW, I don't think it is about making people happy as much as it is using the bell curve correctly. People will always have issue with things, regardless I think for those that are familiar with it, however, the low sample size is a big elephant in the room. And obviously the German's are re-considering it's use. Maybe to people that are not familiar with it, the whole conversation seems very pedantic.

                        (and the test is obviously not standardized if we have different rules and even the creators are seeing a need for change)

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X