• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Canadian Shannon Dueck Sues Oldenburg Verband in Germany Over Defective Horse

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Canadian Shannon Dueck Sues Oldenburg Verband in Germany Over Defective Horse

    Arthur found this article on Dressage News .com http://www.dressage-news.com/?p=6330

    We were wondering what has come of this lawsuit. When you read the article, it seems like a rather straightforward problem, that could have been resolved several ways early on... without litigation. There did not seem to be any animus in the part of the plaintiff... and the GOV was sort of caught in the middle a bit... how was this resolved... or is it ongoing?
    Logres Farm on Facebook
    http://logresfarmpintowarmbloods.com/
    http://logresdobermans.com/
  • Original Poster

    #2
    here is the article - First Noel is by Fürst Heinrich

    First Noel by First Heinrich

    LOXAHATCHEE, Florida, May. 7–Shannon Dueck, an international rider for Canada, has filed a lawsuit in Germany against the Oldenburg Horse Breeding Association seeking a refund for the horse, First Noel, bought at auction a year ago which was later found to have a congenital heart defect.

    The suit was filed in Landgericht Oldenburg and alleges that a veterinary report, including the results of a cardiovascular examination, made available to prospective buyers at the April, 2009, auction in Vechta, Germany, did not show any defects in the 2005 horse. The suit does not claim deception, saying the official veterinary examination at the time may not have discovered the defect in First Noel, bred by Albert Sprehe.



    The Oldenburg Horse Breeding Association said in a statement that as is normal at their auctions, the stallion was examined by auction veterinarian, Dr. Holger Steinmann, three months before the auction and passed the vet. check successfully. While at the Oldenburg facility, the horse was ridden each day by auction riders and was tried out by our customers without any problems.

    “The stallion was insured for eight weeks after the auction, according to the published agreement with the insurance company,” the association said in a statement to dressage-news.com.

    “Shannon decided to geld the stallion before resale altering the horse she bought. During the castration the vets also did not detect a heart murmur what they should have recognized due to the anesthesia.

    “A while after this the gelding was examined again for resale. In the meantime, the eight weeks coverage by the insurance were expired. On the occasion of the second examination the veterinarian found a heart murmur which is, according to the Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, a birth defect. This was not noted in the prepurchase examination already as this defect was covered by a membrane so that nobody was able to hear any heart murmur.

    “If we had been aware of this defect before the auction the horse would have never got an allowance to be auctioned. We are very sorry for all the trouble caused and would like to point out that this is not our mistake.”

    Shannon, who has ridden for Canada at the 1997 Pan American Games, 2002 World Equestrian Games and 2003 World Cup Final, said that she bought First Noel as a prospective Grand Prix horse for herself, not for resale.


    Shannon Dueck and her Ayscha competing in South Florida. © 2010 Ken Braddick/dressage-news.com

    Shannon, who is based in South Florida, is a member of Canada’s funded squad to compete at four major European shows over the next two months in preparation for selection of the official team for the Alltech FEI World Equestrian Games in Kentucky.

    She left the horse in Germany to be gelded and by the time he recovered she felt it was too hot to ship him to South Florida.

    “I was arranging his transport home in September of 2009 when I was diagnosed with breast cancer,” she said. “Because of the financial ramifications, etc. I had to sell him.

    “I found a buyer, who vetted him in Germany. He was found to have a heart murmur.

    “The buyer arranged first for an echocardiogram at the same clinic where the horse was initially vetted.

    “They found no reason for the murmur, but it was disturbing enough for all vets involved to arrange to send the horse to the University of Hanover for a two-day stay with a complete cardiac workup by the expert cardiologists there.

    “The cardiologists found a congenital hole in the septum of the heart, and cannot say he is rideable without risk to himself and the rider, but can say, with a very high degree of certainty, that it has been there since birth.”

    Shannon contacted the Oldenburg society in October to ask them to take the horse back as the auction has “warranties against defects, and insurance to cover these occurrences.”

    “There is no doubt that their veterinary examination missed this heart murmur,” she said.

    The Oldenburg society got their lawyers involved, she said, and tried to talk to the previous owner/breeder.

    “I said I was happy to pick out a replacement horse of approximately equal value, but Mr. Sprehe refused to do anything,” she said.

    “After no results, I finally contacted a lawyer in Germany who is an equine expert.

    “He looked at the case and said we had a very strong case. He has been trying to negotiate with the Oldenburg Verband until now, with no positive results.”

    The lawyer finally gave up, she said, and filed court papers last week.

    First Noel is stabled near Vechta until the issue is resolved,
    Logres Farm on Facebook
    http://logresfarmpintowarmbloods.com/
    http://logresdobermans.com/

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      “The cardiologists found a congenital hole in the septum of the heart"

      The article says the heart defect was congenital… so it could be the result of all sorts of epigenetic factors. But, still, is there any formal tracking of Fürst Heinrich offspring after this rather high profile incident?

      Good dog breeders do all sorts of screening tests and evaluations before breeding. In the horses, we don't seem to do much of any testing for known genetic disorders. That has always been a bit of a concern.
      Logres Farm on Facebook
      http://logresfarmpintowarmbloods.com/
      http://logresdobermans.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        you can always find a lawyer to sue someone. this whole case, assuming the facts above are all correct as stated (probably not, but we will assume they are for now) has nothing to do with the Verband as they just represented the horse. Read the auction laws as regards consignment of horses. The e & o insurance for the vet who did the initial work up will end up cutting a check in the end. But actually sounds like this is something that could have been hard to detect anyway--they had to send him off to the University to do a work up by cardiologists to determine if there really was a murmur.

        so it has been there from birth. I have seen these before, not often, and the horse can compete for a long life, or fall over ill tomorrow. Just like it could from something else. you don't get a 100,000 mile warranty when you buy a horse. every professional knows that. sounds like Shannon refuses to assume any degree of risk responsibility. she could have renewed the insurance, but chose not to. she could have obtained a second opinion before initially buying the horse, but again chose not to.

        it is too bad the horse business gets littered with these kinds of cases where buyers think they have zero responsibility. this is a 50/50 business. we live in a world where you can just buy anything and if you don't like it you can just take it back. or sue.
        Discipline is the Bridge between Dreams and Accomplishments

        Comment


        • #5
          I had a filly born with a heart murmur detected at her foal check. Vet said it can close up, re-check within a few days or week (can't remember exact timing), we did and it was gone. So, if a proper foal check was done I would think the defect would have been noted at that time. I would request ALL vet records from foal check on to see if the defect was known about and not disclosed at some point in horse's history. Also, to see if a foal check was done as is standard practice here in the states (not sure what is done in Germany).

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by khall View Post
            I had a filly born with a heart murmur detected at her foal check. Vet said it can close up, re-check within a few days or week (can't remember exact timing), we did and it was gone. So, if a proper foal check was done I would think the defect would have been noted at that time. I would request ALL vet records from foal check on to see if the defect was known about and not disclosed at some point in horse's history. Also, to see if a foal check was done as is standard practice here in the states (not sure what is done in Germany).
            who checks a foal if they in all respects are healthy? I don't. And I am sure most of the German breeders don't. so what do you do if it didn't close up? put it down? I have known horses competing in the sport with slight heart murmurs. never had a problem. And lots of horses in the sport with excellent vet checks broken down.
            it is obviously a defect that just needs to get considered when putting a value/price on the horse if all else is o.k.
            Discipline is the Bridge between Dreams and Accomplishments

            Comment


            • #7
              So what do we all do now? Stop selling horses? Doubling our prices to include a 2yrs warranty? Then what?
              Froh zu sein bedarf es wenig...
              http://www.germanhorseconnection.com
              https://www.facebook.com/pages/Germa...m/237648984580

              Comment


              • #8
                I have a foal check done on ALL of my foals born. Ever heard of LFG? You need to know what is going on in those little bodies that will not necessarily show just by looking at them. I have IGG run, heart and lungs listened to, temp taken, eyes looked at, umbilical looked at/palpated, check their palates (ever seen a horse with congenital problems with their palate eat?) All done within their first 12 hours of birth. That is how the vet found my filly's heart murmur, knew it could be a problem if it did not close up, so I knew enough to contact stallion owner on possible issues, but thankfully she ended up fine. For breeders breeding the quality of horses that are selling for what that horse sold for, why would you not do a foal check?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kareen View Post
                  So what do we all do now? Stop selling horses? Doubling our prices to include a 2yrs warranty? Then what?


                  So where would this end? Buyer sues the Verband. Does the Verband then sue the vet who did the auction exam? Or does it sue the consignor? Or the breeder? Should the vet who gelded the horse also be sued?

                  It really sounds as though the suit is without merit - despite what her attorney told her, particularly because the lawsuit itself states:

                  ...a veterinary report, including the results of a cardiovascular examination, made available to prospective buyers at the April, 2009, auction in Vechta, Germany, did not show any defects in the 2005 horse. The suit does not claim deception, saying the official veterinary examination at the time may not have discovered the defect in First Noel, bred by Albert Sprehe.
                  I think her attorney took her for a ride - probably under the assumption that the Verband would settle out of court just to avoid the hassle and expense of a trial.

                  And I'm a bit perplexed about the OP's comment regarding Fuerst Heinrich. Is ONE known instance of a heart defect in an FH offspring enough evidence to assume the defect came from him? Is it just POSSIBLE it came from the dam, or maybe was a developmental problem that happened in the womb, with no genetic cause?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by khall View Post
                    I have a foal check done on ALL of my foals born. Ever heard of LFG? You need to know what is going on in those little bodies that will not necessarily show just by looking at them. I have IGG run, heart and lungs listened to, temp taken, eyes looked at, umbilical looked at/palpated, check their palates (ever seen a horse with congenital problems with their palate eat?) All done within their first 12 hours of birth. That is how the vet found my filly's heart murmur, knew it could be a problem if it did not close up, so I knew enough to contact stallion owner on possible issues, but thankfully she ended up fine. For breeders breeding the quality of horses that are selling for what that horse sold for, why would you not do a foal check?
                    Some breeders in Germany breed such large quantities of foals, they aren't going to spend the money to have the vet out for every single one, esp. if it appears healthy and normal. If one goes downhill, they make a determination if it is worth trying to save it. If it isn't a very special foal, they will often let it go - esp. if the "problem" may affect its development, or future soundness, or marketability. I know it sounds a bit hard-hearted, but they tend to regard their horses more as livestock there.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I've never had to have a vet out to tell me if a foal was live or not....

                      IGG snap tests are easy to administer, and a reasonably knowledgeable breeder can use a stethoscope.

                      Jennifer
                      Third Charm Event Team

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ThirdCharm View Post
                        I've never had to have a vet out to tell me if a foal was live or not....

                        IGG snap tests are easy to administer, and a reasonably knowledgeable breeder can use a stethoscope.


                        Yeah, I think even the German farmers can tell if their foal is "live", without calling the vet.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          But it wasn't just some breeder selling a horse out of their backyard. It was an auction, run by the Verband, that guaranteed health via pre-screening vettings. I think that is a bit of a different situation.
                          Rhode Islands are red;
                          North Hollands are blue.
                          Sorry my thoroughbreds
                          Stomped on your roo. Originally Posted by pAin't_Misbehavin' :

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Being a Canadian, we are generally not as sue happy as some other countries because our laws are different and do not reward the same way. But that doesn't mean the case necessarily has merit. However, it could be that someone had previous knowledge of the condition or diligence was not shown in the vet check or there is an expectation of the product use (aka the high price would suggest that they are selling a product of a certain quality and the onus is on them to make sure of that quality). In most cases I think people should insure things they cannot afford to lose but if there was any evidence of prior knowledge or lack of due diligence then the insurance company would probably still go ahead with the law suit (depending on the price of the horse compared to legal fees).
                            I doubt the case will mean anything to most sellers in NA but it will be interesting to see if it has merit in court.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by stoicfish View Post
                              Being a Canadian, we are generally not as sue happy as some other countries because our laws are different and do not reward the same way. But that doesn't mean the case necessarily has merit. However, it could be that someone had previous knowledge of the condition or diligence was not shown in the vet check or there is an expectation of the product use (aka the high price would suggest that they are selling a product of a certain quality and the onus is on them to make sure of that quality). In most cases I think people should insure things they cannot afford to lose but if there was any evidence of prior knowledge or lack of due diligence then the insurance company would probably still go ahead with the law suit (depending on the price of the horse compared to legal fees).
                              I doubt the case will mean anything to most sellers in NA but it will be interesting to see if it has merit in court.
                              lol, my first reaction was.. She is Canadian and she is suing... then I read she lives in the US... well, something 's rubbed off obviously.

                              So, in the meantime, what is happening to the horse. He is in limbo for sure.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Ok, so the posters who suggested that:
                                A) a prepurchase exam is a guarantee of health and
                                B) it is the responsibility of the SELLER to guarantee that the horse is indeed worth what the buyer pays for it....

                                How long, exactly, have you been involves in the horse world??

                                LOL

                                Jennifer
                                Third Charm Event Team

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by ThirdCharm View Post
                                  Ok, so the posters who suggested that:
                                  A) a prepurchase exam is a guarantee of health and
                                  B) it is the responsibility of the SELLER to guarantee that the horse is indeed worth what the buyer pays for it....

                                  How long, exactly, have you been involves in the horse world??

                                  LOL

                                  Jennifer
                                  What poster suggested that?

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Cartier View Post
                                    The article says the heart defect was congenital… so it could be the result of all sorts of epigenetic factors. But, still, is there any formal tracking of Fürst Heinrich offspring after this rather high profile incident?

                                    Good dog breeders do all sorts of screening tests and evaluations before breeding. In the horses, we don't seem to do much of any testing for known genetic disorders. That has always been a bit of a concern.
                                    The better division here is "heritable" and "non-heritable," not "genetic" and "epigenetic." Yes, the latter terms mean different things but the relationship between genes and ontogenetic development is changing all the time, depending on the part of the body you are talking about.

                                    Yes, a breeder should be concerned about a developmental defect. After all, how many cases of hip dysplasia were blown off as "accidental and unrelated to parentage" before that condition gained the title of heritable?

                                    I have no idea if this suit will get anywhere, but how can the Verband argue (as some posters have here) that the buyer screwed up by not seeking a second PPE? If this is a normal part of "due diligence" than what would be the purpose of the PPE done under auction auspices? Doesn't it stand to reason that the buyer believed she was gaining the assurance of the breed association that the horses included in that auction had met some minimum standard of quality that the Verband chose?

                                    And I wouldn't put congenital heart defect and "breaking down" in the same biological category. There are many more known causes of "nurture" involved in trashing the "nature" of a horse's legs than his heart.
                                    The armchair saddler
                                    Politically Pro-Cat

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by stoicfish View Post
                                      However, it could be that someone had previous knowledge of the condition or diligence was not shown in the vet check or there is an expectation of the product use (aka the high price would suggest that they are selling a product of a certain quality and the onus is on them to make sure of that quality).
                                      This could be what ThirdCharm is referring to.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Well, I won't assume that is what ThirdC meant but to reply. Every country has it's own laws but in general....if the condition was known and sold like that, she would have a good case. Or if the tests were not done properly and she could prove that or if the product was advertised with a certain standard associated with it. If I advertise a healthy horse for sale and you buy it only to find that it has pre-exsisting issues, and the terms of the sale were explicit, you could probably have a case. I think most times the horse is not worth the legal effort or the terms are not written down.


                                        A) a pre-purchase exam is a guarantee of health and
                                        B) it is the responsibility of the SELLER to guarantee that the horse is indeed worth what the buyer pays for it....
                                        It isn't so much the horse world as it is the agreement of the purchase. A prepurchase is done to try and ensure a certain level of health at the time of sale. It is not a guarantee of future health but it is a statement of evaluation at the time. If a pre purchase doesn't mean anything, try falsifiing one and see what happens.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X