• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Another interesting "hot young stallion" vs "proven older stallion" tidbit

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Another interesting "hot young stallion" vs "proven older stallion" tidbit

    I was just reading my most recent issue of "The Oldenburg Horse" magazine, published by the German Oldenburg Verband. In it, it mentions that (according to Katrin Burger, Deputy Breeding Director) in 2011, of the 20 most used stallions only 3 had offspring going under saddle. I was shocked by that statistic! She goes on to stress the importance of using older, proven producers and that breeders shouldn't be tempted by the young, hot stallions of the moments. She puts the "blame" for this trend on two main issues: the young horse classes rewarding big, swingy movement vs. breeding for true Grand Prix horses and (secondly) how this has affected the market into which breeders have to sell their youngsters.

    Very interesting food for thought coming from a registry official.
    Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

  • #2
    Good for Katrin. She is not only the breeding director but a talented rider. Katrin received two first places at the Oldenburg State Championships at Rastede this year, with two different Diamond Hit offspring..... so am thinking Diamond Hit may be on that list.

    Katrin is direct in her comments. There is no gray area. Asked her two weeks ago about a stallion to breed to my Licotus/Landadel that she had judged for her MPT. The mare will be bred ET, as is a competition horse. Katrin looked at me and said that is a problem. You will need to use a stallion that will not mess it up! And that was the end of the discussion. Not too much direction there but honesty about stallions in general.
    Nancy Holowesko
    www.crosiadorefarm.com
    Breeders of GOV Horses for Dressage

    Comment


    • #3
      Awesome that they have such a talented rider as the breeding director.. definitely makes sense. Does anyone know if she was the inspector for the GOV in Canada a few years ago? I went to watch one inspection here and I thought the inspectors did a great job and she (I think Katrin) did a young horse clinic. This year there was someone new..

      I just think it's hard as many breeders, probably most, breed to sell the offspring as foals and as we all know, "hot and flashy" sells. If we all had to keep these foals and develop them first we would probably be making some different decisions?. I know when I first started breeding I was thinking more along the lines of marketable foals, but now we keep them and develop them and because we also ride them, we are much more mindful of a stallions production record and in particular the rideability (and of course of having mares who also produce well in this regard!!).

      You can get away with a lot in a foal I think...if it is dark with flashy gaits and from one of these stallions it is easy to market. Many people really don't seem to look past that. A breeder truly has his/her work cut out if they are breeding first and foremost for a high quality dressage horse.

      The mare will be bred ET, as is a competition horse. Katrin looked at me and said that is a problem. You will need to use a stallion that will not mess it up!

      She must be very nice !
      www.svhanoverians.com

      "Simple: Breeding,Training, Riding". Wolfram Wittig.

      Comment


      • #4
        Donella, the mare is very nice. But the lesson in this I think is.....no stallion is perfect....and do not expect miracles from stallions when your mare is less than special.

        Nothing new, but something that needs to be re-iterated as it is one of the more important factors when making breeding decisions. The other is that if you could breed the best to the best and get the best.....you would be in the money. But that theory does not work either. That is what makes breeding so interesting.
        Nancy Holowesko
        www.crosiadorefarm.com
        Breeders of GOV Horses for Dressage

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by Donella View Post
          Awesome that they have such a talented rider as the breeding director.. definitely makes sense. Does anyone know if she was the inspector for the GOV in Canada a few years ago? I went to watch one inspection here and I thought the inspectors did a great job and she (I think Katrin) did a young horse clinic. This year there was someone new..

          I just think it's hard as many breeders, probably most, breed to sell the offspring as foals and as we all know, "hot and flashy" sells. If we all had to keep these foals and develop them first we would probably be making some different decisions?. I know when I first started breeding I was thinking more along the lines of marketable foals, but now we keep them and develop them and because we also ride them, we are much more mindful of a stallions production record and in particular the rideability (and of course of having mares who also produce well in this regard!!).

          You can get away with a lot in a foal I think...if it is dark with flashy gaits and from one of these stallions it is easy to market. Many people really don't seem to look past that. A breeder truly has his/her work cut out if they are breeding first and foremost for a high quality dressage horse.

          The mare will be bred ET, as is a competition horse. Katrin looked at me and said that is a problem. You will need to use a stallion that will not mess it up!

          She must be very nice !
          Yes, she touches upon the marketability issue in the article; she goes on to say:

          " The older fashioned, slow maturing horses can be difficult to sell as foals and most breeders cannot afford to raise, train and hold onto dressage horses until they mature. The market breeders must sell to has sadly created a certain demand".

          I don't breed dressage horses, but I'm fascinated by this. With those numbers will it eventually affect the number of "true" Grand Prix horses, or will the sport adjust to the "new" type of horse? Or is the divide not that great?
          Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
          https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

          Comment


          • #6
            Donella - IIRC, Sarah Schroer did a YH clinic in Canada either last year or the year before. For several years, she was the head inspector in Canada (usually accompanied by Verband employee Bastian Scharmann). Sarah is no longer with the Verband, and this year, Marielle Oellrich went to Canada (accompanied by Bastian Scharmann). Marielle has been the breeding director for the Weser-Ems registry (the "Oldenburg" registry for sport ponies and small horses) for quite some years. She used to do inspections in NA more regularly, but after the birth of her twins a few years back, she hasn't been able to travel as much.

            And yes, it is wonderful to have an inspector who is a rider. And Katrin not only rides young horses, but she has also taken horses all the way to Grand Prix in dressage. The fact that she still rides and competes is one reason why she is not able to do a lot of inspections here - between her duties as Vice Breeding Director of the Verband, and her riding/competing schedule, she doesn't have a lot of extra time in her life!

            Comment


            • #7
              And I haven't read the article yet, but I am not surprised about the statistics she quotes. Everyone wants to breed to the hot young stallions, because those are the ones that have caught the attention of the buying public, and therefore are the ones that will be easiest to market.

              Her comment says it all:
              "The older fashioned, slow maturing horses can be difficult to sell as foals and most breeders cannot afford to raise, train and hold onto dressage horses until they mature. The market breeders must sell to has sadly created a certain demand".

              Comment


              • #8
                Too expand on this conversation, De Niro was a stallion that was mentioned. Not always a foal producer or a young horse producer, but a stallion that is proving to be important in the upper levels of Dressage.
                Nancy Holowesko
                www.crosiadorefarm.com
                Breeders of GOV Horses for Dressage

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just ran accrost this good thread from last year. I am wondering Donella who you ended up breeding the above mentioned mare (via ET ) to? How has it turned out. Some good points made above..
                  One day you'll wake up and there wont be any more time to do what you've always wanted to do. Do it NOW!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Having been a breeder of warmbloods for longer than I care to admit anymore, I can't help but add my two cents worth to this discussion.... There is nothing wrong with breeding "flashy" foals provided you mean above average movement and looks with that adjective. I have bred plenty of Top Five KWPN-NA foals that were super flashy during their inspection and then impressed again when presented for their Ster/Keur inspections. At that point they have to be at least 3 years old and for the Keur predicate they have to perform a ridden test. You would be amazed how many of those flashy foals turned into excellent movers as adults! :-) I think it's very important for youngsters to be "correct" in both, conformation and movement, but I wouldn't automatically dismiss the "flashy" mover as a future disappointment....
                    Siegi Belz
                    www.stalleuropa.com
                    2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                    Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by siegi b. View Post
                      Having been a breeder of warmbloods for longer than I care to admit anymore, I can't help but add my two cents worth to this discussion.... There is nothing wrong with breeding "flashy" foals provided you mean above average movement and looks with that adjective. I have bred plenty of Top Five KWPN-NA foals that were super flashy during their inspection and then impressed again when presented for their Ster/Keur inspections. At that point they have to be at least 3 years old and for the Keur predicate they have to perform a ridden test. You would be amazed how many of those flashy foals turned into excellent movers as adults! :-) I think it's very important for youngsters to be "correct" in both, conformation and movement, but I wouldn't automatically dismiss the "flashy" mover as a future disappointment....
                      There is a ton of talented horses out there right now. It makes me wonder what will be the deciding factors of the ones that make it to the top. If any horse can make it to PSG (scores will vary greatly) then what abilities/temperament are going to get them further and how do you tell if a stallion can do that before his kids are of age?
                      Jumping is so much more straight forward in terms of variables but dressage has more variables.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Stoicfish - I agree with you that there are a lot of very talented horses "out there".... In the end, it will be the rider and owner that make the difference because showing your horse at the right venues is getting to be more and more expensive. I've decided to hang on to one of my 3-year olds - well, I actually decided that when he was a foal :-) - and now it's primarily a question of how much money I have to invest in his progress... At this point I'm pretty sure I won't make it to PSG and the horse will be sold before then. This is where I think we could use some help from the USDF....
                        Siegi Belz
                        www.stalleuropa.com
                        2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                        Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Above average "Flashy" movement is NOT for the average rider( which is most of the US market). It takes a rider with tact with a good seat and hands to take that type of horse up the levels.

                          The question of what makes the difference between a PSG horse and a GP horse is TEMPERMENT and WORK ETHIC along with the ability to collect. Some of those flashy types will make it to GP if they were lucky enough to end up in the right hands. The rider/trainer will have established a working partnership with the horse and can reliably guess as to their future at GP.

                          What I beleive the article speaks to is the conformation needed to go all the way. IMO horse needs a shorter cannon bone, long forarm, good size hocks and muscled gaskin with the right pelvic angle to "sit and carry". The more modern type has a short forarm and long cannons. This type of front end tends towards very flashy trot and uphill type canter, but also later on with the extended gates, suspensory injury.

                          USDF can't take on this job of trying to "place" or help find the right rider for the right horse. We as breeders have to be creative to help the best pairing to happen. The USEF National Young Horse Championships next year is a talent search for the best horses. It can also be a wonderful marketing venue for the breeder and horses to be showcased.

                          This is one of the focus points of the new USSHBA. To highlight US born/bred horses with top talent.
                          Maryanna Haymon- Marydell Farm - Home to Don Principe & Doctor Wendell MF
                          www.marydellfarm.com
                          2012 USDF Champion Breeder! 2007, 2011 USEF Champ Breeder
                          2009,2010,2011 USDF Res Breeder of the Year!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Marydell - while I agree with some of your statements, isn't it also a choice you make as a breeder when it comes to the quality of horse you want to produce? Yes, the top moving horses typically require a better rider and they are out there. I happen to think that as a breeder you have to aim very, very high in order to consistently produce very good youngsters, and when you get that special one you will definitely find a client for it (at least that's been my experience). Look around you - there are lots of very talented riders looking for that special horse..... Having also been a stallion owner in a past life, I understand where that can be a limiting factor in your breeding program and may - on occasion - give you a slightly prejudiced view of other stallions' offspring. Owning a stallion in this country takes a lot of perseverance as well as strong financial resources, and it's very difficult/impossible to compete with the "latest flavor of the month stallions" that are advertised all over the internet.
                            Siegi Belz
                            www.stalleuropa.com
                            2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                            Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              yes, it is a choice of what one's breeding goals are. But the questions in this thread are old v new stallions.
                              I have and still do use many outside stallions. But my goal is amatuer GP, not just market sales at a young age.
                              That is a risk of using new and flashy- you just do not know if they can hold up to the work as they are usually not in performance past the 6 yr mark or if lucky, psg.
                              Maryanna Haymon- Marydell Farm - Home to Don Principe & Doctor Wendell MF
                              www.marydellfarm.com
                              2012 USDF Champion Breeder! 2007, 2011 USEF Champ Breeder
                              2009,2010,2011 USDF Res Breeder of the Year!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Crosiadore View Post
                                Too expand on this conversation, De Niro was a stallion that was mentioned. Not always a foal producer or a young horse producer, but a stallion that is proving to be important in the upper levels of Dressage.
                                wonderful and very useful topic as it really comprises it all!
                                and it is making me smile as i justed posted a feature about de niro on this board - sheer coincidence.
                                as a matter of fact, while i was researching and analysing my very personal thoughts about de niro the outcome of it truly reflects all of what has been mentioned in this post so far:
                                -the fact that breeding to young stallions has overcome breeding to old and proven ones
                                -the time it takes to proof or disproof any given stallion by his get and respective performance under saddle
                                -the difference in demand breeding for amateur vs professional riders
                                -foal maker vs proven sport horse producers, differences or mutualities?

                                while i do not want to hijack this topic in any case to advertise my own writing you might want to read the de niro feature anyway, as it does add to this topic in many respects - just love this topic!

                                and it is not a new or recent development, either. even though the intial poster refers to an article dealing with 2011 breedings in oldenburg i remember dr. schleppinghoff stating exactly the same about ten years ago or so, but it was put in a different context:
                                3 stallions of the same paternal line made up for more than 50% of oldenburg breedings back than (not sure if it was 50, think the number was even higher have been more.) 2 of these stallions were sons of the first and still needed to gain their second part of performance testing (respective sport qualification for the bundeschampionat or SPT). one of the two has meanwhile been gelded.
                                http://hippologi.com

                                http://muensterland-pferde.de

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  fannie mae - while I don't dispute any of your statements, let me explain to you that 99.9% of all warmblood breeders in US are one-generational.... meaning that once they retire, their breeding business closes. Given that and the fact that the vast majority of clients has access to the internet and all the posts about the fabulous new stallions and how much their first foals sell for, what do you think these clients look for when buying horses? So, as a breeder in this country, and one that isn't independently wealthy, I have to respond to the market if I want to stay in business. It doesn't mean that I abandon all "good" breeding principles, however, it does mean that I have to listen to my clientele for some of the stallion decisions I make. Let's hope that there are enough "conscientious" breeders with deep pockets left in order to ensure the lofty goals of breeding for results in second and third generations. :-)
                                  Siegi Belz
                                  www.stalleuropa.com
                                  2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
                                  Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X