• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM RISING STAR FARM

    At this time, Rising Star Farm is retracting the contractual agreement to purchase the stallion known as Romantic Star. All previous affiliations with Jill Burnell/Grey Fox Farms and Robert Maggie Weems have been discontinued and official notification to the respected parties has been given. Any financial evaluations or statements made in any legal case involving these parties is in NO WAY indicative of the previous purchase agreement between Rising Star Farm and Grey Fox Farms for the purchase of Romantic Star. It is my sincere hope that this stallion is able to find refuge in a situation where he is given the good care he deserves.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by horseofcorff View Post
      That is exactly what I am wondering. UC Davis did a thorough workup and did not mention one word about being underweight. They noted he was muddy and they gave him a bath. AND they fed him what you would feed an ordinary horse. Now UC Davis is very well-respected with regards to nutrition, so I cannot believe they would underfeed a starving horse; as well, I cannot believe they would examine an undernourished horse and fail to mention it, especially when they went to the effort to note that he was muddy.

      I'd have to go back and look, but I believe it was reported by those involved that the horse had a body score of 3 upon seizure, and that bloodwork revealed indiciations of malnouishment issues.
      www.littlebullrun@aol.com See Little Bull Run's stallions at:
      "Argosy" - YouTube and "Boleem" - YouTube
      Boleem @ 1993 National Dressage Symposium - YouTube

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Sonesta View Post
        So now we have a brand new poster starting yet another rumour.
        What's next? That Redwine and Aloha were just heading through Mexico to start their new careers siring a new line of Guatemalan polo ponies???



        Lets just all hope that all the stallions land softly.

        Comment


        • [QUOTE=horseofcorff;6825587]Quick question. If a horse has a body score of 3 why would he only be fed two flakes of alfalfa a day and two flakes of grass hay a day? That would be only 15 to 16 pounds of hay a day for a huge stallion! I am sorry but we keep feed in front of our stallion (and mares for that matter) 24/7 and they have winter ryegrass. I can't imagine why you would feed a thin horse such little hay? Unless maybe he did not have a body score of 3?[/QUO f

          When a horse has not been fed or barely fed for a period of time resulting in a body score of 3 you have to bring feed quantities back slowely building them back up over time. UC Davis knows what they"re doing.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by risingstarfarm View Post
            At this time, Rising Star Farm is retracting the contractual agreement to purchase the stallion known as Romantic Star. All previous affiliations with Jill Burnell/Grey Fox Farms and Robert Maggie Weems have been discontinued and official notification to the respected parties has been given. Any financial evaluations or statements made in any legal case involving these parties is in NO WAY indicative of the previous purchase agreement between Rising Star Farm and Grey Fox Farms for the purchase of Romantic Star. It is my sincere hope that this stallion is able to find refuge in a situation where he is given the good care he deserves.
            Oh my. I'm so sorry that this has come to pass for Romantic Star and Rising Star Farm. I have no direct knowledge of any of the people involved in any way, but it seemed from my catbird seat that this poor stallion had finally found a wonderful, safe home, and I'm sad that it will no longer be a possibility for him.

            I admit to not having read the entire vet record, but the idea that a horse has fractured and infected teeth, has fresh blood coming from his mouth and is anorexic raises fluorescent, not just red, flags to me. My interpretation is that poor animal was in too much pain to eat - in addition to the swollen eyes and significant wounds.

            I have to tip my hat to those of you who would care for a horse with this complex presentation at your home barns. I've dealt with some real train wrecks at home, but I'd defer care on a case like this to more experienced and intensive settings. I have so very much to learn.
            They don't call me frugal for nothing.
            Proud and achy member of the Eventing Grannies clique.

            Comment


            • [QUOTE=equitruth;6825774]
              Originally posted by horseofcorff View Post
              Quick question. If a horse has a body score of 3 why would he only be fed two flakes of alfalfa a day and two flakes of grass hay a day? That would be only 15 to 16 pounds of hay a day for a huge stallion! I am sorry but we keep feed in front of our stallion (and mares for that matter) 24/7 and they have winter ryegrass. I can't imagine why you would feed a thin horse such little hay? Unless maybe he did not have a body score of 3?[/QUO f

              When a horse has not been fed or barely fed for a period of time resulting in a body score of 3 you have to bring feed quantities back slowely building them back up over time. UC Davis knows what they"re doing.
              That's right. Horses that have been starving have to be brought back up slowly.

              Anyone who has had a horse have a colic surgery has learned why teeny weeny bits of forage are given free choice (but in very small quantities) so their belly, digestive tract and system can adjust. Often with a bale of hay bungied to the stall bars. Y

              One can kill a horse (or any mammal for that matter) that is starving by feeding too much too fast. It can be a LONG road, but the right path to follow for the interest of the horse. I have no doubt that UC Davis knows exactly what they are doing to recover this horse to good health.
              www.littlebullrun@aol.com See Little Bull Run's stallions at:
              "Argosy" - YouTube and "Boleem" - YouTube
              Boleem @ 1993 National Dressage Symposium - YouTube

              Comment


              • Originally posted by horseofcorff View Post
                That is exactly what I am wondering. UC Davis did a thorough workup and did not mention one word about being underweight. They noted he was muddy and they gave him a bath. AND they fed him what you would feed an ordinary horse. Now UC Davis is very well-respected with regards to nutrition, so I cannot believe they would underfeed a starving horse; as well, I cannot believe they would examine an undernourished horse and fail to mention it, especially when they went to the effort to note that he was muddy.
                https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...21101250_n.jpg

                From what I read on the physical exam on intake it says
                MS:BS 3/6 Symmetrical muscling with ribs visible on both sides but vertebrae still covered with muscling.

                Under discharge instructions 9) A complete blood count and chemistry was submitted. The CBC reveled some inflammation and there were changes on chemistry due to anorexia and muscle damage.

                Also about his feeding. If his Chemistry reveled anorexia their moderate feeding plan certainly in on par with the idea that you have to gradually wean them up to full feedings when you suspect starvation.
                "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                Comment


                • Well RS has lost, he has lost big time in this manipulative and sick game Ms Burnell is playing. Very sad! Very very very sad.

                  She will go over corpses to externalize blame and use others, human or equine, to justify her actions.

                  I read the report from UC Davis, and the bloodwork is very clear. While to the 'novice' it may look like everything is within normal values, the indexes are off, which skewed the 'normal' values, and thus the 'normal' values are not so 'normal'. They were actually indicative of prolonged 'anorexia' as they called it. The UC Davis report is plenty of evidence that the seizure was warranted.

                  It is no wonder he lost a stallion fight. Weak from lack of nourishment, sliding in mud. EAsy target.

                  I wish Rising Star would have been able to work things out with the MHS and he would go to her in the end.
                  Marieke

                  www.EquineFashionandTack.com
                  www.Twitter.com/EquineFashion

                  Comment


                  • Wow, I was barbecued for saying I didnt think that RS had actually been bought (meaning money changed hands)...imagine, me spreading wild rumours and all.

                    Now I truly hope someone can step up and give that Stallion (and all of the horses) the homes they deserve.

                    Comment


                    • Having seen the way RSF was vilified here for supposedly helping JB by buying the stallion, do you think anyone is going to be willing to be involved??

                      I think COTH has a lot to answer for here, and I'm not talking about the auction funds.

                      Comment


                      • My "feeling" is that RS has not lost. He's in good hands, is recovering and will not go by the wayside.

                        Maybe not breed again, but who the heck cares! He needed help and he's getting it. That is all that counts, in my mind. If only people would forget that he's a stallion. That doesn't make him any more special than Nelly-Bell who needs the same help and may have been starved and treated badly.

                        Hopefully, we'll hear about how those mares are doing. They deserve the same attention... good girls who popped out babies for years I suppose.
                        www.littlebullrun@aol.com See Little Bull Run's stallions at:
                        "Argosy" - YouTube and "Boleem" - YouTube
                        Boleem @ 1993 National Dressage Symposium - YouTube

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by saje View Post
                          Having seen the way RSF was vilified here for supposedly helping JB by buying the stallion, do you think anyone is going to be willing to be involved??

                          I think COTH has a lot to answer for here, and I'm not talking about the auction funds.
                          I don't remember anyone making RSF out to be a villian, things just simply didn't make sense. And now they do, sort of.

                          Comment


                          • Body condition score 3/6? Sounds like Davis uses a 6 point scale. A horse that's muscled over the vertebrae, but with ribs showing is much closer to the normal range on a 6 pt. scale than on a 9 pt. scale. The stallion was not grossly underweight.

                            Also, changes on bloodwork indicative of anorexia is not the same as starvation. Two days without eating after getting beaten up = bloodwork indicative of anorexia. Anorexia means not eating.
                            "...it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

                            Comment


                            • From what has been posted about Jill, it doesn't sound like she would let the possibility of $100,000 go without a fight.
                              The virtual "woodshed" seems the only remedy for willful fools .

                              Comment


                              • I didn't read all of the report, but in his early report from UC Davis, his neck was sufficiently swollen (edema) that it was reducing the blood flow in his jugular (right hand side).

                                Comment


                                • Dead Lame, you might not want to confuse anyone with FACTS.

                                  I mean that a 3/6 is more similar to a 4/5 on teh 9 point scale might mess with some people's re feeding theories.
                                  Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by saje View Post
                                    I think COTH has a lot to answer for here, and I'm not talking about the auction funds.
                                    With all due respect, what does COTH have to answer for? The SIL had the nerve to start this thread. Brought a bad, bad situation for both JB clients and her horses to light. That needed to be done.

                                    No matter all the vitriol, it's great she posted on COTH. It made things happen for these horses and overseers regarding the other as to their care and recovery...and what happens with the rest is still to be seen. Despite all of this mess on this BB, it's really all about the horses, no?

                                    Like others, I suspect the resolution will take a long time so patience will indeed be a virtue for everyone as this case goes through "the system".

                                    I don't know RSF at all. But to disengage from the likes of JB is probably a very wise, professional move. I'm sure RS will find a soft landing and the others will find a soft landing at some point. Poor kiddos.
                                    www.littlebullrun@aol.com See Little Bull Run's stallions at:
                                    "Argosy" - YouTube and "Boleem" - YouTube
                                    Boleem @ 1993 National Dressage Symposium - YouTube

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by BaroquePony View Post
                                      I didn't read all of the report, but in his early report from UC Davis, his neck was sufficiently swollen (edema) that it was reducing the blood flow in his jugular (right hand side).
                                      I don't see that in the report. Edema yes, but nothing to indicate edema so severe that it impacted jugular blood flow.
                                      "...it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                        Dead Lame, you might not want to confuse anyone with FACTS.

                                        I mean that a 3/6 is more similar to a 4/5 on teh 9 point scale might mess with some people's re feeding theories.
                                        One page says 3/6 this page https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...49960997_n.jpg

                                        Says under Case History: Body Condition score of 3/9

                                        Editing for Dead Lame this page
                                        https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...60506575_n.jpg

                                        at the top "Slow jugular refill on the left jugular vein with edema present over the vein in the cranial cervical region" The next statement is is good jugular refill on the left. I am guessing a typo and they meant right. Since they would have checked each side.
                                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by risingstarfarm View Post
                                          At this time, Rising Star Farm is retracting the contractual agreement to purchase the stallion known as Romantic Star. All previous affiliations with Jill Burnell/Grey Fox Farms and Robert Maggie Weems have been discontinued and official notification to the respected parties has been given. Any financial evaluations or statements made in any legal case involving these parties is in NO WAY indicative of the previous purchase agreement between Rising Star Farm and Grey Fox Farms for the purchase of Romantic Star. It is my sincere hope that this stallion is able to find refuge in a situation where he is given the good care he deserves.
                                          Thank you for bravely trying to extricate Romantic Star and provide quality care. I am so sorry to read this. Again, thanks so much for taking the risk and DOING something.

                                          May MHS preside and extricate all the horses involved in this tragedy. Best wishes to both R.S.s - may each have a very bright future.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X