• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Acertainsmile View Post
    Wowza DMK, are you okay? Where did I say ALL current transactions fail? Maybe those who had okey dokey transactions did do their homework, crossed their t's and dotted their i's. Or maybe Jill decided to have a moment of clarity and do the right thing...I have no idea. No crystal ball here, just some common sense when dealing with someone like Jill Burnell.
    Gotcha. So it's just the one transaction you are worried about? You seem happy to speculate and wonder endlessly in the absence of oh, I don't know... any information or facts whatsoever?

    Which is why I wondered a week ago if money had actually changed hands for this horse. Seems a little suspicious that the "new" owner couldnt find out any information on him. Maybe there was a contract, and he really is in bad enough shape that she backed out of it.
    ust want to make it clear that I never suspected the possible buyer (or new owner) of RS of any shady dealings, just that it was odd that she could not (to our knowledge) find out anything on his condition if she had actually purchased him.
    And if in fact the stallion was actually purchased, why wouldnt the new owner go out at this point with paperwork in hand and find out his condition?
    No one ever said only an idiot would buy a horse from her...exactly where are you reading that? It's only being said that at this point in time, (or at least since this thread was started) you might want to do due diligence if you were going to purchase something sight unseen.
    If there is a shadow of a doubt than you would be a fool (yes I said it) to fork over your cash and hope for the best.
    You have gone on and on about how you are so worried about it, so I just wonder why you are just so darn worried? Did RS take out a loan from you to purchase the horse or is this just an amazing display of heartfelt concern for a fellow COTH poster? I mean I'm sure only the finest of motives apply!
    Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

    Comment


    • Anyone in the know able to give us a vague update on the condition of the seized horses? Are the injuries RS received healing well?

      Comment


      • ^^^ I too would like to know the status of the horses.
        APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

        Comment


        • I do not expect details because I know they are keeping those safe for their own reasons. Just wondering if RS is doing OK? Are the mares doing OK?

          Comment


          • Why there isn't more info available....

            This is a contested case involving private property. Confidentiality applies to vets and the MHS and what they can and cannot make public. The seized horses are private property and the owner's attorney is all over the case and MHS. Why would MHS jeopardize the case by revealing facts just to satisfy bystanders? The court is where information is presented and available to the public. Unless MHS attorney or other authority okays a press release.

            To get the scoop requires good journalism on the ground, doing the investigating and then double checking sources. Until you can get a respectable news organization to do this work -- and report -- bystanders have to rely on the official statements. Or speculate and guess work - which seems to fuel some folks and this thread for pages and pages.
            Last edited by Justa Bob; Jan. 22, 2013, 04:24 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by DMK View Post
              Gotcha. So it's just the one transaction you are worried about? You seem happy to speculate and wonder endlessly in the absence of oh, I don't know... any information or facts whatsoever?












              You have gone on and on about how you are so worried about it, so I just wonder why you are just so darn worried? Did RS take out a loan from you to purchase the horse or is this just an amazing display of heartfelt concern for a fellow COTH poster? I mean I'm sure only the finest of motives apply!
              I wouldn't call it worry, hey, not my dimes and nickles...just curiosity which seems to cover about everyone who has posted on this thread. Could you point out where I ever stated that I was "worried" about it? Sometimes it's actually good to bring this stuff up, you know, so people can actually read and learn from others possible mistakes. Besides the frying of JB, isn't that kind of what this entire thread is about?

              Comment


              • DMK I think the cliche "Fool me once shame on you Fool me twice shame on me" is applicable here.

                The statements made are conditional based upon past, current and sadly I'm sure future evidence that has been compiled against Mrs. Burnell.

                As per Horsenut's statement about "majority were very happy". How are you so certain? When it has been discussed , proven and re proven over the course of 212 pages that her website and its list of sale/sold horses available in utero's, mares and even purchasers is nothing more then a elaborate tapestry with some fragments of truth , some fantasy and out right lies, all woven together in order to create the illusion of grandeur.

                I think that those that purchase horses from her for whatever reason are certainly more then free to do so. However I would also expect even prior to this particular thread that there has been enough FACTUAL evidence provided that anyone expecting to do business with her and hoping for a positive outcome without providing their own fail safes certainly would have earned a few adjectives to describe their naiveté.

                We are not talking about buying horses sight unseen from a breeder or establishment of good repute. The discussion is about doing business with Jill Burnell.
                "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Acertainsmile View Post
                  I really hope you are smarter in real life than what you type...if there is any lesson to be learned through all of this mess (and I would at least hope that there is) it would be that people need to check, and then double check when it comes to buying anything sight unseen from someone who has less than a stellar reputation.

                  If this lesson fails, people like Jill Burnell will continue to come out of the woodwork, preying on those who may be niave to their practices, but most of all, failing the horses in their care who have absoloutely no voice or recourse in the situation.

                  We are no longer "speculating" on Jills horse keeping practices, nor are we drinking the kool aid and thinking that these accusations about her are coming from jealous stallion owners. We are also not speculating that she has had a few of the top professionals suing for non-payment for services, etc.

                  If you know where and whom you are buying horses, foals, or in utero foals from thats great, there is no need to be a little paranoid and double check. If there is a shadow of a doubt than you would be a fool (yes I said it) to fork over your cash and hope for the best.
                  Like I said, someone would take the bait. People who are not smart don't take the bait.

                  Your post(s) did not specify the JB situation in particular. Instead you have posted as a general statement that applies to all.

                  Way too much tin foil hats on this thread.
                  Fan of Sea Accounts

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                    DMK I think the cliche "Fool me once shame on you Fool me twice shame on me" is applicable here.

                    The statements made are conditional based upon past, current and sadly I'm sure future evidence that has been compiled against Mrs. Burnell.

                    As per Horsenut's statement about "majority were very happy". How are you so certain? When it has been discussed , proven and re proven over the course of 212 pages that her website and its list of sale/sold horses available in utero's, mares and even purchasers is nothing more then a elaborate tapestry with some fragments of truth , some fantasy and out right lies, all woven together in order to create the illusion of grandeur.

                    I think that those that purchase horses from her for whatever reason are certainly more then free to do so. However I would also expect even prior to this particular thread that there has been enough FACTUAL evidence provided that anyone expecting to do business with her and hoping for a positive outcome without providing their own fail safes certainly would have earned a few adjectives to describe their naiveté.

                    We are not talking about buying horses sight unseen from a breeder or establishment of good repute. The discussion is about doing business with Jill Burnell.
                    ok should have qualified my statement. MOST people on this board whether they hate JB or not are happy with their babies. I say this based on the number of them posted on FB pages, winning classes etc etc. Yes some have said they received their purchase in poor shape and I believe there was one that was injured. But in percentages I'd say she's doing well despite herself.

                    as for fictional purchases etc, I think you only need to look at USEF, FB, to know that there really are quite a few purchases. If you are suggesting she only REALLY sold a few and the rest are made up that doesn't fly.

                    There were quite a few making a general statement about people being foolish buying inutero or site unseen, they were not directing it only at people who bought from JB.
                    Last edited by horsenut93136; Jan. 22, 2013, 05:15 PM. Reason: hit enter too soon

                    Comment


                    • Prior to this year, I found few, if any problems with her sale announcements on the website, or breedings that didn't actually take place. These particular problems seem to have really cropped up this year, especially the last 6-9 months. She has sold a HUGE number of babies, and, as the poster above noted, percentage wise, there have been very few unhappy WITH THE HORSES. With other aspects of her business, certainly. But she has not gone six years lying on her website.

                      No defense, just a reality check.
                      Laurie

                      Comment


                      • Wow, some of you just don't get it, or are lost in the reading for comprehension aspect of it all. Amazing!

                        As far as "taking the bait", really not sure what you are referring too, as I am not "on the hook" for anything. I am not owed a horse, breeding, unborn foal from JB, nada.

                        Yes, I made some general statements regarding buying anything from a less than reputable person. And I stand by that, whether it be a horse, dog, car you name it. And yes, I did add Jill Burnells name to the mix, because that is actually the person being named over and over and even over in this thread.

                        I have zero conspiracy theory, I just go by what I see. A woman who supposably purchased a stallion, but to date still doesnt have any information on him. This isn't heresay, she's posted about it on her FB page. I suppose instead of saying that she doesnt have any information, she could always update and say she does, but can't post about it.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Acertainsmile View Post
                          Besides the frying of JB, isn't that kind of what this entire thread is about?
                          "Worry" was the kindest motive I could think of for such obsessive concern, because what this thread is about, other than JB (which it is barely about any more), is dragging anyone tangentially related to the issue through the muck. But concerns for others learning a valuable life lesson when it comes to buying a breeding stallion is another possibility, I suppose. But so is being too cute by half.
                          Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Acertainsmile View Post
                            Wow, some of you just don't get it, or are lost in the reading for comprehension aspect of it all. Amazing!

                            As far as "taking the bait", really not sure what you are referring too, as I am not "on the hook" for anything. I am not owed a horse, breeding, unborn foal from JB, nada.

                            Yes, I made some general statements regarding buying anything from a less than reputable person. And I stand by that, whether it be a horse, dog, car you name it. And yes, I did add Jill Burnells name to the mix, because that is actually the person being named over and over and even over in this thread.

                            I have zero conspiracy theory, I just go by what I see. A woman who supposably purchased a stallion, but to date still doesnt have any information on him. This isn't heresay, she's posted about it on her FB page. I suppose instead of saying that she doesnt have any information, she could always update and say she does, but can't post about it.
                            After her treatment here, I would bet her updates will be few and far between.
                            Laurie

                            Comment


                            • I guess the bottom line Laurie , DMK, etc is WHY defend her at all? Years ago people who have equal respect in the business warned of something being NQR and over the last say 6 years using the number you've quoted the % of poor business issues and poor horse care has been on a steady rise.

                              Why defend her at all ? Do you think the picture of the starved mare .. or where her in laws were being housed ..or the money she to owes god knows who at this point deserve a defense ?

                              If anything Laurie the very fact that her quasii ponzi scheme has degraded to the point that even people like yourself who at one time was a business associate and a stalwart defender have been left holding the tab should be enough to just let the defending go.

                              She is a smart women who had/has nice stallions and nice mares and by all accounts had all the pieces to make a really successful mark in the business. It was her choices and actions that have caused her decent into the current. None of it is defensible.

                              The rest of the arguing back and forth is just trying to pick fly shit out of the pepper.
                              Last edited by Lynnwood; Jan. 22, 2013, 05:59 PM.
                              "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                "Worry" was the kindest motive I could think of for such obsessive concern, because what this thread is about, other than JB (which it is barely about any more), is dragging anyone tangentially related to the issue through the muck. But concerns for others learning a valuable life lesson when it comes to buying a breeding stallion is another possibility, I suppose. But so is being too cute by half.
                                While I agree that there were some conspiracy theories (and mudslinging) about RS, being hidden, someone doing a favor for JB, etc. I can assure you that those statements didn't come from me, go back and do some fact checking. What you call "obsessive" is me trying to drive a point home to some obviously very thick individuals who for whatever reason just can't seem to grasp a very simple concept. And that was me stating that in the nicest way possible.

                                Am I the least bit concerened about people buying horses, dogs, cars or anything from a reputable person? Nope! Just trying to point out again that this is clearly not the case here.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Acertainsmile View Post

                                  supposably
                                  AAAAAAAAAAAGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                                  "...it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

                                  Comment


                                  • I guess the bottom line Laurie , DMK, etc is WHY defend her at all? Years ago people who have equal respect in the business warned of something being NQR and over the last say 6 years using the number you've quoted the % of poor business issues and poor horse care has been on a steady rise.
                                    Seriously??? Again, showing limited ability to keep up or read, take your pick.

                                    FFS, NOBODY, I REPEAT, NOBODY... least of all, LaurieP and myself is defending JB. The furthest thing from it. <head desk head desk head desk>.

                                    What we object to is dragging everyone else through the muck based on little more than idiotic invented claims of conspiracies or collusion, compounded with idle gossip, damaging speculation or anything else along those lines. Facts? Not so much.

                                    Personally I think JB needs to be out of the business one way or another. I'd like it to be through legal transfer/sale of her remaining stock because that is what is best for all of the animals. I also think anyone who is doing their job as it relates to this case deserves the respect and consideration of not being raked over the internet coals for their efforts.

                                    You want to call JB a starving hoarder, have at it.
                                    Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Acertainsmile View Post
                                      I suppose instead of saying that she doesnt have any information, she could always update and say she does, but can't post about it.
                                      Oh yes, I am sure that would be met with nary an internet peep. Based on the hysterical idiocy of many and the targeted agendas of a few, I'm sure posting something like that would just make the whole thing settle right down and we would all sing kumbaya and roast marshmallows. I think you should email her with that suggestion. And for a follow up, maybe ask the vet to elaborate on what she thinks about dental care as an excuse. I can see how that would just set everyone's mind at ease.

                                      #livinginapipedream
                                      Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                      Comment


                                      • Lynwood you do what you have to do, I will do what I see fit. I see no defense in introducing actual FACTS back into the mix, for no other reason than to put a check on the rampant speculation. I find it unacceptable to ignore facts just to continue the ongoing into the Twilight Zone. There have been enough stories presented here, accepted as fact, without continuing to extrapolate incorrectly. But, as I said, do as you like.
                                        Laurie

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                          Oh yes, I am sure that would be met with nary an internet peep. Based on the hysterical idiocy of many and the targeted agendas of a few, I'm sure posting something like that would just make the whole thing settle right down and we would all sing kumbaya and roast marshmallows. I think you should email her with that suggestion. And for a follow up, maybe ask the vet to elaborate on what she thinks about dental care as an excuse. I can see how that would just set everyone's mind at ease.

                                          #livinginapipedream
                                          The truth will set you free...

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X