• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Perfect Pony
    I am sad to hear that David Adamo is involved with someone involved heavily with JB, and then I discovered he is also now on Chileno Valley Road himself at another less than decent "breeders" farm. Sigh.

    Seriously people, you are all shocked by all this, but NorCal is full of them
    For pete's sake she is a LAWYER. Her job is to represent people. It does NOT mean that she approves of JB any more than the lawyers who represent rapists approve of their clients.

    I posted this earlier:

    Originally posted by saje View Post
    A lawyer's job is to represent their client and try to get charges made against them cleared. That's the job they signed on for.

    Lawyers represent alll sorts of horrible, evil people, also people who are accused of horrible things but who are sick, not evil, also people accused of horrible actions who have not actually done any such thing**.

    That Is Their Job.

    Like it or don't, but just because a lawyer represents someone accused of child rape does not mean that they themselves approve of child rape, or will bring children to that rapist's house and leave them there unsupervised just to get free babysitting.



    **and no, I am not putting JB in this category.

    And what David Adamo has to do with anything is beyond me. His job is to ride and train her horses, nothing more. Do you think that lawyers who represent horrible people should get no services at all simply because of the job they do?

    Seriously folks, concentrate on the one and only villain in all this, Jill Burnell. SHE is the ONLY one responsible for any of this, perhaps adding her husband in as an accessory.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by saje View Post
      Seriously folks, concentrate on the one and only villain in all this, Jill Burnell. SHE is the ONLY one responsible for any of this, perhaps adding her husband in as an accessory.
      What? And ignore the enablers?

      Comment


      • Auction Updates

        Auction Items Closing This Evening, Sun Jan 20 2013:
        (Note that auction closes at time indicated or approximately 5 minutes after last bid)

        21:10:00 EST 1 Informal Stock Tie (seasonal print of choice)
        21:25:00 EST 1 Breeding to winners choice of Beste Gold or Hot Shot MRF
        21:40:00 EST 1 Breeding to the Hanoverian-approved (AHS) Holsteiner stallion, Contratto
        21:55:00 EST 1 breeding to the Welsh Section A stallion, Coyote Run Gryffon
        22:10:00 EST 1 Breeding to SS Stallone - Homozygous Tobiano/Black - Licensed Oldenburg N.A.

        Tally to Date/Time of Posting

        Date Total
        Winning
        Bids
        Payments Received to Date
        (Google Checkout, PayPal or other payment commissions not deducted)
        January 10, 2013 $2,124.00 $1,524
        January 11, 2013 $2,110.00 $910
        January 12, 2013 $1,805.00 $745
        January 13, 2013 $1,755.00 $990
        January 14, 2013 $2,980.00 $1,730
        January 15, 2013 $1,090.00 $1,090
        January 16, 2013 $3,515.00 $1,250
        January 17, 2013 $1,650.00 $1,650
        January 18, 2013 $1,750 $1,150
        January 19, 2013 $1,064.50 $410
        TOTALS: $19,843.50 $11,449
        Leg-Up Equestrian Assistance Program, Inc. a 501(c)(3) charity
        Contact Us!
        Make an Auction Donation

        Comment


        • Leg Up - I really like the way you've bolded the paid-to-date days of the auction where all the winning bids have been paid for.

          Very concise, informative chart. (and a nice total amount so far too!)
          "No matter how cynical I get its just not enough to keep up." Lily Tomlin

          Comment


          • Lawyer or not, isn't there some "ethics" (I know we are talking lawyers), that if you really do not agree with the case, you can refuse it? I sure would not try to defend a person like JB because I feel I could not do a proper job. I would always be looking at the evidence, seeing these poor horses and that mess... and I could NOT defend her.

            Comment


            • What i am going to say next does not mean i support JB.

              From what we have been told her horses are not in the kind of condition it takes to be seized - if they were they would of been taken already. While you may not keep your horses that way - there are many that do.

              So honestly - people need to stop hoping that her horses will be taken - it is 99.99% likely they wont. If folks are involved and want justice they need to act.

              simple as that.

              Lawyers are paid to defend their clients and a good one will do that to the best of their ability. That is how our country works, after all.

              Comment


              • So honestly - people need to stop hoping that her horses will be taken - it is 99.99% likely they wont. If folks are involved and want justice they need to act.
                When you make your living off of your horses and more than one horse ends up in terrible shape due to your neglect I don't think you should get to say "whoops" and get to continue. Sorry, you cant tell people how to feel... I DO hope her horses are taken away... AND that the courts put sanctions on her to prevent her from horse ownership in the future.

                Im sorry.. She had the means to make change before they started starving, and if you seriously think the situation wouldn't be 10 times worse by now if she hadn't had horses seized and been thrown into the spotlight, well....

                Comment


                • Originally posted by FalseImpression View Post
                  Lawyer or not, isn't there some "ethics" (I know we are talking lawyers), that if you really do not agree with the case, you can refuse it? I sure would not try to defend a person like JB because I feel I could not do a proper job. I would always be looking at the evidence, seeing these poor horses and that mess... and I could NOT defend her.
                  Then it's a good thing you aren't an attorney. A good attorney needs to be able to shelve their own personal beliefs and feelings and simply deal with the facts of a case. Everyone has the right to a trial and to be defended, someone has to do that defending. Murderers, rapists, abusers, the lot of 'em. They don't have to like it, but it is the job they signed on for.

                  You want insane conjecture? Here's one - maybe Ms Weems is hoping to lose this and get JB out of the breeding game for good, showing up her frauds all the while...

                  I doubt it highly, but one bit of speculation is as useful as the next.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Perfect Pony
                    I am sad to hear that David Adamo is involved with someone involved heavily with JB, and then I discovered he is also now on Chileno Valley Road himself at another less than decent "breeders" farm. Sigh.

                    Seriously people, you are all shocked by all this, but NorCal is full of them
                    Why keep going after David Adamo? He's a TRAINER. He has to work somewhere, doesn't he? He's currently working at one of the bigger Hunter/Jumper Barns in the area. There's only so much available space for trainers. He has a family he'd probably like to see, once in a while. Is he supposed to commute to some fictional ideal "COTH approved" barn that doesn't exist? Frankly, all the farms have their pluses and and minuses, including batty owners. The poor man is making a living as best he can. I met him, years ago, at another facility, and found him to be a very nice man, for what it's worth. If you don't like the owner, don't breed to her horse/s and don't board there, but stop attacking the people who rent out the space to run their business. That's not fair.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by saje View Post
                      Then it's a good thing you aren't an attorney. A good attorney needs to be able to shelve their own personal beliefs and feelings and simply deal with the facts of a case. Everyone has the right to a trial and to be defended, someone has to do that defending. Murderers, rapists, abusers, the lot of 'em. They don't have to like it, but it is the job they signed on for.

                      You want insane conjecture? Here's one - maybe Ms Weems is hoping to lose this and get JB out of the breeding game for good, showing up her frauds all the while...

                      I doubt it highly, but one bit of speculation is as useful as the next.
                      Totally agree, I am glad I am not one!
                      And this is really why I don't trust lawyers. They have to shelve their personal beliefs which makes them hypocritical in my eyes... I am just wondering if you can refuse such a case if you truly, looking at the facts in front of you ie the poor condition of the horses, disagree that everything is fine?
                      In case of a murderer, etc., there are ways the lawyers can argue mental illness, etc, but here... she can only argue that the horses are in good condition? mental illness? no... lack of money? which means can't buy feed... I just don't see proper defense unless the lawyer agrees...
                      I could not do it... period. The hypocrisy is just too much for me.

                      Comment


                      • I don't think there is any state in which a lawyer can be forced to take a case. But you guys need to remember that our entire American legal justice system is based upon the right of every citizen to be represented by competent legal counsel. Why would you vilify a lawyer for upholding that system?

                        Sometimes the only thing a lawyer can do is damage control or to force the authorities to make sure they dot all their i's and cross all their t's before they bring the full might of the system down upon the client.

                        You should be GLAD of this, not condemning the lawyer.

                        So sad to know that you think lawyers should leave someone hanging in the wind just because some COTH members disapprove.
                        Visit Sonesta Farms website at www.sonestafarms.com or our FaceBook page at www.facebook.com/sonestafarms. Also showing & breeding Cavalier King Charles Spaniels.

                        Comment


                        • Yes, exactly.

                          Comment


                          • It's been my experience that if it was sold as a buildable lot all the feasibility work would have been done ahead of time - it would either perc or have an easement to an area that did, sometimes they go to the extent of having a vested septic system drawn up and ready to be put in, a test hole for a well would have been drilled and the GPH established and a lot of times power would have been brought to the property. Sometimes all the systems are in place but generally that's hard to recoup at a profit. Sellers just get it started, which is hugely important in itself.

                            However that isn't always the case, if it's an old subdivision or just sold as a lot with no mention of building status then you'd be on your own to determine whether you could build on it and the deed or the zoning don't really tell you anything. I fear that she's leapt from the frying pan into the fire, and it'll get worse before it gets better.

                            I really don't understand how she can be such a good salesman and present such a good front for a business that she clearly doesn't want to do the work to keep up. I've met people like that in the past and I never have understood how they can so glowingly represent the work that they just can't get around to doing. They are true con men I guess, but they aren't conning intentionally, they mean well. Is it maybe a form of OCD, like hoarding? Just crazy.
                            Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                            Incredible Invisible

                            Comment


                            • I thought the only lawyers who had to take a case were public defenders. All the rest, it's their choice.

                              Comment


                              • Thanks to those who keep trying to bring the sanity.

                                Honestly, thank you.
                                "Aye God, Woodrow..."

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Perfect Pony
                                  Here we go. I was seriously wronged, as have others.
                                  Hunh?

                                  If you were wronged by David Adamo, then start another thread about that. If you were wronged by Jill Burnell, than leave Adamo out of it. He wasn't the one misleading owners and buyers and mistreating horses at Gray Fox Farm.

                                  (Which is the topic of this thread, remember?)

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by saje View Post
                                    Hunh?

                                    If you were wronged by David Adamo, then start another thread about that. If you were wronged by Jill Burnell, than leave Adamo out of it. He wasn't the one misleading owners and buyers and mistreating horses at Gray Fox Farm.
                                    Agreed.
                                    What has a trainer to do with the neglected horses? Just because he's down the road doesn't entitle you to drag him down, as well. Why not go after the feed stores, the truck dealers, the utility companies, heck, let's just drag the whole state of California, and everyone who DARES live with 200 miles of JB, down with her.
                                    WTF?

                                    Correction: he didn't rider for her.
                                    Last edited by Callmeacab; Jan. 20, 2013, 03:07 PM. Reason: fact check

                                    Comment


                                    • Did he ride for her? (JB, that is) He's an Eventer, not sure he'd be showing at the top of the H/J world.

                                      Comment


                                      • He was mentioned, way back. I thought it was about him riding for her, but found on page 154, of this thread that it was only in reference to the atty claiming that she's groomed for him. How that brings him into this mess is beyond me.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Sonesta View Post
                                          I don't think there is any state in which a lawyer can be forced to take a case. But you guys need to remember that our entire American legal justice system is based upon the right of every citizen to be represented by competent legal counsel. Why would you vilify a lawyer for upholding that system?

                                          So sad to know that you think lawyers should leave someone hanging in the wind just because some COTH members disapprove.
                                          What, you don't trust the computer screen attorneys, vets, farriers, accountants, and zoning code enforcers to mete out justice?

                                          A couple pages back, commenters were dismissing the examining vet's report because she was only 2 years out of vet school, and obviously less experienced with horses than COTH members with.... zero years of vet school, and not at the scene.

                                          You know why all vets and farriers don't come to a neglect scene and kick the owner's butt? Because sometimes a horse professional might think that by acting all level headed and sane, they'll have a chance to convince the owner to make things better. You can go in and immediately alienate the owner, or you can act professional and polite and hope to keep the owner's attention and get them to take action.

                                          It's not the same as being called in by Animal Control or by USDA to inspect a puppy mill, where you're representing the enforcement agency. If you're working as a private vet or farrier, on some rare occasions you actually can educate an owner to do a better job.

                                          Usual disclaimer, not excusing Burnell, blah blah, nor is Burnell a candidate for educating like some new owners.
                                          "...it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X