• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So now a (so far) three week hospitalization is considered a "slight" injury.
    "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique

    Comment


    • Originally posted by hAlterHorse View Post
      Did you read the document?

      "Food Supply:... Mrs. Burnell stated that due to the condition of the roads, that they have been unable to purchase large amounts of hay to be brought onto the property. Their current program is to store the hay on their truck and to purchase more hay as needed until the contemplated hay barn is built. On this day, I observed a pick-up truck full of alfalfa hay, which arrived shortly after my arrival."
      Someone who knows how to stack bales can get a ton of hay on a pick up. (Amazing but true).

      That is 2000#. MY horses get 20 - 25 pounds of hay a day (plus feed and supplements). Say JB's horses are getting 20 pounds each/day x 30 horses = 600 pounds a day are being fed. At that rate, the hay will be gone in 3.33 days.

      If JB is feeding only 10 pounds of hay/day (oh my, it makes me sad to even type those words), that means the hay will last a week. Please, someone report back how soon more hay is delivered.....

      I am also questioning that she is feeding alfalfa hay. No way can horses who are that malnourished process such a rich type of hay. It would be like giving a starving man a full roast beef dinner with a rich desert. It would go right through them and give then terrible diarrhea (sp?). Orchard grass or timothy would be more appropriate.

      If the horses are NOT getting alfalfa, but a medium rich hay more suited to their precarious condition, then whoever reported the truck contained alfalfa (a) is not a horseperson, or (b) is not reporting accurately for some other reason.
      "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

      Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

      Comment


      • Originally posted by DownYonder View Post
        FWIW, someone just pointed out to me that Dr. Ellis just received her DVM in 2010. I am thinking it may be far easier for someone like JillB to blow smoke up the a** of a fairly recent grad then a vet with many years experience.

        And in reading through her report, I am struck by how many horses she noted as in serious need of dental work. Really makes me wonder if JillB used the poor dental condition of those horses as an excuse for their poor body condition.
        Well that may well be. But in the end the owner of a horse or horses should not be excused for "ignorance" of all their care. What...blame the dentist of lack of one. Geesh. Do you blame no feed because the hay or grain wasn't delivered on time? That is a victim state of mind, and often you can see this with people who have no more money.

        Very clever defense, but ignorance or creating a defense of ignorance doesn't cut it. Not with someone so "experienced' with horses and breeding that was the CV that was out there and is being expounded upon by her own court papers.

        Clearly she thinks she knows better than anyone else. And that IS a bug that plagues horse people.

        In this case the ego will hopefully fail. It is what it is. Even a non horse person can see that. Power and facade gone wild, with the scoring on the USET for the unsuspecting to buy hook line and sinker.

        In that defense, they look at the horses they see in front of them as they should. The horse nor the owner that was "able" to get that progeny should be punished from where that horse came.

        But these offenses, terrible offenses, in the horse world should be announced before things like this go on and on and on.
        www.littlebullrun@aol.com See Little Bull Run's stallions at:
        "Argosy" - YouTube and "Boleem" - YouTube
        Boleem @ 1993 National Dressage Symposium - YouTube

        Comment


        • Stripes, how do you figure? The horse wasn't injured at the time, his body condition hasn't been addressed, but even if he was thin, thin horses are shipped all the time! As said before, he probably saw it as a way to get the horse out of the situation. Why harp on that vet who did nothing wrong?
          Laurie

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post
            I am also questioning that she is feeding alfalfa hay. No way can horses who are that malnourished process such a rich type of hay. It would be like giving a starving man a full roast beef dinner with a rich desert. It would go right through them and give then terrible diarrhea (sp?). Orchard grass or timothy would be more appropriate.

            If the horses are NOT getting alfalfa, but a medium rich hay more suited to their precarious condition, then whoever reported the truck contained alfalfa (a) is not a horseperson, or (b) is not reporting accurately for some other reason.
            Alfalfa and oat hay are the cheapest hays, locally. Orchard Grass is, currently, at about $22 a bale (140#). For all we know, it could be cattle alfalfa. She owes the local feed store, so, who knows where she's buying her hay.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by sid View Post
              Well that may well be. But in the end the owner of a horse or horses should not be excused for "ignorance" of all their care. What...blame the dentist of lack of one. Geesh. Do you blame no feed because the hay or grain wasn't delivered on time? That is a victim state of mind, and often you can see this with people who have no more money.

              Very clever defense, but ignorance or creating a defense of ignorance doesn't cut it. Not with someone so "experienced' with horses and breeding that was the CV that was out there and is being expounded upon by her own court papers.

              Clearly she thinks she knows better than anyone else. And that IS a bug that plagues horse people.

              In this case the ego will hopefully fail. It is what it is. Even a non horse person can see that. Power and facade gone wild, with the scoring on the USET for the unsuspecting to buy hook line and sinker.

              In that defense, they look at the horses they see in front of them as they should. The horse nor the owner that was "able" to get that progeny should be punished from where that horse came.

              But these offenses, terrible offenses, in the horse world should be announced before things like this go on and on and on.
              It sounded like she admitted to not having a handle on her dental program, assuming that was her excuse for the horses being thin. Sounds better to say they are starving because of bad teeth rather than because I can't feed them?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by 3Dogs View Post
                Penny - she was sued within 6-8 months by the "co-owner" partner in Redwine
                She was sued by John French- public record - for not paying fees
                She by the grapevine never paid Peter Pletcher

                Thus I am not sure she EVER had the money to do anything she has done.

                Wish I could get my horses shown by top trainers for no payment - have to work on my spiel
                Peter Pletcher is listed as owner of one of her Redwine babies (per her web site). I am GUESSING that she paid him off in horse flesh, which is why he has not sued her.
                "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

                Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

                Comment


                • I seem to remember when RS was seized they said along with the broken jaw and injuries from the fight his BCS was 1.
                  Maybe it is in the original statement that was issued.
                  Kanoe Godby
                  www.dyrkgodby.com
                  See, I was raised by wolves and am really behind the 8-ball on diplomatic issue resolution.

                  Comment


                  • No doubt he thought the horse should just stay there? That was the better choice? There's been plenty said on this thread, but not many people thought the better choice was no choice at all.

                    I also noticed that some people are saying that a horse scored as a 3 shouldn't have the phrase "thin/bordering on very thin" following a score of 3. However the henneke scale describes 3 as thin and 2 as very thin. Sure, a 2.5 is more accurate, but based on the scale the Vet should be using, that description didn't sugar coat it, so I'm at a loss as to why anyone has an issue with that? Unless of course the issue is that the horse is not a 3, but a 1 or 2, in which case your beef isn't with the Vet, but the agency that didn't seize the horse...
                    Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by CDE Driver View Post
                      I seem to remember when RS was seized they said along with the broken jaw and injuries from the fight his BCS was 1.
                      Maybe it is in the original statement that was issued.
                      I seen to remember that was what the rumor mill said along that along with he was a 2, he had a broken jaw or not, but that was not officially stated anywhere that I have seen, just that he was seized due to untreated serious injuries.

                      Mind you, I have no doubt he was not in good condition, but I suspect the best thing that could have happened to him was to stand on a trailer with a bag full of hay in cool weather and head to a home that came with food. And vet care. And shelter. And safe turn out facilities.
                      Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                      Comment


                      • I searched both Jill Burnell and Gray Gox Farm, LLC on USEF and there are several horses there which do not appear on her website or are listed as sold. Anyone know the deal with these: Collateral, Culpable, Envision, Accessorized, Action Hero, Apricot Hill, Finger Paints, First Kiss, Perfect Alibi, Rip Tide, Rocket Science, or Rumors Fly?

                        I know most of these are probably safe in homes which just have given them new names or haven't yet done the USEF transfer of ownership, but I want to be thorough and make sure we aren't missing any horses.
                        Last edited by HunterRider992; Jan. 18, 2013, 12:15 AM. Reason: found one

                        Comment


                        • That is a pretty sad vet rapport, those horses are not doing well. Perhaps not in immediate danger, this is not a good situation. It won't take much for an atty to turn that into favor of the MHS. Most of it, when explained by an expert, is actually in favor of the MHS.

                          For one, she notes her observations, but also her 'hear say' without providing That she has verified this information through receipts, purchase orders etc.

                          Any good lawyer would reply with 'do you have any proof of that?' I mean JB can say anything she would like, she can say the moon is blue. But as a business, she has to keep records for taxes, so she has to be able to provide this proof in discovery. Though I doubt that. She can come up with something, but a smart atty would subpoena the original receipts from the seller.

                          While she is qualified to determine and observe the horses, and what is right for the horses, it is obvious the rest is just the story spun to the vet by JB. Those are just meaningless with out proof.

                          And if JB did as said she did, providing this proof is easy.

                          I mean bad teeth don't cause that much distress that quickly.

                          2 things caught my attention immediately.

                          Where are the other stallions? If they are gone, are other horses gone?
                          Those are very few mares actually in foal.
                          Marieke

                          www.EquineFashionandTack.com
                          www.Twitter.com/EquineFashion

                          Comment


                          • Was Porta Westfalica a Thoroughbred mare who was owned by a COTHer? Or maybe a WBxTB. If she's who I think she is, she has a wonderful tail female.
                            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                            Thread killer Extraordinaire

                            Comment


                            • Irony at it's finest. If Mistyblue or any of the other COTH sleuths wants to connect the dots on who the breeder of the foal in this post is, please feel free. This web is so tangled not even a spider could negotiate it!

                              http://grayfoxfarm.blogspot.com/2012...your-baby.html
                              McDowell Racing Stables

                              Home Away From Home

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post
                                Someone who knows how to stack bales can get a ton of hay on a pick up. (Amazing but true).

                                That is 2000#. MY horses get 20 - 25 pounds of hay a day (plus feed and supplements). Say JB's horses are getting 20 pounds each/day x 30 horses = 600 pounds a day are being fed. At that rate, the hay will be gone in 3.33 days.

                                If JB is feeding only 10 pounds of hay/day (oh my, it makes me sad to even type those words), that means the hay will last a week. Please, someone report back how soon more hay is delivered.....
                                Ah, someone who can do math and knows how to figure the rate of what is being fed by weight, number of horses being fed, and how many days that will last. Rate of consumption by number of horses and expected/necessary daily intake should also have been calculated for water as well as the hay and compared to the storage capacity of the tank mentioned for any status report on Burnell's situation that even mentions hay and water. Those figures would dictate how often it would be necessary for the Burnell's to maintain the supposed rates they claim the horses are being given in food and water. Where's the water coming from? Are they paying for it? Where is the hay coming from? Are there receipts to back up the rate that they claim they are feeding? These things can be quantified, somebody just needs to mandate that they do prove it, otherwise it's just Jill opening her mouth and some sound coming out of it. Btw, the scenario with the pick-up truck coming with a load of hay on it? Deja vu; that is exactly what happened on the day in March two years ago that I visited GFF in Petaluma to take a look at Redwine. It was a red flag then and still is: there was only a couple of bales of hay in the "storage area" which was nothing more than a small RV cover. When I saw hay being delivered by the pick-up truck load for the, idk, 25 or more horses on the place that I saw, I didn't count, I KNEW she had bad credit with the hay brokers or feed stores, and was probably on a cash-only basis. I used to be a licensed vet tech that worked with a large animal vet practice, and had seen scenes like that at least a few times. It's a red flag for anyone holding this many horses. I personally have far fewer horses than GFF to feed, and I buy hay 40 ton at a time and have the hay barn to house it in. Buying hay by the pick-up truck load is BS when there are this many horses.
                                www.forwardfarms.com.
                                Follow us on Facebook:
                                http://www.facebook.com/pages/Forwar...s/192796641203

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
                                  I realize that everyone is entitled to representation which means someone has to defend what seems indefensible to most of us ala Jerry Sandusky and such. My question is, in order to defend that person does the lawyer have to BELIEVE what their client has told them to be the truth or can they just repeat what they have been told? If that lawyer believes that crap she is as crazy as Jill Burnell.
                                  No. A lawyer does not have to believe his client. This is one of the reasons I got out of practicing litigation -- I could not stomach representing someone who I did not believe was being truthful. The only thing a lawyer cannot do is suborn perjury --- letting his client take the oath to tell the truth when he KNOWS that his client intends to lie on the stand.
                                  "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

                                  Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                    Was Porta Westfalica a Thoroughbred mare who was owned by a COTHer? Or maybe a WBxTB. If she's who I think she is, she has a wonderful tail female.
                                    Porta is a Trakehner who was listed for sale on Warmbloods for sale on 11/2009 by http://www.castell-trakehner.webs.com/
                                    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                    Comment


                                    • I have been following this story for a long, long time and am more disgusted than ever. Perhaps the vet's experience helping horses in impoverished areas has given her a skewed view of acceptable practices. Those poor animals. Skinny, pot-bellied, snotty noses, crusty eyes... what did I miss?

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                        Was Porta Westfalica a Thoroughbred mare who was owned by a COTHer? Or maybe a WBxTB. If she's who I think she is, she has a wonderful tail female.
                                        The Porta Westfalica you're thinking about is standing in my barn, safe and sound. It is a completely different mare ( you did do the pedigree research on my mare for me )
                                        Already excited about our 2016 foals! Expecting babies by Indoctro, Diamant de Semilly, Zirocco Blue and Calido!
                                        https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hills...h/112931293227

                                        Comment


                                        • Ah. I was wondering if it was this mare:
                                          http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/porta+westfalica2
                                          Thanks, Hillside H. I remembered the pedigree that went with the name, and hoped you weren't one who had been cozened by JB.
                                          "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                          Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X