• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Breeding and foaling season is just around the corner. I'm curious how current conditions of the farm/housing is going to affect JBs ability to foal out mares and collect and ship semen. While this thread has probably gone a long ways towards informing mare owners and possible buyers to beware, it would appear that standing stallions and selling offspring are Jill's main source of income. What happens to the horses she has now when any sort of income stream dries up?

    I'm hoping that the MCHS is closely monitoring the situation. It could go from bad to worse right quick when Jill is unable to sell semen or horses. Conditions may be okay now, but the next 6 months could spell disaster.
    Surgeon General warns: "drinking every time Trump lies during the debate could result in acute alcohol poisoning."

    Comment


    • I also noted from the report that Dr. Ellis recommended JB contact an equine nutritionist and gave recommendations for several of the horses be fed more and separated while they eat. Also recommended blankets for those that didn't have them. Noted snotty noses, etc. I got the impression that there wasn't a single horse that she thought was in optimal condition. She merely stated their condition could improve with better care and feeding and that JB seemed amenable to her advice.

      I can only imagine the thoughts going through her head as she scored one horse after another a 3, 3 minus or a 4. And the poor stallion in the mud with nowhere dry to stand. I bet she was sick to her stomach.
      In an age when scientists are creating artificial intelligence, too many of our educational institutions seem to be creating artificial stupidity.—Thomas Sowell, Is Thinking Obsolete?

      Comment


      • Sorry if I missed this, but what happened to the yearling "Blaze"? In the petition, Jill states she was also served with notice that a yearling would be seized, but Blaze was not mentioned as one of the horses seized at a later date, nor is he listed in the horses inspected on the property by Dr. Ellis.

        8. On December 27, 2012, Sgt. Rogers also served me with a NOTICE OF INTENT TO
        SEIZE ANIMAL(S) for a yearling named "Blaze", a true and correct copy of which is attached
        as Exhibit B.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Go Fish View Post
          Breeding and foaling season is just around the corner. I'm curious how current conditions of the farm/housing is going to affect JBs ability to foal out mares and collect and ship semen. While this thread has probably gone a long ways towards informing mare owners and possible buyers to beware, it would appear that standing stallions and selling offspring are Jill's main source of income. What happens to the horses she has now when any sort of income stream dries up?

          I'm hoping that the MCHS is closely monitoring the situation. It could go from bad to worse right quick when Jill is unable to sell semen or horses. Conditions may be okay now, but the next 6 months could spell disaster.
          Other than turnout sheds, she won't be able to build a barn, without going through the planning process, and getting a permit. That takes months to years, with Marin County Planning Dept. She also won't have electricity on the property, without the proper permits, either. I'd hate to think she'd be running her lab in the back of a pickup.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by sid View Post
            Re: feeding hay by the flake. A "flake" can weigh 2 lbs. or it can weigh 10 lbs.

            The number of "flakes" mean nothing. It's the poundage that matters. And whether or not each individual is getting the poundage (calories) they need...even in a herd environment. Horsekeeping 101, unless this was a "survival of the fittest" mentality, because she simply did not have enough money to feed them and pretended she could, as she pretended she had a fabulous farm with a bogus website.

            Smoke and mirrors.

            Carry on.

            This is worthy of repeating and exactly what I was thinking when I was reading the report. Here in CA I believe most of us use 'large' bales that are roughly 100-120 lbs. I feel the need to try and do the math on how many pounds she "should" be feeding, but dont have the energy to do it just yet.... I know I have done the math for my 3 horses and I feed roughly 50-60 lbs of hay a day (with 6 lbs of a complete feed on top of it). That's a lot of bales a day if I'm feeding 20 plus horses that are in foal, nursing, or are growing youngsters..... But I digress... What I also noticed was the report mentioned the piles of hay appeared fresh. Ah, we'll at least they are eating.

            I find myself going back and forth on my opinion of this vet (not that my opinion matters to anyone else but me). I can appreciate the hard position she has put herself in, she probably means well and is doing her best in an undesirable position. But, when I was reading her reports on the horses individually and giving her professional opinions for the record, how was she able to give her opinion on the two horses that were blanketed and uncatchable? I would think she would reserve her opinion in those two cases ( horses #14&15) if she was unable to properly evaluate them? What if they had blankets on for a reason? Just speculation here, of course, but with my professional name on the line here I would be very diligent and careful.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by stripes View Post
              All this talk about the vet that inspected the horses that were not seized, what about the vet that gave Romantic Star his health certificate??? That's the vet that deserves to get raked over the coals. JMHO..
              Seriously??

              Because that vet came out EIGHT days before the stallion was injured. WTF was he supposed to do, look into his crystal ball and foresee that the horse would get injured in the future?

              Because as far as I know, RS was not seized due to BCS, but due to injuries. Don't just take my word for it, how about what MCHS states in their press release?

              A badly wounded stallion known as “Romantic Star” was seized as a result of untreated serious injuries
              Mind you, they pointed out that the three other horses were seized due to malnourishment so I don't think they missed the boat on RS' body condition if that was an issue

              Another malnourished mare known as “Pookie” was also impounded and transported to MHS for evaluation, treatment and rehabilitative care.
              ...Officers seized an additional two mares known as “Nutsie” and “Blackie” from the property. Both were found to be nearly emaciated...
              They don't charge by the word, it wouldn't cost extra to say the stallion was malnourished AND wounded. It might would only help their case. He seems to have fallen into the category of "has not received medically necessary treatment in an appropriate time frame" seizure.

              So with a little bit of (easily accessible) information, exactly what kind of coals do you think the vet should be raked over? The "I can't see into the future" coals or maybe the "This stallion, who is not in great weight, is damned lucky to get out of this hellhole and how fast can I help him" coals?

              Consider your answer carefully. This might be a test.
              Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

              Comment


              • what about the Sable filly,,,presumably born in Sept? "poor conformation due to genetics, poor doer appearance"

                Comment


                • There are three young horses on the vet report which are not listed on her website or listed under different names. Paris is likely the 2012 filly out of Likide by Redwine listed on her website as due 8/7/12. The other two mystery foals on the vet report are the filly Sable and the colt Revelation. The filly Sable could be Devil's Sis' 2012 foal listed as Radiant (http://www.grayfoxfarms.com/radiant.htm), and the colt Revelation could be Rabbit Hill (http://www.grayfoxfarms.com/rabbit_hill.htm), as they are the only two 2012 foals not listed as sold on Jill's website.

                  There are two 2011 foals which are listed as "For Sale" on her website, but are not included in the vet report. They are Remember When, and Rendition #1.

                  Since we can't trust Jill to be accurate in reporting which horses are actually sold, it'd be helpful if anyone in the know can confirm the location of any of the 2011 and 2012 foals.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by HunterRider992 View Post
                    There are three young horses on the vet report which are not listed on her website or listed under different names. Paris is likely the 2012 filly out of Likide by Redwine listed on her website as due 8/7/12. The other two mystery foals on the vet report are the filly Sable and the colt Revelation. The filly Sable could be Devil's Sis' 2012 foal listed as Radiant (http://www.grayfoxfarms.com/radiant.htm), and the colt Revelation could be Rabbit Hill (http://www.grayfoxfarms.com/rabbit_hill.htm), as they are the only two 2012 foals not listed as sold on Jill's website.

                    There are two 2011 foals which are listed as "For Sale" on her website, but are not included in the vet report. They are Remember When, and Rendition #1.

                    Since we can't trust Jill to be accurate in reporting which horses are actually sold, it'd be helpful if anyone in the know can confirm the location of any of the 2011 and 2012 foals.
                    Remember When was one that went to MO. Devil's Sis' baby was born in July, the report said Sable was 4 1/2 mths old.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by LostAcres View Post
                      THIS whole escapade is an example of why I put on my search hat of the first Hanno double G line baby bred many years ago and selling at age 5. Went out of the horse business after I sold her. Have been reading so many horror stories over the years, so I started searching for that filly, and found her. Contacted current owners, and told them I want her back when they are ready to retire her or she was not useful anymore to them. She has been back with me now for a yr and a half, 25 yrs old now. Happy and healthy. I can sleep. I feel so bad for everyone that got involved with this sick individual
                      I'm with you would like to require background check, references (which I know some people do already microchipping for tracking, because it's not always who you sell to but who THEY sell to Not cool that Diamonette did not get back to her owner despite the document with the BOS. That is on the woman who sold her to Jill. I'm sure she didn't get much $$ so hopefully she is ashamed that she did not honor the owner's request.

                      Comment


                      • If someone is in fact hiding Aloha and Redwine for JB that is so disturbing. It takes a fairly knowledgeable person to house and care for stallions. Those poor animals. I hope they all get out soon.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Jack16 View Post
                          If someone is in fact hiding Aloha and Redwine for JB that is so disturbing. It takes a fairly knowledgeable person to house and care for stallions. Those poor animals. I hope they all get out soon.
                          I would hope that it is within MHS rights to know where the stallions are. BUT I am happy they are elsewhere presumably receiving better care.

                          Comment


                          • Whoever Blaze is, he must have been in very poor condition if they issued a notice of intent to seize him after seeing him on that first visit. Names changing aside, none of the yearlings in the vet report sound to be in (relatively) bad enough condition to issue a notice of intent to seize. Hope nothing bad happened to this yearling between 12/26 and the next visit when the 2 other mares were taken...I may not want to know

                            Comment


                            • Another story from the patch:

                              http://novato.patch.com/articles/hor...humane-society
                              The virtual "woodshed" seems the only remedy for willful fools .

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                Seriously??

                                Because that vet came out EIGHT days before the stallion was injured. WTF was he supposed to do, look into his crystal ball and foresee that the horse would get injured in the future?

                                Because as far as I know, RS was not seized due to BCS, but due to injuries. Don't just take my word for it, how about what MCHS states in their press release?



                                Mind you, they pointed out that the three other horses were seized due to malnourishment so I don't think they missed the boat on RS' body condition if that was an issue





                                They don't charge by the word, it wouldn't cost extra to say the stallion was malnourished AND wounded. It might would only help their case. He seems to have fallen into the category of "has not received medically necessary treatment in an appropriate time frame" seizure.

                                So with a little bit of (easily accessible) information, exactly what kind of coals do you think the vet should be raked over? The "I can't see into the future" coals or maybe the "This stallion, who is not in great weight, is damned lucky to get out of this hellhole and how fast can I help him" coals?

                                Consider your answer carefully. This might be a test.

                                QFT*




                                *(Quoted For Truth)

                                Comment


                                • FWIW, someone just pointed out to me that Dr. Ellis just received her DVM in 2010. I am thinking it may be far easier for someone like JillB to blow smoke up the a** of a fairly recent grad then a vet with many years experience.

                                  And in reading through her report, I am struck by how many horses she noted as in serious need of dental work. Really makes me wonder if JillB used the poor dental condition of those horses as an excuse for their poor body condition.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Joanne View Post
                                    Would love for RMHP to get ahold the declarations from Jill's "vet and farrier" guess it did answer the question about why there were not many horse pics in the ones on RMHP county was after land issues.

                                    Comment


                                    • I realize that everyone is entitled to representation which means someone has to defend what seems indefensible to most of us ala Jerry Sandusky and such. My question is, in order to defend that person does the lawyer have to BELIEVE what their client has told them to be the truth or can they just repeat what they have been told? If that lawyer believes that crap she is as crazy as Jill Burnell.
                                      McDowell Racing Stables

                                      Home Away From Home

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                                        A body score is not a 3 when its followed up with "thin /verging on very thin"

                                        I thought the same thing!
                                        http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fentre...24774504235082

                                        http://fentressfieldsequestriancenter.com/

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by DMK View Post
                                          Seriously??

                                          Because that vet came out EIGHT days before the stallion was injured. WTF was he supposed to do, look into his crystal ball and foresee that the horse would get injured in the future?

                                          Because as far as I know, RS was not seized due to BCS, but due to injuries. Don't just take my word for it, how about what MCHS states in their press release?



                                          Mind you, they pointed out that the three other horses were seized due to malnourishment so I don't think they missed the boat on RS' body condition if that was an issue





                                          They don't charge by the word, it wouldn't cost extra to say the stallion was malnourished AND wounded. It might would only help their case. He seems to have fallen into the category of "has not received medically necessary treatment in an appropriate time frame" seizure.

                                          So with a little bit of (easily accessible) information, exactly what kind of coals do you think the vet should be raked over? The "I can't see into the future" coals or maybe the "This stallion, who is not in great weight, is damned lucky to get out of this hellhole and how fast can I help him" coals?

                                          Consider your answer carefully. This might be a test.
                                          Yes, seriously. When the facts come out about him and his actual condition on the day he was seized it will tell the true tale. And again, let me repeat, YES the vet who signed a health certificate for this horse should be raked over the coals.
                                          http://www.tamarawiththecamera.com

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X