• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Laurie, gotcha. I've obviously following as this is so horrific. As I'm sure many others are. Hard to tame down the angered masses that actually got this exposed.

    And that's probably not a bad thing. Were there not so much ire that showewd up here, that would be pitiful from our industry.

    At this point the JB case it might be a double sided sword. Nevertheless, the feelings and facts should not be silenced.. the those things got this the attention out there.

    We cannot control everything. And sometimes I personally thing we shoudn't.
    www.littlebullrun@aol.com See Little Bull Run's stallions at:
    "Argosy" - YouTube and "Boleem" - YouTube
    Boleem @ 1993 National Dressage Symposium - YouTube

    Comment


    • Maybe this was already discussed.

      A link to this new article probably has already been posted somewhere here. No one appears to officially know (or can't say) which stallion was injured and removed, but interesting that that particular stallion appears to be sold. Doesn't someone here (I can't remember the name of the farm--it's the one who sponsors the stallion testing) have a lien on one of the stallions?

      "Weems, whose office is in Fairfax, said she also represents a Georgia woman who bought the stallion and was waiting for it to be shipped before it was injured and confiscated. According to Weems, the stallion was hurt not from abuse or neglect, but in a fight with another stallion."

      Is this old news?

      http://www.marinij.com/novato/ci_223...chileno-valley
      The virtual "woodshed" seems the only remedy for willful fools .

      Comment


      • I think the lien is on Aloha, as he is the one that was at the test, if I am not mistaken.
        Laurie

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Callmeacab View Post
          Getting a judgement against someone will only put you in a long line of liens against that person's property, if they own any. At a certain point, there can be more liens on a property than it's worth. I know of one person who racked up three times the value of the property, and the bank wouldn't even foreclose on it, as they would then have inherited the liens on the property. After a while, it's meaningless paper, as it will never be recouped, so one has to ask "why bother?". This doesn't mean don't try, but if you learn that you're number 100 in a long line of liens, sometimes people will cut their losses and move on. This is how serial con artists work the system, and keep getting away with it. Makes you long for the old "debtor's prison".
          But it costs very litle to file a lawsuit against her. California has "fill in the blank" forms; you do not even need an attorney. If you fill in the form and pay the filing fee you don't have to serve her right then. Just get the dispute filed in the court's database. The more lawsuits that are on record, the less likely other people (who think to check things like this) will do business with her.

          When I was an attorney in California I had to do this against a contractor who had done shoddy work on my house. Within several days of the lawsuit being filed I received calls (this was before the Internet) from other people who had had trouble with this same contractor. He saw the writing on the wall and brought his work up to code.

          If everyone with a legal dispute files a complaint ("in pro Per" -- acting as his/her own attorney) against JB they will each: 1. Toll the Statute of Limitations and 2. Create a public record. If there are enough complaints filed agaisnt her, then, at a later date if the Plaintiff's want, they can be consolidated and each Plaintiff can substitue in an attorney who will represent all the Plaintiffs who have similar interests.

          ETA: I just saw that John French (and Peter Pletcher?) got a default Judgment against JB. All he had to do was fiile a complaint, have her served by a process server, and show up at the hearing. If Jill Doesn't appear, then Plaintiff wins, and the Judgment is a matter of public record. Easy Peasy.

          Point being: there is no excuse for doing nothing.
          Last edited by Lord Helpus; Jan. 8, 2013, 09:48 PM.
          "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

          Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
            Just got copies of the recorded JUDGEMENTS AGAINST JILL BURNELL

            Household Finance owed $11,002.26 Document 2008096823

            Turner, Reynolds, et al owed $64,684.43 Document 2011028070 (WOW – wonder why she needed so much legal counsel? Guess they do not take horses for payment!!)

            Myron Hinrichs (vet)owed $5,080.00
            Document 2011098447

            Rivertown FEED owed $4,340.
            83 Document 2012004127

            PROOF JILL BURNELL DOES NOT PAY JUDGEMENTS and has LOST IN COURT.
            Originally posted by Daventry
            Here is another one, with a copy of the arrest warrant. http://www.ratemyhorsepro.com/equine...defendant.aspx
            I forwarded all of this information to Gary Klein from the Marin Independent Journal. Wonder if he will do more than Brent would?

            Comment


            • If there are all these outstanding judgements against her, couldn't her assets, i.e. horses, ordered to be sold to satisfy said judgments ?
              So wouldn't it be in the best interest of anyone who is owed money to file in order to get a judgment ?
              http://sporthorsesnw.com/
              https://www.facebook.com/pages/Sport...01526589966216

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Elfe View Post
                If there are all these outstanding judgements against her, couldn't her assets, i.e. horses, ordered to be sold to satisfy said judgments ?
                So wouldn't it be in the best interest of anyone who is owed money to file in order to get a judgment ?
                That is what we have been saying all along. Hopefully now that there is an auction to raise funds for legal fees among other things that will be exactly what happens.
                McDowell Racing Stables

                Home Away From Home

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Pixtwo View Post
                  I find it interesting that out of 30 horses, the MHS could only find two that they felt were being neglected.
                  I've seen no pictures of the horse to show body condition or needing hoof attention. Yet most of you seem to think all the horses are going to be seized in a day or two because they are in deplorable condition.
                  Where's the proof? Why not name the confiscated horses? Why the secrecy?
                  From COTH article, and anyone that watches Animal Cops
                  "Carrie Harrington, spokesperson of the MHS, spoke generally about the process the MHS investigators undergo during potentially neglectful or abusive situations. She explained that there are instances in which animals are not receiving proper care—generally food, water, shelter and adequate veterinary attention. If the animals are in immediate danger, the investigators may have grounds to immediately impound the animals.

                  “There might be an instance where the animal is not receiving proper shelter but not in immediate danger,” Harrington said. In those cases, the investigators often work with the owners and caretakers to improve the living conditions. Usually the process involves specific instructions to increase education and follow up visits to ensure compliance."


                  Your statement that Marin felt only 2 horses were being neglected is ignorant and wrong. Marin may feel all horses are being neglected, only the 2 were in "immediate danger," as in Marin felt they would likely die in a matter of hours or days without their intervention. The other 28 horses are being neglected, and per their policy, they are working with the owner with specific instructions and timelines to get those horses properly cared for. If any horse's condition deteriorates in that time frame where the horse is in danger of death, Marin will seize them. Which is what happened on January 4th when they seized 2 more.

                  Jill's neglect is not as simple as the horses being fat and seeing a vet when needed. It also includes adequate shelter and containment. Something it sounds like she's having a difficult time providing right now. The 26 horses still on the property may very well be the picture of health, but they'll still be seized if she doesn't provide shelter and containment per Marin's instructions and within the time frame they demand.

                  Regarding your other 2 ignorant points:
                  The proof will be provided by Marin in due time.

                  The secrecy and lack of names is for legal purposes. It not only helps protect Marin's case against Jill, but it also helps protect Jill! Jill Burnell and her attorney should be happy for the current level "secrecy".

                  Comment


                  • my guess, based on hunch and also wording of what Weems said - is that none of the horses (or only Ahoha?) are in her name anymore.

                    my guess is that they all belong to others.....

                    and to be clear: i am absolutely supporting those that have been wronged... however, i would hate to see JB get out of anything because of this thread or posts on FB etc.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by mbm View Post
                      my guess, based on hunch and also wording of what Weems said - is that none of the horses (or only Ahoha?) are in her name anymore.

                      my guess is that they all belong to others.....
                      I have suspected the bolded part of your statement to be true for some time now. I'm betting that they are in her husband's name or another close friend or family member and have been since the very first lawsuit against her popped up.

                      Comment


                      • Correct Greenie, (not so Green at all it seems). Mr. Adamo is alive and well in Sonoma County w/ no connection to this case and no plans for a trip to Georgia.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post
                          But it costs very litle to file a lawsuit against her. California has "fill in the blank" forms; you do not even need an attorney. <snip>
                          Point being: there is no excuse for doing nothing.
                          Not everyone lives in CA though. So it does make it quite a bit more difficult.

                          Comment


                          • [QUOTE=trubandloki;6771312]Not everyone lives in CA though. So it does make it quite a bit more difficult.[I]

                            It has been mentioned several times on this thread by real life lawyers that you don't necessarily have to file in CA. There is no excuse for not pursuing this to the fullest extent of the law. That is the only way to make sure there are no new victims. You saw her newsletter, it has a buy in now link. Some poor sap clicks that button and there is now one new victim. Only the victims have the power to put an end to this.
                            McDowell Racing Stables

                            Home Away From Home

                            Comment


                            • Perhaps someone has already pointed this out but if a stallion is injured in a fight with another stallion that is NEGLECT.

                              Chris Rush
                              Fair Winds Farm

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
                                Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                                Not everyone lives in CA though. So it does make it quite a bit more difficult.
                                It has been mentioned several times on this thread by real life lawyers that you don't necessarily have to file in CA. There is no excuse for not pursuing this to the fullest extent of the law. That is the only way to make sure there are no new victims. You saw her newsletter, it has a buy in now link. Some poor sap clicks that button and there is now one new victim. Only the victims have the power to put an end to this.
                                I did see that, I was responding to that one poster who was talking about how easy it is in CA so therefor it is easy for everyone.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                                  Not everyone lives in CA though. So it does make it quite a bit more difficult.
                                  You do not have to live in California to sue in California. JB lives in California and that gives the state jurisdiction over her.

                                  The forms are probably available on line.

                                  The only problem with filing in California is that the Plaintiff will have to make an appearance in California for the hearing. Perhaps a current California attorney could confirm the law on this point, but I would be surprised if an agent (friend) couldn't make an appearance in your behalf. Or an appearance via Skype, etc.

                                  Bottom line, you need to appear at the hearing in order to get a default judgment against her. If you file in small claims court, then JB's attorney CANNOT make an appearance on her behalf. I do not know the maximum award available to Plaintiffs is in small claims court; it is probably in the ballpark of $10,000. If she owes you more and you file in small claims court, then you waive the right to collect any damages in excess of the maximum award.

                                  But, it appears that the goal of actually getting money out of her is secondary to having a lot of Judgments against her on the record. And $10,000 is better than not doing anything.
                                  "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

                                  Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                                    Not everyone lives in CA though. So it does make it quite a bit more difficult.
                                    In the state of Maryland the district court handles small claims up to $5,000. It is as simple as filing a complaint form and having the out of state person served by certified mail.
                                    New Blessing Farm
                                    Standing the Oldenburg stallion Legaczy
                                    www.newblessingfarm.com
                                    "The greatest oak was once a little nut who held its ground".

                                    Comment


                                    • PS: I have no idea if other states will recognize jurisdiction over JB in small claims court. Plaintiff will have to establish that jurisdiction is appropriate (i.e. that Plaintiff lives in ND and the agreement to sell/loan/lease the horse was made in ND.

                                      That is certainly possible, and, if filed in Small Claims court, JB's attorney may not be able to question jurisdiction.

                                      Gotta run now, but if anyone has questions they can PM me.

                                      NOTE: I am not a current member of the California Bar, and so the suggestions explained above MAY NOT represent current law in that (or any other) state. These are just examples of what might happen. Everyone needs to do their own checking and find out the current law for their state.
                                      "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

                                      Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

                                      Comment


                                      • I believe all the forms you need for small claims in CA can be found here:
                                        http://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm?filter=SC

                                        All other possible forms needed can also be found at that link by changing the option in the dropdown box.

                                        Information about SC in CA.

                                        http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/sc100info.pdf
                                        Rhode Islands are red;
                                        North Hollands are blue.
                                        Sorry my thoroughbreds
                                        Stomped on your roo. Originally Posted by pAin't_Misbehavin' :

                                        Comment


                                        • Info on California small claims court can be found here -
                                          http://dca.lacounty.gov/tsHow2SueSmalClaims.html

                                          It says County of Los Angeles, but is based on California law. Pay particular attention to the statute of limitations listed on the above link.

                                          Forms are here - http://www.courts.ca.gov/forms.htm?filter=SC .

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X