• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Seems the FEI is allowing clones to compete

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Well for once I can say the TB industry does one thing right. They require live cover which (for very good reasons) eliminates this very issue from being a concern. Specifically, I was referring only to WB breeding and the rule from the fei.

    Comment


    • #22
      Where is bayhawk? This certainly has to be sending the holshsteiner people into a complete tizzy!!!!!

      Comment


      • #23
        Nurture is my biggest problem with the whole thing. I know semen doesn't get nurtured to me but there has to be more to it than simply dna.
        McDowell Racing Stables

        Home Away From Home

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Noms View Post
          What was stolen?? Again it's not illegal to clone and if you use material taken from horse while on a show ground, what law was broken.

          Yup could certainly happen now. But until I whip out my very own cassini-clone I doubt many breeders are thinking like I am. And they should.

          Perhaps stallion and mare owners need to start copyrighting their animals. Hum new niche market for you lawyers out there.
          I believe that is where this is going to go.
          It would also control semen use if the genetics of the horses registered are more closely recorded. But the registries are going to have to be on board with this.
          As far as competition, I do think it is a bit of an issue. While training is very important, the animal still has to have the innate physical ability. If we didn't believe this we wouldn't pay more for one stallion over another. I bet a clone of Secretariat would still kick ass, his heart was huge. Jumping requires more of a learned skill set and dressage even more but if you start with an animal that you know is physically capable of doing the job, you are ahead of the game. I wonder if Eric would prefer a clone of Hickstead or not? It would be a different horse in some ways but in some the same. Breeders always say how similar the foals of a mare are and many riders prefer certain bloodlines because they know what to expect. A clone would give you even more insight into the training if you were familiar with the original. I am waiting to see a Ratina Z clone compete.

          Comment


          • #25
            There is also the issue of only cloning the “great” horses and losing the diversity and value of breeding better horses. So for example if every team is made up of clones of Totilas, Jazz or Jerich Parzival what will that mean to competition and what will happen to the next “best” generation ... I don’t think that this is a good thing for horses and the sport in general. However will clarify and say a great gelding or mare that never got to reproduce should not in my opinion be allow to complete (for the above reasons) but should be allowed to contribute to the breed. The success of their progeny will provide the “value” of the mating.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by JB View Post
              For ME, the big hoopla is being able to use/continue genetics that were lost. Gem Twist is from a very, very good line of TBs that wasn't widely used and there are soooo very few of them left.

              I don't see ANY value in putting them in the show ring. Sure, you can have fun doing it, but it doesn't add anything constructive to the genetic pool.

              I have never understood the fuss about allowing them to compete
              I'm with you, JB!!
              Erin
              Dodon Farm Training Center - on Facebook

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Noms View Post
                What was stolen?? Again it's not illegal to clone and if you use material taken from horse while on a show ground, what law was broken.

                Yup could certainly happen now. But until I whip out my very own cassini-clone I doubt many breeders are thinking like I am. And they should.

                Perhaps stallion and mare owners need to start copyrighting their animals. Hum new niche market for you lawyers out there.
                Actually theft of human genetic material for other than law investigation purposes is illegal in many places. Even farmers who save seed from their own crops when using genetically altered plants have also been successfully sued for gene theft.

                I expect that this sort of cloning would be treated similarly to a mare owner sneaking their mare into a stallions paddock.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by ChelseaR View Post
                  Actually theft of human genetic material for other than law investigation purposes is illegal in many places. Even farmers who save seed from their own crops when using genetically altered plants have also been successfully sued for gene theft.

                  I expect that this sort of cloning would be treated similarly to a mare owner sneaking their mare into a stallions paddock.
                  Big AG spent considerable $$$ to patent their seed DNA. That is the only reason they are allowed to sue anyone who happens to have the misfortune of having a cross polinization issue in their field. Monstanto is the biggest POS ag company.

                  Horse DNA is not protected under the law, UNTIL stallion and mare owners realize they need to do so. That is the only way they have recourse against the low lifes who will one day try to capitalize on their blood, sweat, tears and lets not forget $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ spent.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    If they don't make up some type of regulation what prevents me from grabbing some Flexible or Sapphire skin and making my own. 150k would be cheap.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I am sure I could come up with several legal theories that I'd bet would stand up in court if someone stole my horse's DNA to get their own clone of my horse. It's no different than stealing semen or eggs. The common law evolves to meet new circumstances all the time.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        unless you also clon the rider/trainer who made the original issue of the clon "big" cloning won't bring you anything but regress in breeding.
                        would i breed to ETclon?
                        never.
                        would i clon hugo simon and give him my crazy jumping prospect noone else could deal with before?
                        i certainly would, in a heartbeat!
                        http://hippologi.com

                        http://muensterland-pferde.de

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post
                          I am sure I could come up with several legal theories that I'd bet would stand up in court if someone stole my horse's DNA to get their own clone of my horse. It's no different than stealing semen or eggs. The common law evolves to meet new circumstances all the time.
                          And what legal theory would that be?

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Theft of property for one. Other torts like misappropriation, maybe.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              I guess the real question is..Is cloning genetic manipulation?

                              If so, Then clones should not be allowed to compete in the Olympics..since WADA and IOC do not allow genetic manipulation of athletes,and horses are classed as athletes.

                              Another point to bear in mind,is that a clone is actually the age of its original parent..Dolly the sheep was cloned from a 6 year old ewe. So add 6 to whatever age she was when she died and that is her correct age. Premature ageing ??

                              Just a thought!
                              www.australiancolouredperformancehorses.com.au

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by Riverotter View Post
                                I must confess, I don't understand the hoopla against breeding them either. No, it's not natural, but really, anything except live cover is not natural.
                                Collecting semen and AIing so that a stallion has hundreds of foals a year - not natural.
                                Embryo transfer so a mare can have more then 1 foal a year - not natural.
                                Shipping semen (or embryos!) "across the pond" so that lots of people can have a baby from this horse or that, when there's no way they'd get that breeding otherwise - not natural.

                                Using frozen semen from a stud who has died or was gelded is using genetics that were lost. I completely fail to see the difference that makes these things ok, and breeding to a clone not.

                                I can see how someone would see value in showing a clone. It's the nature vs nurture thing. I, personally, can ride a spooky, rearing fool, and in a month or two that beasty will be mellow and calm with all feet on the ground so long as I am on him - it doesn't make him less an airhead to begin with, it was only me.

                                Conversely, if you were to give me a clone of <insert uber, spectacular horse here> and we made it to the Grand Nationals - you would know that this was 99.9% the horse and all I did was steer a little and not fall off, kwim?

                                Horses are gelded for lots of reasons that have nothing to do with them. I know that I am not at this time able to raise a colt as a stallion prospect, I can't afford the RPSI evaluation and frankly, it would be too big a PITA for me to set up to keep stud colts as stud colts past about the age of 2 maximum.
                                I'm expecting a foal this year and 2 next year and if they are colts and here long enough to start training, they'll be gelded by then. It has nothing to do with their quality, I think they'll be great and I hope they'll be even better then I expect (don't we all ) and everything to do with my farm lay-out.
                                If the the heavens open and the angels sing and the horse world is blessed with something I bred that turns out amazing (and then gelded because it is easier for me to keep a gelding) and people look longingly at him and think "oh, if only". Why not?
                                LOL, ok, it's unlikely, but I don't understand the uproar.
                                So well written! The only thing I can add is that folks keep claiming the clones wont be as good as the original....but if you don't let them compete how do you know that is true? Now if the registries will paper them is a whole different issue. Most folks wont breed to them based on lack of papers alone/ a few will. If the clone does do well in competition then it will be like a successful grade horse if the registry wont paper it.....some folks will then breed to him papers or not. If the stalllion is issued full papers too.....now that would be a game changer in terms of volume used at stud.I don't personally plan to run out and use a clone....but if it was a nearly lost bloodlines as mentioned in an earlier post would I someday consider it? Possibly.
                                Providence Farm
                                http://providencefarmpintos.blogspot.com/

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #36
                                  Originally posted by belambi View Post
                                  I guess the real question is..Is cloning genetic manipulation?

                                  If so, Then clones should not be allowed to compete in the Olympics..since WADA and IOC do not allow genetic manipulation of athletes,and horses are classed as athletes.
                                  What is the IOC's definition of "genetic manipulation"?

                                  what I can quickly find is this:
                                  "“As we go forward, they are more and more confident that they will have a non-invasive test that will allow us to determine whether or not there has been artificial manipulation,” said Dick Pound, IOC member and former head of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

                                  Gene therapy has been around for years, but remains largely untested. It involves inserting new DNA into the body’s cells to correct genetic flaws that cause disease.

                                  To increase performance, it is believed that dopers are trying to develop a method for increasing levels of a naturally occurring hormone through genetic manipulation."

                                  In that context, cloning is not at all gene manipulation/therapy. The clone has all the same genetics as the original. The ONLY difference is the clone has a different set of mitochondrial DNA, as that comes from the dam.

                                  Another point to bear in mind,is that a clone is actually the age of its original parent..Dolly the sheep was cloned from a 6 year old ewe. So add 6 to whatever age she was when she died and that is her correct age. Premature ageing ??

                                  Just a thought!
                                  Not an issue any more. It WAS an issue early on (even then Dolly died of a common sheep disease, not premature old age). Cloning now is done from "baby" cells, to correct the original issue with telomere length.
                                  ______________________________
                                  The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by Kareen View Post
                                    Am very laid back about this as I am 100% sure the clones won't get anywhere near the originals for a variety of reasons.
                                    I think it's the exact opposite... in the right hands, the clones likely stand a BETTER chance of excelling, than did the originals. Why? Because the latter were a well known/studied item.

                                    Think about it: Gem was started relatively late, switched owners/riders throughout his early years, and then became a project of a 19yr-old who was just getting his feet wet at the international level. Greg Best went on to become one of the greatest riders in the world, everyone knows that, but he wasn't at the time Gem was coming up. Imagine, for Gem, if he was.

                                    ...now, consider Gemini. Growing up under the eye/care of Frank Chapot, who knew everything there was to know about Gem. If Gemini proves to be even remotely like Gem, in terms of movement, personality/temperament, fears, difficulties, etc-- Frank would know about it, and be able to tailor Gemini's training to address those issues early on, possibly even avoiding some of them altogether. Then combine that with the fact that Laura is already a well-seasoned GP rider, not a rookie as she was with Gem. There's another advantage for Gemini.

                                    So in summary, while there's only a snowball's chance of any horse moving up the ranks to become an FEI level champion... if ANY horse has it, it's this one.
                                    A vaincre sans péril, on triomphe sans gloire.
                                    ~ImmortalSynn

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
                                      I am dead set against cloning as I am a nature/nurture proponent
                                      That makes no sense whatsoever.

                                      If you're a "proponent" of nature vs. nurture, then you should be the biggest fan of cloning.... as there's no better way to observe the interaction between the two!
                                      A vaincre sans péril, on triomphe sans gloire.
                                      ~ImmortalSynn

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by Noms View Post
                                        Lets say someone sneaks into Totilas stall at a show and snips a bit of his DNA and produces a Totilas clone
                                        So they're going to slice the horse's chest open and peel back muscle/fat layers? Hmm, won't that be a tad messy.

                                        Because right now, and for the foreseeable future, about the only particularly valuable material for cloning an equine, would be the epithelial tissues between the skin/fat/muscle layers deep inside the chest.... taking THAT out in any sort of rushed/secretive manner, would leave a mark, to say the least.

                                        ************
                                        That said, your scare scenario doesn't need cloning at all to occur. Overzealous natural breeding to just a few stallions could/would produce the same effect. Cloning would just be an agent to speed it up. At the end of the day, it just comes down to a matter of conceptual discipline--- cloning, per se, really has nothing to do with that.
                                        A vaincre sans péril, on triomphe sans gloire.
                                        ~ImmortalSynn

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X