• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

TB family 9-e

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TB family 9-e

    I'm interested in learning about this particular mareline.

  • #2
    in the stam rankings several years ago i saw the only instance i've seen of a tb mare family in the top 20 globally for jumper production. i believe is was listed as '9', as opposed to the '9e' you're asking about.

    i have no idea how closely related they may be, but i've got a sneaking suspicion there may be someone on here who knows!

    it also leads me to wonder if you're asking about this family pertaining to their jumper production?
    Hidden Pearl Farm

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by ne1 View Post
      it also leads me to wonder if you're asking about this family pertaining to their jumper production?
      Guilty

      Chin Chin/Carthago Z/Major de la Cour/Don Camillo XX - (Florencia XX) TB family 9-e

      I find the pedigree very interesting,

      Comment


      • #4
        http://www.bloodlines.net/TB/Families/Family9e.htm
        http://www.tbheritage.com/HistoricDa...9/Family9.html

        The 9-c family that was referred to has been questioned as a member of 9 in the Irish MtDNA research because the MtDNA of the Palotta branch (9-c) which includes Lady Josephine doesn't match the MtDNA of the rest of FF9.

        However, it's an absolutely wonderful family in sport and in breeding and racing.
        "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
        Thread killer Extraordinaire

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          So all of TB family 9 goes back to the Vintner mare? Horsetelex shows that my horse (family 9-e) goes back to the Vintner mare.

          Comment


          • #6
            All that's been MtDNA tested except for part of 9-c that supposedly derives from the Young Sir Peter Mare. There was a question about a supposedly fabricated pedigree for that branch, and it's the one that has Lady Josephine.
            The GSB has kept as good records as possible since about 1780, and Bruce Lowe and Bobinski did their work on mares in the 1890s and 1920s (or thereabouts for Bobinski). Lowe did the research to establish the foundation mares of the families, and he numbered them by how many winners of the English Classics were attributed to each family. Then Bobinski broke the Lowe families down into smaller branches.

            A mare from 9-e would not actually be in the same MtDNA family as the superlative females and their produce and descendants who derive from Palotta/Americus Girl/Lady Josephine. But there is a very viable "true" 9-c, which includes Alydar and TV Lark.

            9-f and 9-g and 9-h are all branches of 9-e. 9-h is the family of the very, very, very great race mare and broodmare, Urban Sea.
            Young Sir Peter Mare

            According to the General Stud Book the pedigree given for Young Sir Peter Mare may have been fabricated. She is recorded in the stud book as such:

            "YOUNG SIR PETER MARE (son of Doge) MARE,
            Her dam by Engineer - Wilson's Arabian - Hutton's Spot - Mogul - Crab - B Bolton - Curwen Barb - Spot - White-legged Lowther Barb - Vintner Mare

            1797 ch c Quilter, by Standard Mr Baker
            1798 b c by Overton (cut) Sir F Boynton
            1799 ch c Garnerin, or Garnera, by Restless Mr Byndloss
            *1800 b f Spitfire, by Beningbrough Mr Flint

            This pedigree was stated by Mr Baker of Elemore Hall and Mr Butler to have been invented. The Rev Mr Perceval of Acomb bred all these colts, and they were sold to Mr Baker and Sir F Boynton as half-breds, and won many half-bred races.

            Mr Baker's entry of QUILTER was by Standard, dam by Sir Peter Pellet (son Espersykes), out of a well-bred mare (pedigree unknown); but the above pedigree is quite possible.

            *SPITFIRE was the grandam of Muley Moloch" [GSB 1:354]

            While in these cases it is impossible to know the motives or sincerity of all parties involved, the fact that the General Stud Book made note of it is significant.

            The family of Spitfire has produced some of the most distinguished horses ever known and it may be desired to maintain accord with traditional Bruce Lowe and Bobinski family numbers. The Sir Peter Pellet Mare (previously said to be Young Sir Peter Mare) should probably be considered a co-taproot mare of Family 9-c.

            Also, since Sir Peter Pellet was later called Milfield, the co-taproot mare should probably be called Milfield Mare. The family table would appear thus:

            Milfield Mare (f Milfield [ex-Sir Peter Pellet]) ... 9-c
            Spitfire (b f 1800 Beningbrough)
            Nancy (b f 1813 Dick Andrews)
            Muley Moloch (br c 1830 Muley)
            Muliana (br f 1831 Muley)
            Certainly the MtDNA research shows the part of 9-c which includes Lady Josephine/Palotta isn't the same as the rest of FF9. Which could be evidence that the GSB was right to question the pedigree.
            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
            Thread killer Extraordinaire

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Thanks for the info.

              Comment


              • #8
                I was at one of Dr. Hill's presentations when she talked about the "true" families. I was delighted she highlighted 14-a as one of the true ones. That's Stella.

                I think it amusing that like 100 years ago a breeding took place and maybe it was a case of, who will ever know but us!

                I'm seeing a few 9-e in my research of the Goffs mare catalog.

                Terri
                COTH, keeping popcorn growers in business for years.

                "I need your grace to remind me to find my own." Snow Patrol-Chasing Cars. This line reminds me why I have horses.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Equilibrium View Post
                  I was at one of Dr. Hill's presentations when she talked about the "true" families. I was delighted she highlighted 14-a as one of the true ones. That's Stella.

                  I think it amusing that like 100 years ago a breeding took place and maybe it was a case of, who will ever know but us!

                  I'm seeing a few 9-e in my research of the Goffs mare catalog.

                  Terri
                  Well you need to say more now. Which are the other "true" ones?
                  www.EquusMagnificus.ca
                  Breeding & Sales
                  Facebook | YouTube

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have a 9e gelding. He has some scope, way too much for me (his first and only horse trial... he is very green...my trainer is riding):

                    http://photohippique.com/index.cfm?f...ID=167&ordre=1

                    We're doing dressage--he has nice, very correct gaits and a lot of power in the hindquarters.

                    Pedigree:
                    http://www.pedigreequery.com/catch+buddha

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yeah right! LOL! That conference was like 4 years ago and I have zero idea where the notes are! I only remember 14-a because it was relevant to me!

                      Terri
                      COTH, keeping popcorn growers in business for years.

                      "I need your grace to remind me to find my own." Snow Patrol-Chasing Cars. This line reminds me why I have horses.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I thought it was the 9c family that showed up in the list of top jumper mare lines....but I could never figure out how they arrived at that myself. But I could see Erdball (9c) was showing up as the dam sire in a lot of jumpers at that time.
                        Last edited by omare; Oct. 24, 2011, 10:14 AM. Reason: oops wrong foundation mare

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Equilibrium View Post
                          Yeah right! LOL! That conference was like 4 years ago and I have zero idea where the notes are! I only remember 14-a because it was relevant to me!

                          Terri
                          Oh well!
                          www.EquusMagnificus.ca
                          Breeding & Sales
                          Facebook | YouTube

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                            All that's been MtDNA tested except for part of 9-c that supposedly derives from the Young Sir Peter Mare. There was a question about a supposedly fabricated pedigree for that branch, and it's the one that has Lady Josephine.
                            The GSB has kept as good records as possible since about 1780, and Bruce Lowe and Bobinski did their work on mares in the 1890s and 1920s (or thereabouts for Bobinski). Lowe did the research to establish the foundation mares of the families, and he numbered them by how many winners of the English Classics were attributed to each family. Then Bobinski broke the Lowe families down into smaller branches.

                            A mare from 9-e would not actually be in the same MtDNA family as the superlative females and their produce and descendants who derive from Palotta/Americus Girl/Lady Josephine. But there is a very viable "true" 9-c, which includes Alydar and TV Lark.

                            9-f and 9-g and 9-h are all branches of 9-e. 9-h is the family of the very, very, very great race mare and broodmare, Urban Sea.


                            Certainly the MtDNA research shows the part of 9-c which includes Lady Josephine/Palotta isn't the same as the rest of FF9. Which could be evidence that the GSB was right to question the pedigree.
                            And I learn more about my horse's pedigree from Viney, as Lady Josephine is in there at least 6 times. I love the info!
                            Originally posted by Silverbridge
                            If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Viney, how do you identify which family a particular horse is from? I know my foundation mare's pedigree is mostly the family being discussed here. But when you have horses with many of those names as well as others, what decides which family?
                              Thanks!
                              PennyG

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Tail Female is the Female Family. It's the MtDNA line. But Bruce Lowe and Bobinski couldn't have known how MtDNA was inherited when they set up the family system. If you go to Pedigree Query pedigree and click on a mare and get her progeny, you'll also get the Female Family Number.

                                I wish the Jockey Club would include that information on its pedigrees as well as the dosage numbers. Now THAT would be really useful.
                                "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Thank you TKR for asking and Viney for answering. Was wondering the same thing!

                                  How do you find out details on the different families? Just found out my mare is 1-w.

                                  So so much to learn about the TBs!!
                                  Animals are not disposable!!!
                                  http://www.pawsnela.org

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Thanks viney for your incredibly informative posts as well as for sharing those links. Had no idea my mare shared the same family as Deputy Minister, To Market, Exclusive Native and Riverman. The ones I do know, Laudanum, Mansingh and Kris S, don't appear to have updated yet!
                                    Stübben North America
                                    Los Angeles - Ventura County - San Luis Obispo

                                    Comment

                                    Working...
                                    X