• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

For those that think Hunters are European culls...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For those that think Hunters are European culls...

    1st year green and Grand Hunter Champion at Harrisburg 2011 "Dedication"

    Born '05 approved '07 Holsteiner stallion Colorido (Casado-Silvano) Casado is by Coriano, my personal favorite hunter sire

    Reserve Champion 1st year green "Come Monday" aka Tamara

    '03 Holsteiner mare Cassini-Cor de la bryere-Literat

    Out of the Literat mare was Cayce Harrisons amazing horse Coeur by Calido I

    Tamara had a foal in '07 sold at the Foal auction for 16,000 euros.

    Not too bad!

  • #2
    Gorgeous horses!!

    But if either had shown the scope of an Olympic showjumper, I doubt they would be showing hunters in the US. That is what is meant by "European cull" (IMHO anyway) Europe doesn't have a market for hunters, so very few are breeding specifically for that discipline. However, if their jumper foal has the temperament and movement for hunters, it is far more valuable here than as a mid-level jumper over there. Marketing, marketing, marketing. They have us beat.

    Have to add that it's the same here. I am breeding for a 1.50+ horse and have sold the ones that don't look promising for that. The prospects that are appropriate for the hunters sell faster and for more $$, but I still consider them culls as they fell short of my goal.

    "Cull" is not synonymous with "worthless", LOL.

    Comment


    • #3
      As few horses make it to the 1.6m level on any continent --that sure makes for a lot of "culls" !

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh Yes, LOL. I'd take a 1.6 cull that wins at 1.5 anytime! But I don't have a need for the 1.40 winner and that one would be sold. (hopefully for $$$$ )

        As I said before "cull" doesn't mean worthless (or even worth less )

        These horses are champion hunters. They don't have many (if any) shows for hunters in Europe. If they were kept in the program their breeders were aiming for they would be mediocre, so they were sold to the states. They ARE Europe's culls. Maybe this goes back to the threads about breeding better horses. If we bred more for the top instead of the middle, our culls might be exceptional too. Not trying to start a flame fest, but something to think about.
        Last edited by tuckawayfarm; Oct. 20, 2011, 05:01 PM. Reason: add

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by tuckawayfarm View Post
          If we bred more for the top instead of the middle, our culls might be exceptional too. Not trying to start a flame fest, but something to think about.
          My point of view.
          www.EquusMagnificus.ca
          Breeding & Sales
          Facebook | YouTube

          Comment


          • #6
            My view as well.

            Imported hunters are failed European jumpers , simple as that.

            Also agree that it doesn't mean they are worthless. It means they are what they are. Lucky for them , otherwise they might wind up on a dinner plate somewhere.

            Comment


            • #7
              What is a cull in Europe since only a limited number of horses end up jumping 1.6 m .....and many approved European stallions--holsteiners included- only jumped up to 1.4m? Jumping 1.4 m and under?

              Comment


              • #8
                Omare , there are National GP's all over the world in many countries. If the horse can't do that it's considered as failed. GP does not start at 1.60 meter but this is their breeding goal.

                You do have a few equine enthusiasts that like to tool around a 1.30 - 1.40 meter but not many.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Not sure that "imported hunters are failed European jumpers" is worded quite right.

                  "Failed European jumpers who have the form, look, movement, temperament and style of a hunter are imported" might describe these horses better.

                  To my mind, nothing beats an elegant hunter with his knees up to his eyeballs
                  over a fence.

                  If a breeder has such a horse, the US is the place to send him.
                  Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    hmmm still seems like their must be a far number of "culls" as how many horses--out of all those so specially bred- eventually jump 1.5m national GPs or up?
                    Thank goodnesss for USA hunters and A/O/Jr Jumpers!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by omare View Post
                      hmmm still seems like their must be a far number of "culls" as how many horses--out of all those so specially bred- eventually jump 1.5m national GPs or up?
                      Thank goodnesss for USA hunters and A/O/Jr Jumpers!
                      Omare , there are many 1.50 meter jumpers produced. The lot thins considerably at 1.60 meter

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by omare View Post
                        hmmm still seems like their must be a far number of "culls" as how many horses--out of all those so specially bred- eventually jump 1.5m national GPs or up?
                        Thank goodnesss for USA hunters and A/O/Jr Jumpers!
                        The Cull, starts early and is usually the first place the horse ends up.

                        He goes to inspection, there they decide by his movement and free jump if he is GP material.
                        And if they thick "no way", then the horse is culled and sent to the US.

                        Isn't this how it happens?

                        so yes, they care culled and sent to the US.
                        Now, the number of horses that are kept at that time to be trained to GP and the horses that actually make it to GP may be different.

                        but usually, culling is done at the beginning. Before major training.
                        http://kaboomeventing.com/
                        http://kaboomeventing.blogspot.com/
                        Horses are amazing athletes and make no mistake -- they are the stars of the show!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jewels09 View Post
                          1st year green and Grand Hunter Champion at Harrisburg 2011 "Dedication"

                          Born '05 approved '07 Holsteiner stallion Colorido (Casado-Silvano) Casado is by Coriano, my personal favorite hunter sire

                          Reserve Champion 1st year green "Come Monday" aka Tamara

                          '03 Holsteiner mare Cassini-Cor de la bryere-Literat

                          Out of the Literat mare was Cayce Harrisons amazing horse Coeur by Calido I

                          Tamara had a foal in '07 sold at the Foal auction for 16,000 euros.

                          Not too bad!
                          not quiet sure how your argument of being culled provides for any reasonable cunclusion in the context you've put it?

                          a holsteiner can still make a good hunter.
                          that doesn't exclude he has been bred in the first place to suit specific holsteiner jumping requirements?
                          it doesn''t exclude neither he might serve well as a specialized jumping sire or even succed himself in higher (intl) jumping if only trained accordingly and shown as such?

                          the process of "culling" says nothing about the potential ability of any given horse with respect to sport - any (european) gelding that appears in intl sport has eventually been "culled" before.

                          the assumption on this board seems to be that "culling" is a negative per se. it is not. it is simply a process 90% of male offspring in any european breeding verband undergo, as such it applies to 45% of all horses being bred within the european breeding community who applies a strict process of selection when it comes to licensing selections.
                          licensing selections however are designed to identify BREEDING animals for the population, not sport horses in the first place.
                          sport horese will occur from those, eventually.
                          nowadays more often than it used to be before.
                          question of modern breeding techniques rather than genetic quality/heritability perfomance as such.
                          life cover didn't suit sport horses in the old days.
                          insemination practices do suit some of them today.

                          selecting potential breeding stallions however is entirely about identifying optimal heritage/genetic transfer from one generation to the next.
                          a super breeding stallion does not necessarily have to be a super sport horse, neither does a super sport horse have to be a super breeding horse.
                          these are two entirely different things.
                          colts are being culled age two for various reasons (SPORT success is not one of them as by then none of them can provide for any track record in sport AT ALL) and the only assumption being made by culling 90% of any given male year group is the fact the the committe has to start SOMEWHERE predicting the 10% most appropriate prospectuses with respect to breeding. NOT sport.

                          the fact that most breeding stallions nowadays also appear in sport, some even up to intl level, is useful, but serves marketing reasons in the first place and is not part of traditional breeding culture.
                          if however, you meet on a stallion (left intact after initial culling) who happend to become an intl sport horse and as such becomes approved in later age by the verbands based on his track record, that doesn't tell you anything about his genetic value as a breeding stallion, either.
                          he might as well be an end product.
                          he might have succeeded d e s p i t e reasons of failure earlier in the selection process (conformation, lack of natural given gaites, lack of consolidated damline, incapability of jumping at liberty with the desired expression, wrong colour (!) etc etc), obvious flaws which prevented him from being a breeding stallion in the first place.
                          eventually, he might turn out to be the super breeding stallion, too, and his genetic value might overcome all his contesters who were not culled at the initial preselection years before...
                          you never know.

                          culling is about breeding prosepctuses and the attemp to predict reproductive advantages only.
                          as a carefully installed selection process has it that in the end only 10% of any given year group are being selected on the basis of ideally "best predictability" by the selection committee.
                          as now breed in the world will succeed if any male can cover any mare.
                          you have to start somewhere with your breeding selection to assure for a potential "top" quota of reproductive advantages, only.
                          that doesn't exclude top horses amongst the remaining 90% - the contrary is the case. top sport horses SHOULD develop from the remaining 90% since after all, these have already been preselected by someone at some stage, otherwise they hadn't even been introduced to the licensing or preselction process in the first place.

                          get rid of the negative association of "culling" in the context of stallion selection.
                          it is not a stigma per se. it is a natural part of selecting the good from the better, hopefully helping to identify the "best" in the end.
                          producers, that is, not sport horses.
                          culling the poor and mistaken ones from the good or the better should have taken place way ahead within each breeder's very own responsibility at foal age or little later. ideally, no breeder would introduce a somewhat suboptmal colt to any preselection trial, anyway. these are being gelded at yearlings already. and even those make good and often outstanding sport horses (as any gelding in your intl equipe proves).

                          if only breeders anywhere in the world would show equally responisble "culling" methods when it comes to judging their mare base and fillies.
                          if they fail to be riding horses, breed them...
                          if the process of culling would be run by individual breeders in an equally responisble manner for fillies as it is being practized for potential breeding stallions our sport horse breed would be a league of its own and still produce a big number of excellent sport horses who never got a chance to reproduce themselves.
                          http://hippologi.com

                          http://muensterland-pferde.de

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by fannie mae View Post
                            if only breeders anywhere in the world would show equally responisble "culling" methods when it comes to judging their mare base and fillies.
                            if they fail to be riding horses, breed them...
                            if the process of culling would be run by individual breeders in an equally responisble manner for fillies as it is being practized for potential breeding stallions our sport horse breed would be a league of its own and still produce a big number of excellent sport horses who never got a chance to reproduce themselves.
                            Agreed. And yes, "culling" is not necessarily a bad word! It's a breeding equivalent to "a man's trash is another man's treasure".
                            www.EquusMagnificus.ca
                            Breeding & Sales
                            Facebook | YouTube

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Sorry, I presented this wrong. The meaning and interpretation of cull is not something I ever want to discuss on this board It is not a word I am fond of

                              Anyway, I was just trying to point out that the good hunters are just good horses. These 2 horses were considered good horses in Europe and good horses here too. Just wanted to defend the hunters since people were bashing athletic ability of hunters in other threads

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Jewels09 View Post
                                Just wanted to defend the hunters since people were bashing athletic ability of hunters in other threads
                                A top hunter is an athletic horse.
                                www.EquusMagnificus.ca
                                Breeding & Sales
                                Facebook | YouTube

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Foxtrot's View Post
                                  Not sure that "imported hunters are failed European jumpers" is worded quite right.

                                  "Failed European jumpers who have the form, look, movement, temperament and style of a hunter are imported" might describe these horses better.

                                  Exactly. Not just any failed jumper makes a hunter. And many horses that would "fail" as hunters (don't have the form, look and temperament) make great amateur jumpers. A good breeder, whether of hunters or jumpers, knows the difference. Since Europeans specialize in jumping, of course they would send the horses more suitable to be hunters to the U.S.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Jewels09 View Post
                                    Sorry, I presented this wrong. The meaning and interpretation of cull is not something I ever want to discuss on this board It is not a word I am fond of

                                    Anyway, I was just trying to point out that the good hunters are just good horses. These 2 horses were considered good horses in Europe and good horses here too. Just wanted to defend the hunters since people were bashing athletic ability of hunters in other threads
                                    I love the word ! It is clearly responsible for the best mares in holstein today.

                                    Culling is part of breeding.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      fanny mae, When I look at the 10 top ranked stallions for Jumpers, it's clear that they all performed at the top of the sport.
                                      I agree that not all top performer stallions will be top breeding animals but it's clear today that the best breeding stallions are top sport horses.

                                      Here is the top 10 stallions (WBFSH last ranking) for Jumping, You can't find even one who didn't compete at the international level, and many where Super Stars in the arena.
                                      1 DARCO - 9937 - 69
                                      2 CARTHAGO - 8807 - 67
                                      3 QUIDAM DE REVEL - 7336 - 63
                                      4 CARETINO - 6439 - 39
                                      5 BALOUBET DU ROUET - 5604 - 52
                                      6 HEARTBREAKER - 5388 - 60
                                      7 NABAB DE REVE - 5081 - 37
                                      8 KANNAN - 4598 - 48
                                      9 MR BLUE - 4534 - 24
                                      10 QUICK STAR - 4366 - 34

                                      IMHO the traditional way of selecting stallions is not the best way (in all the top Studbooks, traditions are very difficult to overcome)
                                      "If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster, And treat those two imposters just the same"
                                      Rudyard Kipling
                                      Quartz Rouge

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Yes, but Andy, the Holsteiners on the top of this list were not rejected at their inspection. They were not inferior specimens that later proved themselves in sport. They went through the process, got approved, then competed in sport. I have always said that breeding horses are sport horses, just better.

                                        Culling is a process of removing breeding stock. Most sport horses in the world are just that. All geldings were culls.

                                        The statement is that a Hunter from Europe is a failed jumper. If you purchased your animal as a foal, probably not. However, the hunter movement is not what they breed for, so when they see it, they sell it. The failure is that they haven't accomplished what they were aiming for. In this there is a failure. To add, many breeders have many failures a year, because what they aim for is very difficult. 1.5m jumper is technically a failure for many in Holstein, when they were aiming for 1.6m. It doesn't mean it isn't a good horse. Quite the contrary.

                                        I will say this, they can fail on Type(Holsteiner), movement(Jumper), engagement(Jumper), and athleticism and they can still win as a Hunter. They will only have to succeed on ridability. This would be a failure in my mind.

                                        Tim
                                        Sparling Rock Holsteiners
                                        www.sparlingrock.com

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X