• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Sandro Hit Son "Soprano" Tops OHBS 2010 List of Premium Foal Sires

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sandro Hit Son "Soprano" Tops OHBS 2010 List of Premium Foal Sires

    Out of over 100 stallions, Sandro Hit son Soprano, along with Sir Donnerhall and Shakespeare, produced the highest number of GOV Premium foals in North America 2010, as indicated in the Oldenburg Horse Breeders Society's 2011 Stallion Directory. Congratulations to Soprano on having produced 9 premium foals! This is a significant achievement in the USA...having already produced horses competing at the Swedish National Championship and the World Championship for Young Dressage Horses. This includes Grevens Sa Va who scored 86.2% and was named Best Mare at the 2010 World Championship for Young Dressage Horses in Verden, Germany.

  • #2
    And I am anxiously awaiting my Soprano foal out of Starlight Engholt RDH (Blue Hors Romancier/Midt-Wet Ibi-Light). It's gonna be a black beauty!!!
    Erica H. Max
    Fire Hjorner Farm
    Breeders and Importers of Danish Warmbloods

    www.danishwarmblood.com

    Comment


    • #3
      That is great news! I have produced two foals by Soprano out of an Idocus and a Ferro mare respectively. The Soprano x Idocus filly is turning two and will be incorporated into my broodmare band. Her gaits are awesome and she has a very quick and powerful hindleg. The Soprano x Ferro filly, a real beauty, was sold to a young professional rider. I hope to see her in the show ring in a few years. Neither of these Soprano offspring has been inspected yet. They are both KWPN-NA registered (Reg. A).
      Below are links to each:

      Soprano x Idocus filly, Electra NSN, at 15 months:
      http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l9...N/DSC_0130.jpg

      Soprano x Ferro filly, Farazana NSN, at 3 weeks:
      http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l9...N/DSC_0003.jpg
      Martha Haley - NeverSayNever Farm
      2009 KWN-NA Breeder of the Year/Silver Level Breeder
      www.angelfire.com/ns2/our_horses/
      https://www.facebook.com/pages/Never...01844536521951

      Comment


      • #4
        Darling filly - and yes, very like her cousin, in colouring, if not character.
        Personally, I love the red ones. Have fun with your beautiful herd!
        Sunny Days Hanoverians
        http://www.sunnydayshanoverians.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes, one of my Jazz x Soprano fillies sold as a yearling and her new owners just love her. Her name is Enya S. E. and I have a feeling you will see her in the breed shows as a 2-year old ....
          Siegi Belz
          www.stalleuropa.com
          2007 KWPN-NA Breeder of the Year
          Dutch Warmbloods Made in the U. S. A.

          Comment


          • #6
            My homebred Shakespeare RSF produced 9 premium foals, Soprano produced 9, Sir Donnerhall produced 9 and Starlight produced 7. Quite a good representation for Sandro Hit! We had 12 other premium foals, some by my other stallions Fhitzgerald and Welcome S. It was a good year!
            http://www.rollingstonefarm.com
            Large Oldenburg and Hanoverian breeding farm
            Standing Shakespeare RSF, Fhitzgerald, Sir James and the homebred stallion Dheputy.

            Comment


            • #7
              Great news for Soprano!
              My very good mare SPS Waldrose (Lafitte-Argentinus), had a beautiful bay filly on Wednesday! Elegant and super friendly!


              www.huntingtonfarm.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Congrats on Shakespeare Mo!
                Martha Haley - NeverSayNever Farm
                2009 KWN-NA Breeder of the Year/Silver Level Breeder
                www.angelfire.com/ns2/our_horses/
                https://www.facebook.com/pages/Never...01844536521951

                Comment


                • #9
                  Congratulations to the three stallions who TIED for the top of the list.
                  www.oakhollowstable.blogspot.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Oakstable View Post
                    Congratulations to the three stallions who TIED for the top of the list.
                    Agreed! Congratulations to Soprano, Sir Donnerhall AND Shakespeare!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The analyst in me wants to know - how does their percentage stack up against the other stallions? In other words, if those stallions have oodles more foals on the ground, odds are they're going to have numbers, in the absolute sense, that are higher.

                      But if they have a relatively small % of their hundreds of foals premium, then while the absolute number is bigger, the relative number is smaller.

                      Just curious as I am NOT implying they're just doing better out of sheer numbers
                      ______________________________
                      The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I happened to pick up the 2009 GOV directory and Sinatra Song had 17 premium foals in 2008. Sandro Hit blood again.

                        JB, I like to look at numbers too, but most NA registeries don't disclose the number of mares bred. I suspect this data is public information in Europe.

                        The ATA recently published a list of stallions who bred 10 or more mares. The KWPN NA used to publish data on mares bred, and resulting 1st, 2nd and 3rd premiums. I think the ISR publishes that info and if so, it should be on their web site.

                        The stalled economy has everything to do with the number of breedings.
                        www.oakhollowstable.blogspot.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by JB View Post
                          The analyst in me wants to know - how does their percentage stack up against the other stallions? In other words, if those stallions have oodles more foals on the ground, odds are they're going to have numbers, in the absolute sense, that are higher.

                          But if they have a relatively small % of their hundreds of foals premium, then while the absolute number is bigger, the relative number is smaller.

                          Just curious as I am NOT implying they're just doing better out of sheer numbers
                          I can't speak on the percentages of premiums on the other stallions, but Shakesperare only had one foal last year that was not named premium by the GOV, and only one foal that didn't receive premium from the GOV in the previous year. He has one out of two foals presented to the American Hanoverian Society that were named the top foal at their inspection.
                          http://www.rollingstonefarm.com
                          Large Oldenburg and Hanoverian breeding farm
                          Standing Shakespeare RSF, Fhitzgerald, Sir James and the homebred stallion Dheputy.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I had a beautiful Soprano colt in 2009 that is sold and going to CA. I would absolutely use him again without hesitation.

                            I really, really like Shakespeare too..................hmmmm, wonder what that would be like with my new Pik Bube mare?????
                            Holly
                            www.ironhorsefrm.com
                            Oldenburg foals and young prospects
                            LIKE us on Facebook!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              JB, you are right -- it is the % that truly matters. They do with this TBs -- give a % of stakewinners, winners, etc. sired by a stallion.

                              That is more meaningful. Obviously if a stallion sired 3 o/o 3 Premiums, he has a better % than the one who sired 3 o/o 10.

                              Again, not to take away from any of these wonderful sires....just sayin'....

                              It would be SO helpful if ALL the American WB registries would supply this data to help breeders make choices...
                              Last edited by Kyzteke; May. 16, 2011, 11:32 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by MoSwanson View Post
                                I can't speak on the percentages of premiums on the other stallions, but Shakesperare only had one foal last year that was not named premium by the GOV, and only one foal that didn't receive premium from the GOV in the previous year. He has one out of two foals presented to the American Hanoverian Society that were named the top foal at their inspection.
                                But how many foals did he have? 5? 20? That's my point

                                1/20 not receiving premium is more impressive than 1/5, but not as impressive as 1/50.

                                Kyzteke gets it
                                ______________________________
                                The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by JB View Post
                                  But how many foals did he have? 5? 20? That's my point

                                  1/20 not receiving premium is more impressive than 1/5, but not as impressive as 1/50.

                                  Kyzteke gets it
                                  I have revealed all of the foals Shakespeare has had. Last year, he had 10 foals, 9 were premium. He was the Region 1 Champion at Second Level and won multiple third level tests with scores as high as 71%. The year before, he had 8 premium Oldenburg foals out of 9 presented, and one top foal out of 2 presented to the AHS. The autumn prior, he won the 70 day test in Oklahoma. He will be competing this year again. As his breeder and owner, I am trying to prove his quality by competing him and presenting his foals. As everyone knows, this is a daunting task that many stallion owners do not do. Shakespeare's oldest foals are 2 years old this year, and we are anxious to start them under saddle next year to see if his wonderful rideability has been passed on.
                                  http://www.rollingstonefarm.com
                                  Large Oldenburg and Hanoverian breeding farm
                                  Standing Shakespeare RSF, Fhitzgerald, Sir James and the homebred stallion Dheputy.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Please don't get me wrong - as I originally said, I'm not saying these aren't nice stallions. I'm sorry I didn't put 9 + 1 together from separate posts and recognize that must have meant he had 10 foals.

                                    I'm just trying to get a better feel for the stallions listed in the OP and the relative success. 90% premium foals is awesome. When it's out of 50 foals though it's a lot more impressive than out of 10 foals. I know Shakespeare is young and doesn't have that many foals on the ground - does not at all mean he's not a nice boy, I quite like him a lot!

                                    There is no offense meant here, at all. I'm just trying to get some perspective on what "the most" means, and it sadly appears there is no context provided unless you can manage to find out from the SOs themselves how many foals there were.
                                    ______________________________
                                    The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Not all NA WB registeries require foals being seen as foals or yearlings to get registration papers, the KWPN NA prominent among them.

                                      The AHS gives site championships but does not give premiums to foals.

                                      I've had premium foals who went on to do nothing in their amateur homes. I've had foals who were not presented who went on to show at Grand Prix at Spruce Meadows.

                                      I like to have a premium ribbon or medallion but it is akin to getting distracted by a shiney object.

                                      An inspection is one day in a foal's life.
                                      www.oakhollowstable.blogspot.com

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Oakstable View Post
                                        Not all NA WB registeries require foals being seen as foals or yearlings to get registration papers, the KWPN NA prominent among them.

                                        The AHS gives site championships but does not give premiums to foals.

                                        I've had premium foals who went on to do nothing in their amateur homes. I've had foals who were not presented who went on to show at Grand Prix at Spruce Meadows.

                                        I like to have a premium ribbon or medallion but it is akin to getting distracted by a shiney object.

                                        An inspection is one day in a foal's life.
                                        I totally agree with you, but it's one of the only ways we have of tracking foal quality till mare inspection time.

                                        If a stallion is approved through multiple registries, you would have to belong to all of them to get an idea of their overall quality.

                                        And, while the odd foal may score Premium and turn out to be a dud OR score just average then turn out to be a winner, if you saw consistently high quality produced by a stallion o/o a variety of mares, wouldn't that impress you? It would me.

                                        But again, it's hard to gather all this data in our system (or lack thereof).

                                        Lastly, this falls under the "sad, but true" heading: if you are breeding for the market it's a "plus" to use a sire that produces fancy, high scoring foals. I sell almost all my stock as weanlings; people DO like to see those scores (if they are high). Seems like very few folks have enough confidence in their foal evaluation skills to make up their own mind.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X