• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Wow, honest to goodness handicap assignments!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wow, honest to goodness handicap assignments!

    We'll see if the field entered actually shows up but you'd almost think this was the 1970's again with that much lead being stuffed into saddle cloths!

    Does NYRA still even keep that much weight in stock?

    DRF 11-20-07 "Joey P. tests weight-carrying ability"

    The heavier than normal imposts was one of the incentives that lured Joey P. He is always the one to beat in the New Jersey-bred sprint handicaps at Monmouth Park and the Meadowlands Racetrack, where he routinely carries top weight.

    Having proven his ability to successfully carry 125 pounds to victory this summer in the Colts Neck and Friendly Lover handicaps at Monmouth, Joey P. should be able to handle his 131-pound assignment.

    Compare that to Bishop Court Hill, who toted only 115 in his win in Aqueduct's Grade 1 Carter Handicap in 2006 and most recently carried 118 in an allowance race at Woodbine. He must carry 133 in the Fall Highweight.

    THUR Nov 22 Race 8 - Aqueduct "Fall Highweight Handicap"

    6 Furlongs | Open | 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes | Purse: $100,000

    Post # Horse Jockey Weight
    1 Bishop Court Hill - Velazquez J R 133
    2 Around the Cape - Castro E 130
    3 Park Avenue Ball - Garcia Alan 134
    4 Grand Champion - Coa E M 130
    5 City Attraction- Castellano J J 130
    6 Debussy - Luzzi M J 126
    7 Joey P. - Bravo J 131
    Also worth pointing out - race 9 includes Golden Man who is only one of two horses in US racing history to finish on the board in two graded stakes races within 24-hours.

    July 16, 2005 Monmouth Park Grade 3 Long Branch Stakes - 3rd (earned a 92 Beyer)
    July 17, 2005 Delaware Park Grade 3 Leonard Richards Stakes - 2nd (earned a 91 Beyer); Sun King took the win

    see: ESPN "Golden Man's golden opportunity" for more

  • #2
    Well I'll be damned... do they even make that much lead anymore?

    About time those handicappers started doing their jobs!!!


    Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by Texarkana View Post
      Well I'll be damned... do they even make that much lead anymore?
      Hey look at it this way: if the cloths are made in China there must be some extra lead included

      Bishop Court Hill will be huffing and puffing with an extra 15-lbs over his last effort!

      Flashback to the heros of old who could carry real weight and run like a locomotive without a brakeman: video: Forgo carrying 137 lbs in the 1976 Marlboro Cup

      (Tommy Trotter was the racing secretary at Belmont Park in '76 who assigned that backbreaking amount)

      Comment


      • #4
        It's still not much of a weight differential though, only 8lbs from top to bottom. A G1 winner giving away only 7lb to an allowance horse isn't much of a handicap.

        Comment


        • #5
          I was thinking the same thing; weights are heavier over all but still not a huge spread.

          Lead is so . Aren't they using pads like these yet: bestpad.com?

          Comment


          • #6
            I thought weight assignments for handicaps and allowances were usually in the 130s. Are these weight assignments typically lower in North America than the rest of the world?

            Comment


            • #7
              They used to carry REAL weight in that race. Like 140 odd pounds.
              Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

              Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Calico View Post
                I thought weight assignments for handicaps and allowances were usually in the 130s. Are these weight assignments typically lower in North America than the rest of the world?
                In general horses tend to carry less weight in NA across the board. American handicaps also tend to have much smaller weight spreads, at least not true reflections of the difference in class in the horses entered, which kind of undermines the idea of a handicap. But then, handicaps are not as big a feature of US racing, as opposed to other parts of the world where they make up the lion's share of races carded. The claiming system is the prefered method of equalisation stateside.

                Check out this race at Gowran Park last month, a run of the mill handicap, over 9.5f, first race on the card on a Fri evening. The top weight is carrying 140lbs, the bottom weight shouldered 106lbs, a 34lb weigh concession. Btw, the top weight won that race, he was giving away 20lb and 25lb respectively to the 2nd and 3rd placed horses, and he's not any kind of special GSW horse, just an ordinary run of the mill handicapper. His two attempts in listed company he finished well down the field.

                So a G1 winner like Bishop Court Hill giving away 7lb to an allowance horse doesn't seem like much of a burden in my eyes.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Btw, a handicap isn't so much about the weight a horse is carrying per se, it's how much weight they are conceding to the field. If everyone is carrying 10lbs extra, then wether they are carrying 134lbs or 124lbs really doesn't really make a difference if the the weight differential is the same.
                  The idea of a handicap is that the handicapper assigns weights so that theoretically all the horses will cross the line at the same time, obviously this never happens, but it's supposed to create a level playing field.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by summerhorse View Post
                    They used to carry REAL weight in that race. Like 140 odd pounds.
                    Does anyone know what the highest weight toted is to victory?

                    Way back in the day when Western Union was the information provider of the Nation ... Roseben was "The Big Train" because he "carried the freight." The bay gelding carried 140 pounds or more 29 times, winning 14.

                    Of his 111 races, Roseben carried 130 pounds or more 59 times and conceded weight to all of his opponents 86 times. Furthermore, he carried 140 pounds or more in 29 races and won 14 of those. He won carrying 144 pounds, 146 pounds, and on four occassions, won carrying 147 pounds. In the four races in which he was assigned 148 pounds, he tallied 3 seconds and a third. In the race in which he carried 150 lbs, he ran 2nd
                    The mare Pan Zar an iron horse won with handicap weights of 136, 140 and 146 pounds. A 1972 Hall of Fame inductee, the gal who raced last at the age of 7 finished with a lifetime record of: 151 starts 76-31-21

                    Dr. Fager carried 139-lbs in the 7-furlong 1968 Vosburgh. He won by 6 lengths in 1:20 1/5. That set the track record and came within 1/5 of a second of the world record (at the time) pulling that weight. LO-CO-MOTIVE!

                    (As cited in the link - Artax in 1999 broke that record in 1:20.04 pulling a measly 114lbs. If you gave Dr Fager that feather of a handicap he would've certainly set a record untouched by another in my lifetime)

                    Beloved Iron Horse, Exterminator, was assigned weights over 130 most of his life but in terms of 140-lbs or more he never won with that much. He did with 138-lbs.

                    Discovery (1935 HOTY) hauled 139-lbs to victory in the Merchants' and Citizens' Handicap

                    Wisk Broom hauling 139-lbs won the Suburban Handicap (1913) in what was then a world record time.

                    Gladiator won the Toboggan Handicap with 140-lbs in 1921.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by summerhorse View Post
                      They used to carry REAL weight in that race. Like 140 odd pounds.
                      Midnight Lute was assigned 142 lbs, but only 123 for the Cigar Mile. The choice of which race to enter is pretty obvious.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by On the Farm View Post
                        Midnight Lute was assigned 142 lbs, but only 123 for the Cigar Mile. The choice of which race to enter is pretty obvious.
                        Seriously??? Dang... kinda makes the decision easy!

                        I agree there isn't much of a spread with no real low weights, but it's still nice to see them actually assigning weight to horses in a handicap.
                        Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by On the Farm View Post
                          Midnight Lute was assigned 142 lbs, but only 123 for the Cigar Mile. The choice of which race to enter is pretty obvious.
                          In the Cigar Mile he will be giving away 9lbs to almost the entire field.
                          If he were in this race he would be giving away 8lbs x1, 9lbs x1, 11lbs x1, 12lbs x3, and then a 16lbs to a no name horse. Not a huge difference.

                          I think the Cigar being worth 3 times as much as the Fall Highweight, and a G1 to boot, may have had more to do with the decision.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            This may be a blinding glimpse of the obvious but carrying weight is the purpose of the Fall Highweight Handicap. There was a time when it was a much more prestigious race and the imposts assigned were even higher. Ta Wee carried 140 (and presumably that's after the 5 pound sex allowance) and in 1985 Mt Livermore carrying 140 beat Fighting Fit carrying 139.

                            This is like the Fall Highweight Lite.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              If anyone watched this race (replay available on calracing.com) they'll see the weight assignments made for an evenly matched race - as is the goal of the handicap assignments. Very close at the wire between three horses. A head between the winner and place and just a neck back to show. So clearly the weights did their job.

                              The results from Aqueduct's 94th running of the race:

                              Grand Champion showed the heart of a champion, coming back on Joey P. to take yesterday's 94th running of the Fall Highweight Handicap, the traditional stakes run at Aqueduct on Thanksgiving, by a head.

                              It was a neck back to City Attraction in the three-horse photo. "He always makes it hard for me," said winning jockey Eibar Coa. "He let that horse (Joey P.) go by and made me work. At the eighth-pole, I never thought he would come back but he kept trying. I saw that horse wasn't getting away from me so I kept pushing and pushing. He finally came back and got it."
                              Also Golden Man did a lovely job winning in his allowance race which was just after the above Fall Highweight Handicap.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X