• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Business As Usual

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by lily04 View Post
    To anyone that would like to know, horses have been shipped from ECR to various racetracks specifically to be euthanized. This saves MG the $185 it costs to have them pickd up at the farm. This was confirmed by the state vet.
    Seems to me that Michael Gill IS the Michael Vick of horse racing.
    Interesting thread. It has only taken me a few hours to read through all of this. Might I say WOW!!!

    Comment


    • It just doesnt make sense that someone would ship a
      horse INTO a track to have it killed and dumped.....
      Last edited by brightskyfarm; Dec. 15, 2010, 04:03 PM.
      IN GOD WE TRUST
      OTTB's ready to show/event/jumpers. Track ponies for perfect trail partners.
      http://www.horseville.com/php/search...=1&ssid=057680

      Comment


      • again......... many of these statements arent making
        sense
        Last edited by brightskyfarm; Dec. 15, 2010, 04:03 PM.
        IN GOD WE TRUST
        OTTB's ready to show/event/jumpers. Track ponies for perfect trail partners.
        http://www.horseville.com/php/search...=1&ssid=057680

        Comment


        • Ask Dick Hertz

          is there is a standard for this?
          Last edited by brightskyfarm; Dec. 15, 2010, 04:03 PM.
          IN GOD WE TRUST
          OTTB's ready to show/event/jumpers. Track ponies for perfect trail partners.
          http://www.horseville.com/php/search...=1&ssid=057680

          Comment


          • brightsky, is questioning the ethics of euthanasia your way of telling us you're stepping up to take on a Gill horse, more specifically, a Gill horse which is only suitable to live life as a companion and which will require special supplements to stay comfortably pasture sound? Because this is the issue all of us involved in TB retirement are all too aware of: there are not enough homes out there for the broken down retirees.

            I'm sure this may vary from track to track, but in regards to catastrophic injuries incurred during a race (I did not ask about random backside incidents), I have been told that the attending veterinarian has the authority to administer drugs and/or euthanize an animal without even asking permission from the stewards, owners, or trainers.

            Comment


            • [QUOTE=brightskyfarm;4671433]
              Originally posted by AppJumpr08 View Post
              If the only other option is to put them on a truck to Canada? Absolutely.

              That is never the Only ever option ... I know Im stepping
              into the flame here............
              but, I see the direction of the thread as some very serious accusations..
              involving, not only a trainer/owner,
              but a vet,
              track management
              the whole chain......

              and would really like some ......(something).....
              that this type of activity isnt happening .

              It just doesnt make sense that someone would ship a
              horse INTO a track to have it killed and dumped.....

              My point was that it IS the only other option that Gill uses for his broken down, not comfortable as pasture pet horses.
              I believe he avoids groups like the TRF and CANTER as retirement avenues because the horses he is finished racing are often too broken to even be comfortable as pasture pets.


              Of course *I* know there are other options. Like not running the horses into the ground, like finding responsible happy retirement homes for them before they are completely broken, like donating some of your mega amounts of purse earnings to a retirement group to take your deserving retirees, but that is not what Gill does. He euths them, or ships them to Canada.
              And if he is going to euth them, why wouldn't he ship them to the track to A) Save Money, and B) not have to dispose of the body? If that is in fact what he has done, and it does save him money, it makes perfect sense from a business perspective.

              And Barnfairy is right, the retirement groups are OVERFLOWING with horses who can do no more than be pasture pets... Just because Mrs. Adamo is helping to rehome the soundest horses doesn't mean Gill isn't dumping the lame ones as cheaply and quickly as possible.


              Edited to add: I don't blame the vets at all. I'm not accusing them of anything. They are euthing lame horses. Putting them out of their discomfort. There is nothing wrong with that.
              -Jessica

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Pronzini View Post
                Meredith, given the tenor of some of the posting, do you think posting door to door directions to his farm is really a good thing?
                Oh.. sorry, I didn't really think that people would go burn it down or anything!

                If you google "Micheal Gill + horse farm in PA" or something similar you can find it easily or if you just google "Elk Creek Ranch"

                If people think I should take down the directions I will
                http://www.clarkdesigngrouparchitects.com/index.html - Lets build your dream barn

                Comment


                • Dont quote me om this, but I believe the TRF now requires a $3000 dollar fee to retire a horse with them... I'm sure MG could afford that, since he claims to have made so much money at this game.

                  Comment


                  • Here is the Thoro. Retirement Foundation's protocol for retiring a horse with them (from their web site):

                    1.Horses at the racetrack or at risk of going to the slaughterhouse are given first priority.
                    2.All applicants will be expected to give an annual donation to the TRF in the amount deemed appropriate by the committee.
                    3.Except in unusual circumstances, former racehorses, now sport horses or show horses, are only accepted if they can go directly to an adoptive home without spending time at a TRF farm.
                    4.Broodmares are only accepted if they have a racing record and the owner shows financial reasons why the broodmare cannot live out her life on the breeding farm, unless they qualify under category 1.
                    5.Horses must be pasture sound or potentially pasture sound.
                    6.Stallions must be gelded.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DickHertz
                      How can that be answered when the track owner in question published and anti-slaughter policy on the overnight for over a month last year and when it was brought to their attention that Brandon Jenkins sold a horse to a meat man, they came out and said (sic) "well, we really don't have an official anti-slaugther policy".
                      Funny, you seem to have a self-proclaimed handle on everything else going on at Penn. Oh well.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by DickHertz
                        How can that be answered when the track owner in question published and anti-slaughter policy on the overnight for over a month last year and when it was brought to their attention that Brandon Jenkins sold a horse to a meat man, they came out and said (sic) "well, we really don't have an official anti-slaugther policy".
                        Don't throw Brandon Jenkins under the bus. He isn't the only one who sold a horse to the "meat man". Many others at many other tracks over many years.

                        Comment


                        • The question was: what is the track's policy on euthanizing horses/ON grounds, NOT race nights...? what is the policy/standards of euthanizing and disposing on track property ?... someone must have an accounting of such things... the horses... what/who determines this as an allowable option?

                          the claim has been made that horses were shipped IN specifically for euthanization
                          Last edited by brightskyfarm; Dec. 15, 2010, 04:03 PM.
                          IN GOD WE TRUST
                          OTTB's ready to show/event/jumpers. Track ponies for perfect trail partners.
                          http://www.horseville.com/php/search...=1&ssid=057680

                          Comment


                          • I don't think DickHertz is throwing Brandon Jenkins under the bus, we all know what goes on- his point is that Penn published a "zero tolerance policy" after pressure from certain people, and they have not and will not enforce it. They have not offered the horsemen any alternatives, like Turning for Home or the FLTAP. Jenkins is certainly not the only one, but there was no arguing with the paper trail in that case, and Penn then back-tracked. I personally wish they would remove that sham of a policy, bc far too many horses have gone underground since then with no hope of being purchased at any auction. The clueless people that insisted on this policy are nowhere to be seen now either. What a joke.
                            Last edited by BeverlyAStrauss; Apr. 22, 2010, 05:07 PM.
                            Be a part of the solution~ Adopt a thoroughbred!
                            MidAtlanticHorseRescue.org

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by BeverlyAStrauss View Post
                              I don't think DickHertz is throwing Brandon Jenkins under the bus, we all know what goes on- his point is that Penn published a "zero tolerance policy" after pressure from certain people, and they have not and will not enforce it. They have not offered the horsemen any alternatives, like Turning for Home or the FLTAP. Jenkins is certainly not the only one, but there was no arguing with the paper trail in that case, and Penn then backtracked. I personally wish they would remove that sham of a policy, bc far too many horses have gone underground since then with no hope of being purchased at any auction. The clueless people that insisted on this policy are nowhere to be seen now either. What a joke.
                              All so true. Thanks for posting this.

                              Comment


                              • What Beverly said.
                                -Jessica

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by brightskyfarm View Post
                                  The question was: what is the track's policy on euthanizing horses/ON grounds, NOT race nights...? what is the policy/standards of euthanizing and disposing on track property ?... someone must have an accounting of such things... the horses... what/who determines this as an allowable option?

                                  the claim has been made that horses were shipped IN specifically for euthanization

                                  I guess I don't see why this would be an ETHICAL issue. A business issue as far as cost to the track for body disposal? Sure. But I don't see the difference between a vet driving out to a farm to euth a horse, or having the owner meet the vet at the track or clinic to have the same thing done.
                                  Bottom line, if the owner and vet deems it appropriate to euthanize a horse, than it should be put down. It sure beats dumping the same horse at an auction. There are far worse fates for an animal than to have a needle that ends it's pain.

                                  What exactly is your point? Because I feel like I'm missing something...
                                  -Jessica

                                  Comment


                                  • [QUOTE=AppJumpr08;4672168]I guess I don't see why this would be an ETHICAL issue. A business issue as far as cost to the track for body disposal? Sure. But I don't see the difference between a vet driving out to a farm to euth a horse, or having the owner meet the vet at the track or clinic to have the same thing done.
                                    Bottom line, if the owner and vet deems it appropriate to euthanize a horse, than it should be put down. It sure beats dumping the same horse at an auction. There are far worse fates for an animal than to have a needle that ends it's pain.

                                    QUOTE]

                                    Absolutely!

                                    Comment


                                    • *Its being suggested that the track is backing this
                                      outlet by using its resources to assist?
                                      Last edited by brightskyfarm; Dec. 15, 2010, 04:04 PM.
                                      IN GOD WE TRUST
                                      OTTB's ready to show/event/jumpers. Track ponies for perfect trail partners.
                                      http://www.horseville.com/php/search...=1&ssid=057680

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by brightskyfarm View Post
                                        The point:

                                        *I am directly challenging the statement that horses were shipping in to be euthanized.

                                        *If horseman/owners/rescues/ ARE using this euthanasia *excuse* as a cop-out to spending time, money and other resources to re-home a horse, yes, then I directly challenge the ethics of that.

                                        *Its being suggested that the track is backing this
                                        outlet by using its resources to assist?

                                        If authorities went to a(any) farm and found a pit full of horses, they'd be quickly asking for an accounting I assure you that.

                                        I personally wouldn't mind if they euthanized every single one of Gill's horses right then and there. At least they would be the only ones to die and there would be no worries of them taking their riders with them which if you think back is the entire reasoning behind this thread PLUS it would spare them the nightmare of slaughter. It never was about the horses, it was trying to keep the horses from killing the people around them.
                                        And no, if you went to a farm and found a pit full of healthy weight horses with trimmed hooves that were humanely euthanized the authorities whomever that may be would not and could not do a thing about it.
                                        McDowell Racing Stables

                                        Home Away From Home

                                        Comment


                                        • Personally I wish tracks would offer a ship-in euthanasia option. I don't think making the decision to euthanize an animal should ever be easy, however, I do think finding an outlet to do so affordably should be. If low cost euthanasia was business as usual that would take away one of the arguments for slaughter.

                                          I will never understand the people who can't bear the thought of euthanising their unsound animal, and yet have no compunction about giving away that animal for free to a stranger -- horses end up in far worse fates that way than by the needle.

                                          Before you go questioning someone else's decision to euthanize an animal, ask yourself how many unsound horses have you successfully rehomed.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X