• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

WOOOOHOOOO! CURLIN!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I love Hard Spun, too. He always runs his heart out and is so consistent. I think 1 1/4 miles is a little too long for him, but whatever. He's done racing now.

    Most of the time, I can separate Curlin from his owners. I like his trainer, so I try to think of him as being Steve's horse instead of being owned by that unsavory lot.

    I'm sure Curlin's value went way up on Saturday. It would be sad (and ironic) if he gets retired now because of his win. It was a great win, but I probably would have preferred him to lose if it meant he would keep racing next year.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by ravenclaw View Post
      I'm sure Curlin's value went way up on Saturday. It would be sad (and ironic) if he gets retired now because of his win.
      My view is that Jess Jackson holds 30% of Curlin yet by way of the structuring actually has the majority control. So if he really is committed to the sport and the promotion of it you'd think he would keep the horse running. The money (at stud) shouldn't mean a thing to him plus he'd only retire to Jacksons own stables anyhow - no further selling of his breeding rights.

      The only reason Penny Chenery didn't see Secretariat run at 4-yrs old was due to financial obligations on her father's estate. A huge disservice to all was the removal of him from the track at what could've been only the start of his popularity and success.

      Why can't the lessons of history be spoken loud and clear: no top notch US runner in my lifetime has produced at equal or better horse at stud. Period. None. No Affirmed, Alydar, Spectacualr Bid, Secretariat, Dr. Fager, Damascus, et al. (Not that he is in that super league today) I say keep him running and see what he can do at 4. Take the glory from that and don't salivate over what you might produce mixing him with select mares.

      If the lawsuits against the minor owners (20%) results in forcing their stake to be sold, then so be it. Jackson has enough to buy out that share under private treaty without blinking an eye.

      Comment


      • #23
        Ooops after I posted the above I ran across the Bill Finley article of today from ESPN "Breeders' Cup winners soon to be breeding" which says the same things.

        As big as the windfall will be when Curlin goes to stud, these men obviously don't need the money. Why wouldn't they choose the thrill of owning a horse who could potentially go down as one of the all-time greats over a few more million dollars?

        Curlin is just now starting to get good. He was a late-bloomer who did not start as a 2-year-old. He overcame a major obstacle, his inexperience, to win the Preakness and didn't really blossom until the Classic. As good as he was as a 3-year-old, he would be better next year.

        "With Robby (Albarado) on board and Steve (Asmussen) training, I'm sure that we can prove that he's one of the best in the last century or half century," Jackson said, mulling what Curlin could prove on the racetrack next year.

        Then why not give him the chance?
        Also

        "You don't understand people like this," a prominent bloodstock advisor told me. "Who has the biggest pile of money? That's how they keep score. They don't care about trophies."

        That's too bad. This game used to be filled with great sportsman, people who loved the sport more than they loved their investment portfolios. With the exception of the Phipps family, they're all gone.
        Heck I'd think winning HOY at 4-yr old after just maybe taking the same wins Invasor did plus the Whitney Handicap, Jockey Club Gold Cup again and Breeders Cup' 2008 would beat any pile of money any day. Plus its not like Curlin would be infertile for having run 1 more year, or is that how some dolts think happens?

        I will correct Bill in one remark: let it not go without note that one of the leading persons who bought up Secretariat's breeding rights and thus forced him into retirement was one of the most respected sportsmen - Paul Mellon.

        Comment


        • #24
          Not too long of a wait ...

          Courier-Journal 10-29-07 "Curlin's future to be decided soon"

          Trainer Steve Asmussen said yesterday that discussions will begin "in the next day or two" whether Breeders' Cup Classic winner Curlin will be retired to stud or stay in training next year.

          Comment


          • #25
            Regarding Hard Spun not being a 1 1/4 mile horse...yeah, he is what?...like only the 2nd best? I used to think the same thing, but think about it! What other horse ran second in the biggest 1 1/4 races? Who? Hard Spun? Doesn't sound too shabby to me!

            Yeah, maybe he could have been the next Lure at a mile on turf, but I think that awesome horse (and Larry) showed us ALL what he really can do!

            For those of you interested in horses that performed at or under thier abilities, see:
            http://cristblog.drf.com/crist/

            Comment


            • #26
              [QUOTE]


              Heck I'd think winning HOY at 4-yr old after just maybe taking the same wins Invasor did plus the Whitney Handicap, Jockey Club Gold Cup again and Breeders Cup' 2008 would beat any pile of money any day. Plus its not like Curlin would be infertile for having run 1 more year, or is that how some dolts think happens?
              QUOTE]

              He might not be infertile, but he could feasibly be dead. Just saying, as per GW, there is that risk any time he steps on a track, race or workout. Any time. I would think that's where they have to seriously weigh the risks.

              I'm a huge Curlin fan, was thrilled to see him at Keeneland, on the track in the morning, and in his stall, and to see him win Saturday. Maybe he would do great things next year and be safe... maybe not.
              We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
              www.dleestudio.com

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by miss_critic View Post
                Regarding Hard Spun not being a 1 1/4 mile horse...yeah, he is what?...like only the 2nd best? I used to think the same thing, but think about it! What other horse ran second in the biggest 1 1/4 races? Who? Hard Spun? Doesn't sound too shabby to me!

                Yeah, maybe he could have been the next Lure at a mile on turf, but I think that awesome horse (and Larry) showed us ALL what he really can do!

                For those of you interested in horses that performed at or under thier abilities, see:
                http://cristblog.drf.com/crist/
                I think I agree with both points here. Yes, Hard Spun would have blown the competition away as a miler, but how many milers have there been that can still finish on the board at the classic distances?? Plus, I can think of a few horses that would be considered "true" 10F horses that have finished behind Hard Spun at that distance (*cough cough Street Sense cough).

                Each time Hard Spun ran, he impressed me more. It's a shame he wasn't the first under the wire each time, but he was always right there. The horse won at 6, 7, 8, and 9 furlongs in his career and finished 2nd in the biggest 10 furlong races. You don't see too many horses who can do that.

                But this thread is supposed to be about Curlin. I'd just rather talk about Hard Spun.

                Hey miss_critic-- thanks for the link on the speed figures! It's really interesting to see that the slop didn't really affect any of the winners except the sprinters. Hmmm...
                Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by DLee View Post
                  He might not be infertile, but he could feasibly be dead. Just saying, as per GW, there is that risk any time he steps on a track, race or workout. Any time. I would think that's where they have to seriously weigh the risks.
                  If that is truly a concern - him breaking down - then I'd say this to his owners: get out of the business. A stable cannot effectively be run if that is a factor, of any significance, in their minds. Sure waaaaaaay back in the recesses of their minds before the opening of the gates they may for a moment think "what if" but that should never ever be a leading thought.

                  Having a stable of race horses in training or even broadmares and studs means what - that they'll be raising horses to play bowling or hopscotch? The name of the game is racing. If there are concerns about footing - then scratch. Fears about a sore leg - then scratch.

                  There is no excuse to retire a healthy horse who hasn't yet reach his or her maximum potential. Yes, George Washington broke down. Then again the legendary polo pony of Averell Harriman, sadly tagged with a name out of sync with today of "Gay Boy" was crushed to death by a falling airplane while standing in his stall at Meadow Brook Club.

                  Said William Averell Harriman, financier, owner of the two ponies: "They were two of the best polo ponies in the world. I raised them from colts. They were priceless." Time Jun. 18, 1928

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Glimmerglass,
                    The risk of losing Curlin now is a far greater loss financially, obviously, then when he first raced in early '07. It should definitely be a 'factor of significance'.
                    We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                    www.dleestudio.com

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by DLee View Post
                      Glimmerglass,
                      The risk of losing Curlin now is a far greater loss financially, obviously, then when he first raced in early '07. It should definitely be a 'factor of significance'.
                      Whatever happend to love of the game? His major shareholder has a net worth over $2 billion. I don't think the financial loss would put him in the poor house. Heck, the shareholders sitting in jail sure don't have a lot to lose!

                      Really, how many fatal breakdowns in G1 horses have you seen in the last 50 years? We've had a run of bad luck recently, and I don't think you can blame it on anything but that. Three years ago, with Ruffian only a faint memory, I guarantee no one would have been talking like this.
                      Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Maybe I should have said "would be a factor" rather than "should". I'd be very surprised if they decided to risk him in another season of racing.

                        I see the fees are out, Street Sense is $75,000, Hard Spun is $50,000.
                        We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                        www.dleestudio.com

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Texarkana View Post

                          thanks for the link on the speed figures! It's really interesting to see that the slop didn't really affect any of the winners except the sprinters. Hmmm...

                          As weak as an arguement as it might be, SS is in the red

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Judge Rules Interest In Curlin Turned Over to Plaintiffs
                            http://news.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=41822

                            This doesn't look good (in terms of Curlin running next year).

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              What a huge, huge mess.
                              We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                              www.dleestudio.com

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                I for one fully expected their 20% stake to be seized as they owe in excesss of $45 million and seemingly don't have the money - or won't give up any details on where their looted funds went. There is a reason why those two have been sitting in a jail for over two months. It's more of a shame (for racing fans) that Jackson and his partners didn't fully buy them out as opposed to rolling the dice and seeing what came from their legal issues.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  A classic example of how one of the said and since disbarred lawyers operated, Source: Associated Press Oct 31, 2007:

                                  Federal prosecutors said they may use evidence that attorney Shirley Cunningham Jr. used money taken from clients to endow the [$1M Florida A&M law school] chair, which is the subject of a separate investigation.

                                  Cunningham gave the money to Florida A&M in January 2002 with the condition that the school grant him the position at a $100,000-a-year salary. The school fired Cunningham in 2005 after interim FAMU president Castell Bryant said there was no evidence Cunningham had done any work at the law school.
                                  To keep the names straight, Cunningham is Charles Curlin's great grandson

                                  From the TB Times of Nov 1, 2007:

                                  From the attorney, Angela Ford, representing the 418 members of the phen-fen class action suit who now own 20% of Curlin:

                                  “This is potentially huge because Curlin is an extremely valuable asset,” Ford said Thursday night. “I haven’t had direct conversations with all the owners, but … we’re interested in collecting and liquidating assets, so we are in favor of selling Curlin.”
                                  However as minority holders of the horse, even if they sold off their 20% stake to the highest bidder that doesn't necessarily mean the new owner could dictate anything in regards to next steps with his racing or going to stud.

                                  Lawyer Ron is a perfect example of that whereby he's continued to race despite different ownership stakes in him with different agendas.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    I am still confused as to why one of the other stake holders can't just buy out Midnight Cry's 20%, or why they couldn't just sell their 20% to the highest bidder and carry on racing... unless of course the other owners don't want to do that.

                                    What a PITA...
                                    Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by Texarkana View Post
                                      I am still confused as to why one of the other stake holders can't just buy out Midnight Cry's 20%, or why they couldn't just sell their 20% to the highest bidder and carry on racing... unless of course the other owners don't want to do that.
                                      I am wondering the same thing. I'm sure it would have been cheaper and easier for Jess Jackson and George Bolton to buy out the other owners earlier. But I don't see why it couldn't be done now unless there is some legal red tape because of the judge's ruling.

                                      Doesn't Jess Jackson have the controlling interest?

                                      This whole thing is so sleazy. It's sad that Curlin's success has been tarnished because of this mess with his owners.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by Texarkana View Post
                                        I am still confused as to why one of the other stake holders can't just buy out Midnight Cry's 20%, or why they couldn't just sell their 20% to the highest bidder and carry on racing... unless of course the other owners don't want to do that.
                                        I'm Jackson/Bolton/Sanan could buy out the other 20% from the plantiffs however the issue now becomes price. Let's for the sake of guessing that he could be syndicated for breeding at $40 million. That means the 20% stake is worth $8M and I just don't see that partnership putting up that money to own 100% and sending him back to the track. Not that such a sum isn't anything but a drop in the bucket.

                                        Even though they could (1) insure him to recover that buyout money + see a return on their own purchase stake in case of injury and (2) make make back the $8M (if he's that good) in 2008 racing. Win in Dubai and the Breeders' Cup Classic plus a couple more races and you're there .. plus he then could be sold for 2009 breeding at a value closer to $60M+.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          The other problem is the 400 people are responsible for paying for his keep, albiet their share is probably $2 each - but how is that going to be arranged.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X