• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Ouch - PA racing: "about that G2 you won, we'll be taking it back"

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ouch - PA racing: "about that G2 you won, we'll be taking it back"

    Looks like the only three graded stakes races for the state of Pennsylvania already held in 2009 will be now be recinded and sadly the winners of each are out of luck with that black type but do retain the win.

    DRF 12-4-09 "Grades rescinded for Pennsylvania stakes"

    The American Graded Stakes Committee has rescinded the grades for three stakes races held in Pennsylvania in 2009 - the Grade 2 Pennsylvania Derby, the Grade 2 Cotillion Stakes, and the Grade 3 Presque Isle Downs Masters - because horses that participated in the stakes were not tested for alkalizing agents, racing officials said late on Friday.

    The three races are the only graded stakes races held in Pennsylvania.
    (alkalizing agents are a/k/a milkshakes)

    Those hurt are by no mean 'little guys' in horse racing:

    Phipps Stable runner Gone Astray had won the Pennsylvania Derby
    Augustin Stables (Geo. Strawbrige Jr) runner Informed Decision had won the Presque Isle Downs Masters ... and later the Breeders Cup Filly and Mare Sprint
    Donver Stable's Careless Jewel took the Cotillion Stakes

  • #2
    Yeah I saw that yesterday. I don't see how they can do that retroactively, I think if I owned one of those horses I would be talking to a lawyer and finding out what options I had.
    McDowell Racing Stables

    Home Away From Home

    Comment


    • #3
      How silly. I have to agree with Laurierace... I think I'd be talking to the lawyers if I were an owner of one of those horses...

      Comment


      • #4
        Ah, the fun...

        but yeah, if I'd be affected, I'd have my lawyer send them a nice letter, with further action to follow.

        I mean, to my kowledge it is not common practice for owners to insist on being tested...that's the track staff's job.
        Originally posted by BigMama1
        Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
        GNU Terry Prachett

        Comment


        • #5
          The racing commission didn't follow the rules but the horse owners are the ones who are paying the price. Its not like they had any control over the testing procedures. If anything they can sue them for false advertising.
          McDowell Racing Stables

          Home Away From Home

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
            The racing commission didn't follow the rules but the horse owners are the ones who are paying the price.
            Agreed that the owners are paying the price having made the logical assumption each race was going to be conducted in keeping with the requirements, etc garnering the graded rating.

            From that DRF article:

            Andrew Schweigardt, the secretary of the committee, said on Friday that he did not believe that owners of the horses would have been aware that the races were being run outside of the rules to comply with the graded stakes committee. He said that the committee asks all state racing commissions to provide a letter verifying that they conducted drug tests meeting the committee's requirements, and Pennsylvania said that it could not provide the letter last week.

            "I didn't know it was an issue until just last week, so I doubt any owners knew about it," Schweigardt said.
            Somewhat shocking that Pennsylvania was that asleep at the wheel and non-compliance.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post



              Somewhat shocking that Pennsylvania was that asleep at the wheel and non-compliance.
              Let me clue you in on the powers that be in Pennsylvania racing - they don't care about whether a stake is graded or not. That would probably rank somewhere slightly above testing for Epogen or doing pre-race exams.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3
                How is this retro active? The rule has been in place since the start of the year.

                http://www.grayson-jockeyclub.org/ne...ded_stakes.pdf



                Penn racing commish are the ones who didn't play by the rules.
                The Pennsylvania Racing Commission is responsible for enforcing PA racing law, not the wishes of some self-appointed group who answers to no one in this industry.

                As I stated at TBC, I wish the tracks (and owners) would get together and tell the Graded Stakes Committe to go take a hike.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DickHertz View Post
                  Let me clue you in on the powers that be in Pennsylvania racing - they don't care about whether a stake is graded or not. That would probably rank somewhere slightly above testing for Epogen or doing pre-race exams.
                  That may be true and with a mere 3 races being graded one would otherwise think it would be just a blip on the radar. Yet when the oversight impacts a PA-resident, leading breeder and owner like George Strawbridge Jr. as well as the Phipps family methinks that will result in them caring.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Not sure of PA's testing prceedures, but wouldn't the samples still be around? I wonder if they could go back and test those samples??? Not sure how co2 test are done and how long the samples are good for...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3
                      1) if you don't care about the whole pattern system, then why do you care that they lost the grading?
                      2) You want the owners to tell themselves to take a hike? The American Graded Stakes Committee was set up and is run by the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association.... TOBA
                      Frankly, I don't care since I feel the elimination of the Grades Stakes Committee is long overdue. Their methodology is terribly flawed and the result has done more damage to the industry than any medication policy.

                      When I say the "owners," I mean the ones who lost whatever accolade they considered important when they entered the races in question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X