• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

MTB to contest BCC w/ Borel

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MTB to contest BCC w/ Borel

    The Blood Horse announces Mine That Bird is still being pointed at the BCC and USA Today announces Borel to ride.

    Not sure how I feel about either one, but I know I'm glad his stallcam is staying up!
    "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

  • #2
    Hope Borel gives him a better ride than he did in the Belmont.

    Comment


    • #3
      Good luck with that. I suppose their view would be "why not thy not try for some little pice of the prize and some of the glory before the race." However I just don't see it myself.

      He wasn't blown away in the Goodwood - less then 4 lengths off at the end - however against a Sea the Stars, Zenyatta, Summer Bird, Gitano Hernando and others cited as 'maybe' for running it doesn't look good.

      Calvin said he didn't like the surface much and was a bit tired. Listen to your jockey and rethink your plans folks ...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post
        Good luck with that. I suppose their view would be "why not thy not try for some little pice of the prize and some of the glory before the race." However I just don't see it myself.

        He wasn't blown away in the Goodwood - less then 4 lengths off at the end - however against a Sea the Stars, Zenyatta, Summer Bird, Gitano Hernando and others cited as 'maybe' for running it doesn't look good.

        Calvin said he didn't like the surface much and was a bit tired. Listen to your jockey and rethink your plans folks ...
        Well yeah, and since this is the 2nd time he's bombed on that surface I'll bet against him. I don't think changing his shoes is going to make diddly squat difference against the competition he'll be facing in the Classic. I can hardly wait for the decisions of the Zenyatta and Sea the Stars camps!!!!!!!!!
        "Everyone will start to cheer, when you put on your sailin shoes"-Lowell George

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't think STS is coming and Z is running with the "girls", so they aren't part of the picture. I like Calvin as the jockey, yeah he made a mistake in the Belmont, but I think he is good at keeping MTB calm.

          I like the little bird. With some more training under his belt he might pull off a win. I'm tied between him and Summer Bird.
          Hillary Rodham Clinton - the peoples choice for president.

          Comment


          • #6
            I have no knocks on Calvin with the Belmont on MTB as no one can pull off that perfect timed rail rubbing trip time and again. By comparison Summer Bird has proven himself to be a better horse with the Belmont victory, the Travers Stakes, Jockey Club Gold Cup and even in spite of the loss in the Haskell against Rachel.

            MTB might have a lot of heart, his owners may be folk with a lot of NASCAR appeal, and they aren't offering up excuses which is refreshing. That said when you don't win the Preakness, Belmont, West Virginia Derby or Goodwood and for 2009 have a record of 7 starts 1-2-2 you have to wonder was it a fluke.

            More specifically he totally bombed on the Santa Anita surface in the BC JV last year finishing 12th, and just finished 6th in the Goodwood on the same and yet somehow he's going to have a come to Jesus moment and pull off a victory in the BCC? Maybe so and that's why the run the races ....

            Comment


            • #7
              It's a shame when the trainer's "ego" gets in the way of the horse. The little warrior needs a break... it proves nothing to run up the track... JMO

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Blinkers On View Post
                It's a shame when the trainer's "ego" gets in the way of the horse. The little warrior needs a break... it proves nothing to run up the track... JMO
                He just had a 10 week break. And an 8 week break before that. Yesterday was his second race since June 6th.
                Maybe he needs a new trainer.

                Comment


                • #9
                  MTBs running style will lose him more races than wins. He's a come from behind, or at least, is the way he is ridden. Love the little horse, just not at SA.

                  Summerbird has no races on fake AW surface. Which is why I avoided Swift Temper like the plague in the Spinster Stakes at Keeneland yesterday. She went off as the favorite and ran.........8th. Dirt horse.

                  I'm just learning the fake surface, but it seems like turf horses do okay on it, or horses used to running on it, but true dirt horses do not.

                  So, I would have grave concerns about SB on the SA surface.

                  You have horses like Gitano Hernando, who are synth specialists, he broke track record on it and his synth record was awesome. And Colonel John, and Richard's Kid. These horses trained by CA trainers, or AW specialists with jocks used to riding it.

                  All the horses who hit the board in the Goodwood had sire stats where offspring had won on the SA surface specifically, and then you had Gitano, from Europe, who specializes on it.

                  That's going to be my *rule* for the BC races that aren't on turf. Smart money will go on the euros and the ones that run on this fake stuff.

                  As for MTB jock, not dissing Borel in any way, but he has experience at churchilll......practically zero at SA or Belmont. WHen you are trying to win a huge stakes race, it makes sense to get a jock who knows the track, the subtleties, the lay of the land. Borel is great, but no jock can be great *everywhere*. That's why certain jocks have high % at just certain tracks. They know it like the back of their hand. Therefore, if I were wooley, I would think about this.

                  The problem with an "outsider" like MTB is that he hadnt raced here a lot, and Wooley doesn't have an "in" in the jockey colonies of every track, or enough horses to have a "regular" rider for his horse. Etiher that, or he is just being loyal to Borel, who knws

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by WinterTriangle View Post
                    MTBs running style will lose him more races than wins. He's a come from behind, or at least, is the way he is ridden. Love the little horse, just not at SA.

                    Summerbird has no races on fake AW surface. Which is why I avoided Swift Temper like the plague in the Spinster Stakes at Keeneland yesterday. She went off as the favorite and ran.........8th. Dirt horse.

                    I'm just learning the fake surface, but it seems like turf horses do okay on it, or horses used to running on it, but true dirt horses do not.

                    So, I would have grave concerns about SB on the SA surface.

                    You have horses like Gitano Hernando, who are synth specialists, he broke track record on it and his synth record was awesome. And Colonel John, and Richard's Kid. These horses trained by CA trainers, or AW specialists with jocks used to riding it.

                    All the horses who hit the board in the Goodwood had sire stats where offspring had won on the SA surface specifically, and then you had Gitano, from Europe, who specializes on it.

                    That's going to be my *rule* for the BC races that aren't on turf. Smart money will go on the euros and the ones that run on this fake stuff.

                    As for MTB jock, not dissing Borel in any way, but he has experience at churchilll......practically zero at SA or Belmont. WHen you are trying to win a huge stakes race, it makes sense to get a jock who knows the track, the subtleties, the lay of the land. Borel is great, but no jock can be great *everywhere*. That's why certain jocks have high % at just certain tracks. They know it like the back of their hand. Therefore, if I were wooley, I would think about this.

                    The problem with an "outsider" like MTB is that he hadnt raced here a lot, and Wooley doesn't have an "in" in the jockey colonies of every track, or enough horses to have a "regular" rider for his horse. Etiher that, or he is just being loyal to Borel, who knws
                    Gitano Hernando is not a synth specialist. Coming into the Goodwood he had run on it TWO times, both on Poly, which is the exact same stuff that MTB became a 2yo champion on in Canada and indeed qualified for the KY Derby on. In fact MTB had more runs and indeed more wins on synth than GH.
                    It's funny how MTB is now suddenly a "dirt" horse, and Gitano Hernando is a Euro "turf" horse, even though his owners both him to run in the Belmont and possibly the KY Derby.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Geeze, Glimmer, you lose the family homestead on him or something?

                      1-2-3 in the TC races hardly makes him Canonero II... Let's not forget he woulda HAD Rachel in the Preak if he'd had a better ride or 4 more strides. She was done and he was closing like a freight train. No, the little big hoss has earned his right to hunt with this pack; he's a genuine stakes horse all right...

                      Yeah, he was dead last in the BC Juvenile last year against far lesser company - under a different trainer. That kinda suggests to me that since he was 6th there this year in tougher company under Woolley's management, he IS improving, and the LAST thing you'd do at this point is change the trainer.

                      That said: clearly he does not like the footing, and I'm not optimistic of his chances at Santa Anita period. WinterTriangle's assessment has the ring of truth to it on two key counts: the analysis of the footing and of MTB's running style. BUT we still don't actually know who is seriously coming in for the BCC... As of this writing, a lot of supposed "key" players haven't declared... And several of them are horses he has beaten before even when he ran 2nd or 3rd... He may not have WON against them but his nose was still in front of theirs at the line!

                      While a Summer Bird/Mine That Bird rematch would be fascinating, I do think that a more entertaining sporting proposition would be to run MTB in the BC Marathon, but that's just me.

                      I'm fond of the little guy whether he wins or not.
                      "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by War Admiral View Post
                        Geeze, Glimmer, you lose the family homestead on him or something?
                        Lets been exceedingly clear - you can still be a fan, you can still root for a horse who has no chance and you can still love that horse. There are several horses running that I follow who more often then not are over their heads and I know won't win.

                        I actually won money on MTB in the Derby as I knew Calvin's strength was at CD and enhanced on a off-track. So no, he's never burned me.

                        This sport is a business. Hate that fact or not but it is one. There is a cost to shipping, training, hauling and stabling a horse to a track. Further and more importantly there is a cost to the horse - their abilities are not infinite. So decisions should be made sparingly and wisely. I'm still baffled about the Travers skip or why they didn't shift gears and contest the Penn Derby. Some confidence could've been restored and some good coin could've been made.

                        I'll go back to the question: why are they running Mine That Bird in the Breeders' Cup Classic off a four race losing streak? Is it to win? Are they shooting for place money? Is it for the mere prestige for being "in" in the Breeders' Cup?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Sorry, I laugh at "he would have HAD Rachel"... Just like everyone else has "had" her, right?
                          We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                          www.dleestudio.com

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post
                            I'll go back to the question: why are they running Mine That Bird in the Breeders' Cup Classic off a four race losing streak? Is it to win? Are they shooting for place money? Is it for the mere prestige for being "in" in the Breeders' Cup?
                            Well, let's look at the current probables list:

                            Gio Ponte
                            Mastercraftsman (the one I think is the likeliest spoiler, TBH)
                            Rip Van Winkle
                            Macho Again
                            Awesome Gem
                            Summer Bird

                            This isn't a particularly terrifying list, to my eye, save for Mastercraftsman and MAYBE Summer Bird. There's nothing in there MTB can't beat when on his game. I'd happily take the place/show money out of $5 million...

                            DLee: laugh away, then go watch the rerun. He was right there closing fast on that filly at the line.
                            "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yes, I saw the race. There is no telling what she would have done when she saw him. Not sure how you know she was "done". She was at the wire first, period. All year long.
                              We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                              www.dleestudio.com

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by DLee View Post
                                Yes, I saw the race. There is no telling what she would have done when she saw him. Not sure how you know she was "done". She was at the wire first, period. All year long.
                                www.laurienberenson.com

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by DLee View Post
                                  Not sure how you know she was "done".
                                  Maybe because her own jockey SAID she was done?? He's probably in a better position to judge how much horse he had left at the finish than any number of armchair quarterbacks.
                                  "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    And who's calling me an armchair quarterback? Why, an armchair quarterback.

                                    Hey, I'm a MTB fan as well. I'm just saying, Rachel has beaten everything that showed up this year. And it gets old hearing people say 'woulda, shoulda, coulda' about her races. If only...

                                    I think Curlin would have won the Derby if there hadn't been such traffic. Oh well. There was, and he didn't. You don't know MTB would have caught Rachel. I don't know he wouldn't have. End of story.
                                    We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                                    www.dleestudio.com

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by War Admiral View Post
                                      Maybe because her own jockey SAID she was done?? He's probably in a better position to judge how much horse he had left at the finish than any number of armchair quarterbacks.
                                      Combine that with the fact that he gave her five pounds and was closing while having had a bad trip, and her connections have never put her in a longer race, I still have doubts that she can do distance, and I believe at even weights she definitely couldn't win going farther. I think we'll learn a lot more next year if she starts having to carry handicap weights or they start running her at a 1 1/4 or better. I agree with War Admiral that she was done and I've seen no evidence to the contrary--she's got a specialist distance at which she's so far unbeatable, but 1 1/4 is another story. (And we won't know how she would handle the surface, against horses who've run well on it.)

                                      It's academic anyway, she's done for the year and STS is done period, so I'm rooting for Summer Bird and hoping MTB will make a good showing. 1-2-3 in the Triple Crown is nothing to be ashamed of, nor would finishing in the top 3 in the Classic.
                                      Author Page
                                      Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                                      Steampunk Sweethearts

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        You can't hold the weight allowance against RA. That's the WFA scale, she's a filly and deserves it and would get it any where in the world.
                                        You can't expect them to race off level weights, otherwise you'd never ever see fillies race against colts. Colts are bigger, stronger and faster, you have to level the playing field.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X