• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Odd Situation at Charles Town 3/28/09

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Odd Situation at Charles Town 3/28/09

    First race. A horse trained by Joan Reynolds leaves the gate and is pulled up about 3 seconds after the gate is opened. After watching the head-on the horse didn't appear to break down, but was pulled up and I couldn't tell if it was in distress or just fighting the rider because it wanted to run. It was vanned off according to equibase. That's not the odd part.

    After that happened, the stewards repeatedly paged for Joan Reynolds to call them "IMMEDIATELY".

    It was a $4,000 claiming race.

    Anyone have any guesses as to what the judges wanted? Running a lame horse in hopes it would get claimed and instructed the rider to pull it up immediately??? That's about all I can think of.

    I'm not calling Joan Reynolds out or anything, I'm just real curious what the deal was. Any Charles Town people know?

  • #2
    I heard the rider was fined $1000.00

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      I can believe it. It's like he left the gate with the intention of pulling the horse up. I'm sure Ms. Reynolds got a healthy fine as well if they did indeed fine the rider (unless he took the fall for it).

      Comment


      • #4
        No foul by Joan

        I watched the race, I know Joan and was there to hear the aftermath. The rider did not like the way the horse felt the state vet saw nothing wrong with the horse(thats a first) told the jock he could have a change of rider, but fearig she would fire him off all her horses he opted to ride. So the jock pulled the horse up out of the gate and said it took a bad step. The state vet watched it jog again said he still saw nothing wrong and told the stewards what had insued. The stewards fined the rider for failure to try and the horse does not have to return to Charlestown to work. The jock has been fired from her horses.
        Another rider this week took a horse that she did'nt like to the vet, was given option to change riders she opted to ride and the horse trailed the field, she did not attempt to pull it up just let it gallop around. She was also fined for failure to try.

        Comment


        • #5
          I saw the same thing happen years ago. Was running a horse for someone at the Northampton Fair. Horse was an old warrior, gnarly ankles but racing sound. Trainer put an older fair circuit rider on who hadn't been on this horse before. They sprung the latch, rider immediately stood straight up and snatched him hard. But he was unable to pull him up. He made a circuit of the track on the outside fence with the rider waterskiing, and the horse running with his head straight up and mouth wide open.
          I went to pick the horse up after the race, rider had bailed before they got back to the unsaddling area, outrider brought the horse back, said rider claimed he felt bad. How can he say that when he never really rode him? Literally, as soon as the gate opened he snatched him.
          Trainer was furious. Horse ran back and was second by a nose next time out a week later. He claimed the rider pulled him for his own reason, because he had plenty of time to take off him before the start of the race but didn't.
          Riders are people who make their own assessments, and you don't always have control over them.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Originally posted by Muleskick View Post
            I watched the race, I know Joan and was there to hear the aftermath. The rider did not like the way the horse felt the state vet saw nothing wrong with the horse(thats a first) told the jock he could have a change of rider, but fearig she would fire him off all her horses he opted to ride. So the jock pulled the horse up out of the gate and said it took a bad step. The state vet watched it jog again said he still saw nothing wrong and told the stewards what had insued. The stewards fined the rider for failure to try and the horse does not have to return to Charlestown to work. The jock has been fired from her horses.
            Another rider this week took a horse that she did'nt like to the vet, was given option to change riders she opted to ride and the horse trailed the field, she did not attempt to pull it up just let it gallop around. She was also fined for failure to try.
            Interesting. I just figured that vet would have scratched if there was anything wrong with the horse, but then again he scratches horses because they have high knee action, but totally sound.

            Comment


            • #7
              Wow! If I was Joan, I'm sure I would be furious!!! I know that Jockeys are their own people who make their own decisions, but the Jocks have to trust the Vet's opinion on whether a horse is sound to race. And it sounds like the Jock was given the chance to take off his mount that he "didn't like" to feel of. He made the decision to stay on the horse, so he should have rode it!

              Wow - I'm so glad the stewards caught wind of this. In my eyes, that seems like a low-down thing to do.
              ~*~*~*~Founding member of the Spotted Saddlebred Pals Clique~*~*~*~

              The equine love of my life: Gabriel
              4/6/1993 - 8/23/2015 ...RIP my big, beautiful boy <3

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ClassyRide View Post
                but the Jocks have to trust the Vet's opinion on whether a horse is sound to race.
                While I suppose that's true, and this may not apply in THIS specific case, it is possible for things to be wrong with horses that vets and trainers don't catch. My own horse felt off to me for a while, and everyone kept telling me it was ok. A vet told me I'd brought them a sound horse. A professional trainer I respect said he was just being lazy. But I could feel it, and in the end I was right that there was a problem (pedal osteitis, and some inflammation in a knee, time off, injections, and new farrier seems to have solved it).

                Would the horse have broken down or been severely injured if raced? Who knows. And in all likelihood this specific instance isn't like my situation at all. JUST piping up that there can be things wrong with horses that don't "show" and a rider just feels.

                I don't know who the jockey is or anything else, and I can totally see why trainer and stewards would be pissed here, but I do wonder about situations like these.
                "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                My CANTER blog.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by caffeinated View Post
                  While I suppose that's true, and this may not apply in THIS specific case, it is possible for things to be wrong with horses that vets and trainers don't catch. My own horse felt off to me for a while, and everyone kept telling me it was ok. A vet told me I'd brought them a sound horse. A professional trainer I respect said he was just being lazy. But I could feel it, and in the end I was right that there was a problem (pedal osteitis, and some inflammation in a knee, time off, injections, and new farrier seems to have solved it).

                  Would the horse have broken down or been severely injured if raced? Who knows. And in all likelihood this specific instance isn't like my situation at all. JUST piping up that there can be things wrong with horses that don't "show" and a rider just feels.

                  I don't know who the jockey is or anything else, and I can totally see why trainer and stewards would be pissed here, but I do wonder about situations like these.
                  There are two seperate, but related, issues. The jockey can decide to get off the horse and refuse to ride if he feels his personal safety is jeopardized by what he thinks to be an unsound horse. In this case the jockey had that oppurtunity, but he chose to stay on the horse and be loaded in the gate.
                  The descision as to whether the horse is sound enough to run is made by the trainer and or vet.
                  By pulling the horse up immediately he is making a descion that is not his to make. He is lucky he got off with a slap on the wrist $1k fine.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    That really stinks for Joan.

                    I just had to find out what rider it was... interesting... the horse was even 2-1 morning line.
                    Race training and retraining Thoroughbreds.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Chad Murphy did that to one of ours once - a nice gelding named Pirate Ship. Pulled him up down the backside, vanned him off, came back to barn and jogged 100% sound, as witnessed by the state vet, Dr Day. That horse would colic once every 6 weeks or so and was on GG from the day we got him. Couple years later for a different trainer, same owner (horse went to Chicago) horse colicked badly enough to operate - during surgery they found a tumor the size of a football in his gut. So after two years of thinking he had been pulled up for no reason we finally got the reason why he might have felt terrible underneath the jock.

                      Hope they find some reason to give this trainer some ease of mind. But yeah, if they don't, that just SUCKS for the owner and trainer. Jocks have a moral obligation to take off IF they aren't going to ride 100%. But they don't want to give up the stables because of one horse, so they give that horse a half hearted effort, or worse - pull the sucker up. Sorry to the trainer that her jock yanked her horse up outa the gate, thats terrible.
                      Jessi Pizzurro ~~ Pennyroyal Stables
                      Racehorses, OTTBs ~~ 330 383 1281
                      Courage is being scared to death and saddling up anyway. -- John Wayne

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hopefully such oddities won't occur when HRTV is there live for the coverage of the Charles Town Classic day April 18th

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X