• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Eclipse Awards tonight

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eclipse Awards tonight

    If you aren't lucky enough to be in the ballroom, or even wandering around Gulfstream Park tonight, HRTV will carry the presentation at 8pm on their channel, as well as live streaming on their website.

    Have watched it a couple of times - can be very dry, and sometimes a little goofy - I wish the presenters were often aware they're being televised nationally instead of at the local company awards banquet, and I guess this year with Stronach taking over, they're trying to improve?!?

    But Mary Lou Whitney's speech two years ago was very moving. Well worth the time waiting to hear. Hoping to have some similar moments this evening.

    http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/wgoh/...it-speech.aspx
    But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

  • #2
    I love the eclipse awards, although nothing can beat last year when they announced Zenyatta as HOY, unexpected tears started streaming

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jennywho View Post
      I love the eclipse awards, although nothing can beat last year when they announced Zenyatta as HOY, unexpected tears started streaming
      I was talking about that with a friend last night. It was really like a bonus RACE she was running in. I was fully prepared to be absolutely pissed at the outcome. So much fun when it was announced after she'd earned it both years previous and not won.

      Tonight will be the first in what, 4 years?, that a filly doesn't win horse of the year. Royal Delta, according to some, should've been a HOY finalist.
      It's a uterus, not a clown car. - Sayyedati

      Comment


      • #4
        I also think Royal Delta should have been a finalist but I am pleased with the outcome. Wise Dan put together a tremendous campaign and had zero question marks on his 2012 resume. No knocks intended towards IHA, but I am happy that voters awarded a superior, if not as flashy, year long record over the ado of an impressive, media friendly shorter string of accomplishments.

        Royal Delta has another year.
        bar.ka think u al.l. susp.ect
        free bar.ka and tidy rabbit

        Comment


        • #5
          I couldn't see the Awards as HRTV for whatever reason is currently unavailable with my provider - yet I pay for it - and they cannot physically check the main connection until Monday. Obviously Comcastic has no respect for horse racing

          That aside I'm blown away by some Turf Writers continuing to have voting rights - no make that privileges - and didn't pick. What the heck?! Examples this year

          Jockey category: voter abstentions, 3; no vote, 1
          Horse of the Year: Frankel, 1; voter abstention, 1
          Breeder: Kenneth and Sarah Ramsey, 1; voter abstentions 10
          Owner: voter abstentions, 7
          The vote for Frankel for an Eclipse is the asinine vote I've seem in quite some time. With Breeder for all the success the Ramsey's have had with their Kitten's Joy off spring and being a considerable home bred outfit you mean they get a single vote with 10 votes withheld? Do these writers watch even more than two hours of racing a month? What about jockey? 3 voters had such paralysis that they couldn't vote for anyone hence abstaining? Amazing.

          Comment


          • #6
            Glimmer, maybe you can explain the process to me a little more thoroughly (or anyone else?)- I know abstentions have been an ongoing problem. Are voting rights "grandfathered", as it were, meaning does a specific publication get a vote for their turf writer regardless of a change in the person holding that position? How are new voters granted the privilege? Curious as I personally know our local "turf writer" and while I know he doesn't have a vote, I alos know he's just the sports guy and knows about as much about racing as I do about theoretical physics, and I'd imagine that's a common problem nationwide with non-racing specific publications.
            bar.ka think u al.l. susp.ect
            free bar.ka and tidy rabbit

            Comment


            • #7
              A bit more of the voting:

              http://www.tra-online.com/eclipse.html

              Eclipse Awards voters cast their ballots to rank the top three horses and individuals in each Championship division on a 10-5-1 point system basis.

              Voting entities: NTRA, Daily Racing Form and National Turf Writers And Broadcasters. For the 2012 Awards there were 254 voters vs. last year's awards being decided by fewer eligible voters (248). Last year some notable personalities were given the Eclipse voting right under the "broadcasters" part of the Turf Writers. Among then:

              Bob Neumeier of NBC, Simon Bray and Rich Perloff of TVG, host Steve Byk of “At the Races,” and Caton Bredar, of HRTV. Former jockey Jerry Baily (and Eclipse winner himself) as well as jockey turned broadcast reporter Donna Barton Brothers.
              This year's edition had just one horse that almost was unanimous with Shanghai Bobby capturing 253 votes and just 1 vote going to Uncaptured.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                I wondered about Frankel and Black Caviar, so looked the awards up before the broadcast and was reminded this is for American racing. Kind of thought so, so what, because we got to watch Frankel on television? someone voted for him? Or maybe it's an example of the voter not knowing what they're voting for...

                I've seen Richie Migliore's article supporting the apprentice jockey of the year, and agree it should be kept.

                Also LOVED that winning handicapper opting to donate for TB retirement, and with plans to encourage others to do so. Changed my jaundiced view of them as a group!
                But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

                Comment

                Working...
                X