• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Suffolk's zero tolerance policy...

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Suffolk's zero tolerance policy...

    'Thought this was worthy of a thread all its own, for those who've been wondering if the zero tolerance policy was all talk.

    Suffolk acts on slaughter policy
    Steve Myrick for the Thoroughbred Times

    Suffolk Downs has taken action to enforce its policy of zero-tolerance toward the sale of racehorses for slaughter.

    Track officials recently informed a Thoroughbred owner, who they would not identify, that he was no longer welcome at the track after two horses associated with him were discovered at the auction pens at New Holland, Pennsylvania.

    Suffolk officials also are sorting through their response to another individual who may be involved in the transport of horses to auctions frequented by slaughterhouse buyers.

    “The vast majority of our horsemen are responsible about the welfare of our horses,” said Chip Tuttle, chief operating officer at Suffolk Downs. “Unfortunately, there are one or two bad apples. We hoped we wouldn't have to take action on this policy, but in the last two weeks, it came to our attention that two horses from Suffolk Downs wound up at an auction. The owner who transported them is no longer welcome at our facility.”

    Tuttle said the track purchased the two horses from the auction and donated them to the Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation. Tuttle stressed that the incident was a rare exception to the prevailing attitude of local horsemen. He cited the New England Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association leadership's strong support of the zero-tolerance policy.

    Sam Elliott, vice president of racing for the Boston track, outlined the policy earlier this year, and it has since attracted attention across the industry. Trainer Nick Zito cited his support for the policy as a factor in entering Commentator in the Massachusetts Handicap on Saturday.
    Last edited by Barnfairy; Jun. 4, 2009, 02:58 PM.

  • #2
    Good for them, i'm glad the horses ended up in a safe home.


    • #3
      I was looking forward to hearing the outcome of that situation! Those are two very lucky horses that someone was paying attention and pulled them out!

      So glad to hear that Suffolk stuck to their guns


      • #4
        This isn't the 1950's any longer, and the sooner other tracks figure that out, the better.
        On a side note, I'd be very curious to know who the offending parties are. I have some idea who it very likely could have been.


        • #5
          worthy indeed. Thanks for posting it, and kudos to the track.


          • #6
            About time! And Kudos!


            • #7
              That news made my day! I am so happy to hear that they are putting their money where their mouth is.
              McDowell Racing Stables

              Home Away From Home


              • Original Poster

                Rowland Hoyt for the Daily Racing Form:

                The zero-tolerance policy at Suffolk Downs that rules off horsemen who send runners at the end of their careers to slaughter has been tested for the first time, with an unidentified horse owner no longer allowed on Suffolk's property following the discovery of two horses at a known slaughter auction in New Jersey.

                The discovery came within days of Commentator's 14-length victory in last week's Massachusetts Handicap. Hall of Fame trainer Nick Zito, outspoken in the anti-slaughter movement, noted the track's policy as part of the reason he and owner Tracy Farmer sent the multiple Grade 1 winner to Suffolk for the Mass Cap.

                Suffolk officials were alerted by horse-rescue activists that a gelding, Dunemoor, who had been working at Suffolk Downs but did not race there, was in a pen slated to be shipped to a foreign slaughterhouse.

                Sam Elliott, the track's vice president of racing, on behalf of the track purchased the gelding and another filly named Dahlia Denda, who had raced once at Suffolk but was based at Penn National, at the auction. They were sent to the Thoroughbred Retirement Fund's farm in Walkill, N.Y.

                Dunemoor, a 6-year-old gelding by El Amante, was owned by RV Racing Stables and trained by Reuben Monjes in his last race, a sixth-place finish in a $20,000 claimer at Delaware Park in August 2007. He won 3 of 21 starts and earned $62,970.

                Dahlia Denda raced for Alvis Lockhart and trainer Gregorio Rivera in a $5,000 maiden claiming race at Suffolk on June 6. She concluded her career by finishing seventh in a $5,000 maiden claimer at Penn National on June 19. Dahlia Denda failed to win in seven lifetime starts.

                After investigating the circumstances, no trainers are being sanctioned, but the person who purchased the horses has been "uninvited" to Suffolk, according to Chip Tuttle, Suffolk Downs chief operating officer. When the track announced the policy earlier this year, it stated trainers who were caught sending their horses to slaughter would lose their stalls.

                "We believe this was an individual who was not forthright with the trainers he approached about where he would be transporting these two horses," said Tuttle, who would not identify the buyer. "All the horsemen here have been very supportive of the policy. We believe the trainers in this case didn't knowingly allow this to happen."

                Cheaper racing circuits have long been places where buyers for slaughter auctions have done considerable business, offering cash for broken-down animals to horsemen who themselves are struggling to get by. Suffolk officials, on behalf of the track's principal shareholder Richard Fields, instituted the policy as a way to aggressively promote adoption and second careers for the track's horses. To that end, those buying for slaughter have been identified.

                "We know who they are and they are not allowed to conduct business at Suffolk," Tuttle said. "One buyer also works for a transportation company. He is allowed to bring horses to the track, but he can not leave with any. He tried once and was stopped at the stable gate, and the horses were returned to their stalls."

                Commentator's appearance notwithstanding, Suffolk did not set out to score publicity points with the policy.

                "We didn't institute this with the hope of recruiting horses," Tuttle said. "This started out as a retirement policy, and it morphed organically. It was an unintended benefit that it appears this policy struck Mr. Farmer and Mr. Zito as worthy of their support."


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Barnfairy View Post
                  "We believe the trainers in this case didn't knowingly allow this to happen."
                  ... and around and around we go.


                  • #10
                    Well the individual who misrepresented his intentions with these horses is the same person being lauded in another thread on this forum. Having dealt with him personally he is a very slick lying bastard, so I have no problem seeing how he could mislead someone.
                    McDowell Racing Stables

                    Home Away From Home


                    • Original Poster

                      Furthermore, for what it's worth, both of the trainers in this situation often rehome their horses through CANTER.

                      I have no reason to doubt Chip Tuttle in his assessment of what transpired here.


                      • #12
                        A related item - Paulick Report 11-6-08 - Banned Trainer: "Suffolk Done me Dirty"


                        How the horses went from supposedly being donated to a Boy Scout ranch or to the CANTER program and ending up in the kill pen destined for slaughter is where the story gets a bit fuzzy. Pompell and Michelson told the Paulick Report they donated the horses at no cost to a horse trader named Dave Costa, who owns Chipaway Stables in Acushnet, Mass. Costa, however, said he paid Michelson for the horses and intended to send them to his farm in Florida, where he hoped to sell them as polo horses in the toney Wellington area of Palm Beach County.

                        Costa said he sent the horses to New Holland to “overnight” before someone he hired would drive them to Florida. Costa changed his mind when he got a call from the van driver who said someone was willing to pay $1,500 for the five horses. The new owner then sold them by the pound to the auction company and put them in the kill pen, the area designated for horses not being auctioned off but sent directly to the Canadian slaughterhouse.

                        That’s where they were when Elliott of Suffolk Downs rescued them.
                        A classic line:

                        Costa claimed that he had never heard the term “kill pen” before. “All this is a bunch of b.s.,” he said. “What’s a kill pen? I’ve seen pigs in that pen, cattle, saddle horses. It was the only pen available, and the guys receiving cattle said to put them in that pen. The horses may have even been marked to keep them out of the sale.”

                        No matter how the horses wound up in the kill pen, hours away from the final ride of their lives, one thing seems certain: Suffolk Downs is serious about enforcing the anti-slaughter rules adopted under the leadership of Richard Fields, who bought controlling interest in the track last year.


                        • #13
                          Ok so call me a dope, but I don't know how to link articles, could someone please link the article here from the thorougbred times, so I can then bash those two pieces of **** they knew exactly what they were doing and are SO stupid they didn't think they could get caught. I could go on and on about what pieces of crap they are. And what's up with Costa, he's a horse dealer!! OF COURSE HE KNOWS WHAT A KILL PEN IS!! Man, he really sounds stupid!!! Luckily Lorita got wind of this (after they left the track, but I bet before they even made it Chipaway.) and started the ball rolling to find them. Lorita needs a medal!!!!
                          DAILY THOUGHT:



                          • #14
                            I had to laugh at that quote. What a bunch of BS.

                            Lorita has been a lifesaver to so many horses - she had called me about Wayne Sargent's 3, and by the time I got to Suffolk to check them out they were already MIA and she had alerted Sam to the problem. Every single person who was just banned was irresponsible, and absolutely knew better.


                            • #15
                              The referenced article refers to 5 horses, but the track only purchased 2. Did the other 3 go for that ride?
                              Oldenburg foals and young prospects
                              LIKE us on Facebook!


                              • #16
                                All 5 are safe. Must've been a misprint.



                                • Original Poster

                                  Here you go spooky. From the Thoroughbred Times: Five banned in Suffolk slaughter policy

                                  I'm so pleased that people are not being allowed to get away with feigned ignorance.
                                  Last edited by Barnfairy; Nov. 7, 2008, 04:40 PM. Reason: sp


                                  • #18
                                    "they donated the horses at no cost to a horse trader named Dave Costa"

                                    Ok, right there is your problem. You don't donate horses to a freakin horse trader. They all deserve to get banned. Suffolk did the right thing.


                                    • #19
                                      First hand account to be found here:


                                      picts included there
                                      "Police officers are public servants. Not James Bond with a license to kill."


                                      • #20
                                        look what i found:

                                        Seems like all the horses here are well taken care of and it looks like a nice place...but....