• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

TB's are weedy with little substance

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    When she was 2...right from her racing trainer.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...s_picture2.jpg

    If that's weedy...then I'm also a super model.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by hundredacres View Post
      Perhaps less useful to YOU because you won't buy a smaller horse, but that doesn't make them "less useful".
      No kidding. I get a little tired of hearing people suggest that TB breeders need to breed bigger, fatter, slower, trendier, whatever for their "post-race" career. In an ideal situation, they won't HAVE a "post-race" career beyond "making more little racehorses." Why would they want a slow-maturing giant who's going to suck at racing just so he'll look prettier in a sale ad?

      Besides, 15.3 is pretty damn big. Unless you're really above-average height (like model-range out of the norm) you really don't NEED a 17.1 giant. Most of these teeny hunter women on 16.2+ behemoths look ridiculous.
      Author Page
      Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
      Steampunk Sweethearts

      Comment


      • #43
        Oh, and Quality Road was so little he had a hard time fitting into the starting gate.
        But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

        Comment


        • #44
          They are all sooooooo scopeless.

          Poor dears.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by danceronice View Post
            No kidding. I get a little tired of hearing people suggest that TB breeders need to breed bigger, fatter, slower, trendier, whatever for their "post-race" career. In an ideal situation, they won't HAVE a "post-race" career beyond "making more little racehorses." Why would they want a slow-maturing giant who's going to suck at racing just so he'll look prettier in a sale ad?

            Besides, 15.3 is pretty damn big. Unless you're really above-average height (like model-range out of the norm) you really don't NEED a 17.1 giant. Most of these teeny hunter women on 16.2+ behemoths look ridiculous.
            Seriously.
            "No, not anything goes, I said no rules!"

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by danceronice View Post
              Besides, 15.3 is pretty damn big. Unless you're really above-average height (like model-range out of the norm) you really don't NEED a 17.1 giant. Most of these teeny hunter women on 16.2+ behemoths look ridiculous.
              HAHA! I didn't want to say it, I'm so glad you did! I think it's the same mentality that people have with their SUV's as well...they feel large and in charge in them. It's an illusion, not reality.

              I saw a newbie at a show on a giant 17hh TB this summer. I was embarrassed for her. He was dragging her around the ring and she looked utterly exhausted. She was very proud to have a TB, and she told me she picked him because she "looks stupid on small horses"... I'd guess that was her last show - she looked absolutely miserable. Too bad she didn't pick a horse for suitability!

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by FairWeather View Post
                GREAT shots! Who is that?

                Comment


                • #48
                  So many people buy into the bigger is better theory. It's a pity for them, because it really is not so. I love my 15:3 stocky boy..People see pictures and think he is huge, no he just has a lot of substance.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    To each his own. I don't mind a 15.3hh if they are stocky, but much prefer the 16.2-16.3hh range. My mare is actually a bit big for my preference. Each horse is different, some ride huge at 15.3 and some feel like you are riding a pony at 16.2. I don't think you can make sweeping generalizations that people who want big horses are just trying to make a statement and feel "large and in charge". Each horse is different and you have to judge the athletic ability of the individual.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      My weedy and delicate 2 year old filly: http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...ene2-4-12g.jpg

                      Another weedy one - all 17 hands of her and only 3: http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...s/SANY0008.jpg

                      And her dam (excuse the weird angle!):
                      http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...Ardent/103.jpg

                      Another weedy 2 year old, also 17h:
                      http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...ssOakhurst.jpg


                      Weedy 17h gelding who is also very "hot"- another homebred:
                      http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...itron10_05.jpg


                      Another hot, weedy homebred eventing:
                      http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...linor20052.jpg


                      Just off the racetrack at age 6 - anothr 17h homebred who is now in training to be an eventer:
                      http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...y/SANY0081.jpg

                      and one of his many win pictures:
                      http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...ey/Scan001.jpg

                      As you see, I could go on and on (and did!)...

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Oh what the heck! My "weedy" 24 year old. 16.1 54" girth 84" blanket.
                        Attached Files
                        McDowell Racing Stables

                        Home Away From Home

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Well it does take a horseman to throw a leg over a TB.

                          Love it

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            It's one of the statements that make my eyes bulge.
                            But as others have said it is just a sign of ignorance/bias/misinformation.

                            One of the comments that always annoys me (even though they intend it as a compliment) is when someone asks "what kind of WB" A Fine Romance is.
                            And when correct I them saying that he is (proudly) a TB, they shake their heads in denial - as if I might be lying - and say, "well he is more like a WB."

                            No, no and no.
                            He is most definitely a TB, I bred him to be a racehorse, and IMO he looks like what he was bred to be.
                            One of my homebreds (reg TB , race-bred) is also a winning Grand Prix jumper, and he could not be mistaken for a WB by anyone IMO.
                            But he is, simply because he is in the GP ring.

                            A Fine Romance. April 1991 - June 2016. Loved forever.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by witherbee View Post
                              My weedy and delicate 2 year old filly: http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i2...ene2-4-12g.jpg
                              Okay witherbee, I actually choked with laughter and had a coughing fit when I clicked on her photo after reading your "weedy and delicate 2 year old" description -- even though I was expecting the opposite. I don't know how old you are, but a few decades ago it was fashionable where I lived for Quarter Horses to have tails trimmed to hock height. If she doesn't look like a Quarter Horse in that photo then, well, I don't know what!

                              So the song came unbidden, "I like big butts and I cannot lie..."
                              "Random capitAlization really Makes my day." -- AndNirina

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Witherbee, I forgot to add, what beautiful horses!
                                "Random capitAlization really Makes my day." -- AndNirina

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #56
                                  mvp stated:

                                  "Yabbut we have gone through a few decades of TBs bred for sprints. And the racing industry has seemed to create a track for any horse conceived, whether or not it had genuine speed, intelligence or long-term soundness. The 15.2, 10"-strided thing doesn't have a ready place in the Hunter ring.

                                  All these add together to perhaps give some context to your idiot friend's perception. That's not to say that anyone should value the Old Style WB-- physically and mentally course and clunky. Does your friend like these?"

                                  Does anyone here seem to subscribe to this belief that the last few decades have produced 15.2 sprinter things with a 10" stride that can't make the distances???

                                  I'm curious mvp: what do you show/ride. WB--TB or something else??

                                  Do you have any articles that you can direct me to written by anyone of actual merit to substanciate your claim? I'm always open to learning. Thanks
                                  Last edited by kaluha2; Sep. 24, 2012, 07:36 PM. Reason: forgot to add.

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #57
                                    Fred: I just love "A Fine Romance". What a class act. Of course that just happens to be one of my all time favorite songs sung by non other than a very young Ginger Rogers. Your horse is fabulous. Did you name him??

                                    I am loving all the photos everyone is showing off their TB's be they 17+hands or 15.2.

                                    They are just lovely. Thanks

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      My current mare.....certainly not weedy. Solid 16.2 (I'm 5'9") and one of the best jumpers I've sat on in a while (still working on learning about jumping down banks--instead of leaping). She has been mistaken for a WB many times already (and I correct that---and will show her under her JC name)...but to my eye, she is a pretty classic TB build (with a Mr. P butt).

                                      http://www.pedigreequery.com/rockstina

                                      She was a winner on the track too. She would make a great big timber horse but will be a great event horse for me too
                                      Attached Files
                                      ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        I first saw this thread and thought " dems fightin' words!" lol.

                                        Witherbee, that last grey has some serious bone!

                                        I have to get some pictures scanned one of these days, my now 27 yr old TB, looks like an ISH. (still does)

                                        None of my TBs have been weedy, far from it! The smallest I had was a barely 15.2 h filly, who while petite and feminine, was very sturdy.

                                        Funniest thing happened at a dressage show, some woman asked me if my horse was some line warmblood (sadly can't remember exactly what she said) and was like, uh no- he's a Kentucky bred TB and he is! The funniest thing is this guy is sooo TB looking. I understood why people were confused with the old man.
                                        Unrepentant carb eater

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Actually there has been a substantial change in the TB as a breed in the past 50 years, beginning in the US primarily. Starting with Nearco and the spread of his genes around the world, a formerly rare version of a myostatin gene that has a large place in muscle development and also whether a horse has a "preference" for longer distances is now present in at least 50% of TBs. It's also present in 90% of QHs today. This is the famous "speed" gene and the C allele. It seems to be a "fairly" recent mutation, in the grand scheme of things. The "wild" version is the T variant, whose effect can be summarized as making a horse mature at a later age and be stamina oriented. The mutation is the C variant. It fosters precocity and sprinting.

                                          Back when the C variant was very rare (10% or less, per Dr. Emmeline Hill), sprinters were greyhounds. A homozygous C horse will sprint, mature early, and develop to look much like a QH because of the way the muscles respond to training.

                                          If anyone would like cites for this, I have oodles.

                                          Anyone who calls this stallion weedy is blind or on crack.
                                          http://www.littlehawkfarm.com/default%20stallion.html
                                          Last edited by vineyridge; Sep. 25, 2012, 02:50 PM.
                                          "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                          Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X