• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

RIP Thoroughbred Times

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RIP Thoroughbred Times

    It's bankrupt and closed. Got sold about ten years ago, and the new owner seems to have used it to support other publications that he owned--put their employees on the TB Times payroll--per the story on the Paulick Report. The TB recession and loss of advertising killed it.
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire

  • #2
    Really?? That's disappointing.
    I enjoyed their publication very much.

    The Blood Horse always seemed "on top" of the latest news, but the Times had the best "in depth" articles ,and some very interesting online video features.. Darn.

    Comment


    • #3
      That's a shame, but to some degree the handwriting was on the wall and I have to suspect that the BloodHorse isn't exactly thriving either with ads or circulation. (The Chronicle of the Horse is such a niche Bible that it might be fairing better.) Weekly or even bi-weekly print publications unfortunately are offering semi-stale info - even if its presented in a well written detailed form - with the internet/twitter/youtube giving instant results.

      Even the Steeplechase Times indicated recently their publication is going to move away from rehashing race summaries as content for their newspaper because of the internet. They may be right with some races and meets, but honestly 'chasing is also so niche that if they don't document the who/what/where is doubtful its already been hashed about

      I used to subscribe to both the BloodHorse and TB Times and latter was even with a courtesy professional rate it was expensive annually. If I'm not mistaken the TB Times was the reincarnation of the Thoroughbred Record which a granddaddy publication. They use to have on the back page a reflection going back into the archives of what happened that week in say 1912, 1948, 1968, etc

      The Daily Racing Form is such a different animal with economics as they are instrumental for the betting community and charge a hefty price per daily issue for the print and/or on-line wagering aide content. Although I have wondered how the recent buyouts (and with it heavy debt loads assumed) have put a burden on their finances.

      Rather that losing the TB Times I do hope that a ST Times could entertain buying it - at least for the rights to own all that rich historical content with articles, photos, et al that does have value.

      I had to laugh at the PaulickReport readers somehow suggesting a Mike Repole would buy it. Ha! Like a fish needs a bicycle. Plenty of wealthy people are in racing, but that doesn't mean they would - or even should - be the best candidates to get into publishing. There are obvious reasons why a one-time big racing owner Peter Brandt got out of owning the TB Times much like Bert Firestone got own of owning race tracks.
      Last edited by Glimmerglass; Sep. 16, 2012, 04:54 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        I saw this earlier today on FB. Sad indeed.
        Gilchrist said. "With Lost In The Fog, it's different. We want to take real good care of this horse. He's the only bullet in our holster."

        Comment


        • #5
          I think everything in print is going to have to reinvent themselves as something other than "news" since even the morning paper is old news by the time it arrives at your house. They need to set themselves apart with great photography or in depth articles that you can't devote the space to in a regular newspaper or magazine.
          McDowell Racing Stables

          Home Away From Home

          Comment


          • #6
            Regardless of great photography and in-depth articles -- if you can't sell advertising, you can't stay in business, and few companies want to pay for print advertising anymore
            "If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em."

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Which leads to an ever widening gap between the haves with broadband internet access and the have-nots who are either shut out of the internet, or, if rural, have access only to crawlingly slow dial-up. Print magazines are available to anyone at waiting rooms, etc, or through the US mail.
              "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
              Thread killer Extraordinaire

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm sure the debate over the advantages of print vs. electronic have been well hashed somewhere on the internet. What is of considerable risk is that digital stories, reports, and the like which exist solely on the internet do go "poof". (So too videos on youtube of races with copyright claims and user infighting.) Whereas a library or an office have keep back issues safely archived away.

                We all have likely done a google search on say a horse, and you find something good with an article from a while ago, but when you click it either the link is dead or moved to who knows where. As such the benefit of the article is accordingly lost.

                Don't get me wrong I haven't ventured into a public library to look up a horse in quite some time. Still you have to wonder long term how much information will be lost as sites come and go.

                Not to mention a lot of the on-line content compared to the print counterparts is rather breezy to say the least. The thinking being that internet users have limited attention spans so why indulge in too much verbosity.

                All that aside if the publication is closed, to be liquidated, staff laid off, how is it their website continues to operate? I've assumed they would've started pulling that down with an explanation to paid readers that "sorry but no refunds".

                http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                  Which leads to an ever widening gap between the haves with broadband internet access and the have-nots who are either shut out of the internet, or, if rural, have access only to crawlingly slow dial-up. Print magazines are available to anyone at waiting rooms, etc, or through the US mail.
                  Well, IME the postal service SUCKS at getting The Blood-Horse and (in the past) Thoroughbred Times delivered on time to anyone who does not live in a "horsey" area.

                  Both subscriptions consistently used to arrive 10-14 days after the publication date. No matter how much I begged, pleaded, and finally lost my temper and SCREAMED about it, it never got any better over a period of about 8 years.

                  One week I got all 5 Blood-Horse mags that were scheduled for delivery in my ZIP. Postal worker was too lazy to unpackage them and mine happened to be on top, so I got them all.

                  It's not as if I live in the remote outposts - we're a pretty busy suburb of Atlanta. But when I lived in a more horse-intense part of the metro area (Alpharetta), no problem.

                  Once it got to the point where I could read pretty much all of the content online, I didn't see any reason to keep subscribing. Why pay for 2 week-old news?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mara View Post
                    One week I got all 5 Blood-Horse mags that were scheduled for delivery in my ZIP. Postal worker was too lazy to unpackage them and mine happened to be on top, so I got them all.
                    Ha! The exact same thing happened to me with multiple issues arriving at once. The worse example of something run afoul was when I receive the Derby preview issue after the Belmont Stakes

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      There's another in-depth thread going on about this in "On Course".

                      http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=368195

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'll bet the website is still up because there isn't an employee left to take it down -- they were locked out! LOL -- or not so much
                        "If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Bow Tie Publications

                          Hi,
                          I, unfortunately, know quite a bit about this. Thoroughbred Times was under the auspices of Bow Tie publications but had a separate owner. He mismanages some things and poof we lose a wonderful publication.

                          But, there are problems with several Bow Tie publications like Horse Illustrated and others. Freelancers in some cases haven't been paid since March....and they're getting no solid assurances that they'll definitely be paid anytime soon.

                          I could go on and on but I better keep my yap shut.

                          Hallie

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by haligator View Post
                            Hi,
                            But, there are problems with several Bow Tie publications like Horse Illustrated and others. Freelancers in some cases haven't been paid since March....and they're getting no solid assurances that they'll definitely be paid anytime soon.

                            Hallie
                            Yes - Bow Tie has ceased publication of "Bird Talk", "Wild Bird", & several other magazines. What's funny in a bizarre sort of way is that folks who just recently subscribed or renewed subscriptions to the cancelled mags have been getting letters telling them that due to the fact that the mag they wanted no longer exists, they'll be getting a subscription to one of the other mags still around. But - you don't get a choice. From what I've heard, folks who subscribed to "Bird Talk" have been automatically subscribed to "Dog Fancy" instead. This has made for a LOT of grumpy people who don't have nor plan to have a dog - lol!! (However, I've also heard that those who are "squeaky wheels", have been getting refunds.)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm sick about a lot of it, but the worst thing now is that Ridker is saying he and Bow Tie are owed millions and should be the first paid. What a loser this guy is. Smart of him to stay on the West Coast -- far away from Kentucky!
                              "If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em."

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Who the heck could possibly owe him "millions"?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I was not a subscriber, but it always saddens me when we lose another equine publication. I am sure most, if not all, are struggling to survive between the internet competition and the economy.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Bacardi1 View Post
                                    Who the heck could possibly owe him "millions"?
                                    According to the bankruptcy paperwork, he's owed ~$1.8 million (his name personally) and Bow Tie is owed ~$2.3 million -- both owed by the company Thoroughbred Times. (Numbers might be a little off -- don't have it in front of me -- but they are close.)
                                    "If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em."

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Paper advertising is almost a thing of the past these days. As a marketing rep, I can assure you that the Internet is the present and I'm sure, the future. Now if things can just be archived as Glimmerglass said.....
                                      Randee Beckman ~Otteridge Farm, LLC (http://on.fb.me/1iJEqvR)~ Marketing Manager - The Clothes Horse & Jennifer Oliver Equine Insurance Specialist

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Still - one has to wonder "who" & "for what".

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X